| Age | Commit message (Collapse) | Author | Lines |
|---|
|
Refactorings in preparation for const value trees
cc #72396
This PR changes the `Scalar::Bits { data: u128, size: u8 }` variant to `Scalar::Bits(ScalarInt)` where `ScalarInt` contains the same information, but is `repr(packed)`. The reason for using a packed struct is to allow enum variant packing to keep the original size of `Scalar` instead of adding another word to its size due to padding.
Other than that the PR just gets rid of all the inspection of the internal fields of `Scalar::Bits` which were frankly scary. These fields have invariants that we need to uphold and we can't do that without making the fields private.
r? `@ghost`
|
|
|
|
Use reparsed `TokenStream` if we captured any inner attributes
Fixes #78675
We now bail out of `prepend_attrs` if we ended up capturing any inner
attributes (which can happen in several places, due to token capturing
for `macro_rules!` arguments.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Rollup of 7 pull requests
Successful merges:
- #77950 (Add support for SHA256 source file hashing)
- #78624 (Sync rustc_codegen_cranelift)
- #78626 (Improve errors about #[deprecated] attribute)
- #78659 (Corrected suggestion for generic parameters in `function_item_references` lint)
- #78687 (Suggest library/std when running all stage 0 tests)
- #78699 (Show more error information in lldb_batchmode)
- #78709 (Fix panic in bootstrap for non-workspace path dependencies.)
Failed merges:
r? `@ghost`
`@rustbot` modify labels: rollup
|
|
Fix panic in bootstrap for non-workspace path dependencies.
If you add a `path` dependency to a `Cargo.toml` that is located outside of the workspace, then the `in_tree_crates` function can panic because it finds a path dependency that is not defined (since it uses `cargo metadata --no-deps`). This fixes it by skipping over those entries, which are usually not things you select on the command-line.
Fixes #78617
|
|
Show more error information in lldb_batchmode
Even more information to try and debug #78665.
|
|
Suggest library/std when running all stage 0 tests
r? ``@Mark-Simulacrum``
cc ``@ijackson``
For context, this came out of a discord conversation where ``@ijackson`` was running `test --stage 1` when they were only adding doc-tests to the standard library.
|
|
Corrected suggestion for generic parameters in `function_item_references` lint
This commit handles functions with generic type parameters like you pointed out as well as const generics. Also this is probably a minor thing, but the type alias you used in the example doesn't show up so the suggestion right now would be `size_of::<[u8; 16]> as fn() ->`. This is because the lint checker works with MIR instead of HIR. I don't think we can get the alias at that point, but let me know if I'm wrong and there's a way to fix this. Also I put you as the reviewer, but I'm not sure if you want to review it or if it makes more sense to ask one of the original reviewers of this lint.
closes #78571
|
|
r=estebank
Improve errors about #[deprecated] attribute
This change:
1. Turns `#[deprecated]` on a trait impl block into an error, which fixes #78625;
2. Changes these and other errors about `#[deprecated]` to use the span of the attribute instead of the item; and
3. Turns this error into a lint, to make sure it can be capped with `--cap-lints` and doesn't break any existing dependencies.
Can be reviewed per commit.
---
Example:
```rust
struct X;
#[deprecated = "a"]
impl Default for X {
#[deprecated = "b"]
fn default() -> Self {
X
}
}
```
Before:
```
error: This deprecation annotation is useless
--> src/main.rs:6:5
|
6 | / fn default() -> Self {
7 | | X
8 | | }
| |_____^
```
After:
```
error: this `#[deprecated]' annotation has no effect
--> src/main.rs:3:1
|
3 | #[deprecated = "a"]
| ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^ help: try removing the deprecation attribute
|
= note: `#[deny(useless_deprecated)]` on by default
error: this `#[deprecated]' annotation has no effect
--> src/main.rs:5:5
|
5 | #[deprecated = "b"]
| ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^ help: try removing the deprecation attribute
```
|
|
Add support for SHA256 source file hashing
Adds support for `-Z src-hash-algorithm sha256`, which became available in LLVM 11.
Using an older version of LLVM will cause an error `invalid checksum kind` if the hash algorithm is set to sha256.
r? `@eddyb`
cc #70401 `@est31`
|
|
|
|
Properly handle lint spans after MIR inlining
The first commit shows what happens when we apply mir inlining and then cause lints on the inlined MIR.
The second commit fixes that.
r? `@wesleywiser`
|
|
Even more information to try and debug #78665.
|
|
add mipsel-unknown-none target
This adds a target for bare MIPS32r2, little endian, softfloat. This target can be used for PIC32 microcontrollers (or possibly for other devices that have a MIPS MCU core such as the M4K core).
Tried to find a name for the target that is in line with the naming scheme apparently used for the other MIPS targets.
r? `@jonas-schievink`
|
|
Fix ICE when a future-incompat-report has its command-line level capped
Fixes #78660
With PR https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/pull/75534 merged, we now run
more lint-related code for future-incompat-report, even when their final
level is Allow. Some lint-related code was not expecting `Level::Allow`,
and had an explicit panic.
This PR explicitly tracks the lint level set on the command line before
`--cap-lints` is applied. This is used to emit a more precise error
note (e.g. we don't say that `-W lint-name` was specified on the
command line just because a lint was capped to Warn). As a result, we
can now correctly emit a note that `-A` was used if we got
`Level::Allow` from the command line (before the cap is applied).
|
|
Document -Zinstrument-coverage
r? ``@tmandry``
FYI ``@wesleywiser``
Here is my proposed document for LLVM source-based code coverage.
I based it on the `profile.md` page, in the same directory, and on the Clang guide for LLVM source-based coverage.
|
|
Add a test for compiletest rustc-env & unset-rustc-env directives
... and move compiletest meta tests into a separate directory.
|
|
Fix unindent in doc comments
Fixes #70732
r? ``@jyn514``
|
|
Treat trailing semicolon as a statement in macro call
See #61733 (comment)
We now preserve the trailing semicolon in a macro invocation, even if
the macro expands to nothing. As a result, the following code no longer
compiles:
```rust
macro_rules! empty {
() => { }
}
fn foo() -> bool { //~ ERROR mismatched
{ true } //~ ERROR mismatched
empty!();
}
```
Previously, `{ true }` would be considered the trailing expression, even
though there's a semicolon in `empty!();`
This makes macro expansion more token-based.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Fixes #78675
We now bail out of `prepend_attrs` if we ended up capturing any inner
attributes (which can happen in several places, due to token capturing
for `macro_rules!` arguments.
|
|
See https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/issues/61733#issuecomment-716188981
We now preserve the trailing semicolon in a macro invocation, even if
the macro expands to nothing. As a result, the following code no longer
compiles:
```rust
macro_rules! empty {
() => { }
}
fn foo() -> bool { //~ ERROR mismatched
{ true } //~ ERROR mismatched
empty!();
}
```
Previously, `{ true }` would be considered the trailing expression, even
though there's a semicolon in `empty!();`
This makes macro expansion more token-based.
|
|
Try running lldb_batchmode.py with PYTHONUNBUFFERED
When reporting fatal errors, LLVM calls abort() to exit the program. There is a chance that might interfere with Python printing stuff to stdout, as by default it relies on buffering to increase performance.
This commit tries to disable Python buffering, to hopefully get useful logs while debugging #78665.
|
|
(From the PR feedback.)
Co-authored-by: Esteban Küber <esteban@kuber.com.ar>
|
|
When reporting fatal errors, LLVM calls abort() to exit the program.
There is a chance that might interfere with Python printing stuff to
stdout, as by default it relies on buffering to increase performance.
This commit tries to disable Python buffering, to hopefully get useful
logs while debugging #78665.
|
|
Rollup of 5 pull requests
Successful merges:
- #78606 (Clarify handling of final line ending in str::lines())
- #78610 (Do not remove tokens before AST json serialization)
- #78620 (Trivial fixes to bitwise operator documentation)
- #78627 (Point out that total_cmp is no strict superset of partial comparison)
- #78637 (Add fetch_update methods to AtomicBool and AtomicPtr)
Failed merges:
r? `@ghost`
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Fixes #78660
With PR https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/pull/75534 merged, we now run
more lint-related code for future-incompat-report, even when their final
level is Allow. Some lint-related code was not expecting `Level::Allow`,
and had an explicit panic.
This PR explicitly tracks the lint level set on the command line before
`--cap-lints` is applied. This is used to emit a more precise error
note (e.g. we don't say that `-W lint-name` was specified on the
command line just because a lint was capped to Warn). As a result, we
can now correctly emit a note that `-A` was used if we got
`Level::Allow` from the command line (before the cap is applied).
|
|
Do not remove tokens before AST json serialization
`TokenStripper` is error-prone and introduces one more use of `MutVisitor`.
It's much simpler to treat serialization as just one more place that wants lazy token stream to turn into a real token stream.
Also, no code is better than more code, in general.
r? @Aaron1011
(I also merged tests for `TokenStripper` ICEs into one.)
|
|
|
|
This lint was incorrectly suggesting casting a function to a pointer without
specifying generic type parameters or const generics. This would cause a
compiler error since the missing parameters couldn't be inferred. This commit
fixed the suggestion and added a few tests with generics.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Implement rustc side of report-future-incompat
cc https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/issues/71249
This is an alternative to `@pnkfelix's` initial implementation in https://github.com/pnkfelix/rust/commits/prototype-rustc-side-of-report-future-incompat (mainly because I started working before seeing that branch :smile: ).
My approach outputs the entire original `Diagnostic`, in a way that is compatible with incremental compilation. This is not yet integrated with compiletest, but can be used manually by passing `-Z emit-future-incompat-report` to `rustc`.
Several changes are made to support this feature:
* The `librustc_session/lint` module is moved to a new crate `librustc_lint_defs` (name bikesheddable). This allows accessing lint definitions from `librustc_errors`.
* The `Lint` struct is extended with an `Option<FutureBreakage>`. When present, it indicates that we should display a lint in the future-compat report. `FutureBreakage` contains additional information that we may want to display in the report (currently, a `date` field indicating when the crate will stop compiling).
* A new variant `rustc_error::Level::Allow` is added. This is used when constructing a diagnostic for a future-breakage lint that is marked as allowed (via `#[allow]` or `--cap-lints`). This allows us to capture any future-breakage diagnostics in one place, while still discarding them before they are passed to the `Emitter`.
* `DiagnosticId::Lint` is extended with a `has_future_breakage` field, indicating whether or not the `Lint` has future breakage information (and should therefore show up in the report).
* `Session` is given access to the `LintStore` via a new `SessionLintStore` trait (since `librustc_session` cannot directly reference `LintStore` without a cyclic dependency). We use this to turn a string `DiagnosticId::Lint` back into a `Lint`, to retrieve the `FutureBreakage` data.
Currently, `FutureBreakage.date` is always set to `None`. However, this could potentially be interpreted by Cargo in the future.
I've enabled the future-breakage report for the `ARRAY_INTO_ITER` lint, which can be used to test out this PR. The intent is to use the field to allow Cargo to determine the date of future breakage (as described in [RFC 2834](https://github.com/rust-lang/rfcs/blob/master/text/2834-cargo-report-future-incompat.md)) without needing to parse the diagnostic itself.
cc `@pnkfelix`
|
|
Fix #78549
Before #78430, this worked because `specialize_constructor` didn't actually care too much which constructor was passed to it unless needed. That PR however handles `&str` as a special case, and I did not anticipate patterns for the `&str` type other than string literals.
I am not very confident there are not other similar oversights left, but hopefully only `&str` was different enough to break my assumptions.
Fixes https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/issues/78549
|
|
Suggest calling associated `fn` inside `trait`s
When calling a function that doesn't exist inside of a trait's
associated `fn`, and another associated `fn` in that trait has that
name, suggest calling it with the appropriate fully-qualified path.
Expand the label to be more descriptive.
Prompted by the following user experience:
https://users.rust-lang.org/t/cannot-find-function/50663
|
|
Before #78430, string literals worked because `specialize_constructor`
didn't actually care too much which constructor was passed to it unless
needed. Since then, string literals are special cased and a bit hacky. I
did not anticipate patterns for the `&str` type other than string
literals, hence this bug. This makes string literals less hacky.
|
|
|
