| Age | Commit message (Collapse) | Author | Lines |
|---|
|
Rollup of 9 pull requests
Successful merges:
- #94464 (Suggest adding a new lifetime parameter when two elided lifetimes should match up for traits and impls.)
- #94476 (7 - Make more use of `let_chains`)
- #94478 (Fix panic when handling intra doc links generated from macro)
- #94482 (compiler: fix some typos)
- #94490 (Update books)
- #94496 (tests: accept llvm intrinsic in align-checking test)
- #94498 (9 - Make more use of `let_chains`)
- #94503 (Provide C FFI types via core::ffi, not just in std)
- #94513 (update Miri)
Failed merges:
r? `@ghost`
`@rustbot` modify labels: rollup
|
|
r=estebank
Suggest adding a new lifetime parameter when two elided lifetimes should match up for traits and impls.
Suggest adding a new lifetime parameter when two elided lifetimes should match up for functions in traits and impls.
Issue #94462
|
|
r=estebank
Direct users towards using Rust target feature names in CLI
This PR consists of a couple of changes on how we handle target features.
In particular there is a bug-fix wherein we avoid passing through features that aren't prefixed by `+` or `-` to LLVM. These appear to be causing LLVM to assert, which is pretty poor a behaviour (and also makes it pretty clear we expect feature names to be prefixed).
The other commit, I anticipate to be somewhat more controversial is outputting a warning when users specify a LLVM-specific, or otherwise unknown, feature name on the CLI. In those situations we request users to either replace it with a known Rust feature name (e.g. `bmi` -> `bmi1`) or file a feature request. I've a couple motivations for this: first of all, if users are specifying these features on the command line, I'm pretty confident there is also a need for these features to be usable via `#[cfg(target_feature)]` machinery. And second, we're growing a fair number of backends recently and having ability to provide some sort of unified-ish interface in this place seems pretty useful to me.
Sponsored by: standard.ai
|
|
|
|
Fix inconsistent symbol mangling of integers constants with -Zverbose
The `PrettyPrinter` changes formatting of array size and integer
constants based on `-Zverbose`, so its implementation cannot be used in
legacy symbol mangling.
Example symbol demangling before changes:
```console
$ cat a.rs
pub struct A<T>(T);
impl A<[u8; 128]> { pub fn f() {} }
$ rustc --crate-type=lib a.rs -Zverbose=n && nm -C ./liba.rlib
00000000 T a::A<[u8; 128]>::f
$ rustc --crate-type=lib a.rs -Zverbose=y && nm -C ./liba.rlib
00000000 T a::A<[u8; Const { ty. usize, val. Value(Scalar(0x0000000000000080)) }]>::f
```
|
|
Rollup of 3 pull requests
Successful merges:
- #94438 (Check method input expressions once)
- #94459 (Update cargo)
- #94470 (:arrow_up: rust-analyzer)
Failed merges:
r? `@ghost`
`@rustbot` modify labels: rollup
|
|
Check method input expressions once
If the user mistakenly forgets to wrap their method args in a tuple, then the compiler tries to check that types within the tuple match the expression args. This means we call `check_expr` once within this diagnostic code, so when we check the expr once again in `demand_compatible`, we attempt to apply expr adjustments twice, leading to ICEs.
This PR attempts to fix this by skipping the expression type check in `demand_compatible` if we have detected an method arg mismatch at all.
This does lead to a single UI test regressing slightly, due to a diagnostic disappearing, though I don't know if it is generally meaningful to even raise an type error after noting that the argument count is incorrect in a function call, since the user might be providing (in-context) meaningless expressions to the wrong method.
I can adjust this to be a bit more targeted (to just skip checking exprs in `demand_compatible` in the tuple case) if this UI test regression is a problem.
fixes #94334
cc #94291
Also drive-by fixup of `.node_type(expr.hir_id)` to `.expr_ty(expr)`, since that method exists.
|
|
Lint against more useless `#[must_use]` attributes
This expands the existing `#[must_use]` check in `unused_attributes` to lint against pretty much everything `#[must_use]` doesn't support.
Fixes #93906.
|
|
r=estebank
Generalize "remove `&`" and "add `*`" suggestions to more than one deref
Suggest removing more than one `&` and `&mut`, along with suggesting adding more than one `*` (or a combination of the two).
r? `@estebank`
(since you're experienced with these types of suggestions, feel free to reassign)
|
|
At the very least this serves to deduplicate the diagnostics that are
output about unknown target features provided via CLI.
|
|
If they are trying to use features rustc doesn't yet know about,
request a feature request.
Additionally, also warn against using feature names without leading `+`
or `-` signs.
|
|
Caching the stable hash of Ty within itself
Instead of computing stable hashes on types as needed, we compute it during interning.
This way we can, when a hash is requested, just hash that hash, which is significantly faster than traversing the type itself.
We only do this for incremental for now, as incremental is the only frequent user of stable hashing.
As a next step we can try out
* moving the hash and TypeFlags to Interner, so projections and regions get the same benefit (tho regions are not nested, so maybe that's not a good idea? Would be nice for dedup tho)
* start comparing types via their stable hash instead of their address?
|
|
match up for traits and impls.
Issue #94462
|
|
The `PrettyPrinter` changes formatting of array size and integer
constants based on `-Zverbose`, so its implementation cannot be used in
legacy symbol mangling.
|
|
Add long explanation for E0726
This is the cleaned up version of #87655 with the missing fixes.
Part of https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/issues/61137.
r? `@Urgau`
|
|
Fix ICE when using Box<T, A> with large A
A sequel to #94043 that fixes #81270 and #92054 (duplicate).
|
|
r=petrochenkov
Fix ICE when passing block to while-loop condition
We were incorrectly delaying a bug when we passed _any_ block (that evaluated to `()`) to a while loop. This PR makes the check a bit more sophisticated.
We should only suppress the error here in cases that are equivalent to those we find in #93574 (i.e. only while loop conditions that have destructuring assignment expressions in them).
Fixes #93997
cc `@estebank` who added this code
I would not be opposed to removing the delay-bug altogether, and just emitting this error always. I much prefer duplicate errors over no errors.
|
|
* Recover from invalid `'label: ` before block.
* Make suggestion to enclose statements in a block multipart.
* Point at `match`, `while`, `loop` and `unsafe` keywords when failing
to parse their expression.
* Do not suggest `{ ; }`.
* Do not suggest `|` when very unlikely to be what was wanted (in `let`
statements).
|
|
|
|
regression for issue 90847
Adds a regression test for issue #90847
|
|
Only create a single expansion for each inline integration.
The inlining integrator used to create one expansion for each span from the callee body.
This PR reverses the logic to create a single expansion for the whole call,
which is more consistent with how macro expansions work for macros.
This should remove the large memory regression in #91743.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
LLVM really dislikes this and will assert, saying something along the
lines of:
```
rustc: llvm/lib/MC/MCSubtargetInfo.cpp:60: void ApplyFeatureFlag(
llvm::FeatureBitset&, llvm::StringRef, llvm::ArrayRef<llvm::SubtargetFeatureKV>
): Assertion
`SubtargetFeatures::hasFlag(Feature) && "Feature flags should start with '+' or '-'"`
failed.
```
|
|
|
|
This expands the existing `#[must_use]` check in `unused_attributes`
to lint against pretty much everything `#[must_use]` doesn't support.
Fixes #93906.
|
|
|
|
No branch protection metadata unless enabled
Even if we emit metadata disabling branch protection, this metadata may
conflict with other modules (e.g. during LTO) that have different branch
protection metadata set.
This is an unstable flag and feature, so ideally the flag not being
specified should act as if the feature wasn't implemented in the first
place.
Additionally this PR also ensures we emit an error if
`-Zbranch-protection` is set on targets other than the supported
aarch64. For now the error is being output from codegen, but ideally it
should be moved to earlier in the pipeline before stabilization.
|
|
Restrict query recursion in `needs_significant_drop`
Overly aggressive use of the query system to improve caching lead to query cycles and consequently ICEs. This patch fixes this by restricting the use of the query system as a cache to those cases where it is definitely correct.
Closes #92725 .
This is essentially a revert of #90845 for the significant drop case only. The general `needs_drop` still does the same thing. The hope is that this is enough to preserve the performance improvements of that PR while fixing the ICE. Should get a perf run to verify that this is the case.
cc `@cjgillot`
|
|
TaKO8Ki:suggest-float-literal-for-float-divided-by-integer, r=estebank
Suggest a float literal when dividing a floating-point type by `{integer}`
closes #93829
|
|
Rollup of 5 pull requests
Successful merges:
- #93400 (Do not suggest using a const parameter when there are bounds on an unused type parameter)
- #93982 (Provide extra note if synthetic type args are specified)
- #94087 (Remove unused `unsound_ignore_borrow_on_drop`)
- #94235 (chalk: Fix wrong debrujin index in opaque type handling.)
- #94306 (Avoid exhausting stack space in dominator compression)
Failed merges:
r? `@ghost`
`@rustbot` modify labels: rollup
|
|
chalk: Fix wrong debrujin index in opaque type handling.
A folder in opaque type lowering was substituting all opaque type references with a variable with debrujin index 0 ignoring how many binders deep we are.
This caused an ICE with `Not enough bound vars: ^0 not found in []` ([full logs](https://gist.github.com/Dirbaio/2b9374ff4fce37afb9d665dc9f0000df)) with the following code.
```rust
fn main() -> () {}
async fn foo(x: u32) -> u32 {
x
}
```
With the fix, it no longer ICEs. It still doesn't typecheck due to generator issues. I've added a "known-bug" test so that at least it doesn't regress back to ICEing.
r? ``@jackh726``
|
|
Provide extra note if synthetic type args are specified
Implement the unresolved question in #83701 as suggested in https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/pull/86176#discussion_r680613890.
r? ``@jackh726``
|
|
ChayimFriedman2:dont-suggest-using-const-with-bounds-unused-generic-param, r=jackh726
Do not suggest using a const parameter when there are bounds on an unused type parameter
The user wrote the bound, so it's obvious they want a type.
|
|
fix a message
implement a rustfix-applicable suggestion
implement `suggest_floating_point_literal`
add `ObligationCauseCode::BinOp`
remove duplicate code
fix function names in uitests
use `Diagnostic` instead of `DiagnosticBuilder`
|
|
Suggest adding `{ .. }` around more bad const generic exprs
Fixes #92776
|
|
|
|
|
|
`check_used` should only look at actual `used` attributes
cc? https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/issues/94348
r? ``@nikic``
|
|
Add one more case to avoid ICE
Fix for the #94291, added one more case to related function to avoid ICE.
Not sure if my test is in the correct place 😅
|
|
r=ecstatic-morse
Fix switch on discriminant detection in a presence of coverage counters
Fixes #93848.
r? ``@ecstatic-morse``
|
|
|
|
|
|
Fix debug_assert in unused lint pass
This fixes a debug assertion in the unused lint pass. As a side effect, this also improves the span generated for tuples in the `unused_must_use` lint.
found in #94329
A reproducer for this would be
```rust
fn main() { (1, (3,)); }
```
Not sure, if I should add a regression test for a `debug_assert`.
|
|
Don't ICE when an extern static is too big for the current architecture
Fixes #93760
Emit an error instead of ICEing when an `extern` static's size overflows the allowed maximum for the target.
Changes the error message in the existing `delay_span_bug` call to the true layout error, first for debugging purposes, but opted to leave in to potentially assist future developers as it was being reached in unexpected ways already.
|
|
|
|
The existing v0 tests have been slightly adjusted for compatibility with
legacy mangler, which requires an item to have an ancestor in a value
namespace or a type namespace to produce a symbol for it. In v0 mangling
this results in an extra `Nv` component.
|
|
diagnostic: suggest parens when users want logical ops, but get closures
Fixes #93536
|
