about summary refs log tree commit diff
path: root/src/tools/miri
AgeCommit message (Collapse)AuthorLines
2025-02-24Preparing for merge from rustcRalf Jung-1/+1
2025-02-23Rollup merge of #137483 - bend-n:😅, r=NoratriebTrevor Gross-6/+6
rename sub_ptr to offset_from_unsigned i also made `byte_sub_ptr` `byte_offset_from_unsigned` fixes #137121 tracking issue #95892
2025-02-23Rollup merge of #136543 - RalfJung:round-ties-even, r=tgross35Trevor Gross-8/+8
intrinsics: unify rint, roundeven, nearbyint in a single round_ties_even intrinsic LLVM has three intrinsics here that all do the same thing (when used in the default FP environment). There's no reason Rust needs to copy that historically-grown mess -- let's just have one intrinsic and leave it up to the LLVM backend to decide how to lower that. Suggested by `@hanna-kruppe` in https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/issues/136459; Cc `@tgross35` try-job: test-various
2025-02-23rename sub_ptr 😅bendn-6/+6
2025-02-23stabilize extract_ifbendn-1/+0
2025-02-23Auto merge of #137237 - cuviper:stage0, r=Mark-Simulacrumbors-1/+0
Master bootstrap update https://forge.rust-lang.org/release/process.html#master-bootstrap-update-tuesday r? `@Mark-Simulacrum`
2025-02-23Rollup merge of #137383 - folkertdev:stabilize-unsigned-is-multiple-of, ↵Matthias Krüger-1/+0
r=Noratrieb stabilize `unsigned_is_multiple_of` tracking issue: https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/issues/128101 fcp completed in: https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/issues/128101#issuecomment-2674880635 ### Public API A version of this for all the unsigned types ```rust fn is_multiple_of(lhs: u64, rhs: u64) -> bool { match rhs { // prevent division by zero 0 => lhs == 0, _ => lhs % rhs == 0, } } ```
2025-02-23Rollup merge of #137121 - bend-n:master, r=NoratriebMatthias Krüger-3/+0
stabilize `(const_)ptr_sub_ptr` Tracking issue: #95892 Closes #95892 FCP Completed: https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/issues/95892#issuecomment-2561139730 r? ````@Noratrieb````
2025-02-21stabilize `unsigned_is_multiple_of`Folkert de Vries-1/+0
2025-02-21Add testsbjorn3-0/+40
2025-02-21Fix review commentsbjorn3-7/+7
2025-02-21Implement vpmaxq_u8 on aarch64bjorn3-13/+83
2025-02-21Resolve some FIXME from socketpair testtiif-6/+2
2025-02-20Add explanation commentJakub Beránek-0/+1
Co-authored-by: Ralf Jung <post@ralfj.de>
2025-02-20Remove GitHub job summariesJakub Beránek-9/+4
They don't seem to be used by miri contributors, and they pollute job summaries in rust-lang/rust.
2025-02-20Rollup merge of #135296 - lukas-code:dyn-leak-check, r=compiler-errorsMatthias Krüger-0/+75
interpret: adjust vtable validity check for higher-ranked types ## What Transmuting between trait objects where a generic argument or associated type only differs in bound regions (not bound at or above the trait object's binder) is now UB. For example * transmuting between `&dyn Trait<for<'a> fn(&'a u8)>` and `&dyn Trait<fn(&'static u8)>` is UB. * transmuting between `&dyn Trait<Assoc = for<'a> fn(&'a u8)>` and `&dyn Trait<Assoc = fn(&'static u8)>` is UB. * transmuting between `&dyn Trait<for<'a> fn(&'a u8) -> (&'a u8, &'static u8)>` and `&dyn Trait<for<'a> fn(&'a u8) -> (&'static u8, &'a u8)>` is UB. Transmuting between subtypes (in either direction) is still allowed, which means that bound regions that are bound at or above the trait object's binder can still be changed: * transmuting between `&dyn for<'a> Trait<fn(&'a u8)>` and `&dyn for Trait<fn(&'static u8)>` is fine. * transmuting between `&dyn for<'a> Trait<dyn Trait<fn(&'a u8)>>` and `&dyn for Trait<dyn Trait<fn(&'static u8)>>` is fine. ## Why Very similar to https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/issues/120217 and https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/issues/120222, changing a trait object's generic argument to a type that only differs in bound regions can still affect the vtable layout and lead to segfaults at runtime (for an example see `src/tools/miri/tests/fail/validity/dyn-transmute-inner-binder.rs`). Since we already already require that the trait object predicates must be equal modulo bound regions, it is only natural to extend this check to also require type equality considering bound regions. However, it also makes sense to allow transmutes between a type and a subtype thereof. For example `&dyn for<'a> Trait<&'a u8>` is a subtype of `&dyn Trait<&'static ()>` and they are guaranteed to have the same vtable, so it makes sense to allow this transmute. So that's why bound lifetimes that are bound to the trait object itself are treated as free lifetime for the purpose of this check. Note that codegen already relies on the property that subtyping cannot change the the vtable and this is asserted here (note the leak check): https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/blob/251206c27b619ccf3a08e2ac4c525dc343f08492/compiler/rustc_codegen_ssa/src/base.rs#L106-L153 Furthermore, we allow some pointer-to-pointer casts like `*const dyn for<'a> Trait<&'a u8>` to `*const Wrapper<dyn Trait<&'static u8>>` that instantiate the trait object binder and are currently lowered to a single pointer-to-pointer cast in MIR (`CastKind::PtrToPtr`) and *not* an unsizing coercion (`CastKind::PointerCoercion(Unsize)`), so the current MIR lowering of these would be UB if we didn't allow subtyping transmutes. --- fixes https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/issues/135230 cc `@rust-lang/opsem` r? `@compiler-errors` for the implementation
2025-02-19Merge from rustcThe Miri Cronjob Bot-0/+2
2025-02-19Preparing for merge from rustcThe Miri Cronjob Bot-1/+1
2025-02-18Rollup merge of #136750 - kornelski:ub-bug, r=saethlinUrgau-0/+2
Make ub_check message clear that it's not an assert I've seen a user assume that their unsound code was *safe*, because ub_check prevented the program from performing the unsafe operation. This PR makes the panic message clearer that ub_check is a bug detector, not run-time safety protection.
2025-02-18update `cfg(bootstrap)`Josh Stone-1/+0
2025-02-17Merge from rustcThe Miri Cronjob Bot-4/+4
2025-02-17Preparing for merge from rustcThe Miri Cronjob Bot-1/+1
2025-02-17stabilize (const_)ptr_sub_ptrbendn-3/+0
2025-02-16add erf and erfc to nondet tests, and reduce how much we're changing the ↵Ralf Jung-125/+48
float test
2025-02-16apply random float error to most floating-point operationsLorrensP-2158466-84/+403
2025-02-16Rollup merge of #136986 - ehuss:library-unsafe-fun, r=NoratriebMatthias Krüger-4/+4
Apply unsafe_op_in_unsafe_fn to the standard library This applies unsafe_op_in_unsafe_fn to the standard library in preparation for updating to Rust 2024. Closes https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/issues/127747 (I think?) cc ``@workingjubilee`` I have been testing a variety of targets, and I feel like they are all pretty much covered. I'll continue doing some testing async, but I don't expect to catch any more.
2025-02-16Merge from rustcRalf Jung-0/+15
2025-02-16Preparing for merge from rustcRalf Jung-1/+1
2025-02-16Make ub_check message clear that it's not an assertKornel-0/+2
2025-02-15Merge from rustcThe Miri Cronjob Bot-0/+5
2025-02-15Preparing for merge from rustcThe Miri Cronjob Bot-1/+1
2025-02-15Auto merge of #136324 - GrigorenkoPV:erf, r=tgross35bors-0/+15
Implement `f{16,32,64,128}::{erf,erfc}` (`#![feature(float_erf)]`) Tracking issue: #136321 try-job: x86_64-gnu-aux
2025-02-14add x86-sse2 (32bit) ABI that requires SSE2 target featureRalf Jung-0/+5
2025-02-14miri: shims for `erf` & friendsPavel Grigorenko-0/+15
2025-02-14Bless miri tests after applying unsafe_op_in_unsafe_fnEric Huss-4/+4
2025-02-14Remove the build script for miribjorn3-12/+7
Setting the TARGET env var can be replaced with using rustc_session::config::host_tuple at runtime. And the check-cfg can be replaced with using the lints section in Cargo.toml.
2025-02-13Merge from rustcThe Miri Cronjob Bot-3/+49
2025-02-13Preparing for merge from rustcThe Miri Cronjob Bot-1/+1
2025-02-12Auto merge of #135994 - 1c3t3a:rename-unsafe-ptr, r=oli-obkbors-3/+3
Rename rustc_middle::Ty::is_unsafe_ptr to is_raw_ptr The wording unsafe pointer is less common and not mentioned in a lot of places, instead this is usually called a "raw pointer". For the sake of uniformity, we rename this method. This came up during the review of https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/pull/134424. r? `@Noratrieb`
2025-02-12Change swap_nonoverlapping from lang to library UBBen Kimock-0/+46
2025-02-11Merge from rustcThe Miri Cronjob Bot-21/+0
2025-02-11Preparing for merge from rustcThe Miri Cronjob Bot-1/+1
2025-02-10Auto merge of #135701 - calebzulawski:sync-from-portable-simd-2025-01-18, ↵bors-21/+0
r=workingjubilee Portable SIMD subtree update r? `@workingjubilee`
2025-02-10Convert more missed placesBastian Kersting-3/+3
2025-02-08Merge from rustcThe Miri Cronjob Bot-24/+17
2025-02-08Preparing for merge from rustcThe Miri Cronjob Bot-1/+1
2025-02-07Rollup merge of #135945 - estebank:useless-parens, r=compiler-errorsMatthias Krüger-15/+15
Remove some unnecessary parens in `assert!` conditions While working on #122661, some of these started triggering our "unnecessary parens" lints due to a change in the `assert!` desugaring. A cursory search identified a few more. Some of these have been carried from before 1.0, were a bulk rename from the previous name of `assert!` left them in that state. I went and removed as many of these unnecessary parens as possible in order to have fewer annoyances in the future if we make the lint smarter.
2025-02-07fmtThe Miri Cronjob Bot-1/+1
2025-02-07Merge from rustcThe Miri Cronjob Bot-3/+2
2025-02-07Preparing for merge from rustcThe Miri Cronjob Bot-1/+1