| Age | Commit message (Collapse) | Author | Lines |
|---|
|
Specialize infinite-type "insert some indirection" suggestion for Option
Suggest `Option<Box<_>>` instead of `Box<Option<_>>` for infinitely-recursive members of a struct.
Not sure if I can get the span of the generic subty of the Option so I can make this a `+++`-style suggestion. The current output is a tiny bit less fancy looking than the original suggestion.
Should I limit the specialization to just `Option<Box<TheOuterStruct>>`? Because right now it applies to all `Option` members in the struct that are returned by `Representability::SelfRecursive`.
Fixes #91402
r? `@estebank`
(since you wrote the original suggestion and are definitely most familiar with it!)
|
|
|
|
|
|
r=compiler-errors
Add note to the move size diagnostic
context: https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/issues/83518
|
|
Fix last rustdoc-gui spurious test
This should the last spurious failing GUI test from https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/issues/93784.
r? ``@notriddle``
|
|
Don't ICE when opaque types get their hidden type constrained again.
Contrary to popular belief, `codegen_fulfill_obligation` does not get used solely in codegen, so we cannot rely on `param_env` being set to RevealAll and thus revealing the hidden types instead of constraining them.
Fixes #89312 (for real this time)
|
|
Restore `impl Future<Output = Type>` to async blocks
I was sad when I undid some of the code I wrote in #91096 in the PR #95225, so I fixed it here to not print `[async output]`.
This PR "manually" normalizes the associated type `<[generator] as Generator>::Return` type which appears very frequently in `impl Future` types that result from async block desugaring.
|
|
|
|
async: Give predictable name to binding generated from .await expressions.
This name makes it to debuginfo and allows debuggers to identify such bindings and their captured versions in suspended async fns.
This will be useful for async stack traces, as discussed in https://internals.rust-lang.org/t/async-debugging-logical-stack-traces-setting-goals-collecting-examples/15547.
I don't know if this needs some discussion by ````@rust-lang/compiler,```` e.g. about the name of the binding (`__awaitee`) or about the fact that this PR introduces a (soft) guarantee about a compiler generated name. Although, regarding the later, I think the same reasoning applies here as it does for debuginfo in general.
r? ````@tmandry````
|
|
Add the generic_associated_types_extended feature
Right now, this only ignore obligations that reference new placeholders in `poly_project_and_unify_type`. In the future, this might do other things, like allowing object-safe GATs.
**This feature is *incomplete* and quite likely unsound. This is mostly just for testing out potential future APIs using a "relaxed" set of rules until we figure out *proper* rules.**
Also drive by cleanup of adding a `ProjectAndUnifyResult` enum instead of using a `Result<Result<Option>>`.
r? `@nikomatsakis`
|
|
Stabilize native library modifier syntax and the `whole-archive` modifier specifically
Stabilization report: https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/pull/93901#issuecomment-1041325522
cc https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/issues/81490
|
|
|
|
specifically
|
|
r=petrochenkov
Yet more `parse_tt` improvements
Including lots of comment improvements, and an overhaul of how `matches` work that gives big speedups.
r? `@petrochenkov`
|
|
|
|
Contrary to popular belief, `codegen_fulfill_obligation` does not get used solely in codegen, so we cannot rely on `param_env` being set to RevealAll and thus revealing the hidden types instead of constraining them.
|
|
|
|
allow arbitrary inherent impls for builtin types in core
Part of https://github.com/rust-lang/compiler-team/issues/487. Slightly adjusted after some talks with `@m-ou-se` about the requirements of `t-libs-api`.
This adds a crate attribute `#![rustc_coherence_is_core]` which allows arbitrary impls for builtin types in core.
For other library crates impls for builtin types should be avoided if possible. We do have to allow the existing stable impls however. To prevent us from accidentally adding more of these in the future, there is a second attribute `#[rustc_allow_incoherent_impl]` which has to be added to **all impl items**. This only supports impls for builtin types but can easily be extended to additional types in a future PR.
This implementation does not check for overlaps in these impls. Perfectly checking that requires us to check the coherence of these incoherent impls in every crate, as two distinct dependencies may add overlapping methods. It should be easy enough to detect if it goes wrong and the attribute is only intended for use inside of std.
The first two commits are mostly unrelated cleanups.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
expressions.
This name makes it to debuginfo and allows debuggers to identify such bindings and
their captured versions in suspended async fns.
|
|
Rollup of 5 pull requests
Successful merges:
- #95294 (Document Linux kernel handoff in std::io::copy and std::fs::copy)
- #95443 (Clarify how `src/tools/x` searches for python)
- #95452 (fix since field version for termination stabilization)
- #95460 (Spellchecking compiler code)
- #95461 (Spellchecking some comments)
Failed merges:
r? `@ghost`
`@rustbot` modify labels: rollup
|
|
Spellchecking some comments
This PR attempts to clean up some minor spelling mistakes in comments
|
|
This PR attempts to clean up some minor spelling mistakes in comments
|
|
Lazy type-alias-impl-trait take two
### user visible change 1: RPIT inference from recursive call sites
Lazy TAIT has an insta-stable change. The following snippet now compiles, because opaque types can now have their hidden type set from wherever the opaque type is mentioned.
```rust
fn bar(b: bool) -> impl std::fmt::Debug {
if b {
return 42
}
let x: u32 = bar(false); // this errors on stable
99
}
```
The return type of `bar` stays opaque, you can't do `bar(false) + 42`, you need to actually mention the hidden type.
### user visible change 2: divergence between RPIT and TAIT in return statements
Note that `return` statements and the trailing return expression are special with RPIT (but not TAIT). So
```rust
#![feature(type_alias_impl_trait)]
type Foo = impl std::fmt::Debug;
fn foo(b: bool) -> Foo {
if b {
return vec![42];
}
std::iter::empty().collect() //~ ERROR `Foo` cannot be built from an iterator
}
fn bar(b: bool) -> impl std::fmt::Debug {
if b {
return vec![42]
}
std::iter::empty().collect() // Works, magic (accidentally stabilized, not intended)
}
```
But when we are working with the return value of a recursive call, the behavior of RPIT and TAIT is the same:
```rust
type Foo = impl std::fmt::Debug;
fn foo(b: bool) -> Foo {
if b {
return vec![];
}
let mut x = foo(false);
x = std::iter::empty().collect(); //~ ERROR `Foo` cannot be built from an iterator
vec![]
}
fn bar(b: bool) -> impl std::fmt::Debug {
if b {
return vec![];
}
let mut x = bar(false);
x = std::iter::empty().collect(); //~ ERROR `impl Debug` cannot be built from an iterator
vec![]
}
```
### user visible change 3: TAIT does not merge types across branches
In contrast to RPIT, TAIT does not merge types across branches, so the following does not compile.
```rust
type Foo = impl std::fmt::Debug;
fn foo(b: bool) -> Foo {
if b {
vec![42_i32]
} else {
std::iter::empty().collect()
//~^ ERROR `Foo` cannot be built from an iterator over elements of type `_`
}
}
```
It is easy to support, but we should make an explicit decision to include the additional complexity in the implementation (it's not much, see a721052457cf513487fb4266e3ade65c29b272d2 which needs to be reverted to enable this).
### PR formalities
previous attempt: #92007
This PR also includes #92306 and #93783, as they were reverted along with #92007 in #93893
fixes #93411
fixes #88236
fixes #89312
fixes #87340
fixes #86800
fixes #86719
fixes #84073
fixes #83919
fixes #82139
fixes #77987
fixes #74282
fixes #67830
fixes #62742
fixes #54895
|
|
|
|
diagnostics: regression test for derive bounds
Closes #79076
|
|
Suggest wrapping patterns in enum variants
Structured suggestion to wrap a pattern in a single-field enum or struct:
```diff
struct A;
enum B {
A(A),
}
fn main(b: B) {
match b {
- A => {}
+ B::A(A) => {}
}
}
```
Half of #94942, the other half I'm not exactly sure how to fix.
Also includes two drive-by changes (that I am open to splitting out into another PR, but thought they could be rolled up into this one):
- 07776c111f07b887cd46b752870cd3fd76b2ba7c: Makes sure not to suggest wrapping if it doesn't have tuple field constructor (i.e. has named fields)
- 8f2bbb18fd53e5008bb488302dbd354577698ede: Also suggest wrapping expressions in a tuple struct (not just enum variants)
|
|
yaahc:termination-stabilization-celebration-station, r=joshtriplett
Stabilize Termination and ExitCode
From https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/issues/43301
This PR stabilizes the Termination trait and associated ExitCode type. It also adjusts the ExitCode feature flag to replace the placeholder flag with a more permanent name, as well as splitting off the `to_i32` method behind its own permanently unstable feature flag.
This PR stabilizes the termination trait with the following signature:
```rust
pub trait Termination {
fn report(self) -> ExitCode;
}
```
The existing impls of `Termination` are effectively already stable due to the prior stabilization of `?` in main.
This PR also stabilizes the following APIs on exit code
```rust
#[derive(Clone, Copy, Debug)]
pub struct ExitCode(_);
impl ExitCode {
pub const SUCCESS: ExitCode;
pub const FAILURE: ExitCode;
}
impl From<u8> for ExitCode { /* ... */ }
```
---
All of the previous blockers have been resolved. The main ones that were resolved recently are:
* The trait's name: We decided against changing this since none of the alternatives seemed particularly compelling. Instead we decided to end the bikeshedding and stick with the current name. ([link to the discussion](https://rust-lang.zulipchat.com/#narrow/stream/219381-t-libs/topic/Termination.2FExit.20Status.20Stabilization/near/269793887))
* Issues around platform specific representations: We resolved this issue by changing the return type of `report` from `i32` to the opaque type `ExitCode`. That way we can change the underlying representation without affecting the API, letting us offer full support for platform specific exit code APIs in the future.
* Custom exit codes: We resolved this by adding `From<u8> for ExitCode`. We choose to only support u8 initially because it is the least common denominator between the sets of exit codes supported by our current platforms. In the future we anticipate adding platform specific extension traits to ExitCode for constructors from larger or negative numbers, as needed.
|
|
Rollup of 4 pull requests
Successful merges:
- #94566 (Show ignore message in console and json output)
- #95415 (diagnostics: regression test for HashMap iter_mut suggestion)
- #95422 (Refactor: Use `format-args-capture` and remove an unnecessary nested block)
- #95424 (:arrow_up: rust-analyzer)
Failed merges:
r? `@ghost`
`@rustbot` modify labels: rollup
|
|
Closes #79076
|
|
Show ignore message in console and json output
- Provide ignore the message in console and JSON output
- Modify the ignore message style in the log file
related: #92714
|
|
diagnostics: regression test for HashMap iter_mut suggestion
Closes #82081
|
|
Show ignore message in console and json output
- Provide ignore the message in console and JSON output
- Modify the ignore message style in the log file
related: #92714
|
|
Remove header field from clean::Function
Fixes https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/issues/89673.
This is another take on https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/issues/89673 (compared to https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/pull/91217) but very different on the approach: I moved the header call in one place but still require to have the `clean::Item` so I can use the `DefId` to get what is missing.
cc `@jyn514` (you reviewed the original so maybe you want to take a look?)
r? `@camelid`
|
|
|
|
`needs_note` is false if we've already suggested why the type is Copy...
but that has nothing to do with the diagnostic.
|
|
|
|
|
|
Fix yet another Box<T, A> ICE
Fixes #95036.
This widens the special case from #94414 to make sure that boxes with a custom allocator are never directly dereferenced.
|
|
diagnostics: correct generic bounds with doubled colon
Fixes #95208
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
