| Age | Commit message (Collapse) | Author | Lines |
|---|
|
miri: fail when calling a function that requires an unavailable target feature
miri will report an UB when calling a function that has a `#[target_feature(enable = ...)]` attribute is called and the required feature is not available.
"Available features" are the same that `is_x86_feature_detected!` (or equivalent) reports to be available during miri execution (which can be enabled or disabled with the `-C target-feature` flag).
|
|
|
|
Update Clippy
r? `@Manishearth`
|
|
|
|
:arrow_up: `rust-analyzer`
r? `@ghost`
|
|
|
|
Add a sparc-unknown-none-elf target.
# `sparc-unknown-none-elf`
**Tier: 3**
Rust for bare-metal 32-bit SPARC V7 and V8 systems, e.g. the Gaisler LEON3.
## Target maintainers
- Jonathan Pallant, `jonathan.pallant@ferrous-systems.com`, https://ferrous-systems.com
## Requirements
> Does the target support host tools, or only cross-compilation?
Only cross-compilation.
> Does the target support std, or alloc (either with a default allocator, or if the user supplies an allocator)?
Only tested with `libcore` but I see no reason why you couldn't also support `liballoc`.
> Document the expectations of binaries built for the target. Do they assume
specific minimum features beyond the baseline of the CPU/environment/etc? What
version of the OS or environment do they expect?
Tested by linking with a standard SPARC bare-metal toolchain - specifically I used the [BCC2] toolchain from Gaisler (both GCC and clang variants, both pre-compiled for x64 Linux and compiling my own SPARC GCC from source to run on `aarch64-apple-darwin`).
The target is set to use the lowest-common-denominator `SPARC V7` architecture (yes, they started at V7 - see [Wikipedia](https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/SPARC#History)).
[BCC2]: https://www.gaisler.com/index.php/downloads/compilers
> Are there notable `#[target_feature(...)]` or `-C target-feature=` values that
programs may wish to use?
`-Ctarget-cpu=v8` adds the instructions added in V8.
`-Ctarget-cpu=leon3` adds the V8 instructions and sets up scheduling to suit the Gaisler LEON3.
> What calling convention does `extern "C"` use on the target?
I believe this is defined by the SPARC architecture reference manuals and V7, V8 and V9 are all compatible.
> What format do binaries use by default? ELF, PE, something else?
ELF
## Building the target
> If Rust doesn't build the target by default, how can users build it? Can users
just add it to the `target` list in `config.toml`?
Yes. I did:
```toml
target = ["aarch64-apple-darwin", "sparc-unknown-none-elf"]
```
## Building Rust programs
> Rust does not yet ship pre-compiled artifacts for this target. To compile for
this target, you will either need to build Rust with the target enabled (see
"Building the target" above), or build your own copy of `core` by using
`build-std` or similar.
Correct.
## Testing
> Does the target support running binaries, or do binaries have varying
expectations that prevent having a standard way to run them?
No - it's a bare metal platform.
> If users can run binaries, can they do so in some common emulator, or do they need native
hardware?
But if you use [BCC2] as the linker, you get default memory map suitable for the LEON3, and a default BSP for the LEON3, and so you can run the binaries in the `tsim-leon3` simulator from Gaisler.
```console
$ cat .cargo/config.toml | grep runner
runner = "tsim-leon3 -c sim-commands.txt"
$ cat sim-commands.txt
run
quit
$ cargo +sparcrust run --targe=sparc-unknown-none-elf
Compiling sparc-demo-rust v0.1.0 (/work/sparc-demo-rust)
Finished dev [unoptimized + debuginfo] target(s) in 3.44s
Running `tsim-leon3 -c sim-commands.txt target/sparc-unknown-none-elf/debug/sparc-demo-rust`
TSIM3 LEON3 SPARC simulator, version 3.1.9 (evaluation version)
Copyright (C) 2023, Frontgrade Gaisler - all rights reserved.
This software may only be used with a valid license.
For latest updates, go to https://www.gaisler.com/
Comments or bug-reports to support@gaisler.com
This TSIM evaluation version will expire 2023-11-28
Number of CPUs: 2
system frequency: 50.000 MHz
icache: 1 * 4 KiB, 16 bytes/line (4 KiB total)
dcache: 1 * 4 KiB, 16 bytes/line (4 KiB total)
Allocated 8192 KiB SRAM memory, in 1 bank at 0x40000000
Allocated 32 MiB SDRAM memory, in 1 bank at 0x60000000
Allocated 8192 KiB ROM memory at 0x00000000
section: .text, addr: 0x40000000, size: 104400 bytes
section: .rodata, addr: 0x400197d0, size: 15616 bytes
section: .data, addr: 0x4001d4d0, size: 1176 bytes
read 1006 symbols
Initializing and starting from 0x40000000
Hello, this is Rust!
PANIC: PanicInfo { payload: Any { .. }, message: Some(I am a panic), location: Location { file: "src/main.rs", line: 33, col: 5 }, can_unwind: true }
Program exited normally on CPU 0.
```
> Does the target support running the Rust testsuite?
I don't think so, the testsuite requires `libstd` IIRC.
## Cross-compilation toolchains and C code
> Does the target support C code?
Yes.
> If so, what toolchain target should users use to build compatible C code? (This may match the target triple, or it may be a toolchain for a different target triple, potentially with specific options or caveats.)
I suggest [BCC2] from Gaisler. It comes in both GCC and Clang variants.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
style checks: use latest rustc for cron job
|
|
|
|
Some of the output was quite verbose in CI logs, this should help with that.
|
|
|
|
|
|
miri will report an UB when calling a function that has a `#[target_feature(enable = ...)]` attribute is called and the required feature is not available.
"Available features" are the same that `is_x86_feature_detected!` (or equivalent) reports to be available during miri execution (which can be enabled or disabled with the `-C target-feature` flag).
|
|
misc bootstrap cleanups
- rename `detail_exit_macro` to `exit`
- remove unnecessary `Builder::new_standalone` function
- support `x suggest` with build-metrics
|
|
this makes the panics on nested GHA groups more useful
|
|
This also adds a dynamic check that we don't emit nested groups, since GHA currently doesn't support them.
|
|
|
|
update Miri
This fixes a pretty nasty bug in the tag GC.
r? ghost
|
|
Print artifact sizes in `opt-dist`
The Python PGO script printed a nice table of artifact sizes (`librustc_driver.so`, `libLLVM.so`, ...) at the end of the CI run, which was useful to quickly see the sizes of important files. I forgot to port this functionality into the Rust (`opt-dist`) version in https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/pull/112235. This PR fixes that.
r? bootstrap
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Bump bootstrap to 1.72 beta
|
|
Allow to have `-` in rustdoc-json test file name
I extracted this commit from https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/pull/113574.
When I added the test, it kept saying that the JSON file couldn't be found. After investigating for a while, I discovered that we were expecting files to always use `_`, which is quite bad. So I added support for `-` in file names.
r? ``@notriddle``
|
|
Test simd-wide-sum for codegen error
This adds the necessary test infrastructure to "build-pass" codegen tests, for the purpose of doing that for a single revision of a codegen test. When mir-opts are tested, the output may vary from the usual, and maybe for positive reasons... but we don't necessarily want to output such bad LLVMIR that LLVM starts crashing on it.
Currently when enabling MIR opts at higher levels this LLVMIR is still emitted, but it was previously disabled for getting in mir-opt's way and as this new revision without `// [mir-opt3]build-pass` would make it more likely to, I would like to not see the testing for the actual results regress again just because it was bundled with an ICE check as well.
This fixes https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/issues/98016
|
|
Update cargo
10 commits in 45782b6b8afd1da042d45c2daeec9c0744f72cc7..694a579566a9a1482b20aff8a68f0e4edd99bd28
2023-07-05 16:54:51 +0000 to 2023-07-11 22:28:29 +0000
- fix(embedded): Always generate valid package names (rust-lang/cargo#12349)
- fix(embedded): Error on unsupported commands (rust-lang/cargo#12350)
- chore(ci): Automatically test new packages by using `--workspace` (rust-lang/cargo#12342)
- contrib docs: Add some more detail about how publishing works (rust-lang/cargo#12344)
- docs: Put cargo-add change under nightly (rust-lang/cargo#12343)
- Minor: Use "number" instead of "digit" when explaining Cargo's use of semver (rust-lang/cargo#12340)
- Update criterion (rust-lang/cargo#12338)
- Add profile strip to config docs. (rust-lang/cargo#12337)
- update re: multiple versions that differ only in the metadata tag (rust-lang/cargo#12335)
- doc: state `PackageId`/`SourceId` string is opaque (rust-lang/cargo#12313)
r? ``@ghost``
|
|
Implement selection for `Unsize` for better coercion behavior
In order for much of coercion to succeed, we need to be able to deal with partial ambiguity of `Unsize` traits during selection. However, I pessimistically implemented selection in the new trait solver to just bail out with ambiguity if it was a built-in impl:
https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/blob/9227ff28aff55b252314076fcf21c9a66f10ac1e/compiler/rustc_trait_selection/src/solve/eval_ctxt/select.rs#L126
This implements a proper "rematch" procedure for dealing with built-in `Unsize` goals, so that even if the goal is ambiguous, we are able to get nested obligations which are used in the coercion selection-like loop:
https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/blob/9227ff28aff55b252314076fcf21c9a66f10ac1e/compiler/rustc_hir_typeck/src/coercion.rs#L702
Second commit just moves a `resolve_vars_if_possible` call to fix a bug where we weren't detecting a trait upcasting to occur.
r? ``@lcnr``
|
|
`detail` and `macro` weren't adding any info.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Ignore flaky clippy tests.
These tests are frequently failing due to an issue in ui_test. ui_test doesn't appear to have a blanket ignore instruction that I could find, so I just approximated it with ignoring both 32 and 64 bit.
Fixes #113585
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
r=oli-obk
(re-)tighten sourceinfo span of adjustments in MIR
Diagnostics rely on the spans of MIR statements being (approximately) correct in order to give suggestions relative to that span (i.e. `shrink_to_hi` and `shrink_to_lo`).
I discovered that we're *intentionally* lowering THIR exprs with their parent expr's span if they come from adjustments that are due to a parent expression. While I understand why that may be desirable to demonstrate the relationship of an adjustment and the expression that requires it, it leads to
1. very verbose borrowck output
2. incorrect spans for suggestions
Some diagnostics get around that by giving suggestions relative to other spans we've collected during MIR lowering, such as the span of the method's identifier (e.g. `name` in `.name()`), but this doesn't work too well when things come from desugaring.
I assume it also has lead to numerous tweaks and complications to diagnostics code down the road, which this PR doesn't necessarily aim to fix but may open the gates to fixing later... The last three commits are simplifications due to the fact that we can assume that the move span actually points to what is being moved (and a test).
This regressed in #89110, which was debated somewhat in #90286. cc `@Aaron1011` who originally made this change.
r? diagnostics
Fixes #113547
Fixes #111016
|
|
miri: protect Move() function arguments during the call
This gives `Move` operands a meaning specific to function calls:
- for the duration of the call, the place the operand comes from is protected, making all read and write accesses insta-UB.
- the contents of that place are reset to `Uninit`, so looking at them again after the function returns, we cannot observe their contents
Turns out we can replace the existing "retag return place" hack with the exact same sort of protection on the return place, which is nicely symmetric.
Fixes https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/issues/112564
Fixes https://github.com/rust-lang/miri/issues/2927
This starts with a Miri rustc-push, since we'd otherwise conflict with a PR that recently landed in Miri.
(The "miri tree borrows" commit is an unrelated cleanup I noticed while doing the PR. I can remove it if you prefer.)
r? `@oli-obk`
|
|
|
|
|
|
various download-rustc fixes
separated out from https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/pull/112143 because it keeps getting stuck in limbo.
best reviewed commit-by-commit
|
|
This was not the correct fix. The problem was two-fold:
- `download-rustc` didn't respect `llvm.assertions`
- `rust-dev` was missing a bump to `download-ci-llvm-stamp`
The first is fixed in this PR and the latter was fixed a while ago. Revert this change to avoid breaking `rpath = false`.
|
