| Age | Commit message (Collapse) | Author | Lines |
|---|
|
|
|
:arrow_up: rust-analyzer
r? ``@ghost``
|
|
Update books
## nomicon
3 commits in 9493715a6280a1f74be759c7e1ef9999b5d13e6f..90993eeac93dbf9388992de92965f99cf6f29a03
2022-01-27 19:00:32 -0800 to 2022-02-13 12:44:12 +0900
- Fix a small typo in exception-safety.md (rust-lang/nomicon#341)
- Make `Vec::new` public in vec-alloc.md (rust-lang/nomicon#336)
- Fix a syntax error in leaking.md (rust-lang/nomicon#335)
## reference
6 commits in 411c2f0d5cebf48453ae2d136ad0c5e611d39aec..70fc73a6b908e08e66aa0306856c5211312f6c05
2022-01-30 12:46:37 -0800 to 2022-02-14 19:33:01 -0800
- Document pre-Rust-2021 special case for IntoIterator method lookup (rust-lang/reference#1154)
- Mention std::is_aarch64_feature_detected (rust-lang/reference#1061)
- Fix link to the Bastion of the Turbofish (rust-lang/reference#1161)
- Improve associated constant item CTFE timing section (rust-lang/reference#1147)
- document `#![feature(const_generics_defaults)]` (rust-lang/reference#1098)
- Update patterns allowed in @ patterns (rust-lang/reference#1158)
## book
6 commits in 98904efaa4fc968db8ff59cf2744d9f7ed158166..67b768c0b660a069a45f0e5d8ae2f679df1022ab
2022-01-29 21:22:31 -0500 to 2022-02-09 21:52:41 -0500
- Snapshot of ch18 for nostarch
- Remove mention of destructuring references as that's not covered currently
- Add note that exhaustiveness checking doesn't extend to match guards
- Change match guard example to actually be unexpressable with patterns alone
- Corrected listing number from 9-10 to 9-13
- Remove duplicate paragraph after No Starch related changes
## rustc-dev-guide
3 commits in 8763adb62c712df69b1d39ea3e692b6d696cc4d9..62f58394ba7b203f55ac35ddcc4c0b79578f5706
2022-01-26 14:01:40 -0800 to 2022-02-11 08:42:50 -0500
- Correction, building stage3 compiler (rust-lang/rustc-dev-guide#1298)
- Triage some date references (rust-lang/rustc-dev-guide#1293)
- mention test folders for cfg(bootstrap) (rust-lang/rustc-dev-guide#1294)
|
|
Fix inconsistent symbol mangling with -Zverbose
Always skip arguments that are the defaults of their respective
parameters, to avoid generating inconsistent symbols for builds
with `-Zverbose` flag and without it.
|
|
Update browser UI test version
Might help a bit with https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/issues/93784 (still need to figure out what's going on with the driver).
r? ```@notriddle```
|
|
Support pretty printing of invalid constants
Make it possible to pretty print invalid constants by introducing a
fallible variant of `destructure_const` and falling back to debug
formatting when it fails.
Closes #93688.
|
|
rustdoc --check option documentation
Part of #92763.
r? ```@notriddle```
|
|
Add a bit more padding in search box
As asked in https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/pull/93113#issuecomment-1021565703, here is a bit more padding.
You can check it [here](https://rustdoc.crud.net/imperio/search-input-padding/foo/index.html).
r? `@camelid`
|
|
|
|
Update cargo
5 commits in c082648646cbb2be266df9ecbcdc253058158d68..ea2a21c994ca1e4d4c49412827b3cf4dcb158b1d
2022-02-08 14:55:05 +0000 to 2022-02-15 04:24:07 +0000
- cargo-new should not add ignore rule on Cargo.lock inside subdirs (rust-lang/cargo#10379)
- Add a badge for github actions (rust-lang/cargo#10385)
- Remove outdated badges (rust-lang/cargo#10380)
- Remove `strip = "off"` (and undocumented `strip = "n"`/`strip = "no"`) (rust-lang/cargo#10376)
- Fix unmatched backticks (rust-lang/cargo#10375)
|
|
|
|
|
|
Treat static refs as `mir::ConstantKind::Val`
With the upcoming introduction of Valtrees we want to treat more values as `mir::ConstantKind::Val` directly.
r? `@lcnr`
cc `@oli-obk`
|
|
Always skip arguments that are the defaults of their respective
parameters, to avoid generating inconsistent symbols for builds
with `-Zverbose` flag and without it.
|
|
Make it possible to pretty print invalid constants by introducing a
fallible variant of `destructure_const` and falling back to debug
formatting when it fails.
|
|
|
|
Add support for control-flow protection
This change adds a flag for configuring control-flow protection in the LLVM backend. In Clang, this flag is exposed as `-fcf-protection` with options `none|branch|return|full`. This convention is followed for `rustc`, though as a codegen option: `rustc -Z cf-protection=<none|branch|return|full>`. Tracking issue for future work is #93754.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Rework GAT `where` clause check
rework the GAT where check to use a fixed-point algorithm, and check all GATs in a trait at once
fixes #93278
r? `@jackh726`
cc `@nikomatsakis`
|
|
|
|
|
|
Move transmute_undefined_repr back to nursery
There's still open discussion if this lint is ready to be enabled by
default. We want to give us more time to figure this out and prevent
this lint from getting to stable as an enabled-by-default lint.
cc https://github.com/rust-lang/rust-clippy/pull/8432
r? `@Manishearth` `@dtolnay`
I think this is the way to go here. We can re-enable this lint with the next sync, if we should decide to do so. But I would hold of for this release.
We have until Friday (beta branching) to decide if we want to merge this.
|
|
suggest using raw strings when invalid escapes appear in literals
i'd guess about 70% of "bad escape" cases occur when someone meant to use a raw string literal because they're passing it directly to `Regex::new()`.
this emits an advisory (`Applicability::MaybeIncorrect`) `help:` suggestion to the user that they use an `r""` string, on top of the normal notes about looking at the string literal documentation/spec.
|
|
Overhaul interning.
A number of types are interned and `eq` and `hash` are implemented on
the pointer rather than the contents. But this is not well enforced
within the type system like you might expect.
This PR introduces a new type `Interned` which encapsulates this concept
more rigorously, and uses it to convert a couple of the less common
interned types.
r? `@fee1-dead`
|
|
|
|
There's still open discussion if this lint is ready to be enabled by
default. We want to give us more time to figure this out and prevent
this lint from getting to stable as an enabled-by-default lint.
|
|
Add a stack-`pin!`-ning macro to `core::pin`.
- https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/issues/93178
`pin!` allows pinning a value to the stack. Thanks to being implemented in the stdlib, which gives access to `macro` macros, and to the private `.pointer` field of the `Pin` wrapper, [it was recently discovered](https://rust-lang.zulipchat.com/#narrow/stream/187312-wg-async-foundations/topic/pin!.20.E2.80.94.20the.20.22definitive.22.20edition.20.28a.20rhs-compatible.20pin-nin.2E.2E.2E/near/268731241) ([archive link](https://zulip-archive.rust-lang.org/stream/187312-wg-async-foundations/topic/A.20rhs-compatible.20pin-ning.20macro.html#268731241)), contrary to popular belief, that it is actually possible to implement and feature such a macro:
```rust
let foo: Pin<&mut PhantomPinned> = pin!(PhantomPinned);
stuff(foo);
```
or, directly:
```rust
stuff(pin!(PhantomPinned));
```
- For context, historically, this used to require one of the two following syntaxes:
- ```rust
let foo = PhantomPinned;
pin!(foo);
stuff(foo);
```
- ```rust
pin! {
let foo = PhantomPinned;
}
stuff(foo);
```
This macro thus allows, for instance, doing things like:
```diff
fn block_on<T>(fut: impl Future<Output = T>) -> T {
// Pin the future so it can be polled.
- let mut fut = Box::pin(fut);
+ let mut fut = pin!(fut);
// Create a new context to be passed to the future.
let t = thread::current();
let waker = Arc::new(ThreadWaker(t)).into();
let mut cx = Context::from_waker(&waker);
// Run the future to completion.
loop {
match fut.as_mut().poll(&mut cx) {
Poll::Ready(res) => return res,
Poll::Pending => thread::park(),
}
}
}
```
- _c.f._, https://doc.rust-lang.org/1.58.1/alloc/task/trait.Wake.html
And so on, and so forth.
I don't think such an API can get better than that, barring full featured language support (`&pin` references or something), so I see no reason not to start experimenting with featuring this in the stdlib already 🙂
- cc `@rust-lang/wg-async-foundations` \[EDIT: this doesn't seem to have pinged anybody 😩, thanks `@yoshuawuyts` for the real ping\]
r? `@joshtriplett`
___
# Docs preview
https://user-images.githubusercontent.com/9920355/150605731-1f45c2eb-c9b0-4ce3-b17f-2784fb75786e.mp4
___
# Implementation
The implementation ends up being dead simple (so much it's embarrassing):
```rust
pub macro pin($value:expr $(,)?) {
Pin { pointer: &mut { $value } }
}
```
_and voilà_!
- The key for it working lies in [the rules governing the scope of anonymous temporaries](https://doc.rust-lang.org/1.58.1/reference/destructors.html#temporary-lifetime-extension).
<details><summary>Comments and context</summary>
This is `Pin::new_unchecked(&mut { $value })`, so, for starters, let's
review such a hypothetical macro (that any user-code could define):
```rust
macro_rules! pin {( $value:expr ) => (
match &mut { $value } { at_value => unsafe { // Do not wrap `$value` in an `unsafe` block.
$crate::pin::Pin::<&mut _>::new_unchecked(at_value)
}}
)}
```
Safety:
- `type P = &mut _`. There are thus no pathological `Deref{,Mut}` impls that would break `Pin`'s invariants.
- `{ $value }` is braced, making it a _block expression_, thus **moving** the given `$value`, and making it _become an **anonymous** temporary_.
By virtue of being anonynomous, it can no longer be accessed, thus preventing any attemps to `mem::replace` it or `mem::forget` it, _etc._
This gives us a `pin!` definition that is sound, and which works, but only in certain scenarios:
- If the `pin!(value)` expression is _directly_ fed to a function call:
`let poll = pin!(fut).poll(cx);`
- If the `pin!(value)` expression is part of a scrutinee:
```rust
match pin!(fut) { pinned_fut => {
pinned_fut.as_mut().poll(...);
pinned_fut.as_mut().poll(...);
}} // <- `fut` is dropped here.
```
Alas, it doesn't work for the more straight-forward use-case: `let` bindings.
```rust
let pinned_fut = pin!(fut); // <- temporary value is freed at the end of this statement
pinned_fut.poll(...) // error[E0716]: temporary value dropped while borrowed
// note: consider using a `let` binding to create a longer lived value
```
- Issues such as this one are the ones motivating https://github.com/rust-lang/rfcs/pull/66
This makes such a macro incredibly unergonomic in practice, and the reason most macros out there had to take the path of being a statement/binding macro (_e.g._, `pin!(future);`) instead of featuring the more intuitive ergonomics of an expression macro.
Luckily, there is a way to avoid the problem. Indeed, the problem stems from the fact that a temporary is dropped at the end of its enclosing statement when it is part of the parameters given to function call, which has precisely been the case with our `Pin::new_unchecked()`!
For instance,
```rust
let p = Pin::new_unchecked(&mut <temporary>);
```
becomes:
```rust
let p = { let mut anon = <temporary>; &mut anon };
```
However, when using a literal braced struct to construct the value, references to temporaries can then be taken. This makes Rust change the lifespan of such temporaries so that they are, instead, dropped _at the end of the enscoping block_.
For instance,
```rust
let p = Pin { pointer: &mut <temporary> };
```
becomes:
```rust
let mut anon = <temporary>;
let p = Pin { pointer: &mut anon };
```
which is *exactly* what we want.
Finally, we don't hit problems _w.r.t._ the privacy of the `pointer` field, or the unqualified `Pin` name, thanks to `decl_macro`s being _fully_ hygienic (`def_site` hygiene).
</details>
___
# TODO
- [x] Add compile-fail tests with attempts to break the `Pin` invariants thanks to the macro (_e.g._, try to access the private `.pointer` field, or see what happens if such a pin is used outside its enscoping scope (borrow error));
- [ ] Follow-up stuff:
- [ ] Try to experiment with adding `pin!` to the prelude: this may require to be handled with some extra care, as it may lead to issues reminiscent of those of `assert_matches!`: https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/issues/82913
- [x] Create the tracking issue.
|
|
bootstrap: tidy up flag handling for llvm build
This tidies up the logic in `src/bootstrap/native.rs` such that:
- `CMAKE_*_LINKER_FLAGS` is not overridden if we add to it twice.
- `CMAKE_*_FLAGS` also include the standard `*FLAGS` environment
variables, which CMake respects when we _don't_ set `CMAKE_*_FLAGS`.
- `llvm.ldflags` from `config.toml` appends to the ldflags Rust's
bootstrap logic adds, rather than replacing them.
It also takes a second stab at #89983 by moving `-static-libstdc++` to just be passed as a linker flag, since that's what it is.
Fixes #93880. Fixes #70468. Closes #89983.
|
|
Specifically, rename the `Const` struct as `ConstS` and re-introduce `Const` as
this:
```
pub struct Const<'tcx>(&'tcx Interned<ConstS>);
```
This now matches `Ty` and `Predicate` more closely, including using
pointer-based `eq` and `hash`.
Notable changes:
- `mk_const` now takes a `ConstS`.
- `Const` was copy, despite being 48 bytes. Now `ConstS` is not, so need a
we need separate arena for it, because we can't use the `Dropless` one any
more.
- Many `&'tcx Const<'tcx>`/`&Const<'tcx>` to `Const<'tcx>` changes
- Many `ct.ty` to `ct.ty()` and `ct.val` to `ct.val()` changes.
- Lots of tedious sigil fiddling.
|
|
Specifically, change `Region` from this:
```
pub type Region<'tcx> = &'tcx RegionKind;
```
to this:
```
pub struct Region<'tcx>(&'tcx Interned<RegionKind>);
```
This now matches `Ty` and `Predicate` more closely.
Things to note
- Regions have always been interned, but we haven't been using pointer-based
`Eq` and `Hash`. This is now happening.
- I chose to impl `Deref` for `Region` because it makes pattern matching a lot
nicer, and `Region` can be viewed as just a smart wrapper for `RegionKind`.
- Various methods are moved from `RegionKind` to `Region`.
- There is a lot of tedious sigil changes.
- A couple of types like `HighlightBuilder`, `RegionHighlightMode` now have a
`'tcx` lifetime because they hold a `Ty<'tcx>`, so they can call `mk_region`.
- A couple of test outputs change slightly, I'm not sure why, but the new
outputs are a little better.
|
|
Specifically, change `Ty` from this:
```
pub type Ty<'tcx> = &'tcx TyS<'tcx>;
```
to this
```
pub struct Ty<'tcx>(Interned<'tcx, TyS<'tcx>>);
```
There are two benefits to this.
- It's now a first class type, so we can define methods on it. This
means we can move a lot of methods away from `TyS`, leaving `TyS` as a
barely-used type, which is appropriate given that it's not meant to
be used directly.
- The uniqueness requirement is now explicit, via the `Interned` type.
E.g. the pointer-based `Eq` and `Hash` comes from `Interned`, rather
than via `TyS`, which wasn't obvious at all.
Much of this commit is boring churn. The interesting changes are in
these files:
- compiler/rustc_middle/src/arena.rs
- compiler/rustc_middle/src/mir/visit.rs
- compiler/rustc_middle/src/ty/context.rs
- compiler/rustc_middle/src/ty/mod.rs
Specifically:
- Most mentions of `TyS` are removed. It's very much a dumb struct now;
`Ty` has all the smarts.
- `TyS` now has `crate` visibility instead of `pub`.
- `TyS::make_for_test` is removed in favour of the static `BOOL_TY`,
which just works better with the new structure.
- The `Eq`/`Ord`/`Hash` impls are removed from `TyS`. `Interned`s impls
of `Eq`/`Hash` now suffice. `Ord` is now partly on `Interned`
(pointer-based, for the `Equal` case) and partly on `TyS`
(contents-based, for the other cases).
- There are many tedious sigil adjustments, i.e. adding or removing `*`
or `&`. They seem to be unavoidable.
|
|
Update `sha1`, `sha2`, and `md-5` dependencies
This replaces the deprecated [`cpuid-bool`](https://crates.io/crates/cpuid-bool) dependency with [`cpufeatures`](https://crates.io/crates/cpufeatures), while adding [`crypto-common`](https://crates.io/crates/crypto-common) as a new dependency.
Closes #93676.
|
|
Generator drop tracking: improve break and continue handling
This PR fixes two related issues.
One, sometimes break or continue have a block target instead of an expression target. This seems to mainly happen with try blocks. Since the drop tracking analysis only works on expressions, if we see a block target for break or continue, we substitute the last expression of the block as the target instead.
Two, break and continue were incorrectly being treated as the same, so continue would also show up as an exit from the loop or block. This patch corrects the way continue is handled by keeping a stack of loop entry points and uses those to find the target of the continue.
Fixes #93197
r? `@nikomatsakis`
|
|
i'd guess about 70% of "bad escape" cases occur when someone meant to
use a raw string literal because they're passing it directly to
Regex::new(). this emits an advisory (Applicability::MaybeIncorrect)
help: suggestion to the user that they use an r"" string,
on top of the normal notes about looking at the
string literal documentation/spec.
|
|
r=nikomatsakis
Fix negative overlap check regions
r? `@nikomatsakis`
|
|
This change adds a flag for configuring control-flow protection in the
LLVM backend. In Clang, this flag is exposed as `-fcf-protection` with
options `none|branch|return|full`. This convention is followed for
`rustc`, though as a codegen option: `rustc -Z
cf-protection=<none|branch|return|full>`.
Co-authored-by: BlackHoleFox <blackholefoxdev@gmail.com>
|
|
This thus still makes it technically possible to enable the feature, and thus
to trigger UB without `unsafe`, but this is fine since incomplete features are
known to be potentially unsound (labelled "may not be safe").
This follows from the discussion at https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/pull/93176#discussion_r799413561
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
make `find_similar_impl_candidates` even fuzzier
continues the good work of `@BGR360` in #92223. I might have overshot a bit and we're now slightly too fuzzy :sweat_smile:
with this we can now also simplify `simplify_type`, which is nice :3
|
|
Make `Res::SelfTy` a struct variant and update docs
I found pattern matching on a `(Option<DefId>, Option<(DefId, bool)>)` to not be super readable, additionally the doc comments on the types in a tuple variant aren't visible anywhere at use sites as far as I can tell (using rust analyzer + vscode)
The docs incorrectly assumed that the `DefId` in `Option<(DefId, bool)>` would only ever be for an impl item and I also found the code examples to be somewhat unclear about which `DefId` was being talked about.
r? `@lcnr` since you reviewed the last PR changing these docs
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
