| Age | Commit message (Collapse) | Author | Lines |
|---|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
diagnostics: do not repeat the entire message in the span label
|
|
test_dup: ensure the FDs remain in sync even after dup'ing
|
|
|
|
add SmallVec test
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Enable Non-determinism of float operations in Miri and change std tests
Links to [#4208](https://github.com/rust-lang/miri/issues/4208) and [#3555](https://github.com/rust-lang/miri/issues/3555) in Miri.
Non-determinism of floating point operations was disabled in rust-lang/rust#137594 because it breaks the tests and doc-tests in core/coretests and std. This PR enables some of them.
This pr includes the following changes:
- Enables the float non-determinism but with a lower relative error of 4ULP instead of 16ULP
- These operations now have a fixed output based on the C23 standard, except the pow operations, this is tracked in [#4286](https://github.com/rust-lang/miri/issues/4286#issue-3010677983)
- Changes tests that made incorrect assumptions about the operations, not to make that assumption anymore (from `assert_eq!` to `assert_approx_eq!`.
- Changed the doctests of the stdlib of these operations to compare against fixed constants instead of `f*::EPSILON`, which now succeed with Miri and `-Zmiri-many-seeds`
- Added a constant `APPROX_DELTA` in `std/tests/floats/f32.rs` which is used for approximation tests, but with a different value when run in Miri. This is to make these tests succeed.
- Added tests in the float tests of Miri to test the C23 behaviour.
Fixes https://github.com/rust-lang/miri/issues/4208
|
|
TB: Add flag to disable the more precise interior mutability tracking
|
|
|
|
|
|
const-eval error: always say in which item the error occurred
I don't see why "is this generic" should make a difference. It may be reasonable to key this on whether the error occurs in a `const fn` that was invoked by a const (making it non-obvious which constant it is) vs inside the body of the const.
r? `@oli-obk`
|
|
|
|
Update stdarch submodule
Updates the stdarch submodule.
## Merged PRs
- rust-lang/stdarch#1797
- rust-lang/stdarch#1758
- rust-lang/stdarch#1798
- rust-lang/stdarch#1811
- rust-lang/stdarch#1810
- rust-lang/stdarch#1807
- rust-lang/stdarch#1806
- rust-lang/stdarch#1812
- rust-lang/stdarch#1795
- rust-lang/stdarch#1796
- rust-lang/stdarch#1813
- rust-lang/stdarch#1816
- rust-lang/stdarch#1818
- rust-lang/stdarch#1820
- rust-lang/stdarch#1819
r? `@Amanieu`
`@rustbot` label T-libs-api
Closes rust-lang/rust#111137
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
also adjust the wording a little so that we don't say "the error occurred here" for two different spans
|
|
|
|
use File::lock to implement flock, and add a test for File::lock
|
|
|
|
r=traviscross,jieyouxu
Add a new `mismatched-lifetime-syntaxes` lint
The lang-team [discussed this](https://hackmd.io/nf4ZUYd7Rp6rq-1svJZSaQ) and I attempted to [summarize](https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/pull/120808#issuecomment-2701863833) their decision. The summary-of-the-summary is:
- Using two different kinds of syntax for elided lifetimes is confusing. In rare cases, it may even [lead to unsound code](https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/issues/48686)! Some examples:
```rust
// Lint will warn about these
fn(v: ContainsLifetime) -> ContainsLifetime<'_>;
fn(&'static u8) -> &u8;
```
- Matching up references with no lifetime syntax, references with anonymous lifetime syntax, and paths with anonymous lifetime syntax is an exception to the simplest possible rule:
```rust
// Lint will not warn about these
fn(&u8) -> &'_ u8;
fn(&'_ u8) -> &u8;
fn(&u8) -> ContainsLifetime<'_>;
```
- Having a lint for consistent syntax of elided lifetimes will make the [future goal](https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/issues/91639) of warning-by-default for paths participating in elision much simpler.
---
This new lint attempts to accomplish the goal of enforcing consistent syntax. In the process, it supersedes and replaces the existing `elided-named-lifetimes` lint, which means it starts out life as warn-by-default.
|
|
|
|
r=workingjubilee
UnsafePinned: also include the effects of UnsafeCell
This tackles https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/issues/137750 by including an `UnsafeCell` in `UnsafePinned`, thus imbuing it with all the usual properties of interior mutability (no `noalias` nor `dereferenceable` on shared refs, special treatment by Miri's aliasing model). The soundness issue is not fixed yet because coroutine lowering does not use `UnsafePinned`.
The RFC said that `UnsafePinned` would not permit mutability on shared references, but since then, https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/issues/137750 has demonstrated that this is not tenable. In the face of those examples, I propose that we do the "obvious" thing and permit shared mutable state inside `UnsafePinned`. This seems loosely consistent with the fact that we allow going from `Pin<&mut T>` to `&T` (where the former can be aliased with other pointers that perform mutation, and hence the same goes for the latter) -- but the `as_ref` example shows that we in fact would need to add this `UnsafeCell` even if we didn't have a safe conversion to `&T`, since for the compiler and Miri, `&T` and `Pin<&T>` are basically the same type.
To make this possible, I had to remove the `Copy` and `Clone` impls for `UnsafePinned`.
Tracking issue: https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/issues/125735
Cc ``@rust-lang/lang`` ``@rust-lang/opsem`` ``@Sky9x``
I don't think this needs FCP since the type is still unstable -- we'll finally decide whether we like this approach when `UnsafePinned` is moved towards stabilization (IOW, this PR is reversible). However, I'd still like to make sure that the lang team is okay with the direction I am proposing here.
|
|
|
|
Use the informative error as the main const eval error message
r? `@RalfJung`
I only did the minimal changes necessary to the const eval error machinery. I'd prefer not to mix test changes with refactorings 😆
|
|
This adds an `iter!` macro that can be used to create movable
generators.
This also adds a yield_expr feature so the `yield` keyword can be used
within iter! macro bodies. This was needed because several unstable
features each need `yield` expressions, so this allows us to stabilize
them separately from any individual feature.
Co-authored-by: Oli Scherer <github35764891676564198441@oli-obk.de>
Co-authored-by: Jieyou Xu <jieyouxu@outlook.com>
Co-authored-by: Travis Cross <tc@traviscross.com>
|
|
change tests in std, core and coretests.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Tokio `AsyncWriteExt::write` doesn't actually ensure that the contents
have written, it just *starts* the write operation. To ensure that the
file has actually been written, we need to `sync_all` first.
|
|
The test did `write` and `read` and hoped that it would read/write
everything, which doesn't always happen and caused CI failures.
Switch to `write_all` and `read_to_end` to make it more reliable.
|
|
|
|
Add Range parameter to `BTreeMap::extract_if` and `BTreeSet::extract_if`
This new parameter was requested in the btree_extract_if tracking issue: https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/issues/70530#issuecomment-2486566328
I attempted to follow the style used by `Vec::extract_if`.
Before:
```rust
impl<K, V, A: Allocator + Clone> BTreeMap<K, V, A> {
#[unstable(feature = "btree_extract_if", issue = "70530")]
pub fn extract_if<F>(&mut self, pred: F) -> ExtractIf<'_, K, V, F, A>
where
K: Ord,
F: FnMut(&K, &mut V) -> bool;
}
```
After:
```rust
impl<K, V, A: Allocator + Clone> BTreeMap<K, V, A> {
#[unstable(feature = "btree_extract_if", issue = "70530")]
pub fn extract_if<F, R>(&mut self, range: R, pred: F) -> ExtractIf<'_, K, V, R, F, A>
where
K: Ord,
R: RangeBounds<K>,
F: FnMut(&K, &mut V) -> bool;
}
```
Related: #70530
—
While I believe I have adjusted all of the necessary bits, as this is my first attempt to contribute to Rust, I may have overlooked something out of ignorance, but if you can point out any oversight, I shall attempt to remedy it.
|
|
TB: Track permissions on the byte-level
|
|
Co-authored-by: Ralf Jung <post@ralfj.de>
Co-authored-by: Johannes Hostert <jhostert@ethz.ch>
|
|
|
|
|
|
Implement file cloning on Windows
|
|
|
|
|
|
Add some track_caller info to precondition panics
Currently, when you encounter a precondition check, you'll always get the caller location of the implementation of the precondition checks. But with this PR, you'll be told the location of the invalid call. Which is useful.
I thought of this while looking at https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/pull/129642#issuecomment-2311703898.
The changes to `tests/ui/const*` happen because the const-eval interpreter skips `#[track_caller]` frames in its backtraces.
The perf implications of this are:
* Increased debug binary sizes. The caller_location implementation requires that the additional data we want to display here be stored in const allocations, which are deduplicated but not across crates. There is no impact on optimized build sizes. The panic path and the caller location data get optimized out.
* The compile time hit to opt-incr-patched bitmaps happens because the patch changes the line number of some function calls with precondition checks, causing us to go from 0 dirty CGUs to 1 dirty CGU.
* The other compile time hits are marginal but real, and due to doing a handful of new queries. Adding more useful data isn't completely free.
|
|
|
|
Support F_GETFL and F_SETFL for fcntl
|
|
|
