| Age | Commit message (Collapse) | Author | Lines |
|---|
|
|
|
|
|
collapsed links and reference links have a pretty particular syntax,
it seems unlikely they would show up on accident.
Co-authored-by: León Orell Valerian Liehr <me@fmease.dev>
|
|
|
|
|
|
r=GuillaumeGomez
rustdoc: linking to a local proc macro no longer warns
fixes https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/issues/91274
tried to keep the fix general in case we ever have any other kind of item that occupies
multiple namespaces simultaniously.
|
|
fixes https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/issues/91274
Co-authored-by: Guillaume Gomez <guillaume1.gomez@gmail.com>
|
|
1. rustdoc::bare_urls doesn't output
invalid suggestions if source_span_for_markdown_range
fails to find a span
2. source_span_for_markdown_range tries harder to
return a span by applying an additional diagnostic
fixes https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/issues/135851
|
|
|
|
|
|
This commit takes advantage of a feature in pulldown-cmark that
makes the list of link definitions available to the consuming
application. It produces unresolved link warnings for refdefs
that aren't used, and can now produce exact spans for the dest
even when it has escapes.
|
|
```
error[E0610]: `{integer}` is a primitive type and therefore doesn't have fields
--> $DIR/attempted-access-non-fatal.rs:7:15
|
LL | let _ = 2.l;
| ^
|
help: if intended to be a floating point literal, consider adding a `0` after the period and a `f64` suffix
|
LL - let _ = 2.l;
LL + let _ = 2.0f64;
|
```
|
|
|
|
|
|
```
error[E0432]: unresolved import `some_novel_crate`
--> file.rs:1:5
|
1 | use some_novel_crate::Type;
| ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^ use of unresolved module or unlinked crate `some_novel_crate`
```
On resolve errors where there might be a missing crate, mention `cargo add foo`:
```
error[E0433]: failed to resolve: use of unresolved module or unlinked crate `nope`
--> $DIR/conflicting-impl-with-err.rs:4:11
|
LL | impl From<nope::Thing> for Error {
| ^^^^ use of unresolved module or unlinked crate `nope`
|
= help: if you wanted to use a crate named `nope`, use `cargo add nope` to add it to your `Cargo.toml`
```
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
When encountering a name in an import that could have come from a crate that wasn't imported, use a structured suggestion to suggest `extern crate foo;` pointing at the right place in the crate.
When encountering `_` in an import, do not suggest `extern crate _;`.
```
error[E0432]: unresolved import `spam`
--> $DIR/import-from-missing-star-3.rs:2:9
|
LL | use spam::*;
| ^^^^ maybe a missing crate `spam`?
|
help: consider importing the `spam` crate
|
LL + extern crate spam;
|
```
|
|
We don't want to have questions in the diagnostic output. Instead, we use wording that communicates uncertainty, like "might":
```
error[E0432]: unresolved import `spam`
--> $DIR/import-from-missing-star-3.rs:2:9
|
LL | use spam::*;
| ^^^^ you might be missing crate `spam`
|
= help: consider adding `extern crate spam` to use the `spam` crate
```
|
|
|
|
|
|
Update tests
|
|
Co-authored-by: Adrian <adrian.iosdev@gmail.com>
|
|
|
|
|
|
Fixes #110111
This bug, and the workaround in this commit, is closely linked to
[raphlinus/pulldown-cmark#441], getting offsets of link
components. In particular, pulldown-cmark doesn't provide the
offsets of the contents of a link.
To work around this, rustdoc parser parts of a link definition
itself.
[raphlinus/pulldown-cmark#441]: https://github.com/raphlinus/pulldown-cmark/issues/441
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Improve tests for #110138
These should live in rustdoc-json, not rustdoc-ui, so we can run assertions, and not just check there's no ICE
CC #100515, as we never document this suite
r? rustdoc
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The order in which the multiple errors for the ambiguous intra doc links
are printed is different.
|
|
GuillaumeGomez:fix-invalid-suggestion-ambiguous-intra-doc2, r=oli-obk,notriddle
rustdoc: Fix invalid suggestions on ambiguous intra doc links v2
Fixes https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/issues/108653.
This is another approach to fixing the same issue. This time, we keep the computed information around instead of re-computing it.
Strangely enough, the order for ambiguities seem to have been changed. Not an issue but it creates a lot of diff...
So which version do you prefer?
r? `@notriddle`
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Keep ids of the documented items themselves, not their parent modules.
Parent modules can be retreived from those ids when necessary.
|
|
|
|
if it fails instead of bubbling out an error
|
|
resolve: Fix doc links referring to other crates when documenting proc macro crates directly
Fixes https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/issues/107950
|
|
|
