| Age | Commit message (Collapse) | Author | Lines |
|---|
|
|
|
|
|
fix: include description in label details when detail field is marked for …
Fixes https://github.com/rust-lang/rust-analyzer/issues/18231.
When omitting the autocomplete detail field, the autocomplete label details can still be returned. Currently the label details are missing the description field if the detail field is included in resolveSupport since it is being overwritten as None and opted to be sent with `completionItem/resolve`.
Example completion capabilities.
```
completion = {
completionItem = {
commitCharactersSupport = true,
deprecatedSupport = true,
documentationFormat = { "markdown", "plaintext" },
insertReplaceSupport = true,
insertTextModeSupport = {
valueSet = { 1, 2 }
},
labelDetailsSupport = true,
preselectSupport = true,
resolveSupport = {
properties = { "documentation", "detail", "additionalTextEdits", "sortText", "filterText", "insertText", "textEdit", "insertTextFormat", "insertTextMode" }
},
snippetSupport = true,
tagSupport = {
valueSet = { 1 }
}
}
```
|
|
lsp: fix completion_item something_to_resolve not being a latch to true
while looking at #18245 i noticed that `something_to_resolve` could technically flap between true -> false if some subsequent fields that were requested to be resolved were empty.
this fixes that by using `|=` instead of `=` when assigning to `something_to_resolve` which will prevent it from going back to false once set.
although some cases it's simply assigning to `true` i opted to continue to use `|=` there for uniformity sake. but happy to change those back to `=`'s.
cc `@SomeoneToIgnore`
|
|
fix: Fix `prettify_macro_expansion()` when the node isn't the whole file
Fixes #18238.
|
|
|
|
This ensures that when being on an `await` token, it still only
highlights the yield points and not the exit points.
|
|
|
|
before, when formatting struct constructor for `struct S(usize, usize)` it would format as:
extern "rust-call" S(usize, usize) -> S
but after this change, we'll format as:
fn S(usize, usize) -> S
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Because damnit, it can crash r-a. Why do people make this stupid DFSes anyway (I get it, it's easier until it blows).
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
internal: add json `tracing` Layer for profiling startup
On `buck2/integrations/rust-project`, this results in the following being printed:
```json
{"name":"discover_command","elapsed_ms":18703}
{"name":"parallel_prime_caches","elapsed_ms":0}
{"name":"vfs_load","elapsed_ms":5895}
{"name":"vfs_load","elapsed_ms":547}
{"name":"parallel_prime_caches","elapsed_ms":23}
{"name":"parallel_prime_caches","elapsed_ms":84}
{"name":"parallel_prime_caches","elapsed_ms":5819}
```
|
|
|
|
internal: Filter out opaque tokens in some IDE feature macro descensions
|
|
|
|
When providing a custom rustfmt command, join it with the project
root instead of the workspace root. This fixes rust-analyzer
getting the wrong invocation path in projects containing subprojects.
This makes the behaviour consistent with how a custom path provided
in rust-analyzer.procMacro.server behaves already.
Resolves issue #18222
|
|
|
|
fix: Fix bootstrap error message being incorrect
precedence ...
|
|
|
|
|
|
Just like we don't check for types containing unknown.
|
|
|
|
fix: Fix resolution of label inside macro
When working on Something Else (TM) (I left a hint in the commits :P), I noticed to my surprise that labels inside macros are not resolved. This led to a discovery of *two* unrelated bugs, which are hereby fixed in two commits.
|
|
them textually, instead reuse the results of HIR lowering
This fixes a bug where labels inside macros were not resolved, but more importantly this prepares us to a future where we have hygiene, and textual equivalence isn't enough to resolve identifiers.
|
|
internal: Send less data during `textDocument/completion` if possible
Similar to https://github.com/rust-lang/rust-analyzer/pull/15522, stops sending extra data during `textDocument/completion` if that data was set in the client completions resolve capabilities, and sends those only during `completionItem/resolve` requests.
Currently, rust-analyzer sends back all fields (including potentially huge docs) for every completion item which might get large.
Same as the other one, this PR aims to keep the changes minimal and does not remove extra computations for such fields — instead, it just filters them out before sending to the client.
The PR omits primitive, boolean and integer, types such as `deprecated`, `preselect`, `insertTextFormat`, `insertTextMode`, etc. AND `additionalTextEdits` — this one looks very dangerous to compute for each completion item (as the spec says we ought to if there's no corresponding resolve capabilities provided) due to the diff computations and the fact that this code had been in the resolution for some time.
It would be good to resolve this lazily too, please let me know if it's ok to do.
When tested with Zed which only defines `documentation` and `additionalTextEdits` in its client completion resolve capabilities, rust-analyzer starts to send almost 3 times less characters:
Request:
```json
{"jsonrpc":"2.0","id":104,"method":"textDocument/completion","params":{"textDocument":{"uri":"file:///Users/someonetoignore/work/rust-analyzer/crates/ide/src/inlay_hints.rs"},"position":{"line":90,"character":14},"context":{"triggerKind":1}}}
```
<img width="1338" alt="image" src="https://github.com/user-attachments/assets/104f19b5-7095-4fc1-b008-5d829623b2e2">
Before: 381944 characters
[before.json](https://github.com/user-attachments/files/17092385/before.json)
After: 140503 characters
[after.json](https://github.com/user-attachments/files/17092386/after.json)
After Zed's [patch](https://github.com/zed-industries/zed/pull/18212) to enable all resolving possible: 84452 characters
[after-after.json](https://github.com/user-attachments/files/17092755/after-after.json)
|
|
fix: Ambiguity with CamelCase diagnostic messages, align with rustc warnings
Fixed diagnostic messages so they say UpperCamelCase rather than CamelCase, as it is ambiguous.
Usually I'd call it PascalCase, but in the code base it is called UpperCamelCase so I left it with that naming choice.
`rustc` says `upper camel case` also when the case is wrong
```
warning: trait `testThing` should have an upper camel case name
--> src/main.rs:5:7
|
5 | trait testThing {
| ^^^^^^^^^ help: convert the identifier to upper camel case: `TestThing`
|
= note: `#[warn(non_camel_case_types)]` on by default
```
This is in line with the UPPER_SNAKE_CASE diagnostic messages.
https://github.com/rust-lang/rust-analyzer/blob/546339a7be357b3e95fc4b79a8816dce540d477b/crates/hir-ty/src/diagnostics/decl_check.rs#L60
https://github.com/rust-lang/rust-analyzer/blob/546339a7be357b3e95fc4b79a8816dce540d477b/crates/ide-diagnostics/src/handlers/incorrect_case.rs#L535
|
|
feat: Provide an config option to not set `cfg(test)`
Fixes #17957.
|
|
This will mean users opting to not activate `cfg(test)` will lose IDE experience on them, which is quite unfortunate, but this is unavoidable if we want to avoid false positives on e.g. diagnostics. The real fix is to provide IDE experience even for cfg'ed out code, but this is out of scope for this PR.
|
|
|
|
Rename object_safety
First PR here (yay!), so I read some of the getting started docs. There are a couple references to `handlers.rs`, which as far as I can tell has been refactored into `handlers/*.rs`. I made some tweaks to that in one commit. There is one fixme about a function called `to_lsp_runnable`, which I can't find anywhere at all. I can update that if I get some more info there.
Otherwise I changed references to object safety, is object safe, etc., trying to match case/style as I went. There was one case I found where there's a trait from somewhere else called `is_object_safe`, which I found defined in my cargo registry. I didn't touch that for now, just marked it with a fixme
|
|
|
|
internal: allow overriding proc macro server in analysis-stats
Needed this argument in order to profile the proc macro expansion server (c.f., [this Zulip conversation](https://rust-lang.zulipchat.com/#narrow/stream/185405-t-compiler.2Frust-analyzer/topic/.60macro_rules!.60-based.20macros.20for.20derives.2Fattributes/near/473466794)). I also took the opportunity to change the phrasing for `--proc-macro-srv`.
Ran with `samply record ~/.cargo/bin/rust-analyzer analysis-stats --proc-macro-srv /Users/dbarsky/.cargo/bin/rust-analyzer-proc-macro-srv --parallel .` on rust-analyzer itself.
|
|
|
|
Up to a trait implemented by another package, linking to
$CARGO_HOME/registry/cache/index.crates.io-6f17d22bba15001f/
|
|
|
