| Age | Commit message (Collapse) | Author | Lines |
|---|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Function arguments should never get promoted
fixes https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/issues/59469
|
|
This commit adds a test that demonstrates the compiler's current
behaviour when a function attempts to return a value that was unwrapped
by a `?` operator when the omission of `?` would have made the code
compile.
|
|
|
|
This commit adds a test demonstrating the current behaviour when a macro
defined in a module with the `#[macro_export]` is imported from the
module rather than the crate root.
|
|
|
|
Future-proof the Futures API
cc https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/issues/59113, @carllerche, @rust-lang/libs
r? @withoutboats
|
|
|
|
|
|
More restrictive 2 phase borrows - take 2
Signal lint diagnostic `mutable_borrow_reservation_conflict` when borrow-check finds a 2-phase borrow's reservation overlapping with a shared borrow.
(pnkfelix updated description)
cc #56254 , #59159
blocks PR #59114
r? @pnkfelix
cc @RalfJung @nikomatsakis
|
|
Remove invalid assertion back::link::from add_upstream_rust_crates().
This removes a misplaced assertion. The function containing the assertion is actually only ever called for upstream crates that are not considered for LTO, so we don't care whether upstream code has been merged in by LTO or not.
Fixes #59137
r? @alexcrichton
|
|
Fix invalid bounds string generation in rustdoc
Fixes #58737.
Very weird and I'm not sure this is the best fix around. However, trying to fix it beforehand seems overly complicated compared to the gain (in `clean`, it wouldn't change anything since we **have to** return something so that wouldn't work, and in `hir`, I'm afraid I'd break something else for very little gain).
Also, I wasn't able to make a small code to reproduce the issue. The only way to test is to document `crossbeam` directly and check the `Scope` struct...
r? @QuietMisdreavus
|
|
|
|
Unsized rvalues: implement boxed closure impls. (2nd try)
This is a rebase of S-blocked-closed PR #55431 to current master. LLVM has moved forward since then, so maybe we can check whether the new LLVM 8.0 version unblocked this work.
|
|
This commit changes the behavior of Formatter::debug_struct,
debug_tuple, debug_list, debug_set, and debug_map to render trailing
commas in {:#?} mode, which is the dominant style in modern Rust code.
Before:
Language {
name: "Rust",
trailing_commas: false
}
After:
Language {
name: "Rust",
trailing_commas: true,
}
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
std: Avoid usage of `Once` in `Instant`
This commit removes usage of `Once` from the internal implementation of
time utilities on OSX and Windows. It turns out that we accidentally hit
a deadlock today (#59020) via events that look like:
* A thread invokes `park_timeout`
* Internally, only on OSX, `park_timeout` calls `Instant::elapsed`
* Inside of `Instant::elapsed` on OSX we enter a `Once` to initialize
global timer data
* Inside of `Once`, it attempts to `park`
This means on the same stack frame, when there's contention, we're
calling `park` from inside `park_timeout`, causing a deadlock!
The solution implemented in this commit was to remove usage of `Once`
and instead just do a small dance with atomics. There's no real need we
need to guarantee that the global information is only learned once, only
that it's only *stored* once. This implementation may have multiple
threads invoke `mach_timebase_info`, but only one will store the global
information which will amortize the cost for all other threads.
A similar fix has been applied to windows to be uniform across our
implementations, but looking at the code on Windows no deadlock was
possible. This is purely just a consistency update for Windows and in
theory a slightly leaner implementation.
Closes #59020
|
|
We aren't sure if this will become an error or not yet.
|
|
`#[allow(..)]` etc.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
This commit removes usage of `Once` from the internal implementation of
time utilities on OSX and Windows. It turns out that we accidentally hit
a deadlock today (#59020) via events that look like:
* A thread invokes `park_timeout`
* Internally, only on OSX, `park_timeout` calls `Instant::elapsed`
* Inside of `Instant::elapsed` on OSX we enter a `Once` to initialize
global timer data
* Inside of `Once`, it attempts to `park`
This means on the same stack frame, when there's contention, we're
calling `park` from inside `park_timeout`, causing a deadlock!
The solution implemented in this commit was to remove usage of `Once`
and instead just do a small dance with atomics. There's no real need we
need to guarantee that the global information is only learned once, only
that it's only *stored* once. This implementation may have multiple
threads invoke `mach_timebase_info`, but only one will store the global
information which will amortize the cost for all other threads.
A similar fix has been applied to windows to be uniform across our
implementations, but looking at the code on Windows no deadlock was
possible. This is purely just a consistency update for Windows and in
theory a slightly leaner implementation.
Closes #59020
|
|
Only suggest label names in the same hygiene context, and use a
structured suggestion.
|
|
Never return uninhabited values at all
Functions with uninhabited return values are already marked `noreturn`,
but we were still generating return instructions for this. When running
with `-C passes=lint`, LLVM prints:
Unusual: Return statement in function with noreturn attribute
The LLVM manual makes a stronger statement about `noreturn` though:
> This produces undefined behavior at runtime if the function ever does
dynamically return.
We now emit an `abort` anywhere that would have tried to return an
uninhabited value.
Fixes #48227
cc #7463 #48229
r? @eddyb
|
|
Move query definitions over to the proc macro
r? @oli-obk
|
|
Reduce repetition in librustc(_lint) wrt. impl LintPass by using macros
r? @oli-obk
cc @Zoxc
|
|
Functions with uninhabited return values are already marked `noreturn`,
but we were still generating return instructions for this. When running
with `-C passes=lint`, LLVM prints:
Unusual: Return statement in function with noreturn attribute
The LLVM manual makes a stronger statement about `noreturn` though:
> This produces undefined behavior at runtime if the function ever does
dynamically return.
We now emit an `abort` anywhere that would have tried to return an
uninhabited value.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
