about summary refs log tree commit diff
path: root/src
AgeCommit message (Collapse)AuthorLines
2025-08-31native-lib: pass structs to native codeNia Espera-129/+467
2025-08-31native-lib: more resilient grabbing of instruction bytesNia Espera-26/+26
Co-authored-by: Ralf Jung <post@ralfj.de>
2025-08-31allow taking address to union fieldKivooeo-1/+1
2025-08-31fixup nix dev shell againWaffle Lapkin-0/+3
2025-08-31Auto merge of #146052 - matthiaskrgr:rollup-cfxx9m6, r=matthiaskrgrbors-9/+4
Rollup of 4 pull requests Successful merges: - rust-lang/rust#144443 (Make target pointer width in target json an integer) - rust-lang/rust#145174 (Ensure consistent drop for panicking drop in hint::select_unpredictable) - rust-lang/rust#145592 (Fix format string grammar in docs and improve alignment error message for rust-lang/rust#144023) - rust-lang/rust#145931 (Clarify that align_offset overaligns) r? `@ghost` `@rustbot` modify labels: rollup
2025-08-31Rollup merge of #144443 - WaffleLapkin:integer-target-pointer-width, r=NoratriebMatthias Krüger-9/+4
Make target pointer width in target json an integer r? Noratrieb cc `@RalfJung` (https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/pull/142352/files#r2230380120) try-job: x86_64-rust-for-linux
2025-08-31Auto merge of #146039 - Mark-Simulacrum:fix-bolt-path, r=Kobzolbors-5/+15
Use absolute path to llvm-bolt, merge-fdata rather than PATH This unconditionally uses the provided LLVM toolchain's BOLT. I'm not sure that makes sense, but since we don't build BOLT as part of Rust's build of LLVM today, it's probably the right option for now. This avoids breaking the build on not being able to find the llvm-bolt executable.
2025-08-30rustdoc-search: improve concurrency at type searchMichael Howell-9/+15
2025-08-30Rollup merge of #146036 - Mark-Simulacrum:rust-1, r=KobzolTrevor Gross-1/+5
Use move_file for rename in tracing This avoids panicking when the source and destination are on different filesystems.
2025-08-30More docsAlona Enraght-Moony-7/+43
2025-08-30Use absolute path to llvm-bolt, merge-fdata rather than PATHMark Rousskov-5/+15
This unconditionally uses the provided LLVM toolchain's BOLT. I'm not sure that makes sense, but since we don't build BOLT as part of Rust's build of LLVM today, it's probably the right option for now. This avoids breaking the build on not being able to find the llvm-bolt executable.
2025-08-30Start documenting tests/rustdoc-jsonAlona Enraght-Moony-2/+48
2025-08-30tidy: --bless now makes escheck run with --fixbinarycat-10/+22
2025-08-30Pass `--target` before `--` for `cargo rustc`Elliot Roberts-5/+2
2025-08-30rustdoc-search: split function inverted index by input/outputMichael Howell-67/+256
With a patch applied to count the number of unifications, and running the query `Option<T>, (T -> U) -> Option<U>` before: performed unifyFunctionType on 17484 functions after: performed unifyFunctionType on 3055 functions
2025-08-30Use move_file for rename in tracingMark Rousskov-1/+5
This avoids panicking when the source and destinations are on different filesystems.
2025-08-30Merge pull request #2536 from apiraino/no-typofixes-plsapiraino-0/+3
2025-08-30Auto merge of #145479 - Kmeakin:km/hardcode-char-is-control, r=joboetbors-1/+0
Hard-code `char::is_control` Split off from https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/pull/145219 According to https://www.unicode.org/policies/stability_policy.html#Property_Value, the set of codepoints in `Cc` will never change. So we can hard-code the patterns to match against instead of using a table. This doesn't change the generated assembly, since the lookup table is small enough that[ LLVM is able to inline the whole search](https://godbolt.org/z/bG8dM37YG). But this does reduce the chance of regressions if LLVM's heuristics change in the future, and means less generated Rust code checked in to `unicode-data.rs`.
2025-08-30Do not run `lint-docs` tests in stage 1 `x test` by defaultJakub Beránek-14/+10
2025-08-30Merge pull request #20563 from ChayimFriedman2/ns-projection-dyn-auto-traitShoyu Vanilla (Flint)-1/+70
fix: When mapping next-solver's `dyn` type, add `Self` (aka. bound var ^1.0) to auto traits' substitutions
2025-08-30Fix stage 1 compiler testsJakub Beránek-15/+90
2025-08-30Add test stage 2 snapshot testsJakub Beránek-10/+97
2025-08-30Fix tests and doclinkJakub Beránek-10/+10
2025-08-30Fake nodejs in snapshot testJakub Beránek-0/+2
2025-08-30Fix doclinkJakub Beránek-1/+1
2025-08-30Skip bootstrap tests on CIJakub Beránek-1/+5
2025-08-30Add change tracker entryJakub Beránek-0/+5
2025-08-30Do not run tests on CI in stage 0Jakub Beránek-1/+1
2025-08-30Fix spacing when testing individual cratesJakub Beránek-6/+11
2025-08-30Fix staging for compiler/std crate testsJakub Beránek-56/+106
2025-08-30Move the `test!` macro closer to its usagesJakub Beránek-70/+70
2025-08-30Add metadata to a bunch of steps, rename variables and add commentsJakub Beránek-28/+102
2025-08-30Small refactoring around `RemoteCopyLibs`Jakub Beránek-10/+14
2025-08-30Remove stage0 checkingJakub Beránek-16/+2
2025-08-30Refactor `test::LintDocs`Jakub Beránek-7/+31
2025-08-30Remove `compiler_for` from `test::CodegenCranelift`Jakub Beránek-49/+35
2025-08-30Remove `compiler_for` from `test::CodegenGCC`Jakub Beránek-51/+31
2025-08-30Fix staging of `TestFloatParse`Jakub Beránek-74/+61
The tool wasn't useful for anything, it was only built as a part of the test, but we can just use `cargo test` and `cargo run` in the test, no need to (pre-)build the tool itself.
2025-08-30Add snapshot test for `x test`Jakub Beránek-1/+71
2025-08-30Forbid running tests on stage 0 unless `build.compiletest-allow-stage0` is ↵Jakub Beránek-1/+7
enabled
2025-08-30Fixup `x test tier-check`Jakub Beránek-21/+40
2025-08-30Add snapshot test for `tier-check`Jakub Beránek-0/+13
2025-08-30Merge pull request #4549 from RalfJung/mprotectRalf Jung-39/+21
native-lib mode: avoid unsoundness due to mrpotect
2025-08-30reduce some code duplication and update some commentsRalf Jung-22/+8
2025-08-30native-lib mode: avoid unsoundness due to mrpotectRalf Jung-17/+13
2025-08-30Auto merge of #123319 - no92:managarm-target, r=davidtwcobors-3/+63
Add managarm as a tier 3 target This PR aims to introduce the `x86_64-unknown-managarm-mlibc` as a tier 3 target to Rust. [managarm](https://github.com/managarm/managarm) is a microkernel with fully asynchronous I/O that also provides a POSIX server. Despite the differences, managarm provides good compatability with POSIX and Linux APIs. As a rule of thumb, barring OS-specific code, it should be mostly source-compatible with Linux. We have been shipping a patched rust for over 25 releases now, and we would like to upstream our work. For a smoother process, this PR only adds the target to rustc and some documentation. `std` support will be added in a future PR. ## Addressing the tier 3 target policy > A tier 3 target must have a designated developer or developers (the "target maintainers") on record to be CCed when issues arise regarding the target. (The mechanism to track and CC such developers may evolve over time.) `@no92,` `@64` and `@Dennisbonke` will be target maintainers. > Targets must use naming consistent with any existing targets; for instance, a target for the same CPU or OS as an existing Rust target should use the same name for that CPU or OS. Targets should normally use the same names and naming conventions as used elsewhere in the broader ecosystem beyond Rust (such as in other toolchains), unless they have a very good reason to diverge. Changing the name of a target can be highly disruptive, especially once the target reaches a higher tier, so getting the name right is important even for a tier 3 target. > - Target names should not introduce undue confusion or ambiguity unless absolutely necessary to maintain ecosystem compatibility. For example, if the name of the target makes people extremely likely to form incorrect beliefs about what it targets, the name should be changed or augmented to disambiguate it. > - If possible, use only letters, numbers, dashes and underscores for the name. Periods (.) are known to cause issues in Cargo. `x86_64-unknown-managarm-mlibc` is what we use for LLVM as well. > Tier 3 targets may have unusual requirements to build or use, but must not create legal issues or impose onerous legal terms for the Rust project or for Rust developers or users. > - The target must not introduce license incompatibilities. > - Anything added to the Rust repository must be under the standard Rust license (MIT OR Apache-2.0). > - The target must not cause the Rust tools or libraries built for any other host (even when supporting cross-compilation to the target) to depend on any new dependency less permissive than the Rust licensing policy. This applies whether the dependency is a Rust crate that would require adding new license exceptions (as specified by the tidy tool in the rust-lang/rust repository), or whether the dependency is a native library or binary. In other words, the introduction of the target must not cause a user installing or running a version of Rust or the Rust tools to be subject to any new license requirements. > - Compiling, linking, and emitting functional binaries, libraries, or other code for the target (whether hosted on the target itself or cross-compiling from another target) must not depend on proprietary (non-FOSS) libraries. Host tools built for the target itself may depend on the ordinary runtime libraries supplied by the platform and commonly used by other applications built for the target, but those libraries must not be required for code generation for the target; cross-compilation to the target must not require such libraries at all. For instance, rustc built for the target may depend on a common proprietary C runtime library or console output library, but must not depend on a proprietary code generation library or code optimization library. Rust's license permits such combinations, but the Rust project has no interest in maintaining such combinations within the scope of Rust itself, even at tier 3. > - "onerous" here is an intentionally subjective term. At a minimum, "onerous" legal/licensing terms include but are not limited to: non-disclosure requirements, non-compete requirements, contributor license agreements (CLAs) or equivalent, "non-commercial"/"research-only"/etc terms, requirements conditional on the employer or employment of any particular Rust developers, revocable terms, any requirements that create liability for the Rust project or its developers or users, or any requirements that adversely affect the livelihood or prospects of the Rust project or its developers or users. [managarm](https://github.com/managarm/managarm) is licensed as MIT. No dependencies were added. > Neither this policy nor any decisions made regarding targets shall create any binding agreement or estoppel by any party. If any member of an approving Rust team serves as one of the maintainers of a target, or has any legal or employment requirement (explicit or implicit) that might affect their decisions regarding a target, they must recuse themselves from any approval decisions regarding the target's tier status, though they may otherwise participate in discussions. > - This requirement does not prevent part or all of this policy from being cited in an explicit contract or work agreement (e.g. to implement or maintain support for a target). This requirement exists to ensure that a developer or team responsible for reviewing and approving a target does not face any legal threats or obligations that would prevent them from freely exercising their judgment in such approval, even if such judgment involves subjective matters or goes beyond the letter of these requirements. Understood. None of the listed maintainers are on a Rust team. > Tier 3 targets should attempt to implement as much of the standard libraries as possible and appropriate (core for most targets, alloc for targets that can support dynamic memory allocation, std for targets with an operating system or equivalent layer of system-provided functionality), but may leave some code unimplemented (either unavailable or stubbed out as appropriate), whether because the target makes it impossible to implement or challenging to implement. The authors of pull requests are not obligated to avoid calling any portions of the standard library on the basis of a tier 3 target not implementing those portions. Support for `std` will be provided in a future PR. Only minor changes are required, however they depend on support in the `libc` crate which will be PRed in soon. > The target must provide documentation for the Rust community explaining how to build for the target, using cross-compilation if possible. If the target supports running binaries, or running tests (even if they do not pass), the documentation must explain how to run such binaries or tests for the target, using emulation if possible or dedicated hardware if necessary. The steps needed to take are described in the documentation provided with this PR. > Tier 3 targets must not impose burden on the authors of pull requests, or other developers in the community, to maintain the target. In particular, do not post comments (automated or manual) on a PR that derail or suggest a block on the PR based on a tier 3 target. Do not send automated messages or notifications (via any medium, including via `@)` to a PR author or others involved with a PR regarding a tier 3 target, unless they have opted into such messages. > - Backlinks such as those generated by the issue/PR tracker when linking to an issue or PR are not considered a violation of this policy, within reason. However, such messages (even on a separate repository) must not generate notifications to anyone involved with a PR who has not requested such notifications. Understood. > Patches adding or updating tier 3 targets must not break any existing tier 2 or tier 1 target, and must not knowingly break another tier 3 target without approval of either the compiler team or the maintainers of the other tier 3 target. > - In particular, this may come up when working on closely related targets, such as variations of the same architecture with different features. Avoid introducing unconditional uses of features that another variation of the target may not have; use conditional compilation or runtime detection, as appropriate, to let each target run code supported by that target. We have no indication that anything breaks due to this PR. > Tier 3 targets must be able to produce assembly using at least one of rustc's supported backends from any host target. No problems here, as we target `x86_64`. r? compiler-team
2025-08-30Merge ref 'e004014d1bf4' from rust-lang/rustThe Miri Cronjob Bot-351/+443
Pull recent changes from https://github.com/rust-lang/rust via Josh. Upstream ref: e004014d1bf4c29928a0f0f9f7d0964d43606cbd Filtered ref: d62798e442c1c6ec461725b87dacc87c285259c8 This merge was created using https://github.com/rust-lang/josh-sync.
2025-08-30Prepare for merging from rust-lang/rustThe Miri Cronjob Bot-1/+1
This updates the rust-version file to e004014d1bf4c29928a0f0f9f7d0964d43606cbd.
2025-08-29Rollup merge of #146000 - GuillaumeGomez:rustdoc-error-improvement, r=notriddleTrevor Gross-1/+3
Improve librustdoc error when a file creation/modification failed The message before looks like this: ``` failed to create or modify "/build/x86_64-unknown-linux-gnu/test/rustdoc-gui/doc/search.index/entry/" ``` And with this change it looks like this: ``` failed to create or modify "/build/x86_64-unknown-linux-gnu/test/rustdoc-gui/doc/search.index/entry/": failed to read column from disk: data consumer error: missing field `unknown number` at line 1 column 8 ``` r? ``````@lolbinarycat``````
2025-08-29Rollup merge of #145756 - okaneco:stabilize_char_boundary, r=scottmcmTrevor Gross-18/+16
str: Stabilize `round_char_boundary` feature Closes https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/issues/93743 FCP completed https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/issues/93743#issuecomment-3168382171