summary refs log tree commit diff
path: root/src/tools/compiletest
AgeCommit message (Collapse)AuthorLines
2025-05-07[win][arm64] Disable various DebugInfo tests that don't work on Arm64 WindowsDaniel Paoliello-0/+1
2025-05-04compiletest: Support matching on non-json lines in compiler outputVadim Petrochenkov-90/+49
and migrate most of remaining `error-pattern`s to it.
2025-05-03compiletest: Do not require annotations on empty labels and suggestionsVadim Petrochenkov-10/+13
2025-04-30compiletest: Make diagnostic kind mandatory on line annotationsVadim Petrochenkov-45/+28
2025-04-28compiletest: Remove the libtest-based executor and its dependencyZalathar-132/+7
This patch has deliberately been kept small and simple, to make it easier to revert if necessary. Further cleanup can take palce after we're confident that it won't need to be reverted.
2025-04-26Auto merge of #140288 - Zalathar:new-executor, r=jieyouxubors-7/+11
compiletest: Re-land using the new non-libtest executor by default This PR re-lands #139998, which had the misfortune of triggering download-rustc in its CI jobs, so we didn't get proper test metrics for comparison with the old implementation. So that was PR was reverted in #140233, with the intention of re-landing it alongside a dummy compiler change to inhibit download-rustc. --- Original PR description for #139998: >The new executor was implemented in #139660, but required a manual opt-in. This PR activates the new executor by default, but leaves the old libtest-based executor in place (temporarily) to make reverting easier if something unexpectedly goes horribly wrong. > >Currently the new executor can be explicitly disabled by passing the `-N` flag to compiletest (e.g. `./x test ui -- -N`), but eventually that flag will be removed, alongside the removal of the libtest dependency. The flag is mostly there to make manual comparative testing easier if something does go wrong. > >As before, there *should* be no user-visible difference between the old executor and the new executor. --- r? jieyouxu
2025-04-26Auto merge of #140177 - tmandry:compiletest-par, r=jieyouxubors-38/+60
[compiletest] Parallelize test discovery Certain filesystems are slow to service individual read requests, but can service many in parallel. This change brings down the time to run a single cached test on one of those filesystems from 40s to about 8s.
2025-04-25compiletest: Use the new non-libtest executor by default (2)Zalathar-7/+11
(Re-landing #139998, with a compiler change to inhibit download-rustc.) Currently the new executor can be explicitly disabled by passing the `-N` flag to compiletest (e.g. `./x test ui -- -N`), but eventually that flag will be removed, alongside the removal of the libtest dependency.
2025-04-25Auto merge of #140233 - Zalathar:revert-new-executor, r=jieyouxubors-11/+7
Revert compiletest new-executor, to re-land without download-rustc Revert <https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/pull/139998> because the original merge triggered download-rustc, which messes with test metrics and prevents us from properly comparing them before/after the change. The plan is to re-land this PR as-is, combined with a trivial compiler change to avoid download-rustc and get proper test metrics for comparison. This reverts commit be181dd75c83d72fcc95538e235768bc367b76b9, reversing changes made to 645d0ad2a4f145ae576e442ec5c73c0f8eed829b. r? ghost
2025-04-24Rollup merge of #140191 - Kobzol:remove-git-repository-from-git-config, ↵Matthias Krüger-5/+0
r=jieyouxu Remove git repository from git config It is no longer needed after https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/pull/138591. We could even remove the `nightly_branch` field, but it still has one usage. r? ``@jieyouxu``
2025-04-24Rollup merge of #140194 - jieyouxu:minicore-force-unwind-tables, r=bjorn3Matthias Krüger-2/+6
minicore: Have `//@ add-core-stubs` also imply `-Cforce-unwind-tables=yes` To preserve CFI directives in assembly tests, as `//@ add-core-stubs` already imply `-C panic=abort`. This is a blocker for https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/pull/140037#issuecomment-2816665358. cc ```@RalfJung``` r? ```@bjorn3```
2025-04-24Revert compiletest new-executor, to re-land without download-rustcZalathar-11/+7
Revert <https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/pull/139998> because the original merge triggered download-rustc, which messes with test metrics and prevents us from properly comparing them before/after the change. The plan is to re-land this PR as-is, combined with a trivial compiler change to avoid download-rustc and get proper test metrics for comparison. This reverts commit be181dd75c83d72fcc95538e235768bc367b76b9, reversing changes made to 645d0ad2a4f145ae576e442ec5c73c0f8eed829b.
2025-04-23Auto merge of #139998 - Zalathar:new-executor, r=onur-ozkanbors-7/+11
compiletest: Use the new non-libtest executor by default The new executor was implemented in #139660, but required a manual opt-in. This PR activates the new executor by default, but leaves the old libtest-based executor in place (temporarily) to make reverting easier if something unexpectedly goes horribly wrong. Currently the new executor can be explicitly disabled by passing the `-N` flag to compiletest (e.g. `./x test ui -- -N`), but eventually that flag will be removed, alongside the removal of the libtest dependency. The flag is mostly there to make manual comparative testing easier if something does go wrong. As before, there *should* be no user-visible difference between the old executor and the new executor. --- I didn't get much of a response to my [call for testing thread on Zulip](https://rust-lang.zulipchat.com/#narrow/channel/122651-general/topic/Call.20for.20testing.3A.20New.20test.20executor.20for.20compiletest/with/512452105), and the reports I did get (along with my own usage) indicate that there aren't any problems. So I think it's reasonable to move forward with making this the default, in the hopes of being able to remove the libtest dependency relatively soon. When the libtest dependency is removed, it should be reasonable to build compiletest against pre-built stage0 std by default, even after the stage0 redesign. (Though we should probably have at least one CI job using in-tree stage1 std instead, to guard against the possibility of the `#![feature(internal_output_capture)]` API actually changing.)
2025-04-23compiletest: `//@ add-core-stubs` implies `-Cforce-unwind-tables=yes`Jieyou Xu-2/+6
To preserve CFI directives in assembly tests.
2025-04-23Remove `git_repository` field from `GitConfig`Jakub Beránek-5/+0
It is no longer needed after a recent refactoring.
2025-04-23Auto merge of #138591 - Kobzol:git-ci, r=Mark-Simulacrumbors-1/+1
Refactor git change detection in bootstrap While working on https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/pull/138395, I finally found the courage to delve into the insides of git path change detection in bootstrap, which is used (amongst other things) to detect if we should rebuilt od download `[llvm|rustc|gcc]`. I found it a bit hard to understand, and given that this code was historically quite fragile, I thought that it would be better to rebuild it from scratch. The previous approach had a bunch of limitations: - It separated the computation of "are there local changes?" and "what upstream SHA should we use?" even though these two things are intertwined. - It used hacks to work around what happens on CI. - It had special cases for CI scattered throughout the codebase, rather than centralized in one place. - It wasn't documented enough and didn't have tests for the git behavior. The current approach should hopefully resolve all of that. I implemented a single entrypoint called `check_path_modifications` (naming bikeshed pending, half of the time I spend on this PR was thinking about names, as it's quite tricky here..) that explicitly receives a mode of operation (in CI or outside CI), and accordingly figures out that upstream SHA that we should use for downloading artifacts and it also figures out if there are any local changes. Users of this function can then use this unified output to implement `download-ci-X` and other functionality. Notably, this change detection no longer uses `git merge-base`, which makes it easier to use and doesn't require setting up remotes. I also added a bunch of integration tests that literally spawn a git repository on disk and then check that the function can deal with various situations (PR CI, auto/try CI, local builds). After I built this inner layer, I used it for downloading GCC, LLVM and rustc. The latter two (and especially rustc) were using the `last_modified_commit` function before, but in all cases but one this function was actually only used to check if there are any local changes, which was IMO confusing. The LLVM handling would deserve a bit of refactoring, but that's a larger change that can be done as a follow-up. I hope that the implementation is now clear and easy to understand, so that in combination with the tests we can have more confidence that it does what we want. I tried to include a lot of documentation in the code, so I won't be repeating the actual implementation details here, if there are any questions, I'll add the answers to the documentation too :) The new approach explicitly supports three scenarios: - Running on PR CI, where we have one upstream bors parent commit and one PR merge commit made by GitHub. - Running on try/auto CI, where we have one upstream bors parent commit and one PR merge commit made by bors. - Running locally, where we assume that we have at least one upstream bors parent commit in our git history. I removed the handling of upstreams on CI, as I think that it shouldn't be needed and I considered it to be a hack. However, it's possible that there are other use-cases that I haven't considered, so I want to ask around if people have other situations than the three use-cases described above. If there are other such use-cases, I would like to include them in the new centralized implementation and add them to the git test suite, rather than going back to the old ways :) In particular, the code before relied on `git merge-base`, but I don't see why we can't just lookup the most recent bors commit and assume that is a merge commit that is also upstream? I might be running into Chesterton's Fence here :) CC `@pietroalbini` To make sure that this won't break downstream users of Rust's CI. Best reviewed commit by commit. Companion PRs: - For testing beta: https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/pull/138597 r? `@onur-ozkan` Fixes: https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/issues/101907 try-job: x86_64-gnu-aux try-job: aarch64-gnu try-job: dist-x86_64-apple
2025-04-23compiletest: Use the new non-libtest executor by defaultZalathar-7/+11
Currently the new executor can be explicitly disabled by passing the `-N` flag to compiletest (e.g. `./x test ui -- -N`), but eventually that flag will be removed, alongside the removal of the libtest dependency.
2025-04-22[compiletest] Parallelize test discoveryTyler Mandry-38/+60
Certain filesystems for large monorepos are slow to service individual read requests, but can service many in parallel. This change brings down the time to run a single cached test on one of those filesystems from 40s to about 8s.
2025-04-22compiletest: Fix deadline bugs in new executorZalathar-21/+47
2025-04-21Use output dir for mir_dump_dirChris Denton-14/+3
2025-04-20Fix compiletest and doc commentJakub Beránek-1/+1
2025-04-20Remove `setup-upstream-remote.sh` and upstream handling.Jakub Beránek-1/+1
It shouldn't be needed anymore.
2025-04-18Rollup merge of #139393 - ↵Matthias Krüger-0/+3
willglynn:rustdoc_output_target_feature_information, r=aDotInTheVoid rustdoc-json: Output target feature information `#[target_feature]` attributes refer to a target-specific list of features. Enabling certain features can imply enabling other features. Certain features are always enabled on certain targets, since they are required by the target's ABI. Features can also be enabled indirectly based on other compiler flags. Feature information is ultimately known to `rustc`. Rather than force external tools to track it – which may be wildly impractical due to `-C target-cpu` – have `rustdoc` output `rustc`'s feature data. This change is motivated by https://github.com/obi1kenobi/cargo-semver-checks/issues/1246, which intends to detect semver hazards caused by `#[target_feature]`. try-job: aarch64-gnu try-job: armhf-gnu try-job: test-various try-job: x86_64-msvc-1 try-job: i686-msvc-1 try-job: x86_64-mingw-1 try-job: aarch64-apple
2025-04-17Rollup merge of #139967 - jieyouxu:auxiliary, r=wesleywiserMatthias Krüger-0/+11
Introduce and use specialized `//@ ignore-auxiliary` for test support files instead of using `//@ ignore-test` ### Summary Add a semantically meaningful directive for ignoring test *auxiliary* files. This is for auxiliary files that *participate* in actual tests but should not be built by `compiletest` (i.e. these files are involved through `mod xxx;` or `include!()` or `#[path = "xxx"]`, etc.). ### Motivation A specialized directive like `//@ ignore-auxiliary` makes it way easier to audit disabled tests via `//@ ignore-test`. - These support files cannot use the canonical `auxiliary/` dir because they participate in module resolution or are included, or their relative paths can be important for test intention otherwise. Follow-up to: - #139705 - #139783 - #139740 See also discussions in: - [#t-compiler > Directive name for non-test aux files?](https://rust-lang.zulipchat.com/#narrow/channel/131828-t-compiler/topic/Directive.20name.20for.20non-test.20aux.20files.3F/with/512773817) - [#t-compiler > Handling disabled &#96;//@ ignore-test&#96; tests](https://rust-lang.zulipchat.com/#narrow/channel/131828-t-compiler/topic/Handling.20disabled.20.60.2F.2F.40.20ignore-test.60.20tests/with/512005974) - [#t-compiler/meetings > &#91;steering&#93; 2025-04-11 Dealing with disabled tests](https://rust-lang.zulipchat.com/#narrow/channel/238009-t-compiler.2Fmeetings/topic/.5Bsteering.5D.202025-04-11.20Dealing.20with.20disabled.20tests/with/511717981) ### Remarks on remaining unconditionally disabled tests under `tests/` After this PR, against commit 79a272c6402, only **14** remaining test files are disabled through `//@ ignore-test`: <details> <summary>Remaining `//@ ignore-test` files under `tests/`</summary> ``` tests/debuginfo/drop-locations.rs 4://@ ignore-test (broken, see #128971) tests/rustdoc/macro-document-private-duplicate.rs 1://@ ignore-test (fails spuriously, see issue #89228) tests/rustdoc/inline_cross/assoc-const-equality.rs 3://@ ignore-test (FIXME: #125092) tests/ui/match/issue-27021.rs 7://@ ignore-test (#54987) tests/ui/match/issue-26996.rs 7://@ ignore-test (#54987) tests/ui/issues/issue-49298.rs 9://@ ignore-test (#54987) tests/ui/issues/issue-59756.rs 2://@ ignore-test (rustfix needs multiple suggestions) tests/ui/precondition-checks/write.rs 5://@ ignore-test (unimplemented) tests/ui/precondition-checks/read.rs 5://@ ignore-test (unimplemented) tests/ui/precondition-checks/write_bytes.rs 5://@ ignore-test (unimplemented) tests/ui/explicit-tail-calls/drop-order.rs 2://@ ignore-test: tail calls are not implemented in rustc_codegen_ssa yet, so this causes 🧊 tests/ui/panics/panic-short-backtrace-windows-x86_64.rs 3://@ ignore-test (#92000) tests/ui/json/json-bom-plus-crlf-multifile-aux.rs 3://@ ignore-test Not a test. Used by other tests tests/ui/traits/next-solver/object-soundness-requires-generalization.rs 2://@ ignore-test (see #114196) ``` </details> Of these, most are either **unimplemented**, or **spurious**, or **known-broken**. The outstanding one is `tests/ui/json/json-bom-plus-crlf-multifile-aux.rs` which I did not want to touch in *this* PR -- that aux file has load-bearing BOM and carriage returns and byte offset matters. I think those test files that require special encoding / BOM probably are better off as `run-make` tests. See #139968 for that aux file. ### Review advice - Best reviewed commit-by-commit. - The directive name diverged from the most voted `//@ auxiliary` because I think that's easy to confuse with `//@ aux-{crate,dir}`. r? compiler
2025-04-17Rollup merge of #139870 - ↵Matthias Krüger-14/+25
Shourya742:2025-04-15-add-retries-to-remove_and_create_dir_all, r=jieyouxu add retries to remove and create dir all closes: #139230 r? ```@jieyouxu```
2025-04-17compiletest: add specific `//@ ignore-auxiliary` for test support filesJieyou Xu-0/+11
This is for files that *participate* in actual tests but should not be built by `compiletest` (i.e. these files are involved through `mod xxx;` or `include!()` or `#[path = "xxx"]`, etc.). A specialized directive like `//@ ignore-auxiliary` makes it way easier to audit disabled tests via `//@ ignore-test`.
2025-04-16remove old remove_and_create_dir_all and use build_helpers ↵bit-aloo-14/+25
remove_and_create_dir_all
2025-04-16Rollup merge of #139823 - WaffleLapkin:bootpaper, r=jieyouxuMatthias Krüger-1/+8
Fix some bootstrap papercuts ... related to jj and my `./build` symlink setup[^1]. I'm not sure if these are good solutions, but they seem to work. See commits for a bit more info. r? ``@jieyouxu`` [^1]: see #139804
2025-04-15rustdoc: Output target feature informationWill Glynn-0/+3
`#[target_feature]` attributes refer to a target-specific list of features. Enabling certain features can imply enabling other features. Certain features are always enabled on certain targets, since they are required by the target's ABI. Features can also be enabled indirectly based on other compiler flags. Feature information is ultimately known to `rustc`. Rather than force external tools to track it -- which may be wildly impractical due to `-C target-cpu` -- have `rustdoc` output `rustc`'s feature data.
2025-04-15normalize canonical and non-canonical paths in compiletestWaffle Lapkin-5/+8
Apparently there are tests that print canonical paths *and* tests which print non-canonical paths. An example of the latter is `tests/ui/type_length_limit.rs`.
2025-04-15canonicalize test build dir before normalizing itWaffle Lapkin-1/+5
Fix fixes failures of the following tests when build directory is a symlink: - `tests/ui/error-codes/E{0464,0523}.rs` - `tests/ui/crate-loading/crateresolve{1,2}.rs` (those are the same tests)
2025-04-15fix typoWaffle Lapkin-1/+1
2025-04-15compiletest: Add an experimental new executor to replace libtestZalathar-11/+451
The new executor can be enabled by passing `--new-executor` or `-n` to compiletest. For example: `./x test ui -- -n`
2025-04-15compiletest: Extract libtest-specific executor code to a submoduleZalathar-103/+113
2025-04-13Rollup merge of #139695 - jieyouxu:compiletest-utf8path, r=KobzolJacob Pratt-433/+404
compiletest: consistently use `camino::{Utf8Path,Utf8PathBuf}` throughout compiletest already practically assumes UTF-8 paths everywhere. Use `camino`'s `{Utf8Path,Utf8PathBuf}` consistently throughout compiletest to enforce UTF-8 path assumptions. r? ```@Kobzol``` (or compiler/bootstrap)
2025-04-13compiletest: consistently use `{Utf8Path,Utf8PathBuf}`Jieyou Xu-433/+403
Since compiletest already assumes UTF-8 paths and does not try to be robust against non-UTF-8 paths.
2025-04-13compiletest: add `camino` for UTF-8 path handlingJieyou Xu-0/+1
2025-04-13Rollup merge of #139618 - petrochenkov:virsugg, r=jieyouxuChris Denton-38/+18
compiletest: Make `SUGGESTION` annotations viral If one of them is expected in a test file, then others should be annotated as well, in the same way as with `HELP`s and `NOTE`s. This doesn't require much of an additional annotation burden, but simplifies the rules. r? ```@jieyouxu```
2025-04-11Auto merge of #139578 - ferrocene:pa-compiletest-edition, r=jieyouxubors-3/+14
Fix breakage when running compiletest with `--test-args=--edition=2015` Compiletest has an `--edition` flag to change the default edition tests are run with. Unfortunately no test suite successfully executes when that flag is passed. If the edition is set to something greater than 2015 the breakage is expected, since the test suite currently supports only edition 2015 (Ferrous Systems will open an MCP about fixing that soonish). Surprisingly, the test suite is also broken if `--edition=2015` is passed to compiletest. This PR focuses on fixing the latter. This PR fixes the two categories of failures happening when `--edition=2015` is passed: * Some edition-specific tests set their edition through `//@ compile-flags` instead of `//@ edition`. Compiletest doesn't parse the compile flags, so it would see no `//@ edition` and add another `--edition` flag, leading to a rustc error. * Compiletest would add the edition after `//@ compile-flags`, while some tests depend on flags passed to `//@ compile-flags` being the last flags in the rustc invocation. Note that for the first category, I opted to manually go and replace all `//@ compile-flags` setting an edition with an explicit `//@ edition`. We could've changed compiletest to instead check whether an edition was set in `//@ compile-flags`, but I thought it was better to enforce a consistent way to set the edition in tests. I also added the edition to the stamp, so that changing `--edition` results in tests being re-executed. r? `@jieyouxu`
2025-04-11Rollup merge of #139469 - jieyouxu:compiletest-supports-crate-type, r=onur-ozkanStuart Cook-2/+117
Introduce a `//@ needs-crate-type` compiletest directive The `//@ needs-crate-type: $crate_types...` directive takes a comma-separated list of crate types that the target platform must support in order for the test to be run. This allows the test writer to semantically convey that the ignore condition is based on target crate type needs, instead of using a general purpose `//@ ignore-$target` directive (often without comment). Fixes #132309. ### Example ```rs //@ needs-crate-type: dylib (ignored on e.g. wasm32-unknown-unknown) //@ compile-flags: --crate-type=dylib fn foo() {} ``` ### Review advice - Best reviewed commit-by-commit. - The impl is not very clean, I briefly attempted to clean up the directive handling but found that more invasive changes are needed, so I'd like to not block on the cleanup for now. try-job: test-various try-job: armhf-gnu
2025-04-10compiletest: Trim the value of `dont-require-annotations`Vadim Petrochenkov-1/+1
2025-04-10compiletest: Turn `TestProps::require_annotations` into a setVadim Petrochenkov-46/+19
and further simplify its checking in runtest
2025-04-10compiletest: Make `SUGGESTION` annotations viralVadim Petrochenkov-3/+10
2025-04-10Rollup merge of #139609 - jieyouxu:compiletest-path-misc, r=KobzolMatthias Krüger-22/+23
compiletest: don't use stringly paths for `compose_and_run` Eventually I'd like to fully migrate to `camino`'s `{Utf8Path,Utf8PathBuf}` because compiletest assumes UTF-8 paths all over the place, so this is an precursor change to make the migration diff cleaner. r? `@Kobzol` (or bootstrap/compiler)
2025-04-10Rollup merge of #139606 - jieyouxu:compiletest-edition2024, r=compiler-errorsMatthias Krüger-15/+44
Update compiletest to Edition 2024 r? bootstrap (or compiler) try-job: x86_64-apple-1 try-job: x86_64-msvc-1 try-jbo: x86_64-mingw-1
2025-04-10Rollup merge of #139507 - Zalathar:trim-env-name, r=jieyouxuMatthias Krüger-16/+13
compiletest: Trim whitespace from environment variable names When a test contains a directive like `//@ exec-env: FOO=bar`, compiletest currently includes that leading space in the name of the environment variable, so it is defined as ` FOO` instead of `FOO`. This is an annoying footgun that is pretty much never intended, especially since most other directives *do* trim whitespace. So let's get rid of it by trimming the environment variable name. Values remain untrimmed, since there could conceivably be a use-case for values with leading space, but perhaps we'll end up trimming values too in the future. Recently observed in https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/pull/138603#issuecomment-2783709359. Fixes #132990. Supersedes #133148. --- try-job: test-various
2025-04-10include --edition in the compiletest stampPietro Albini-0/+1
2025-04-10prevent configuring the edition with //@compile-flagsPietro Albini-1/+7
2025-04-10ensure //@compile-flags are last even when passing --editionPietro Albini-2/+6
2025-04-10compiletest: update to Edition 2024Jieyou Xu-15/+44