| Age | Commit message (Collapse) | Author | Lines |
|---|
|
Implement Rust 2021 panic
This implements the Rust 2021 versions of `panic!()`. See https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/issues/80162 and https://github.com/rust-lang/rfcs/pull/3007.
It does so by replacing `{std, core}::panic!()` by a bulitin macro that expands to either `$crate::panic::panic_2015!(..)` or `$crate::panic::panic_2021!(..)` depending on the edition of the caller.
This does not yet make std's panic an alias for core's panic on Rust 2021 as the RFC proposes. That will be a separate change: https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/pull/80879/commits/c5273bdfb266c35e8eab9413aa8d58d27fdbe114 That change is blocked on figuring out what to do with https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/issues/80846 first.
|
|
Add a test for #71202
Closes #71202
---
Note that the test normally generates this warning:
```
warning: cannot use constants which depend on generic parameters in types
--> test.rs:10:5
|
10 | / const ITEM_IS_COPY: [(); 1 - {
11 | | trait NotCopy {
12 | | const VALUE: bool = false;
13 | | }
... |
26 | | <IsCopy<T>>::VALUE
27 | | } as usize] = [];
| |_____________________^
|
= note: `#[warn(const_evaluatable_unchecked)]` on by default
= warning: this was previously accepted by the compiler but is being phased out; it will become a hard error in a future release!
= note: for more information, see issue #76200 <https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/issues/76200>
```
I added `allow(const_evaluatable_unchecked)`, but maybe we just don't want to add a test for this as the program is not really valid?
|
|
Add suggestion for nested fields
Closes https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/issues/81220
r? ```@estebank```
|
|
Remove const_in_array_repeat
Fixes #80371. Fixes #81315. Fixes #80767. Fixes #75682.
I thought there might be some issue with `Repeats(_, 0)`, but if you increase the items in the array it still ICEs. I'm not sure if this is the best fix but it does fix the given issue.
|
|
2229: Fix issues with move closures and mutability
This PR fixes two issues when feature `capture_disjoint_fields` is used.
1. Can't mutate using a mutable reference
2. Move closures try to move value out through a reference.
To do so, we
1. Compute the mutability of the capture and store it as part of the `CapturedPlace` that is written in TypeckResults
2. Restrict capture precision. Note this is temporary for now, to allow the feature to be used with move closures and ByValue captures and might change depending on discussions with the lang team.
- No Derefs are captured for ByValue captures, since that will result in value behind a reference getting moved.
- No projections are applied to raw pointers since these require unsafe blocks. We capture
them completely.
r? `````@nikomatsakis`````
|
|
Add a regression test for ICE of bad_placeholder_type
Add a regression test for #72685. Check the error message is output instead of ICE.
|
|
Clone entire `TokenCursor` when collecting tokens
Reverts PR #80830
Fixes taiki-e/pin-project#312
We can have an arbitrary number of `None`-delimited group frames pushed
on the stack due to proc-macro invocations, which can legally be exited.
Attempting to account for this would add a lot of complexity for a tiny
performance gain, so let's just use the original strategy.
|
|
Account for existing `_` field pattern when suggesting `..`
Follow up to #80017.
|
|
Stabilize by-value `[T; N]` iterator `core::array::IntoIter`
Tracking issue: https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/issues/65798
This is unblocked now that `min_const_generics` has been stabilized in https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/pull/79135.
This PR does *not* include the corresponding `IntoIterator` impl, which is https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/pull/65819. Instead, an iterator can be constructed through the `new` method.
`new` would become unnecessary when `IntoIterator` is implemented and might be deprecated then, although it will stay stable.
|
|
|
|
|
|
Closes #71202
|
|
|
|
Warn write-only fields
cc `@Boscop's` example in #49256.
|
|
cfg(version): treat nightlies as complete
This PR makes cfg(version) treat the nightlies
for version 1.n.0 as 1.n.0, even though that nightly
version might not have all stabilizations and features
of the released 1.n.0. This is done for greater
convenience for people who want to test a newly
stabilized feature on nightly, or in other words,
give newly stabilized features as many eyeballs
as possible.
For users who wish to pin nightlies, this commit adds
a -Z assume-incomplete-release option that they can
enable if they run into any issues due to this change.
Implements the suggestion in https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/issues/64796#issuecomment-640851454
|
|
sexxi-goose:fix-struct-update-functional-record-update-syntax-error, r=nikomatsakis
Support FRU pattern with `[feature(capture_disjoint_fields)]`
In case of a functional record update syntax for creating a structure, `ExprUseVisitor` to only detect the precise use of some of the field in the `..x` part of the syntax. However, when we start building MIR, we
1. First, build the place for `x`
2. and then, add precise field projections so that only some parts of `x` end up getting read.
When `capture_disjoint_fields` is enabled, and FRU is used within a closure `x` won't be completely captured, and therefore the first step will fail. This PR updates `mir_build` to create a place builder in the first step and then create place from the builder only after applying the field projection.
Closes https://github.com/rust-lang/project-rfc-2229/issues/32
r? ``````@nikomatsakis``````
|
|
Stabilize raw ref macros
This stabilizes `raw_ref_macros` (https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/issues/73394), which is possible now that https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/issues/74355 is fixed.
However, as I already said in https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/issues/73394#issuecomment-751342185, I am not particularly happy with the current names of the macros. So I propose we also change them, which means I am proposing to stabilize the following in `core::ptr`:
```rust
pub macro const_addr_of($e:expr) {
&raw const $e
}
pub macro mut_addr_of($e:expr) {
&raw mut $e
}
```
The macro name change means we need another round of FCP. Cc `````@rust-lang/libs`````
Fixes #73394
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
clean up some const error reporting around promoteds
These are some error reporting simplifications enabled by https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/pull/80579.
Further simplifications are possible but could be blocked on making `const_err` a hard error.
r? ``````@oli-obk``````
|
|
Point to span of upvar making closure FnMut
For #80313.
|
|
r=petrochenkov
Add `SEMICOLON_IN_EXPRESSIONS_FROM_MACROS` lint
cc #79813
This PR adds an allow-by-default future-compatibility lint
`SEMICOLON_IN_EXPRESSIONS_FROM_MACROS`. It fires when a trailing semicolon in a
macro body is ignored due to the macro being used in expression
position:
```rust
macro_rules! foo {
() => {
true; // WARN
}
}
fn main() {
let val = match true {
true => false,
_ => foo!()
};
}
```
The lint takes its level from the macro call site, and
can be allowed for a particular macro by adding
`#[allow(macro_trailing_semicolon)]`.
The lint is set to warn for all internal rustc crates (when being built
by a stage1 compiler). After the next beta bump, we can enable
the lint for the bootstrap compiler as well.
|
|
rustc: Stabilize `-Zrun-dsymutil` as `-Csplit-debuginfo`
This commit adds a new stable codegen option to rustc,
`-Csplit-debuginfo`. The old `-Zrun-dsymutil` flag is deleted and now
subsumed by this stable flag. Additionally `-Zsplit-dwarf` is also
subsumed by this flag but still requires `-Zunstable-options` to
actually activate. The `-Csplit-debuginfo` flag takes one of
three values:
* `off` - This indicates that split-debuginfo from the final artifact is
not desired. This is not supported on Windows and is the default on
Unix platforms except macOS. On macOS this means that `dsymutil` is
not executed.
* `packed` - This means that debuginfo is desired in one location
separate from the main executable. This is the default on Windows
(`*.pdb`) and macOS (`*.dSYM`). On other Unix platforms this subsumes
`-Zsplit-dwarf=single` and produces a `*.dwp` file.
* `unpacked` - This means that debuginfo will be roughly equivalent to
object files, meaning that it's throughout the build directory
rather than in one location (often the fastest for local development).
This is not the default on any platform and is not supported on Windows.
Each target can indicate its own default preference for how debuginfo is
handled. Almost all platforms default to `off` except for Windows and
macOS which default to `packed` for historical reasons.
Some equivalencies for previous unstable flags with the new flags are:
* `-Zrun-dsymutil=yes` -> `-Csplit-debuginfo=packed`
* `-Zrun-dsymutil=no` -> `-Csplit-debuginfo=unpacked`
* `-Zsplit-dwarf=single` -> `-Csplit-debuginfo=packed`
* `-Zsplit-dwarf=split` -> `-Csplit-debuginfo=unpacked`
Note that `-Csplit-debuginfo` still requires `-Zunstable-options` for
non-macOS platforms since split-dwarf support was *just* implemented in
rustc.
There's some more rationale listed on #79361, but the main gist of the
motivation for this commit is that `dsymutil` can take quite a long time
to execute in debug builds and provides little benefit. This means that
incremental compile times appear that much worse on macOS because the
compiler is constantly running `dsymutil` over every single binary it
produces during `cargo build` (even build scripts!). Ideally rustc would
switch to not running `dsymutil` by default, but that's a problem left
to get tackled another day.
Closes #79361
|
|
Make hitting the recursion limit in projection non-fatal
This change was originally made in #80246 to avoid future (effectively) infinite loop bugs in projections,
but wundergraph relies on rustc recovering here.
cc #80953
r? `@nikomatsakis`
|
|
This commit adds a new stable codegen option to rustc,
`-Csplit-debuginfo`. The old `-Zrun-dsymutil` flag is deleted and now
subsumed by this stable flag. Additionally `-Zsplit-dwarf` is also
subsumed by this flag but still requires `-Zunstable-options` to
actually activate. The `-Csplit-debuginfo` flag takes one of
three values:
* `off` - This indicates that split-debuginfo from the final artifact is
not desired. This is not supported on Windows and is the default on
Unix platforms except macOS. On macOS this means that `dsymutil` is
not executed.
* `packed` - This means that debuginfo is desired in one location
separate from the main executable. This is the default on Windows
(`*.pdb`) and macOS (`*.dSYM`). On other Unix platforms this subsumes
`-Zsplit-dwarf=single` and produces a `*.dwp` file.
* `unpacked` - This means that debuginfo will be roughly equivalent to
object files, meaning that it's throughout the build directory
rather than in one location (often the fastest for local development).
This is not the default on any platform and is not supported on Windows.
Each target can indicate its own default preference for how debuginfo is
handled. Almost all platforms default to `off` except for Windows and
macOS which default to `packed` for historical reasons.
Some equivalencies for previous unstable flags with the new flags are:
* `-Zrun-dsymutil=yes` -> `-Csplit-debuginfo=packed`
* `-Zrun-dsymutil=no` -> `-Csplit-debuginfo=unpacked`
* `-Zsplit-dwarf=single` -> `-Csplit-debuginfo=packed`
* `-Zsplit-dwarf=split` -> `-Csplit-debuginfo=unpacked`
Note that `-Csplit-debuginfo` still requires `-Zunstable-options` for
non-macOS platforms since split-dwarf support was *just* implemented in
rustc.
There's some more rationale listed on #79361, but the main gist of the
motivation for this commit is that `dsymutil` can take quite a long time
to execute in debug builds and provides little benefit. This means that
incremental compile times appear that much worse on macOS because the
compiler is constantly running `dsymutil` over every single binary it
produces during `cargo build` (even build scripts!). Ideally rustc would
switch to not running `dsymutil` by default, but that's a problem left
to get tackled another day.
Closes #79361
|
|
|
|
Reverts PR #80830
Fixes taiki-e/pin-project#312
We can have an arbitrary number of `None`-delimited group frames pushed
on the stack due to proc-macro invocations, which can legally be exited.
Attempting to account for this would add a lot of complexity for a tiny
performance gain, so let's just use the original strategy.
|
|
cc #79813
This PR adds an allow-by-default future-compatibility lint
`SEMICOLON_IN_EXPRESSIONS_FROM_MACROS`. It fires when a trailing semicolon in a
macro body is ignored due to the macro being used in expression
position:
```rust
macro_rules! foo {
() => {
true; // WARN
}
}
fn main() {
let val = match true {
true => false,
_ => foo!()
};
}
```
The lint takes its level from the macro call site, and
can be allowed for a particular macro by adding
`#[allow(semicolon_in_expressions_from_macros)]`.
The lint is set to warn for all internal rustc crates (when being built
by a stage1 compiler). After the next beta bump, we can enable
the lint for the bootstrap compiler as well.
|
|
Avoid describing a method as 'not found' when bounds are unsatisfied
Fixes #76267
When there is a single applicable method candidate, but its trait bounds
are not satisfied, we avoid saying that the method is "not found".
Insted, we update the error message to directly mention which bounds are
not satisfied, rather than mentioning them in a note.
|
|
const_evaluatable: stop looking into type aliases
see https://rust-lang.zulipchat.com/#narrow/stream/260443-project-const-generics/topic/const_evaluatable.3A.20type.20alias
r? ````@oli-obk````
|
|
add const_evaluatable_checked test
cc `````@oli-obk`````
|
|
const_evaluatable: expand abstract consts in try_unify
See this [zulip topic](https://rust-lang.zulipchat.com/#narrow/stream/260443-project-const-generics/topic/combining.20const.20bounds) for more info
cc ```@lcnr```
r? ```@oli-obk```
|
|
Tweak suggestion for missing field in patterns
Account for parser recovered struct and tuple patterns to avoid invalid
suggestion.
Follow up to #81103.
|
|
Improve diagnostics for Precise Capture
This is just the capture analysis part and borrow checker logging will updated as part of rust-lang/project-rfc-2229#8
Closes rust-lang/project-rfc-2229#22
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Point only at generic arguments when they are unexpected
|
|
Fixes #76267
When there is a single applicable method candidate, but its trait bounds
are not satisfied, we avoid saying that the method is "not found".
Insted, we update the error message to directly mention which bounds are
not satisfied, rather than mentioning them in a note.
|
|
|
|
|
|
Follow up to #80017.
|
|
|
|
|
