| Age | Commit message (Collapse) | Author | Lines |
|
|
|
Rollup of 9 pull requests
Successful merges:
- #122670 (Fix bug where `option_env!` would return `None` when env var is present but not valid Unicode)
- #131095 (Use environment variables instead of command line arguments for merged doctests)
- #131339 (Expand set_ptr_value / with_metadata_of docs)
- #131652 (Move polarity into `PolyTraitRef` rather than storing it on the side)
- #131675 (Update lint message for ABI not supported)
- #131681 (Fix up-to-date checking for run-make tests)
- #131702 (Suppress import errors for traits that couldve applied for method lookup error)
- #131703 (Resolved python deprecation warning in publish_toolstate.py)
- #131710 (Remove `'apostrophes'` from `rustc_parse_format`)
r? `@ghost`
`@rustbot` modify labels: rollup
|
|
Add `&pin (mut|const) T` type position sugar
This adds parser support for `&pin mut T` and `&pin const T` references. These are desugared to `Pin<&mut T>` and `Pin<&T>` in the AST lowering phases.
This PR currently includes #130526 since that one is in the commit queue. Only the most recent commits (bd450027eb4a94b814a7dd9c0fa29102e6361149 and following) are new.
Tracking:
- #130494
r? `@compiler-errors`
|
|
|
|
Retire the `unnamed_fields` feature for now
`#![feature(unnamed_fields)]` was implemented in part in #115131 and #115367, however work on that feature has (afaict) stalled and in the mean time there have been some concerns raised (e.g.[^1][^2]) about whether `unnamed_fields` is worthwhile to have in the language, especially in its current desugaring. Because it represents a compiler implementation burden including a new kind of anonymous ADT and additional complication to field selection, and is quite prone to bugs today, I'm choosing to remove the feature.
However, since I'm not one to really write a bunch of words, I'm specifically *not* going to de-RFC this feature. This PR essentially *rolls back* the state of this feature to "RFC accepted but not yet implemented"; however if anyone wants to formally unapprove the RFC from the t-lang side, then please be my guest. I'm just not totally willing to summarize the various language-facing reasons for why this feature is or is not worthwhile, since I'm coming from the compiler side mostly.
Fixes #117942
Fixes #121161
Fixes #121263
Fixes #121299
Fixes #121722
Fixes #121799
Fixes #126969
Fixes #131041
Tracking:
* https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/issues/49804
[^1]: https://rust-lang.zulipchat.com/#narrow/stream/213817-t-lang/topic/Unnamed.20struct.2Funion.20fields
[^2]: https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/issues/49804#issuecomment-1972619108
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Rollup of 4 pull requests
Successful merges:
- #131331 (Revert "warn_old_master_branch" check)
- #131344 (Avoid `&Lrc<T>` in various places)
- #131346 (Restrict `ignore-mode-*` directives)
- #131353 (Add documentation for `runtest::check_rustdoc_test_option` method)
r? `@ghost`
`@rustbot` modify labels: rollup
|
|
Avoid `&Lrc<T>` in various places
Seeing `&Lrc<T>` is a bit suspicious, and `&T` or `Lrc<T>` is often better.
r? `@oli-obk`
|
|
codemountains:rename-nestedmetaitem-to-metaitemlnner, r=nnethercote
Rename `NestedMetaItem` to `MetaItemInner`
Fixes #131087
r? `@nnethercote`
|
|
|
|
It's simpler and more concise.
|
|
- fix for divergence
- fix error message
- fix another cranelift test
- fix some cranelift things
- don't set the NORETURN option for naked asm
- fix use of naked_asm! in doc comment
- fix use of naked_asm! in run-make test
- use `span_bug` in unreachable branch
|
|
also disallow the `noreturn` option, and infer `naked_asm!` as `!`
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Stabilize `unsafe_attributes`
# Stabilization report
## Summary
This is a tracking issue for the RFC 3325: unsafe attributes
We are stabilizing `#![feature(unsafe_attributes)]`, which makes certain attributes considered 'unsafe', meaning that they must be surrounded by an `unsafe(...)`, as in `#[unsafe(no_mangle)]`.
RFC: rust-lang/rfcs#3325
Tracking issue: #123757
## What is stabilized
### Summary of stabilization
Certain attributes will now be designated as unsafe attributes, namely, `no_mangle`, `export_name`, and `link_section` (stable only), and these attributes will need to be called by surrounding them in `unsafe(...)` syntax. On editions prior to 2024, this is simply an edition lint, but it will become a hard error in 2024. This also works in `cfg_attr`, but `unsafe` is not allowed for any other attributes, including proc-macros ones.
```rust
#[unsafe(no_mangle)]
fn a() {}
#[cfg_attr(any(), unsafe(export_name = "c"))]
fn b() {}
```
For a table showing the attributes that were considered to be included in the list to require unsafe, and subsequent reasoning about why each such attribute was or was not included, see [this comment here](https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/pull/124214#issuecomment-2124753464)
## Tests
The relevant tests are in `tests/ui/rust-2024/unsafe-attributes` and `tests/ui/attributes/unsafe`.
|
|
This lets us compare a `Token` with a `TokenKind`. It's used a lot, but
can be used even more, avoiding the need for some `.kind` uses.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Remove stray println from rustfmt's `rewrite_static`
r? `@calebcartwright` `@ytmimi` -- though anyone should probably r+ this so it gets into nightly sooner than later, since it's obviously wrong.
This can just be fixed in-tree, since I don't think we want to wait until the next sync to fix this.
Fix https://github.com/rust-lang/rustfmt/issues/6210
Fix https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/issues/126887
|
|
Implement `use<>` formatting in rustfmt
This PR implements formatting for precise-capturing `use<>` syntax as proposed in https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/pull/126753.
The syntax is implemented as-if the `use<>` bound were a trait bound but with the `use` keyword as its path segment identifier.
I opted to develop this in the rust-lang/rust tree since I'm not certain when the next rustfmt subtree sync is going to be, and I'd rather not block landing nightly support for `use<>` on something I have no control over. If ``@rust-lang/rustfmt`` would rather I move this PR over to that repository, then I would at least like to know when the next rustfmt->rust subtree sync is going to be, since stabilizing `precise_capturing` without formatting will be disruptive.
This implementation is otherwise rather straightforward.
Tracking:
- https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/issues/123432
|
|
|
|
Rework pattern and expression nonterminal kinds.
Some tweaks to `NonterminalKind` that will assist with #124141. Details in the individual commits.
r? compiler-errors
cc ```@eholk```
|
|
|
|
Merge `PatParam`/`PatWithOr`, and `Expr`/`Expr2021`, for a few reasons.
- It's conceptually nice, because the two pattern kinds and the two
expression kinds are very similar.
- With expressions in particular, there are several places where both
expression kinds get the same treatment.
- It removes one unreachable match arm.
- Most importantly, for #124141 I will need to introduce a new type
`MetaVarKind` that is very similar to `NonterminalKind`, but records a
couple of extra fields for expression metavars. It's nicer to have a
single `MetaVarKind::Expr` expression variant to hold those extra
fields instead of duplicating them across two variants
`MetaVarKind::{Expr,Expr2021}`. And then it makes sense for patterns
to be treated the same way, and for `NonterminalKind` to also be
treated the same way.
I also clarified the comments, because I have long found them a little
hard to understand.
|
|
|
|
|
|
sync-from-rustfmt-24-06
|
|
This paves the way for tracking more state (e.g. error tainting) in the diagnostic context handle
|
|
|
|
r=davidtwco"
This reverts commit 57dad1d75e562ff73051c1c43b07eaf65c7dbd74, reversing
changes made to 36316df9fe6c3e246153fe6e78967643cf08c148.
|
|
Unsafe extern blocks
This implements RFC 3484.
Tracking issue #123743 and RFC https://github.com/rust-lang/rfcs/pull/3484
This is better reviewed commit by commit.
|
|
The `Input::File` and `Input::Text` cases should be very similar.
However, currently the `Input::File` case uses `catch_unwind` because,
until recently (#125815) there was a fallible version of
`new_parser_from_source_str` but only an infallible version of
`new_parser_from_file`. This difference wasn't fundamental, just an
overlooked gap in the API of `rustc_parse`.
Both of those operations are now fallible, so the `Input::File` and
`Input::Text` cases can made more similar, with no need for
`catch_unwind`. This also lets us simplify an `Option<Vec<Diag>>` to
`Vec<Diag>`.
|
|
Currently we have an awkward mix of fallible and infallible functions:
```
new_parser_from_source_str
maybe_new_parser_from_source_str
new_parser_from_file
(maybe_new_parser_from_file) // missing
(new_parser_from_source_file) // missing
maybe_new_parser_from_source_file
source_str_to_stream
maybe_source_file_to_stream
```
We could add the two missing functions, but instead this commit removes
of all the infallible ones and renames the fallible ones leaving us with
these which are all fallible:
```
new_parser_from_source_str
new_parser_from_file
new_parser_from_source_file
source_str_to_stream
source_file_to_stream
```
This requires making `unwrap_or_emit_fatal` public so callers of
formerly infallible functions can still work.
This does make some of the call sites slightly more verbose, but I think
it's worth it for the simpler API. Also, there are two `catch_unwind`
calls and one `catch_fatal_errors` call in this diff that become
removable thanks this change. (I will do that in a follow-up PR.)
|
|
It's a zero-value wrapper of `Parser::new`.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|