| Age | Commit message (Collapse) | Author | Lines |
|---|
|
`rustc_layout_scalar_valid_range_start` and `rustc_layout_scalar_valid_range_end`
|
|
|
|
Signed-off-by: Jonathan Brouwer <jonathantbrouwer@gmail.com>
|
|
Signed-off-by: Jonathan Brouwer <jonathantbrouwer@gmail.com>
|
|
Signed-off-by: Jonathan Brouwer <jonathantbrouwer@gmail.com>
|
|
Signed-off-by: Jonathan Brouwer <jonathantbrouwer@gmail.com>
|
|
Signed-off-by: Jonathan Brouwer <jonathantbrouwer@gmail.com>
|
|
`tests/ui`: A New Order [13/N]
Some `tests/ui/` housekeeping, to trim down number of tests directly under `tests/ui/`. Part of rust-lang/rust#133895.
r? ```@jieyouxu```
|
|
|
|
`tests/ui`: A New Order [12/N]
Some `tests/ui/` housekeeping, to trim down number of tests directly under `tests/ui/`. Part of rust-lang/rust#133895.
r? `@jieyouxu`
|
|
|
|
Signed-off-by: Jonathan Brouwer <jonathantbrouwer@gmail.com>
|
|
The `macro_rules!` parser was written to match the series of rules using
the macros-by-example (MBE) engine and a hand-written equivalent of the
left-hand side of a MBE macro. This was complex to read, difficult to
extend, and produced confusing error messages. Because it was using the
MBE engine, any parse failure would be reported as if some macro was
being applied to the `macro_rules!` invocation itself; for instance,
errors would talk about "macro invocation", "macro arguments", and
"macro call", when they were actually about the macro *definition*.
And in practice, the `macro_rules!` parser only used the MBE engine to
extract the left-hand side and right-hand side of each rule as a token
tree, and then parsed the rest using a separate parser.
Rewrite it to parse the series of rules using a simple loop, instead.
This makes it more extensible in the future, and improves error
messages. For instance, omitting a semicolon between rules will result
in "expected `;`" and "unexpected token", rather than the confusing "no
rules expected this token in macro call".
This work was greatly aided by pair programming with Vincenzo Palazzo
and Eric Holk.
|
|
Signed-off-by: Jonathan Brouwer <jonathantbrouwer@gmail.com>
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Signed-off-by: Jonathan Brouwer <jonathantbrouwer@gmail.com>
|
|
Rollup of 9 pull requests
Successful merges:
- rust-lang/rust#142331 (Add `trim_prefix` and `trim_suffix` methods for both `slice` and `str` types.)
- rust-lang/rust#142491 (Rework #[cold] attribute parser)
- rust-lang/rust#142494 (Fix missing docs in `rustc_attr_parsing`)
- rust-lang/rust#142495 (Better template for `#[repr]` attributes)
- rust-lang/rust#142497 (Fix random failure when JS code is executed when the whole file was not read yet)
- rust-lang/rust#142575 (Ensure copy* intrinsics also perform the static self-init checks)
- rust-lang/rust#142650 (Refactor Translator)
- rust-lang/rust#142713 (mbe: Refactor transcription)
- rust-lang/rust#142755 (rustdoc: Remove `FormatRenderer::cache`)
r? `@ghost`
`@rustbot` modify labels: rollup
|
|
|
|
it should not suggest just `#[align]`
|
|
Right now it's used for functions with `fn_align`, in the future it will
get more uses (statics, struct fields, etc.)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
As a performance optimization, skip elaborating the supertraits of
`Sized`, and if a `MetaSized` obligation is being checked, then look for
a `Sized` predicate in the parameter environment. This makes the
`ParamEnv` smaller which should improve compiler performance as it avoids
all the iteration over the larger `ParamEnv`.
|
|
These tests just need blessing, they don't have any interesting behaviour
changes.
Some of these tests have new errors because `LegacyReceiver` cannot be
proven to be implemented now that it is also testing for `MetaSized` -
but this is just a consequence of the other errors in the test.
|
|
As before, add `MetaSized` and `PointeeSized` traits to all of the
non-minicore `no_core` tests so that they don't fail for lack of
language items.
|
|
Expand the automatic implementation of `MetaSized` and `PointeeSized` so
that it is also implemented on non-`Sized` types, just not `ty::Foreign`
(extern type).
|
|
Introduce the `MetaSized` and `PointeeSized` traits as supertraits of
`Sized` and initially implement it on everything that currently
implements `Sized` to isolate any changes that simply adding the
traits introduces.
|
|
`tests/ui`: A New Order [7/N]
> [!NOTE]
>
> Intermediate commits are intended to help review, but will be squashed prior to merge.
Some `tests/ui/` housekeeping, to trim down number of tests directly under `tests/ui/`. Part of rust-lang/rust#133895.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Method errors have an extra check that force trim paths whenever the
normal string is longer than 10 characters, which can be quite unhelpful
when multiple items have the same name (for example an `Error`).
A user reported this force trimming as being quite unhelpful when they
had a method error where the precise path of the `Error` mattered.
The code uses `tcx.short_string` already to get the normal path, which
tries to be clever around trimming paths if necessary, so there is no
reason for this extra force trimming.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Remove `name_or_empty`
Another step towards #137978.
r? ``@jdonszelmann``
|
|
r=davidtwco,Urgau,traviscross
Stabilize `cfg_boolean_literals`
Closes #131204
`@rustbot` labels +T-lang +I-lang-nominated
This will end up conflicting with the test in #138293 so whichever doesn't land first will need updating
--
# Stabilization Report
## General design
### What is the RFC for this feature and what changes have occurred to the user-facing design since the RFC was finalized?
[RFC 3695](https://github.com/rust-lang/rfcs/pull/3695), none.
### What behavior are we committing to that has been controversial? Summarize the major arguments pro/con.
None
### Are there extensions to this feature that remain unstable? How do we know that we are not accidentally committing to those?
None
## Has a call-for-testing period been conducted? If so, what feedback was received?
Yes; only positive feedback was received.
## Implementation quality
### Summarize the major parts of the implementation and provide links into the code (or to PRs)
Implemented in [#131034](https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/pull/131034).
### Summarize existing test coverage of this feature
- [Basic usage, including `#[cfg()]`, `cfg!()` and `#[cfg_attr()]`](https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/blob/6d71251cf9e40326461f90f8ff9a7024706aea87/tests/ui/cfg/true-false.rs)
- [`--cfg=true/false` on the command line being accessible via `r#true/r#false`](https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/blob/6d71251cf9e40326461f90f8ff9a7024706aea87/tests/ui/cfg/raw-true-false.rs)
- [Interaction with the unstable `#[doc(cfg(..))]` feature](https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/tree/6d71251/tests/rustdoc-ui/cfg-boolean-literal.rs)
- [Denying `--check-cfg=cfg(true/false)`](https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/tree/6d71251/tests/ui/check-cfg/invalid-arguments.rs)
- Ensuring `--cfg false` on the command line doesn't change the meaning of `cfg(false)`: `tests/ui/cfg/cmdline-false.rs`
- Ensuring both `cfg(true)` and `cfg(false)` on the same item result in it being disabled: `tests/ui/cfg/both-true-false.rs`
### What outstanding bugs in the issue tracker involve this feature? Are they stabilization-blocking?
The above mentioned issue; it should not block as it interacts with another unstable feature.
### What FIXMEs are still in the code for that feature and why is it ok to leave them there?
None
### Summarize contributors to the feature by name for recognition and assuredness that people involved in the feature agree with stabilization
- `@clubby789` (RFC)
- `@Urgau` (Implementation in rustc)
### Which tools need to be adjusted to support this feature. Has this work been done?
`rustdoc`'s unstable`#[doc(cfg(..)]` has been updated to respect it. `cargo` has been updated with a forward compatibility lint to enable supporting it in cargo once stabilized.
## Type system and execution rules
### What updates are needed to the reference/specification? (link to PRs when they exist)
A few lines to be added to the reference for configuration predicates, specified in the RFC.
|
|
I'm removing empty identifiers everywhere, because in practice they
always mean "no identifier" rather than "empty identifier". (An empty
identifier is impossible.) It's better to use `Option` to mean "no
identifier" because you then can't forget about the "no identifier"
possibility.
Some specifics:
- When testing an attribute for a single name, the commit uses the
`has_name` method.
- When testing an attribute for multiple names, the commit uses the new
`has_any_name` method.
- When using `match` on an attribute, the match arms now have `Some` on
them.
In the tests, we now avoid printing empty identifiers by not printing
the identifier in the `error:` line at all, instead letting the carets
point out the problem.
|
|
This shows places where the use of `name_or_empty` causes problems, i.e.
we print empty identifiers in error messages:
```
error: unrecognized field name ``
error: `` isn't a valid `#[macro_export]` argument
`#[no_sanitize()]` should be applied to a function
```
(The last one is about an attribute `#[no_sanitize("address")]`.)
The next commit will fix these.
|
|
The current code assumes that the attribute is just an identifier, and
so misprints paths.
|
|
This adds two new warnings, both of which print the attribute
incorrectly as `#[]`. The next commit will fix this.
|
|
- Show the `#![ ... ]` in the span (to make it clear that it should not
be included in the CLI argument)
- Show more detailed errors when the crate has valid token trees but
invalid syntax.
Previously, `crate-attr=feature(foo),feature(bar)` would just say
"invalid crate attribute" and point at the comma. Now, it explicitly
says that the comma was unexpected, which is useful when using
`--error-format=short`. It also fixes the column to show the correct
span.
- Recover from parse errors. Previously we would abort immediately on
syntax errors; now we go on to try and type-check the rest of the
crate.
The new diagnostic code also happens to be slightly shorter.
|
|
|
|
Do not visit whole crate to compute `lints_that_dont_need_to_run`.
This allows to reuse the computed lint levels instead of re-visiting the whole crate.
|
|
r=jdonszelmann
Check if merged attributes list is empty in expr
Fixes #139373
In the example code, an [`UnrecognizedReprHint`](https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/blob/6b5ccfc87f59ab017032e430d4d358b4989735da/compiler/rustc_attr_parsing/src/attributes/repr.rs#L155) error is output, and the list of merged attributes becomes empty. This causes a [panic](https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/blob/6b5ccfc87f59ab017032e430d4d358b4989735da/compiler/rustc_ast_lowering/src/lib.rs#L618) to occur. So, it's necessary to check if merged attributes list is empty as other functions do.
ref: https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/blob/6b5ccfc87f59ab017032e430d4d358b4989735da/compiler/rustc_ast_lowering/src/lib.rs#L896
|
|
|
