| Age | Commit message (Collapse) | Author | Lines |
|---|
|
fix handling of base address for TypeId allocations
This fixes the problems discovered by ````@theemathas```` in https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/pull/142789:
- const-eval would sometimes consider TypeId pointers to be null
- the type ID is different in Miri than in regular executions
Both boil down to the same issue: the TypeId "allocation" has a guaranteed 0 base address, but const-eval assumes it was non-zero (like normal allocations) and Miri randomized it (like normal allocations).
r? ````@oli-obk````
|
|
Mitigate `#[align]` name resolution ambiguity regression with a rename
Mitigates beta regression rust-lang/rust#143834 after a beta backport.
### Background on the beta regression
The name resolution regression arises due to rust-lang/rust#142507 adding a new feature-gated built-in attribute named `#[align]`. However, unfortunately even [introducing new feature-gated unstable built-in attributes can break user code](https://www.github.com/rust-lang/rust/issues/134963) such as
```rs
macro_rules! align {
() => {
/* .. */
};
}
pub(crate) use align; // `use` here becomes ambiguous
```
### Mitigation approach
This PR renames `#[align]` to `#[rustc_align]` to mitigate the beta regression by:
1. Undoing the introduction of a new built-in attribute with a common name, i.e. `#[align]`.
2. Renaming `#[align]` to `#[rustc_align]`. The renamed attribute being `rustc_align` will not introduce new stable breakages, as attributes beginning with `rustc` are reserved and perma-unstable. This does mean existing nightly code using `fn_align` feature will additionally need to specify `#![feature(rustc_attrs)]`.
This PR is very much a short-term mitigation to alleviate time pressure from having to fully fix the current limitation of inevitable name resolution regressions that would arise from adding any built-in attributes. Long-term solutions are discussed in [#t-lang > namespacing macro attrs to reduce conflicts with new adds](https://rust-lang.zulipchat.com/#narrow/channel/213817-t-lang/topic/namespacing.20macro.20attrs.20to.20reduce.20conflicts.20with.20new.20adds/with/529249622).
### Alternative mitigation options
[Various mitigation options were considered during the compiler triage meeting](https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/issues/143834#issuecomment-3084415277), and those consideration are partly reproduced here:
- Reverting the PR doesn't seem very minimal/trivial, and carries risks of its own.
- Rename to a less-common but aim-to-stabilization name is itself not safe nor convenient, because (1) that risks introducing new regressions (i.e. ambiguity against the new name), and (2) lang would have to FCP the new name hastily for the mitigation to land timely and have a chance to be backported. This also makes the path towards stabilization annoying.
- Rename the attribute to a rustc attribute, which will be perma-unstable and does not cause new ambiguities in stable code.
- This alleviates the time pressure to address *this* regression, or for lang to have to rush an FCP for some new name that can still break user code.
- This avoids backing out a whole implementation.
### Review advice
This PR is best reviewed commit-by-commit.
- Commit 1 adds a test `tests/ui/attributes/fn-align-nameres-ambiguity-143834.rs` which demonstrates the current name resolution regression re. `align`. This test fails against current master.
- Commit 2 carries out the renames and test reblesses. Notably, commit 2 will cause `tests/ui/attributes/fn-align-nameres-ambiguity-143834.rs` to change from fail (nameres regression) to pass.
This PR, if the approach still seems acceptable, will need a beta-backport to address the beta regression.
|
|
Rollup of 8 pull requests
Successful merges:
- rust-lang/rust#144144 (tests: Skip supported-crate-types test on musl hosts)
- rust-lang/rust#144159 (opt-dist: change build_dir field to be an actual build dir)
- rust-lang/rust#144162 (Debug impls for DropElaborators)
- rust-lang/rust#144189 (Add non-regression test for rust-lang/rust#144168)
- rust-lang/rust#144216 (Don't consider unstable fields always-inhabited)
- rust-lang/rust#144229 (Miri subtree update)
- rust-lang/rust#144230 (Option::as_slice: fix comment)
- rust-lang/rust#144235 (Fix run-make tests on musl hosts)
r? `@ghost`
`@rustbot` modify labels: rollup
|
|
Miri subtree update
r? `@ghost`
|
|
|
|
|
|
Give a message with a span on MIR validation error
It was handy to get a source+line link for rust-lang/rust#143833, even if it's just to the function and not necessarily to the statement.
r? mir
|
|
interpret: fix TypeId pointers being considered data pointers
Fixes https://github.com/rust-lang/miri/issues/4477
r? ````@oli-obk````
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
update dependencies
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Rollup of 10 pull requests
Successful merges:
- rust-lang/rust#141076 (fix Zip unsoundness (again))
- rust-lang/rust#142444 (adding run-make test to autodiff)
- rust-lang/rust#143704 (Be a bit more careful around exotic cycles in in the inliner)
- rust-lang/rust#144073 (Don't test panic=unwind in panic_main.rs on Fuchsia)
- rust-lang/rust#144083 (miri sleep tests: increase slack)
- rust-lang/rust#144092 (bootstrap: Detect musl hosts)
- rust-lang/rust#144098 (Do not lint private-in-public for RPITIT)
- rust-lang/rust#144103 (Rename `emit_unless` to `emit_unless_delay`)
- rust-lang/rust#144108 (Ignore tests/run-make/link-eh-frame-terminator/rmake.rs when cross-compiling)
- rust-lang/rust#144115 (fix outdated comment)
r? `@ghost`
`@rustbot` modify labels: rollup
|
|
float-nondet
|
|
|
|
miri sleep tests: increase slack
Filing this directly as a rustc PR since it impacts rustc CI (see https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/pull/144075#issuecomment-3085293055)
r? `````@oli-obk`````
|
|
|
|
|
|
From `#[align]` -> `#[rustc_align]`. Attributes starting with `rustc`
are always perma-unstable and feature-gated by `feature(rustc_attrs)`.
See regression RUST-143834.
For the underlying problem where even introducing new feature-gated
unstable built-in attributes can break user code such as
```rs
macro_rules! align {
() => {
/* .. */
};
}
pub(crate) use align; // `use` here becomes ambiguous
```
refer to RUST-134963.
Since the `#[align]` attribute is still feature-gated by
`feature(fn_align)`, we can rename it as a mitigation. Note that
`#[rustc_align]` will obviously mean that current unstable user code
using `feature(fn_aling)` will need additionally `feature(rustc_attrs)`,
but this is a short-term mitigation to buy time, and is expected to be
changed to a better name with less collision potential.
See
<https://rust-lang.zulipchat.com/#narrow/channel/238009-t-compiler.2Fmeetings/topic/.5Bweekly.5D.202025-07-17/near/529290371>
where mitigation options were considered.
|
|
Show the offset, length and memory of uninit read errors
r? ``@RalfJung``
I want to improve memory dumps in general. Not sure yet how to do so best within rust diagnostics, but in a perfect world I could generate a dummy in-memory file (that contains the rendered memory dump) that we then can then provide regular rustc `Span`s to. So we'd basically report normal diagnostics for them with squiggly lines and everything.
|
|
and ensure we don't unwind out of the "weird state" during tracing
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
fix `-Zsanitizer=kcfi` on `#[naked]` functions
fixes https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/issues/143266
With `-Zsanitizer=kcfi`, indirect calls happen via generated intermediate shim that forwards the call. The generated shim preserves the attributes of the original, including `#[unsafe(naked)]`. The shim is not a naked function though, and violates its invariants (like having a body that consists of a single `naked_asm!` call).
My fix here is to match on the `InstanceKind`, and only use `codegen_naked_asm` when the instance is not a `ReifyShim`. That does beg the question whether there are other `InstanceKind`s that could come up. As far as I can tell the answer is no: calling via `dyn` seems to work find, and `#[track_caller]` is disallowed in combination with `#[naked]`.
r? codegen
````@rustbot```` label +A-naked
cc ````@maurer```` ````@rcvalle````
|
|
|
|
|
|
triagebot: tweak welcome message
|
|
|
|
|
|
Make frame spans appear on a separate trace line
This PR changes tracing_chrome's `tracing::Layer` so that if a span has the "tracing_separate_line" field as one of the span arguments, that span is put on a separate trace line. See https://github.com/rust-lang/miri/pull/4451 for an earlier attempt and for screenshots explaining better what I mean by "separate trace line".
This PR also makes the "frame" span use this feature (so it appears on a separate trace line, see https://github.com/rust-lang/miri/pull/4451 for motivation), but passes `tracing::field::Empty` as the span parameter value so it is ignored by other tracing layers (e.g. the logger):
```rust
info_span!("frame", tracing_separate_line = Empty, "{}", instance);
```
<details><summary>Also see the following discussion I had with ``@RalfJung</summary>``
> Is there no way to attach metadata we could use instead?
[These](https://docs.rs/tracing-core/0.1.34/src/tracing_core/metadata.rs.html#57) are the **static** metadata items we can control about a span. We can't add more metadata outside of them. The most relevant are:
- `name` (for the frame span it's currently "frame")
- `target` which acts as the category (for the frame span it's currently "rustc_const_eval::interpret::stack" by default)
- `fields` which contains a list of the *names* of each of the arguments passed to the `span!` macro (for the frame span it's currently ["message"], where "message" is the default identifier for data passed in the `format!` syntax)
When the tracing code is called at runtime, the **dynamic** values of the arguments are collected into a [`ValueSet`](https://docs.rs/tracing-core/0.1.34/src/tracing_core/field.rs.html#166). Each argument value stored there corresponds with one of the static names stored in `fields` (see above).
---
We have already determined that filtering out spans by `name` is not a good idea, and I would say the same goes for `target`. Both the `name` and the `target` fields are printed to stderr when `MIRI_LOG=` is enabled, so changing them to contain an identifier (e.g. "frame:tracing_separate_root" instead of "frame" as the name) would uselessly clutter the text logs (unless we add one more filter [there](https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/blob/master/compiler/rustc_log/src/lib.rs#L137), but then it gets even more complicated).
```rust
// examples of how the above (problematic) solutions would look like
info_span!("frame:tracing_separate_root", "{}", instance);
info_span!(target: "tracing_separate_root", "frame", "{}", instance);
```
---
So that leaves us with `fields` and their runtime values. Now, my initial thought (inspired by [this comment](https://github.com/rust-lang/miri/pull/4451#issuecomment-3068072303)) was to use a field with the static name "tracing_separate_root" and with a dynamic boolean value of "true". In `tracing_chrome.rs` we can easily check if this field is true and act accordingly. This would work but then again this field would also be picked up by the logger when `MIRI_LOG=` is enabled, and would uselessly clutter the text logs.
```rust
// example of how the above (problematic) solution would look like
info_span!("frame", tracing_separate_root = true, "{}", instance);
```
---
To avoid cluttering the text logs, we can instead set "tracing_separate_root" to the dynamic value of `tracing::field::Empty`. Citing from [here](https://docs.rs/tracing/0.1.41/tracing/field/struct.Empty.html), "when a field’s value is `Empty`, it will not be recorded". "not being recorded" means that the field and its value won't be printed to stderr text logs, nor will it be printed by any other tracing layers that might be attached in the future. In `tracing_chrome.rs` we would still be able to check if "tracing_separate_root" is in the list of static `fields`, and act accordingly. So I believe this solution would effectively allow us to attach metadata to a span in a way that does not clutter logs and still allows being read in `tracing_chrome.rs`.
If we ever wanted to pass arbitrary metadata (i.e. not just a present/not present flag), it would be possible with a custom `Empty` that also holds data and implement `Value` without doing anything ([like `Empty` does](https://docs.rs/tracing-core/0.1.34/src/tracing_core/field.rs.html#775)).
```rust
// example of how the above solution would look like
info_span!("frame", tracing_separate_root = tracing::field::Empty, "{}", instance);
```
</details>
|
|
|
|
|
|
Miri subtree update
r? `@ghost`
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Add tracing to `InterpCx::fn_abi_of_instance/fn_abi_of_fn_ptr`
This PR adds tracing to the `InterpCx::fn_abi_of_instance`/`::fn_abi_of_fn_ptr` functions by shadowing `FnAbiOf`'s trait methods with inherent methods on `InterpCx`, like done in rust-lang/rust#142721. The reason why I am targeting these two functions is because they are used for Miri interpretation, and they make a `layout_of` query down the line without passing through the `layout_of` that was traced in rust-lang/rust#142721.
There are other places where `layout_of` is called without being traced (see the analysis below), but that's because the `Machine` used there is not `MiriMachine` but rather `CompileTimeMachine` which does not implement `enter_trace_span()`. But after discussing with ```````@RalfJung``````` we agreed that the const-eval part should not be traced together with Miri, that's why I am ignoring the other places where `layout_of` is called.
r? ```````@RalfJung```````
<details><summary>Analysis of the places where <code>layout_of</code> is called</summary>
I did some analysis for https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/pull/142721#discussion_r2171494841, and these are all the places where the query `tcx.layout_of` is called (directly or indirectly) outside of a traced `InterpCx::layout_of` while a program is being interpreted by Miri:
```
adjust_for_rust_scalar at ./compiler/rustc_ty_utils/src/abi.rs:302:35
{closure#2} at ./compiler/rustc_ty_utils/src/abi.rs:522:25
eval_body_using_ecx<> at ./compiler/rustc_const_eval/src/const_eval/eval_queries.rs:49:22
{closure#1}<> at ./compiler/rustc_const_eval/src/interpret/operand.rs:851:76
{closure#0}<> at ./compiler/rustc_const_eval/src/interpret/stack.rs:612:18
size_and_align at ./compiler/rustc_middle/src/mir/interpret/mod.rs:387:38
```
I got these by:
- patching rustc with this patch that adds a span to the `layout_of` query which prints the backtrace:
[layout_of_other_places.diff.txt](https://github.com/user-attachments/files/21235523/layout_of_other_places.diff.txt)
- adding this to my bootstrap.toml to have debug symbols inside the Miri binary: `rust.debuginfo-level = "line-tables-only"` and also `build.tool.miri.features = ["tracing"]`
- obtaining a trace file with `MIRI_TRACING=1 ./x.py run miri --stage 1 --warnings warn --args src/tools/miri/tests/pass/hello.rs` (note: maybe using a file different than "src/tools/miri/tests/pass/hello.rs" would lead to more places where layout_of is called?)
- running this query in Perfetto to select all `layout_of` spans that have as a direct parent a span named "frame" (as opposed to the parent being `InterpCx::layout_of`) and extract their backtrace: `select args.string_value from slice left join args on slice.arg_set_id = args.id where slice.name = "tcx.layout_of" and slice.parent_id in (select slice2.id from slice as slice2 where slice2.name = "frame") group by args.string_value`
- exporting the data as `.tsv` and processing that file through this Python script. It finds the first path in the backtraces where "layout" isn't mentioned, which imo is a good heuristic to not consider `layout_of` wrappers/friends as call places, but rather go down the backtrace until an actual call place is reached. [layout_of_other_places.py.txt](https://github.com/user-attachments/files/21235529/layout_of_other_places.py.txt)
</details>
|
|
miri: fix out-of-bounds error for ptrs with negative offsets
r? ```````@oli-obk```````
|
|
|
|
Add support for global constructors (i.e. life before main)
|
