| Age | Commit message (Collapse) | Author | Lines |
|---|
|
Do `suggest_await_before_try` with infer variables in self, and clean up binders
Fixes #97704
Also cleans up binders in this fn, since everything is a `Poly*` and we really shouldn't have stray escaping late-bound regions everywhere. That's why the function changed so much. This isn't necessary, so I can revert if necessary.
|
|
Fail gracefully when encountering an HRTB in APIT.
Fixes https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/issues/96954
~The first commit will be merged as part of https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/pull/97415~
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Co-authored-by: Michael Goulet <michael@errs.io>
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
implicit provenance stripping where possible
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
riscv32imac-unknown-xous-elf: add target
This PR starts the process of upstreaming support for our operating system, thanks to a suggestion from `@yaahc` [on Twitter](https://twitter.com/yaahc_/status/1530558574706839567?s=20&t=Mgkn1LEYvGU6FEi5SpZRsA). We have maintained a fork of Rust and have made changes to improve support for our platform since Rust 1.51. Now we would like to upstream these changes.
Xous is a microkernel operating system designed to run on small systems. The kernel contains a wide range of userspace processes that provide common services such as console output, networking, and time access.
The kernel and its services are completely written in Rust using a custom build of libstd. This adds support for this target to upstream Rust so that we can drop support for our out-of-tree `target.json` file.
This first patch adds a Tier 3 target for Xous running on RISC-V. Future patches will add libstd support, but those patches require changes to `dlmalloc` and `compiler_builtins`.
> Tier 3 policy:
>
> A tier 3 target must have a designated developer or developers (the "target maintainers") on record to be CCed when issues arise regarding the target. (The mechanism to track and CC such developers may evolve over time.)
I will be the target maintainer for this target on matters that pertain to the `xous` part of the triple. For matters pertaining to the `riscv32imac` part of the triple, there should be no difference from all other `riscv` targets. If there are issues, I will address issues regarding the target.
> Targets must use naming consistent with any existing targets; for instance, a target for the same CPU or OS as an existing Rust target should use the same name for that CPU or OS. Targets should normally use the same names and naming conventions as used elsewhere in the broader ecosystem beyond Rust (such as in other toolchains), unless they have a very good reason to diverge. Changing the name of a target can be highly disruptive, especially once the target reaches a higher tier, so getting the name right is important even for a tier 3 target.
This is a new OS, so I have taken the `riscv32imac-unknown-none-elf` target and changed the `os` section of the triple. This follows convention on targets such as `riscv32gc-unknown-linux-gnu` and `mipsel-unknown-linux-uclibc`. An argument could be made for omitting the `-elf` section of the triple, such as `riscv32imc-esp-espidf`, however I'm not certain what benefit that has.
> Target names should not introduce undue confusion or ambiguity unless absolutely necessary to maintain ecosystem compatibility. For example, if the name of the target makes people extremely likely to form incorrect beliefs about what it targets, the name should be changed or augmented to disambiguate it.
I feel that the target name does not introduce any ambiguity.
> Tier 3 targets may have unusual requirements to build or use, but must not create legal issues or impose onerous legal terms for the Rust project or for Rust developers or users.
The only unusual requirement for building the `compiler-builtins` crate is a standard RISC-V C compiler supported by `cc-rs`, and using this target does not require any additional software beyond what is shipped by `rustup`.
> The target must not introduce license incompatibilities.
All of the additional code will use Apache-2.0.
> Anything added to the Rust repository must be under the standard Rust license (MIT OR Apache-2.0).
Agreed, and there is no problem here.
> The target must not cause the Rust tools or libraries built for any other host (even when supporting cross-compilation to the target) to depend on any new dependency less permissive than the Rust licensing policy. This applies whether the dependency is a Rust crate that would require adding new license exceptions (as specified by the tidy tool in the rust-lang/rust repository), or whether the dependency is a native library or binary. In other words, the introduction of the target must not cause a user installing or running a version of Rust or the Rust tools to be subject to any new license requirements.
The only new dependency will be the `xous` crate, which is licensed `MIT OR Apache-2.0`
> Compiling, linking, and emitting functional binaries, libraries, or other code for the target (whether hosted on the target itself or cross-compiling from another target) must not depend on proprietary (non-FOSS) libraries. Host tools built for the target itself may depend on the ordinary runtime libraries supplied by the platform and commonly used by other applications built for the target, but those libraries must not be required for code generation for the target; cross-compilation to the target must not require such libraries at all. For instance, rustc built for the target may depend on a common proprietary C runtime library or console output library, but must not depend on a proprietary code generation library or code optimization library. Rust's license permits such combinations, but the Rust project has no interest in maintaining such combinations within the scope of Rust itself, even at tier 3.
Linking is performed by `rust-lld`
> "onerous" here is an intentionally subjective term. At a minimum, "onerous" legal/licensing terms include but are not limited to: non-disclosure requirements, non-compete requirements, contributor license agreements (CLAs) or equivalent, "non-commercial"/"research-only"/etc terms, requirements conditional on the employer or employment of any particular Rust developers, revocable terms, any requirements that create liability for the Rust project or its developers or users, or any requirements that adversely affect the livelihood or prospects of the Rust project or its developers or users.
There are no terms. Xous is completely open. It runs on open hardware. We even provide the source to the CPU.
> Neither this policy nor any decisions made regarding targets shall create any binding agreement or estoppel by any party. If any member of an approving Rust team serves as one of the maintainers of a target, or has any legal or employment requirement (explicit or implicit) that might affect their decisions regarding a target, they must recuse themselves from any approval decisions regarding the target's tier status, though they may otherwise participate in discussions.
This paragraph makes sense, but I don't think it's directed at me.
> This requirement does not prevent part or all of this policy from being cited in an explicit contract or work agreement (e.g. to implement or maintain support for a target). This requirement exists to ensure that a developer or team responsible for reviewing and approving a target does not face any legal threats or obligations that would prevent them from freely exercising their judgment in such approval, even if such judgment involves subjective matters or goes beyond the letter of these requirements.
This paragraph also does not appear to be directed at me.
> Tier 3 targets should attempt to implement as much of the standard libraries as possible and appropriate (core for most targets, alloc for targets that can support dynamic memory allocation, std for targets with an operating system or equivalent layer of system-provided functionality), but may leave some code unimplemented (either unavailable or stubbed out as appropriate), whether because the target makes it impossible to implement or challenging to implement. The authors of pull requests are not obligated to avoid calling any portions of the standard library on the basis of a tier 3 target not implementing those portions.
So far we have:
* Thread
* Mutexex
* Condvar
* TcpStream
* TcpListener
* UdpSocket
* DateTime
* alloc
These will be merged as part of libstd in a future patch once I submit support for Xous in `dlmalloc` and `compiler-builtins`.
> The target must provide documentation for the Rust community explaining how to build for the target, using cross-compilation if possible. If the target supports running binaries, or running tests (even if they do not pass), the documentation must explain how to run such binaries or tests for the target, using emulation if possible or dedicated hardware if necessary.
Testing is currently done on real hardware or in a Renode emulator. I can add documentation on how to do this in a future patch, and I would need instructions on where to add said documentation.
> Tier 3 targets must not impose burden on the authors of pull requests, or other developers in the community, to maintain the target. In particular, do not post comments (automated or manual) on a PR that derail or suggest a block on the PR based on a tier 3 target. Do not send automated messages or notifications (via any medium, including via `@)` to a PR author or others involved with a PR regarding a tier 3 target, unless they have opted into such messages.
Alright.
> Backlinks such as those generated by the issue/PR tracker when linking to an issue or PR are not considered a violation of this policy, within reason. However, such messages (even on a separate repository) must not generate notifications to anyone involved with a PR who has not requested such notifications.
Sounds good.
> Patches adding or updating tier 3 targets must not break any existing tier 2 or tier 1 target, and must not knowingly break another tier 3 target without approval of either the compiler team or the maintainers of the other tier 3 target.
This shouldn't affect any other targets, so this is understood.
> In particular, this may come up when working on closely related targets, such as variations of the same architecture with different features. Avoid introducing unconditional uses of features that another variation of the target may not have; use conditional compilation or runtime detection, as appropriate, to let each target run code supported by that target.
This shouldn't come up right away. `xous` is a new operating system, and most features are keyed off of `target(os = "xous")` rather than a given architecture.
|
|
I forgot to add the diagnostic to the actual types in `std` earlier.
|
|
Handle more cases in cfg_accessible
This PR tries to handle more cases in the cfg_accessible implementation by only emitting a "not sure" error only if we have partially resolved a path.
This PR also adds many tests for the "not sure" cases and for private items.
r? `@petrochenkov`
|
|
The `let_underscore_must_use` lint was really only added because clippy
included it, but it doesn't actually seem very useful.
|
|
We don't actually care about running these programs, only checking the
warnings they generate.
|
|
|
|
feature be enabled
|
|
Add regresion test for #87142
Closes #87142
r? `@compiler-errors`
|
|
Clippy sets this lint to Deny by default, and it having the lint be Deny
is useful for when we test the lint against a Crater run.
|
|
|
|
|
|
This commit uses `span_suggestion_verbose` to add what specific code
changes can be done as suggested by the lint--in this case, either binding
the expression to an unused variable or using `std::mem::drop` to drop
the value explicitly.
|
|
These lints are very noisy and are allow-by-default in clippy anyways.
Hence, setting them to allow-by-default here makes more sense than
warning constantly on these cases.
|
|
This was done to pass `tidy`.
|
|
Similar to `let_underscore_drop`, this lint checks for statements similar
to `let _ = foo`, where `foo` is an expression marked `must_use`.
|
|
Similar to `let_underscore_drop`, this lint checks for statements similar
to `let _ = foo`, where `foo` is a lock guard. These types of let
statements are especially problematic because the lock gets released
immediately, instead of at the end of the scope. This behavior is almost
always the wrong thing.
|
|
|
|
|
|
Signed-off-by: Sean Cross <sean@xobs.io>
|
|
r=Dylan-DPC
Tighten spans for bad fields in struct deriving `Copy`
r? `@estebank`
Closes #89137 for good, I think
Not sure if this is what you were looking for in https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/issues/89137#issuecomment-1146201791
|
|
Fix reachability analysis for const methods
Use `method_might_be_inlined` directly for `ImplItemKind::Fn` instead of duplicating the logic in `def_id_represents_local_inlined_item`.
This is parallel to how we use `item_might_be_inlined` for `ItemKind::Fn` in that same body.
Fixes #97708
|
|
Support the `#[expect]` attribute on fn parameters (RFC-2383)
A small PR to allow the `#[expect]` attribute on function parameters.
Nothing more to say, I hope everyone reading this has a lovely day.
---
r? ``@wesleywiser``
closes: https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/issues/97650
cc: https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/issues/85549
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Do not ICE when failing to normalize during inlining.
Fixes https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/issues/97695
|
|
r=cjgillot
Add a suggestion to replace parentheses with angle brackets on associated trait constraint
This implements a requested suggestion FIXME in [`compiler/rustc_ast_lowering/src/lib.rs` ](https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/blob/9598b4b594c97dff66feb93522e22db500deea07/compiler/rustc_ast_lowering/src/lib.rs#L921)
The suggestion asks for the parentheses to either be replaced with angle brackets or removed completely depending on whether there are arguments provided within.
r? `@oli-obk`
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Remove all json handling from rustc_serialize
Json is now handled using serde_json. Where appropriate I have replaced json usage with binary serialization (rmeta files) or manual string formatting (emcc linker arg generation).
This allowed for removing and simplifying a lot of code, which hopefully results in faster serialization/deserialization and faster compiles of rustc itself.
Where sensible we now use serde. Metadata and incr cache serialization keeps using a heavily modified (compared to crates.io) rustc-serialize version that in the future could probably be extended with zero-copy deserialization or other perf tricks that serde can't support due to supporting more than one serialization format.
Note that I had to remove `-Zast-json` and `-Zast-json-noexpand` as the relevant AST types don't implement `serde::Serialize`.
Fixes #40177
See also https://github.com/rust-lang/compiler-team/issues/418
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Rollup of 3 pull requests
Successful merges:
- #97415 (Compute `is_late_bound_map` query separately from lifetime resolution)
- #97471 (Provide more context when denying invalid type params )
- #97681 (Add more eslint checks)
Failed merges:
- #97446 (Make hir().get_generics and generics_of consistent.)
r? `@ghost`
`@rustbot` modify labels: rollup
|
|
Provide more context when denying invalid type params
|
