| Age | Commit message (Collapse) | Author | Lines |
|---|
|
These tests were added to master after I made my changes.
|
|
* It is called `source` in rustc and the rest of rustdoc
* It is not a span, rather it is the source of the import
|
|
Fix ICE with `use clippy::a::b;`
Fixes #83317.
|
|
Use TrustedRandomAccess for in-place iterators where possible
This can speed up in-place iterators containing simple casts and transmutes from `Copy` types to any type of same size. `!Copy` types can't be optimized since `TrustedRandomAccess` isn't implemented for those iterators.
```
name on.b ns/iter o1.b ns/iter diff ns/iter diff % speedup
vec::bench_transmute 20 (40000 MB/s) 12 (66666 MB/s) -8 -40.00% x 1.67
```
|
|
|
|
|
|
This saves us both the Freeze/Unpin queries, and avoids placing
noalias attributes, which have a compile-time impact on LLVM
even in optnone builds (due to always_inline functions).
|
|
|
|
We don't have any known noalias bugs for LLVM 12 ... yet.
|
|
Such structures may contain self-references, in which case the
same location may be accessible through a pointer that is not
based-on the noalias pointer.
This is still grey area as far as language semantics are concerned,
but checking for !Unpin as an indicator for self-referential
sturctures seems like a good approach for the meantime.
|
|
Perform 'deep recollection' in test helper macros
Currently, the print helper macro performs 'recollection' by doing
`token_stream.into_iter().collect()`. However, this will not affect
nonterminals that occur nested inside delimited groups, since the
wrapping delimited group will be left untouched.
This commit adds 'deep recollection', which recursively recollects every
delimited group in the token stream. As with normal recollection, we
only print out something if deep recollection results in a different
stringified token stream.
This is useful for catching bugs where we update the AST of a
nonterminal (which affects pretty-printing), but do not update the
attatched `TokenStream`
|
|
Fixes '\\' handling in format strings.
Fixes #83340
|
|
Currently, the print helper macro performs 'recollection' by doing
`token_stream.into_iter().collect()`. However, this will not affect
nonterminals that occur nested inside delimited groups, since the
wrapping delimited group will be left untouched.
This commit adds 'deep recollection', which recursively recollects every
delimited group in the token stream. As with normal recollection, we
only print out something if deep recollection results in a different
stringified token stream.
This is useful for catching bugs where we update the AST of a
nonterminal (which affects pretty-printing), but do not update the
attatched `TokenStream`
|
|
|
|
Extend `proc_macro_back_compat` lint to `js-sys`
With this PR, we now lint for all cases where we perform some kind of
proc-macro back-compat hack.
The `js-sys` had an internal fix made to properly handle
`None`-delimited groups, so we need to manually check the version in the
filename. As a result, we no longer apply the back-compat hack to cases
where the version number is missing file the file path. This should not
affect any users of the `crates.io` crate.
|
|
Move some tests to more reasonable directories - 5
cc #73494
Threshold is 0.95. Next time I promise I will take a look into the special/misclassified directories.
- [issues/issue-23208.rs](https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/blob/master/src/test/ui/issues/issue-23208.rs) <sup>[issue](https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/issues/23208)</sup>: associated-types 0.951
- [weird-exprs.rs](https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/blob/master/src/test/ui/weird-exprs.rs) <sup>unknown</sup>: destructuring-assignment 0.958
- [issues/issue-1701.rs](https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/blob/master/src/test/ui/issues/issue-1701.rs) <sup>[issue](https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/issues/1701)</sup>: structs-enums 0.974
- [issues/issue-48508-aux.rs](https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/blob/master/src/test/ui/issues/issue-48508-aux.rs) <sup>[issue](https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/issues/48508)</sup>: numbers-arithmetic 0.991
- [fn_must_use.rs](https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/blob/master/src/test/ui/fn_must_use.rs) <sup>unknown</sup>: lint 1.000
- [mir_check_nonconst.rs](https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/blob/master/src/test/ui/mir_check_nonconst.rs) <sup>unknown</sup>: consts 1.002
- [issues/issue-52060.rs](https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/blob/master/src/test/ui/issues/issue-52060.rs) <sup>[issue](https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/issues/52060)</sup>: consts 1.017
- [issues/issue-45729-unsafe-in-generator.rs](https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/blob/master/src/test/ui/issues/issue-45729-unsafe-in-generator.rs) <sup>[issue](https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/issues/45729)</sup>: generator 1.024
- [issues/issue-10392.rs](https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/blob/master/src/test/ui/issues/issue-10392.rs) <sup>[issue](https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/issues/10392)</sup>: pattern 1.039
- [no-implicit-prelude.rs](https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/blob/master/src/test/ui/no-implicit-prelude.rs) <sup>unknown</sup>: resolve 1.071
- [issues/issue-68000-unicode-ident-after-missing-comma.rs](https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/blob/master/src/test/ui/issues/issue-68000-unicode-ident-after-missing-comma.rs) <sup>[issue](https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/issues/68000)</sup>: parser 1.079
- [shadow.rs](https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/blob/master/src/test/ui/shadow.rs) <sup>unknown</sup>: binding 1.099
- [issues/issue-65611.rs](https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/blob/master/src/test/ui/issues/issue-65611.rs) <sup>[issue](https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/issues/65611)</sup>: consts 1.139
- [concat-rpass.rs](https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/blob/master/src/test/ui/concat-rpass.rs) <sup>unknown</sup>: macros 1.194
- [issues/issue-31597.rs](https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/blob/master/src/test/ui/issues/issue-31597.rs) <sup>[issue](https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/issues/31597)</sup>: associated-types 1.195
- [issues/issue-78372.rs](https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/blob/master/src/test/ui/issues/issue-78372.rs) <sup>[issue](https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/issues/78372)</sup>: resolve 1.426
- [impl-trait-in-bindings-issue-73003.rs](https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/blob/master/src/test/ui/impl-trait-in-bindings-issue-73003.rs) <sup>[issue](https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/issues/73003)</sup>: impl-trait 1.471
- [impl-trait-in-bindings.rs](https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/blob/master/src/test/ui/impl-trait-in-bindings.rs) <sup>unknown</sup>: impl-trait 2.500
r? `@petrochenkov`
|
|
extract `ConstKind::Unevaluated` into a struct
r? `@oli-obk`
|
|
const_evaluatable_checked: Stop eagerly erroring in `is_const_evaluatable`
Fixes #82279
We don't want to be emitting errors inside of is_const_evaluatable because we may call this during selection where it should be able to fail silently
There were two errors being emitted in `is_const_evaluatable`. The one causing the compile error in #82279 was inside the match arm for `FailureKind::MentionsParam` but I moved the other error being emitted too since it made things cleaner imo
The `NotConstEvaluatable` enum \*should\* have a fourth variant for when we fail to evaluate a concrete const, e.g. `0 - 1` but that cant happen until #81339
cc `@oli-obk` `@lcnr`
r? `@nikomatsakis`
|
|
|
|
When building with multiple codegen units the test case can fail with
only a subset of all errors. Use a single codegen unit as a workaround.
|
|
|
|
|
|
Add simd_neg platform intrinsic
Stdarch needs to add simd_neg to support the implementation of vneg neon instructions. Look [here](https://github.com/rust-lang/stdarch/pull/1087)
|
|
|
|
Adjusted LLVM codegen for code compiled with `-Zinstrument-coverage` to
address multiple, somewhat related issues.
Fixed a significant flaw in prior coverage solution: Every counter
generated a new counter variable, but there should have only been one
counter variable per function. This appears to have bloated .profraw
files significantly. (For a small program, it increased the size by
about 40%. I have not tested large programs, but there is anecdotal
evidence that profraw files were way too large. This is a good fix,
regardless, but hopefully it also addresses related issues.
Fixes: #82144
Invalid LLVM coverage data produced when compiled with -C opt-level=1
Existing tests now work up to at least `opt-level=3`. This required a
detailed analysis of the LLVM IR, comparisons with Clang C++ LLVM IR
when compiled with coverage, and a lot of trial and error with codegen
adjustments.
The biggest hurdle was figuring out how to continue to support coverage
results for unused functions and generics. Rust's coverage results have
three advantages over Clang's coverage results:
1. Rust's coverage map does not include any overlapping code regions,
making coverage counting unambiguous.
2. Rust generates coverage results (showing zero counts) for all unused
functions, including generics. (Clang does not generate coverage for
uninstantiated template functions.)
3. Rust's unused functions produce minimal stubbed functions in LLVM IR,
sufficient for including in the coverage results; while Clang must
generate the complete LLVM IR for each unused function, even though
it will never be called.
This PR removes the previous hack of attempting to inject coverage into
some other existing function instance, and generates dedicated instances
for each unused function. This change, and a few other adjustments
(similar to what is required for `-C link-dead-code`, but with lower
impact), makes it possible to support LLVM optimizations.
Fixes: #79651
Coverage report: "Unexecuted instantiation:..." for a generic function
from multiple crates
Fixed by removing the aforementioned hack. Some "Unexecuted
instantiation" notices are unavoidable, as explained in the
`used_crate.rs` test, but `-Zinstrument-coverage` has new options to
back off support for either unused generics, or all unused functions,
which avoids the notice, at the cost of less coverage of unused
functions.
Fixes: #82875
Invalid LLVM coverage data produced with crate brotli_decompressor
Fixed by disabling the LLVM function attribute that forces inlining, if
`-Z instrument-coverage` is enabled. This attribute is applied to
Rust functions with `#[inline(always)], and in some cases, the forced
inlining breaks coverage instrumentation and reports.
|
|
r=petrochenkov
Do not ICE on ty::Error as an error must already have been reported
fixes #83253
|
|
Mark early otherwise optimization unsound
r? `@oli-obk`
cc `@tmiasko`
Related to #78496 and #82905
Should I also bump this one to level 3 or 4 or given that is unsound it doesn't matter?.
Probably need to adjust some tests.
|
|
With this PR, we now lint for all cases where we perform some kind of
proc-macro back-compat hack.
The `js-sys` had an internal fix made to properly handle
`None`-delimited groups, so we need to manually check the version in the
filename. As a result, we no longer apply the back-compat hack to cases
where the version number is missing file the file path. This should not
affect any users of the `crates.io` crate.
|
|
Replace closures_captures and upvar_capture with closure_min_captures
Removed all uses of closures_captures and upvar_capture and refactored code to work with closure_min_captures. This also involved removing functions that were no longer needed like the bridge.
Closes https://github.com/rust-lang/project-rfc-2229/issues/18
r? `@nikomatsakis`
|
|
Extend `proc_macro_back_compat` lint to `actix-web`
Unlike the other cases of this lint, there's no simple way to detect if
an old version of the relevant crate (`syn`) is in use. The `actix-web`
crate only depends on `pin-project` v1.0.0, so checking the version of
`actix-web` does not guarantee that a new enough version of
`pin-project` (and therefore `syn`) is in use.
Instead, we rely on the fact that virtually all of the regressed crates
are pinned to a pre-1.0 version of `pin-project`. When this is the case,
bumping the `actix-web` dependency will pull in the *latest* version of
`pin-project`, which has an explicit dependency on a newer v dependency
on a newer version of `syn`.
The lint message tells users to update `actix-web`, since that's what
they're most likely to have control over. We could potentially tell them
to run `cargo update -p syn`, but I think it's more straightforward to
suggest an explicit change to the `Cargo.toml`
The `actori-web` fork had its last commit over a year ago, and appears
to just be a renamed fork of `actix-web`. Therefore, I've removed the
`actori-web` check entirely - any crates that actually get broken can
simply update `syn` themselves.
|
|
rustdoc: allow list syntax for #[doc(alias)] attributes
Fixes https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/issues/81205.
It now allows to have:
```rust
#[doc(alias = "x")]
// and:
#[doc(alias("y", "z"))]
```
cc ``@jplatte``
r? ``@jyn514``
|
|
|
|
|
|
make changes to liveness to use closure_min_captures
use different span
borrow check uses new structures
rename to CapturedPlace
stop using upvar_capture in regionck
remove the bridge
cleanup from rebase + remove the upvar_capture reference from mutability_errors.rs
remove line from livenes test
make our unused var checking more consistent
update tests
adding more warnings to the tests
move is_ancestor_or_same_capture to rustc_middle/ty
update names to reflect the closures
add FIXME
check that all captures are immutable borrows before returning
add surrounding if statement like the original
move var out of the loop and rename
Co-authored-by: Logan Mosier <logmosier@gmail.com>
Co-authored-by: Roxane Fruytier <roxane.fruytier@hotmail.com>
|
|
|
|
|
|
Unlike the other cases of this lint, there's no simple way to detect if
an old version of the relevant crate (`syn`) is in use. The `actix-web`
crate only depends on `pin-project` v1.0.0, so checking the version of
`actix-web` does not guarantee that a new enough version of
`pin-project` (and therefore `syn`) is in use.
Instead, we rely on the fact that virtually all of the regressed crates
are pinned to a pre-1.0 version of `pin-project`. When this is the case,
bumping the `actix-web` dependency will pull in the *latest* version of
`pin-project`, which has an explicit dependency on a newer v dependency
on a newer version of `syn`.
The lint message tells users to update `actix-web`, since that's what
they're most likely to have control over. We could potentially tell them
to run `cargo update -p syn`, but I think it's more straightforward to
suggest an explicit change to the `Cargo.toml`
The `actori-web` fork had its last commit over a year ago, and appears
to just be a renamed fork of `actix-web`. Therefore, I've removed the
`actori-web` check entirely - any crates that actually get broken can
simply update `syn` themselves.
|
|
Report missing cases of `bare_trait_objects`
Fixes https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/issues/65371
|
|
Detect async visibility wrong order, `async pub`
Partially address #76437.
|
|
|
|
|
|
Allow registering tool lints with `register_tool`
Previously, there was no way to add a custom tool prefix, even if the tool
itself had registered a lint:
```rust
#![feature(register_tool)]
#![register_tool(xyz)]
#![warn(xyz::my_lint)]
```
```
$ rustc unknown-lint.rs --crate-type lib
error[E0710]: an unknown tool name found in scoped lint: `xyz::my_lint`
--> unknown-lint.rs:3:9
|
3 | #![warn(xyz::my_lint)]
| ^^^
```
This allows opting-in to lints from other tools using `register_tool`.
cc https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/issues/66079#issuecomment-788589193, ``@chorman0773``
r? ``@petrochenkov``
|
|
Extend `proc_macro_back_compat` lint to `procedural-masquerade`
We now lint on *any* use of `procedural-masquerade` crate. While this
crate still exists, its main reverse dependency (`cssparser`) no longer
depends on it. Any crates still depending off should stop doing so, as
it only exists to support very old Rust versions.
If a crate actually needs to support old versions of rustc via
`procedural-masquerade`, then they'll just need to accept the warning
until we remove it entirely (at the same time as the back-compat hack).
The latest version of `procedural-masquerade` does work with the
latest rustc, but trying to check for the version seems like more
trouble than it's worth.
While working on this, I realized that the `proc-macro-hack` check was
never actually doing anything. The corresponding enum variant in
`proc-macro-hack` is named `Value` or `Nested` - it has never been
called `Input`. Due to a strange Crater issue, the Crater run that
tested adding this did *not* end up testing it - some of the crates that
would have failed did not actually have their tests checked, making it
seem as though the `proc-macro-hack` check was working.
The Crater issue is being discussed at
https://rust-lang.zulipchat.com/#narrow/stream/242791-t-infra/topic/Nearly.20identical.20Crater.20runs.20processed.20a.20crate.20differently/near/230406661
Despite the `proc-macro-hack` check not actually doing anything, we
haven't gotten any reports from users about their build being broken.
I went ahead and removed it entirely, since it's clear that no one is
being affected by the `proc-macro-hack` regression in practice.
|
|
Make source-based code coverage compatible with MIR inlining
When codegenning code coverage use the instance that coverage data was
originally generated for, to ensure basic level of compatibility with
MIR inlining.
Fixes #83061
|
|
Emit error when trying to use assembler syntax directives in `asm!`
The `.intel_syntax` and `.att_syntax` assembler directives should not be used, in favor of not specifying a syntax for intel, and in favor of the explicit `att_syntax` option using the inline assembly options.
Closes #79869
|
|
|
|
Deprecate `intrinsics::drop_in_place` and `collections::Bound`, which accidentally weren't deprecated
Fixes #82080.
I've taken the liberty of updating the `since` values to 1.52, since an unobservable deprecation isn't much of a deprecation (even the detailed release notes never bothered to mention these deprecations).
As mentioned in the issue I'm *pretty* sure that using a type alias for `Bound` is semantically equivalent to the re-export; [the reference implies](https://doc.rust-lang.org/reference/items/type-aliases.html) that type aliases only observably differ from types when used on unit structs or tuple structs, whereas `Bound` is an enum.
|
|
ast/hir: Rename field-related structures
I always forget what `ast::Field` and `ast::StructField` mean despite working with AST for long time, so this PR changes the naming to less confusing and more consistent.
- `StructField` -> `FieldDef` ("field definition")
- `Field` -> `ExprField` ("expression field", not "field expression")
- `FieldPat` -> `PatField` ("pattern field", not "field pattern")
Various visiting and other methods working with the fields are renamed correspondingly too.
The second commit reduces the size of `ExprKind` by boxing fields of `ExprKind::Struct` in preparation for https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/pull/80080.
|
|
Rollup of 8 pull requests
Successful merges:
- #82774 (Fix bad diagnostics for anon params with ref and/or qualified paths)
- #82826 ((std::net::parser): Fix capitalization of IP version names)
- #83092 (More precise spans for HIR paths)
- #83124 (Do not insert impl_trait_in_bindings opaque definitions twice.)
- #83202 (Show details in cfg version unstable book)
- #83203 (Don't warn about old rustdoc lint names (temporarily))
- #83206 (Update books)
- #83219 (Update cargo)
Failed merges:
r? `@ghost`
`@rustbot` modify labels: rollup
|
|
Don't warn about old rustdoc lint names (temporarily)
Since https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/pull/80527, rustdoc users have an unpleasant situation: they can either use the new tool lint names (`rustdoc::non_autolinks`) or they can use the old names (`non_autolinks`). If they use the tool lints, they get a hard error on stable compilers, because rustc rejects all tool names it doesn't recognize (https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/issues/66079#issuecomment-788589193). If they use the old name, they get a warning to rename the lint to the new name. The only way to compile without warnings is to add `#[allow(renamed_removed_lints)]`, which defeats the whole point of the change: we *want* people to switch to the new name.
To avoid people silencing the lint and never migrating to the tool lint, this avoids warning about the old name, while still allowing you to use the new name. Once the new `rustdoc` tool name makes it to the stable channel, we can change these lints to warn again.
This adds the new lint functions `register_alias` and `register_ignored` - I didn't see an existing way to do this.
r? `@Manishearth` cc `@rust-lang/rustdoc`
|
