| Age | Commit message (Collapse) | Author | Lines |
|---|
|
merge rustc_attr_data_structures into rustc_hir
this move was discussed on zulip: [#t-compiler > attribute parsing rework @ đź’¬](https://rust-lang.zulipchat.com/#narrow/channel/131828-t-compiler/topic/attribute.20parsing.20rework/near/528530091)
Many PRs in the attribute rework depend on this move.
|
|
|
|
|
|
The macro was uniformed between rustc_const_eval and miri
|
|
lookup_link_section: support arrays of function pointers
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Add support for building and linking against genmc
|
|
|
|
|
|
introduce a macro for shim signature checking
|
|
Co-Authored-By: geetanshjuneja <ronitjuneja2002@gmail.com>
|
|
|
|
|
|
Miscellaneous fixes for tracing
|
|
Automatic Rustup
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Perfetto gives an error if an id does not fit in an 64-bit signed integer in 2's complement.
|
|
|
|
|
|
Pull recent changes from https://github.com/rust-lang/rust via Josh.
Upstream ref: b56aaec52bc0fa35591a872fb4aac81f606e265c
Filtered ref: 12f5e3255df658296af9fc953d8c1ab79ba91ea3
This merge was created using https://github.com/rust-lang/josh-sync.
|
|
This updates the rust-version file to b56aaec52bc0fa35591a872fb4aac81f606e265c.
|
|
|
|
|
|
Use `josh-sync` instead of `miri-script` for Josh synchronization
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
fix handling of base address for TypeId allocations
This fixes the problems discovered by ````@theemathas```` in https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/pull/142789:
- const-eval would sometimes consider TypeId pointers to be null
- the type ID is different in Miri than in regular executions
Both boil down to the same issue: the TypeId "allocation" has a guaranteed 0 base address, but const-eval assumes it was non-zero (like normal allocations) and Miri randomized it (like normal allocations).
r? ````@oli-obk````
|
|
Mitigate `#[align]` name resolution ambiguity regression with a rename
Mitigates beta regression rust-lang/rust#143834 after a beta backport.
### Background on the beta regression
The name resolution regression arises due to rust-lang/rust#142507 adding a new feature-gated built-in attribute named `#[align]`. However, unfortunately even [introducing new feature-gated unstable built-in attributes can break user code](https://www.github.com/rust-lang/rust/issues/134963) such as
```rs
macro_rules! align {
() => {
/* .. */
};
}
pub(crate) use align; // `use` here becomes ambiguous
```
### Mitigation approach
This PR renames `#[align]` to `#[rustc_align]` to mitigate the beta regression by:
1. Undoing the introduction of a new built-in attribute with a common name, i.e. `#[align]`.
2. Renaming `#[align]` to `#[rustc_align]`. The renamed attribute being `rustc_align` will not introduce new stable breakages, as attributes beginning with `rustc` are reserved and perma-unstable. This does mean existing nightly code using `fn_align` feature will additionally need to specify `#![feature(rustc_attrs)]`.
This PR is very much a short-term mitigation to alleviate time pressure from having to fully fix the current limitation of inevitable name resolution regressions that would arise from adding any built-in attributes. Long-term solutions are discussed in [#t-lang > namespacing macro attrs to reduce conflicts with new adds](https://rust-lang.zulipchat.com/#narrow/channel/213817-t-lang/topic/namespacing.20macro.20attrs.20to.20reduce.20conflicts.20with.20new.20adds/with/529249622).
### Alternative mitigation options
[Various mitigation options were considered during the compiler triage meeting](https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/issues/143834#issuecomment-3084415277), and those consideration are partly reproduced here:
- Reverting the PR doesn't seem very minimal/trivial, and carries risks of its own.
- Rename to a less-common but aim-to-stabilization name is itself not safe nor convenient, because (1) that risks introducing new regressions (i.e. ambiguity against the new name), and (2) lang would have to FCP the new name hastily for the mitigation to land timely and have a chance to be backported. This also makes the path towards stabilization annoying.
- Rename the attribute to a rustc attribute, which will be perma-unstable and does not cause new ambiguities in stable code.
- This alleviates the time pressure to address *this* regression, or for lang to have to rush an FCP for some new name that can still break user code.
- This avoids backing out a whole implementation.
### Review advice
This PR is best reviewed commit-by-commit.
- Commit 1 adds a test `tests/ui/attributes/fn-align-nameres-ambiguity-143834.rs` which demonstrates the current name resolution regression re. `align`. This test fails against current master.
- Commit 2 carries out the renames and test reblesses. Notably, commit 2 will cause `tests/ui/attributes/fn-align-nameres-ambiguity-143834.rs` to change from fail (nameres regression) to pass.
This PR, if the approach still seems acceptable, will need a beta-backport to address the beta regression.
|
|
non-deterministically truncate reads/writes
|
|
Rollup of 8 pull requests
Successful merges:
- rust-lang/rust#144144 (tests: Skip supported-crate-types test on musl hosts)
- rust-lang/rust#144159 (opt-dist: change build_dir field to be an actual build dir)
- rust-lang/rust#144162 (Debug impls for DropElaborators)
- rust-lang/rust#144189 (Add non-regression test for rust-lang/rust#144168)
- rust-lang/rust#144216 (Don't consider unstable fields always-inhabited)
- rust-lang/rust#144229 (Miri subtree update)
- rust-lang/rust#144230 (Option::as_slice: fix comment)
- rust-lang/rust#144235 (Fix run-make tests on musl hosts)
r? `@ghost`
`@rustbot` modify labels: rollup
|
|
|
|
|
|
Miri subtree update
r? `@ghost`
|
|
|
|
|
|
Give a message with a span on MIR validation error
It was handy to get a source+line link for rust-lang/rust#143833, even if it's just to the function and not necessarily to the statement.
r? mir
|
