| Age | Commit message (Collapse) | Author | Lines |
|---|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
generic_predicates_without_parent_query
|
|
This is intended to be used for Linux kernel RETPOLINE builds.
Signed-off-by: Miguel Ojeda <ojeda@kernel.org>
|
|
|
|
|
|
classification
|
|
|
|
const-eval: full support for pointer fragments
This fixes https://github.com/rust-lang/const-eval/issues/72 and makes `swap_nonoverlapping` fully work in const-eval by enhancing per-byte provenance tracking with tracking of *which* of the bytes of the pointer this one is. Later, if we see all the same bytes in the exact same order, we can treat it like a whole pointer again without ever risking a leak of the data bytes (that encode the offset into the allocation). This lifts the limitation that was discussed quite a bit in https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/pull/137280.
For a concrete piece of code that used to fail and now works properly consider this example doing a byte-for-byte memcpy in const without using intrinsics:
```rust
use std::{mem::{self, MaybeUninit}, ptr};
type Byte = MaybeUninit<u8>;
const unsafe fn memcpy(dst: *mut Byte, src: *const Byte, n: usize) {
let mut i = 0;
while i < n {
*dst.add(i) = *src.add(i);
i += 1;
}
}
const _MEMCPY: () = unsafe {
let ptr = &42;
let mut ptr2 = ptr::null::<i32>();
// Copy from ptr to ptr2.
memcpy(&mut ptr2 as *mut _ as *mut _, &ptr as *const _ as *const _, mem::size_of::<&i32>());
assert!(*ptr2 == 42);
};
```
What makes this code tricky is that pointers are "opaque blobs" in const-eval, we cannot just let people look at the individual bytes since *we don't know what those bytes look like* -- that depends on the absolute address the pointed-to object will be placed at. The code above "breaks apart" a pointer into individual bytes, and then puts them back together in the same order elsewhere. This PR implements the logic to properly track how those individual bytes relate to the original pointer, and to recognize when they are in the right order again.
We still reject constants where the final value contains a not-fully-put-together pointer: I have no idea how one could construct an LLVM global where one byte is defined as "the 3rd byte of a pointer to that other global over there" -- and even if LLVM supports this somehow, we can leave implementing that to a future PR. It seems unlikely to me anyone would even want this, but who knows.^^
This also changes the behavior of Miri, by tracking the order of bytes with provenance and only considering a pointer to have valid provenance if all bytes are in the original order again. This is related to https://github.com/rust-lang/unsafe-code-guidelines/issues/558. It means one cannot implement XOR linked lists with strict provenance any more, which is however only of theoretical interest. Practically I am curious if anyone will show up with any code that Miri now complains about - that would be interesting data. Cc `@rust-lang/opsem`
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Revert "Partially outline code inside the panic! macro".
This reverts https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/pull/115670
Without any tests/benchmarks that show some improvement, it's hard to know whether the change had any positive effect. (And if it did, whether that effect is still achieved today.)
|
|
|
|
This helps to avoid polluting the sysroot of the build compiler.
|
|
|
|
The target is removed by `copy_link` too, so no need to duplicate the syscall.
|
|
According to
https://www.unicode.org/policies/stability_policy.html#Property_Value,
the set of codepoints in `Cc` will never change. So we can hard-code
the patterns to match against instead of using a table.
|
|
Do not copy files in `copy_src_dirs` in dry run
This reduces the time to run the current 9 dist snapshot tests from ~24s to ~2s on my PC.
r? `@jieyouxu`
|
|
Fix tracing debug representation of steps without arguments in bootstrap
I was wondering why I see `lainSourceTarbal` in tracing logs...
r? `@jieyouxu`
|
|
Remove duplicated tracing span in bootstrap
`trace_cmd` is now called also in the `stream` method, so including it also here was duplicating command spans.
r? `@jieyouxu`
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Fix adjacent code
Fix duplicate warning; merge test into `tests/ui-fulldeps/internal-lints`
Use `rustc_middle::ty::FnSig::inputs`
Address two review comments
- https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/pull/139345#discussion_r2109006991
- https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/pull/139345#discussion_r2109058588
Use `Instance::try_resolve`
Import `rustc_middle::ty::Ty` as `Ty` rather than `MiddleTy`
Simplify predicate handling
Add more `#[allow(rustc::potential_query_instability)]` following rebase
Remove two `#[allow(rustc::potential_query_instability)]` following rebase
Address review comment
Update compiler/rustc_lint/src/internal.rs
Co-authored-by: lcnr <rust@lcnr.de>
|
|
Switch to only using aarch64 runners (implying we are now
cross-compiling) and stop running tests. In the future, we could
enable (some?) tests via Rosetta 2.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
this fixes `tests/ui/process/nofile-limit.rs` which fails to link on
nixos for me without this change
|
|
Enhance UI test output handling for runtime errors
When a UI test runs a compiled binary and an error/forbid pattern check fails, the failure message previously only showed compiler output, hiding the executed programs stdout/stderr. This makes it harder to see near-miss or unexpected runtime lines.
Fixed rust-lang/rust#141531
Supersedes rust-lang/rust#141977
|
|
bootstrap: Reduce dependencies
Eliminate the `fd-lock` dependency by using the new native locking in std.
Eliminate the `xattr` dependency by turning off a feature flag in `tar`, since
the tarballs that we extract with bootstrap don't need it.
|
|
Deduplicate -L search paths
For each -L passed to the compiler, we eagerly scan the whole directory. If it has a lot of files, that results in a lot of allocations. So it's needless to do this if some -L paths are actually duplicated (which can happen e.g. in the situation in the linked issue).
This PR both deduplicates the args, and also teaches rustdoc not to pass duplicated args to merged doctests.
Fixes: https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/issues/145375
|
|
r=jieyouxu
Split codegen backend check step into two and don't run it with `x check compiler`
This reduces the amount of work that is done during `x check compiler`. We still check both backends during `x check` by defaut, even if they are not in `rust.codegen-backends`, as just checking them shouldn't require expensive preparations, like building GCC.
r? `@jieyouxu`
|
|
ci: clean windows disk space in background
|
|
Reduce usage of `compiler_for` in bootstrap
While working on refactoring/fixing `dist` steps, I realized that `build.full-bootstrap` does much more than it should, and that it its documentation is wrong. It seems that the main purpose of this option should be to enable/disable stdlib/compiler uplifting (https://rust-lang.zulipchat.com/#narrow/channel/326414-t-infra.2Fbootstrap/topic/Purpose.20of.20.60build.2Efull-bootstrap.60/with/533985624), but currently it also affects staging, or more precisely which compiler will be used to build selected steps, because this option is used in the cursed `compiler_for` function.
I would like to change the option it so that it *only* affects uplifting, and doesn't affect stage selection, which I (partially) did in this PR. I removed the usage of `compiler_for` from the `Std` and `Rustc` steps, and explicitly implemented uplifting, without going through `compiler_for`.
The only remaining usages of `compiler_for` are in dist steps (which I'm currently refactoring, will send a PR later) and test steps (which I will take a look at after dist). After that we can finally remove the function.
I tried to document the case when uplifting was happening during cross-compilation, which was very implicit before. I also did a slight change in the uplifting logic for rustc when cross-compiling. Before, we would attempt to uplift a stage1 rustc, but that is not really a thing when cross-compiling.
r? `@jieyouxu`
|
|
We are moving away from `x86_64-apple-darwin`, so soon these docs
won't be available.
|
|
When a UI test runs a compiled binary and an error/forbid pattern
check fails, the failure message previously only showed compiler output,
hiding the executed programs stdout/stderr. This makes it harder to
see near-miss or unexpected runtime lines.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
