| Age | Commit message (Collapse) | Author | Lines |
|---|
|
Check var scope if it exist
Fixes #92893.
Added helper function to check the scope of a variable, if it doesn't have a scope call delay_span_bug, which avoids us trying to get a block/scope that doesn't exist.
Had to increase `ROOT_ENTRY_LIMIT` was getting tidy error
|
|
Create (unstable) 2024 edition
[On Zulip](https://rust-lang.zulipchat.com/#narrow/stream/213817-t-lang/topic/Deprecating.20macro.20scoping.20shenanigans/near/272860652), there was a small aside regarding creating the 2024 edition now as opposed to later. There was a reasonable amount of support and no stated opposition.
This change creates the 2024 edition in the compiler and creates a prelude for the 2024 edition. There is no current difference between the 2021 and 2024 editions. Cargo and other tools will need to be updated separately, as it's not in the same repository. This change permits the vast majority of work towards the next edition to proceed _now_ instead of waiting until 2024.
For sanity purposes, I've merged the "hello" UI tests into a single file with multiple revisions. Otherwise we'd end up with a file per edition, despite them being essentially identical.
````@rustbot```` label +T-lang +S-waiting-on-review
Not sure on the relevant team, to be honest.
|
|
Stabilize `derive_default_enum`
This stabilizes `#![feature(derive_default_enum)]`, as proposed in [RFC 3107](https://github.com/rust-lang/rfcs/pull/3107) and tracked in #87517. In short, it permits you to `#[derive(Default)]` on `enum`s, indicating what the default should be by placing a `#[default]` attribute on the desired variant (which must be a unit variant in the interest of forward compatibility).
```````@rustbot``````` label +S-waiting-on-review +T-lang
|
|
`--extern-location` was an experiment to investigate the best way to
generate useful diagnostics for unused dependency warnings by enabling a
build system to identify the corresponding build config.
While I did successfully use this, I've since been convinced the
alternative `--json unused-externs` mechanism is the way to go, and
there's no point in having two mechanisms with basically the same
functionality.
This effectively reverts https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/pull/72603
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The current "This is supported" wording implies that it's possible to
still use the item on other configurations, but in an unsupported way.
Changing this to "Available" removes this ambiguity.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
when checking pointee metadata, canonicalize the `Sized` check
Use `infcx.predicate_must_hold_modulo_regions` with a `Sized` obligation instead of just calling `ty.is_sized`, because the latter does not canonicalize region and type vars (and in the test case I added in this PR, there's a region var in the `ParamEnv`).
Fixes #95311
|
|
|
|
|
|
Optimization have improved over time and now LLVM manages to optimize more
in-place-collect noop-iterators to O(1) functions. This updates the codegen test to match.
|
|
|
|
fix: wrong trait import suggestion for T:
The suggestion to bound `T` had an extra `:`.
```rust
fn foo<T:>(t: T) {
t.clone();
}
```
```
error[E0599]: no method named `clone` found for type parameter `T` in the current scope
--> src/lib.rs:2:7
|
2 | t.clone();
| ^^^^^ method not found in `T`
|
= help: items from traits can only be used if the type parameter is bounded by the trait
help: the following trait defines an item `clone`, perhaps you need to restrict type parameter `T` with it:
|
1 | fn foo<T: Clone:>(t: T) {
| ~~~~~~~~
```
Fixes: #95898
|
|
Improve Rustdoc UI for scraped examples with multiline arguments, fix overflow in line numbers
This PR improves a few aspects of the scrape examples feature in Rustdoc.
* Only function names and not the full call expression are highlighted.
* For call-sites with multiline arguments, the minimized code viewer will scroll to the top of the call-site rather than the middle if the argument is larger than the viewer size, ensuring that the function name is visible.
* This fixes an issue where the line numbers column had a visible x-scroll bar.
r? `@GuillaumeGomez`
|
|
|
|
Remove NodeIdHashingMode.
r? `@ghost`
|
|
|
|
Currently it just calls `truncate(0)`. `truncate()` is (a) not marked as
`#[inline]`, and (b) more general than needed for `clear()`.
This commit changes `clear()` to do the work itself. This modest change
was first proposed in rust-lang#74172, where the reviewer rejected it because
there was insufficient evidence that `Vec::clear()`'s performance
mattered enough to justify the change. Recent changes within rustc have
made `Vec::clear()` hot within `macro_parser.rs`, so the change is now
clearly worthwhile.
Although it doesn't show wins on CI perf runs, this seems to be because they
use PGO. But not all platforms currently use PGO. Also, local builds don't use
PGO, and `truncate` sometimes shows up in an over-represented fashion in local
profiles. So local profiling will be made easier by this change.
Note that this will also benefit `String::clear()`, because it just
calls `Vec::clear()`.
Finally, the commit removes the `vec-clear.rs` codegen test. It was
added in #52908. From before then until now, `Vec::clear()` just called
`Vec::truncate()` with a zero length. The body of Vec::truncate() has
changed a lot since then. Now that `Vec::clear()` is doing actual work
itself, and not just calling `Vec::truncate()`, it's not surprising that
its generated code includes a load and an icmp. I think it's reasonable
to remove this test.
|
|
diagnostics: regression test for spurrious "help: store this in the heap"
Closes #82446
|
|
prevent opaque types from appearing in impl headers
cc `@lqd`
opaque types are not distinguishable from their hidden type at the codegen stage. So we could either end up with cases where the hidden type doesn't implement the trait (which will thus ICE) or where the hidden type does implement the trait (so we'd be using its impl instead of the one written for the opaque type). This can even lead to unsound behaviour without unsafe code.
Fixes https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/issues/86411.
Fixes https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/issues/84660.
rebase of #87382 plus some diagnostic tweaks
|
|
Fix suggestions in case of `T:` bounds
This PR fixes a corner case in `suggest_constraining_type_params` that was causing incorrect suggestions.
For the following functions:
```rust
fn a<T:>(t: T) { [t, t]; }
fn b<T>(t: T) where T: { [t, t]; }
```
We previously suggested the following:
```text
...
help: consider restricting type parameter `T`
|
1 | fn a<T: Copy:>(t: T) { [t, t]; }
| ++++++
...
help: consider further restricting this bound
|
2 | fn b<T>(t: T) where T: + Copy { [t, t]; }
| ++++++
```
Note that neither `T: Copy:` not `where T: + Copy` is a correct bound.
With this commit the suggestions are correct:
```text
...
help: consider restricting type parameter `T`
|
1 | fn a<T: Copy>(t: T) { [t, t]; }
| ++++
...
help: consider further restricting this bound
|
2 | fn b<T>(t: T) where T: Copy { [t, t]; }
| ++++
```
r? `@compiler-errors`
I've tried fixing #95898 here too, but got too confused with how `suggest_traits_to_import` works and what it does :sweat_smile:
|
|
Delay a bug when we see SelfCtor in ref pattern
Fixes #95878
|
|
r=notriddle,GuillaumeGomez
Rustdoc: Discriminate required and provided associated constants and types
Currently, rustdoc merely separates required and provided associated _functions_ (i.e. methods). This PR extends this to constants (fixes #94652) and types. This makes the documentation of all three kinds of associated items more alike and consistent.
As an aside, associated types may actually be provided / have a default when users enable the unstable feature `associated_type_defaults`.
| Before | After |
|---|---|
|  |  |
|  |  |
### `clean::types::ItemKind` modification
* `ItemKind::TypedefItem(.., true)` → `ItemKind::AssocTypeItem(..)`
* `ItemKind::TypedefItem(.., false)` → `ItemKind::TypedefItem(..)`
Further, I added `ItemKind::TyAssoc{Const,Type}Item`, the “required” variant of `ItemKind::Assoc{Const,Type}Item`, analogous to `ItemKind::TyMethodItem` with `ItemKind::MethodItem`. These new variants don't contain new information really, they are just the result of me getting rid of the `Option<_>` field in `AssocConstItem` and `AssocTypeItem`.
**Goal**: Make associated items more consistent.
Originally I thought modifying `ItemKind` was necessary to achieve the new functionality of this PR but in retrospect, it does not. If you don't like the changes to `ItemKind`, I think I _can_ get rid of them.
This change is the root cause of those tiny changes in a lot of different files.
### Concerns and Open Questions
* **breaking changes** to hyperlinks: Some heading IDs change:
* `associated-const` (sic!) -> `{provided,required}-associated-consts`
* `associated-types` -> `{provided,required}-associated-types`
* **verbosity** of the headings _{Required,Provided} Associated {Constants,Types}_
* For some files, I am not sure if the changes I made are correct. So please take extra care when reviewing `conversions.rs` (conversion to JSON), `cache.rs`/`fold_item`, `stripper.rs`/`fold_item`, `check_doc_test_visibility.rs`/`should_have_doc_example`, `collect_intra_doc_links.rs`/`from_assoc_item`
* JSON output: I still map `AssocTypeItem`s to `Typedef` etc. (FIXME)
|
|
|
|
Co-authored-by: Michael Goulet <michael@errs.io>
Co-authored-by: Rémy Rakic <remy.rakic+github@gmail.com>
|
|
Closes #82446
|
|
Don't test -Cdefault-linker-libraries=yes when cross compiling.
See https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/pull/95727#issuecomment-1096603163 and the five comments below that.
Unblocks #95727.
|
|
rustdoc doctest: include signal number in exit status
Related to #95601
|
|
|
|
Co-authored-by: Guillaume Gomez <guillaume1.gomez@gmail.com>
|
|
Rollup of 5 pull requests
Successful merges:
- #95671 (feat: Allow usage of sudo [while not accessing root] in x.py)
- #95716 (sess: warn w/out fluent bundle w/ user sysroot)
- #95820 (simplify const params diagnostic on stable)
- #95900 (Fix documentation for wasm32-unknown-unknown)
- #95947 (`impl const Default for Box<[T]>` and `Box<str>`)
Failed merges:
r? `@ghost`
`@rustbot` modify labels: rollup
|
|
|
|
simplify const params diagnostic on stable
Resolves #95150
|
|
|
|
|
|
Instead of checking only the user provided sysroot or the default (when
no sysroot is provided), search user provided sysroot and then check
default sysroots for locale requested by the user.
Signed-off-by: David Wood <david.wood@huawei.com>
|
|
|
|
Fix a bad error message for `relative paths are not supported in visibilities` error
closes #95638
|
|
use `Span::find_ancestor_inside` to get right span in CastCheck
This is a quick fix. This bad suggestion likely lives in other places... but thought it would be useful to fix all of the CastCheck ones first.
Let me know if reviewer would prefer I add more tests for each of the diagnostics in CastCheck, or would like to do a more thorough review of other suggestions that use spans in typeck. I would also be open to further suggestions on how to better expose an API that gives us the "best" span for a diagnostic suggestion.
Fixed #95919
|
|
Fix crate_type attribute to not warn on duplicates
In #88681 I accidentally marked the `crate_type` attribute as only allowing a single attribute. However, multiple attributes are allowed (they are joined together [here](https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/blob/027a232755fa9728e9699337267f6675dfd0a8ba/compiler/rustc_interface/src/util.rs#L530-L542)). This fixes it to not report a warning if duplicates are found.
Closes #95902
|
|
Document the current MIR semantics that are clear from existing code
This PR adds documentation to places, operands, rvalues, statementkinds, and terminatorkinds that describes their existing semantics and requirements. In many places the semantics depend on the Rust memory model or other T-Lang decisions - when this is the case, it is just noted as such with links to UCG issues where possible. I'm hopeful that none of the documentation added here can be used to justify optimizations that depend on the memory model. The documentation for places and operands probably comes closest to running afoul of this - if people think that it cannot be merged as is, it can definitely also be taken out.
The goal here is to only document parts of MIR that seem to be decided already, or are at least depended on by existing code. That leaves quite a number of open questions - those are marked as "needs clarification." I'm not sure what to do with those in this PR - we obviously can't decide all these questions here. Should I just leave them in as is? Take them out? Keep them in but as `//` instead of `///` comments?
If this is too big to review at once, I can split this up.
r? rust-lang/mir-opt
|
|
fix Layout struct member naming style
|
|
|
|
|
