about summary refs log tree commit diff
path: root/tests/codegen/function-arguments-noopt.rs
AgeCommit message (Collapse)AuthorLines
2025-07-22Rename `tests/codegen` into `tests/codegen-llvm`Guillaume Gomez-69/+0
2024-05-31Run rustfmt on `tests/codegen/`.Nicholas Nethercote-14/+14
Except for `simd-intrinsic/`, which has a lot of files containing multiple types like `u8x64` which really are better when hand-formatted. There is a surprising amount of two-space indenting in this directory. Non-trivial changes: - `rustfmt::skip` needed in `debug-column.rs` to preserve meaning of the test. - `rustfmt::skip` used in a few places where hand-formatting read more nicely: `enum/enum-match.rs` - Line number adjustments needed for the expected output of `debug-column.rs` and `coroutine-debug.rs`.
2024-03-05use [N x i8] for byval/sret typesErik Desjardins-2/+2
This avoids depending on LLVM's struct types to determine the size of the byval/sret slot.
2024-02-22[AUTO_GENERATED] Migrate compiletest to use `ui_test`-style `//@` directives许杰友 Jieyou Xu (Joe)-1/+1
2023-12-15Separate immediate and in-memory ScalarPair representationNikita Popov-2/+2
Currently, we assume that ScalarPair is always represented using a two-element struct, both as an immediate value and when stored in memory. This currently works fairly well, but runs into problems with https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/pull/116672, where a ScalarPair involving an i128 type can no longer be represented as a two-element struct in memory. For example, the tuple `(i32, i128)` needs to be represented in-memory as `{ i32, [3 x i32], i128 }` to satisfy alignment requirement. Using `{ i32, i128 }` instead will result in the second element being stored at the wrong offset (prior to LLVM 18). Resolve this issue by no longer requiring that the immediate and in-memory type for ScalarPair are the same. The in-memory type will now look the same as for normal struct types (and will include padding filler and similar), while the immediate type stays a simple two-element struct type. This also means that booleans in immediate ScalarPair are now represented as i1 rather than i8, just like we do everywhere else. The core change here is to llvm_type (which now treats ScalarPair as a normal struct) and immediate_llvm_type (which returns the two-element struct that llvm_type used to produce). The rest is fixing things up to no longer assume these are the same. In particular, this switches places that try to get pointers to the ScalarPair elements to use byte-geps instead of struct-geps.
2023-07-27CHECK only for opaque ptrJosh Stone-5/+5
2023-07-10rustc_target: Add alignment to indirectly-passed by-value types, correcting thePatrick Walton-2/+2
alignment of `byval` on x86 in the process. Commit 88e4d2c2918428d55e34cd57c11279ea839c8822 from five years ago removed support for alignment on indirectly-passed arguments because of problems with the `i686-pc-windows-msvc` target. Unfortunately, the `memcpy` optimizations I recently added to LLVM 16 depend on this to forward `memcpy`s. This commit attempts to fix the problems with `byval` parameters on that target and now correctly adds the `align` attribute. The problem is summarized in [this comment] by @eddyb. Briefly, 32-bit x86 has special alignment rules for `byval` parameters: for the most part, their alignment is forced to 4. This is not well-documented anywhere but in the Clang source. I looked at the logic in Clang `TargetInfo.cpp` and tried to replicate it here. The relevant methods in that file are `X86_32ABIInfo::getIndirectResult()` and `X86_32ABIInfo::getTypeStackAlignInBytes()`. The `align` parameter attribute for `byval` parameters in LLVM must match the platform ABI, or miscompilations will occur. Note that this doesn't use the approach suggested by eddyb, because I felt it was overkill to store the alignment in `on_stack` when special handling is really only needed for 32-bit x86. As a side effect, this should fix #80127, because it will make the `align` parameter attribute for `byval` parameters match the platform ABI on LLVM x86-64. [this comment]: https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/pull/80822#issuecomment-829985417
2023-07-08Always name the return place.Camille GILLOT-2/+2
2023-02-06make PointerKind directly reflect pointer typesRalf Jung-0/+6
The code that consumes PointerKind (`adjust_for_rust_scalar` in rustc_ty_utils) ended up using PointerKind variants to talk about Rust reference types (& and &mut) anyway, making the old code structure quite confusing: one always had to keep in mind which PointerKind corresponds to which type. So this changes PointerKind to directly reflect the type. This does not change behavior.
2023-01-11Move /src/test to /testsAlbert Larsan-0/+63