| Age | Commit message (Collapse) | Author | Lines |
|---|
|
Key changes include:
- Removal of the word "syntax" from the lint message. More accurately,
it could have been something like "syntax group" or "syntax
category", but avoiding it completely is easier.
- The primary lint message now reflects exactly which mismatch is
occurring, instead of trying to be general. A new `help` line is
general across the mismatch kinds.
- Suggestions have been reduced to be more minimal, no longer also
changing non-idiomatic but unrelated aspects.
- Suggestion text no longer mentions changes when those changes don't
occur in that specific suggestion.
(cherry picked from commit 553074431875701f66107049339dc1e67f0cdeba)
|
|
Marks ADT live if it appears in pattern
Marks ADT live if it appears in pattern, it implies the construction of the ADT.
1. Then we can detect unused private ADTs impl `Default`, without special logics for `Default` and other std traits.
2. We can also remove `rustc_trivial_field_reads` on `Default`, and the logic in `should_ignore_item` (introduced by rust-lang/rust#126302).
Fixes rust-lang/rust#120770
Extracted from rust-lang/rust#128637.
r? `@petrochenkov`
|
|
r=lcnr,traviscross
Stabilize `feature(generic_arg_infer)`
Fixes rust-lang/rust#85077
r? lcnr
cc ````@rust-lang/project-const-generics````
|
|
These tests just need blessing, they don't have any interesting behaviour
changes.
Some of these tests have new errors because `LegacyReceiver` cannot be
proven to be implemented now that it is also testing for `MetaSized` -
but this is just a consequence of the other errors in the test.
|
|
|
|
|
|
r=compiler-errors
rustc_resolve: Improve `resolve_const_param_in_non_trivial_anon_const` wording
In some contexts, const expressions are OK. Add a `here` to the error message to clarify this.
Closes rust-lang/rust#79429 which has 15 x 👍
|
|
|
|
also adjust the wording a little so that we don't say "the error occurred here" for two different spans
|
|
In some contexts, const expressions are OK. Add a `here` to the error
message to clarify this.
|
|
Verbose suggestion to make param `const`
```
error[E0747]: type provided when a constant was expected
--> $DIR/invalid-const-arguments.rs:10:19
|
LL | impl<N> Foo for B<N> {}
| ^
|
help: consider changing this type parameter to a const parameter
|
LL - impl<N> Foo for B<N> {}
LL + impl<const N: u8> Foo for B<N> {}
|
```
Part of rust-lang/rust#141973.
|
|
r=traviscross,jieyouxu
Add a new `mismatched-lifetime-syntaxes` lint
The lang-team [discussed this](https://hackmd.io/nf4ZUYd7Rp6rq-1svJZSaQ) and I attempted to [summarize](https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/pull/120808#issuecomment-2701863833) their decision. The summary-of-the-summary is:
- Using two different kinds of syntax for elided lifetimes is confusing. In rare cases, it may even [lead to unsound code](https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/issues/48686)! Some examples:
```rust
// Lint will warn about these
fn(v: ContainsLifetime) -> ContainsLifetime<'_>;
fn(&'static u8) -> &u8;
```
- Matching up references with no lifetime syntax, references with anonymous lifetime syntax, and paths with anonymous lifetime syntax is an exception to the simplest possible rule:
```rust
// Lint will not warn about these
fn(&u8) -> &'_ u8;
fn(&'_ u8) -> &u8;
fn(&u8) -> ContainsLifetime<'_>;
```
- Having a lint for consistent syntax of elided lifetimes will make the [future goal](https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/issues/91639) of warning-by-default for paths participating in elision much simpler.
---
This new lint attempts to accomplish the goal of enforcing consistent syntax. In the process, it supersedes and replaces the existing `elided-named-lifetimes` lint, which means it starts out life as warn-by-default.
|
|
```
error[E0747]: type provided when a constant was expected
--> $DIR/invalid-const-arguments.rs:10:19
|
LL | impl<N> Foo for B<N> {}
| ^
|
help: consider changing this type parameter to a const parameter
|
LL - impl<N> Foo for B<N> {}
LL + impl<const N: u8> Foo for B<N> {}
|
```
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Defer evaluating type system constants when they use infers or params
Split out of #137972, the parts necessary for associated const equality and min generic const args to make progress and have correct semantics around when CTFE is invoked. According to a [previous perf run](https://perf.rust-lang.org/compare.html?start=93257e2d20809d82d1bc0fcc1942480d1a66d7cd&end=01b4cbf0f47c3f782330db88fa5ba199bba1f8a2&stat=instructions:u) of adding the new `const_arg_kind` query we should expect minor regressions here.
I think this is acceptable as we should be able to remove this query relatively soon once mgca is more complete as we'll then be able to implement GCE in terms of mgca and rip out `GCEConst` at which point it's trivial to determine what kind of anon const we're dealing with (either it has generics and is a repeat expr hack, or it doesnt and is a normal anon const).
This should only affect unstable code as we handle repeat exprs specially and those are the only kinds of type system consts that are allowed to make use of generic parameters.
Fixes #133066
Fixes #133199
Fixes #136894
Fixes #137813
r? compiler-errors
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Don't FCW assoc consts in patterns
Fixes #140447
See comment in added test. We could also check that the anon const is a const arg by looking at the HIR. I'm not sure that's necessary though :thinking: The only consts that are evaluated "for the type system" are const args (which *should* get FCWs) and const patterns (which cant be anon consts afaik).
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
These emit prelude imports which means they are always edition dependent
|
|
Add regression test for #127424
Fixes: https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/issues/127424
This ICE no longer reproduces, so it appears to have already been fixed.
This PR adds a regression test to ensure the issue doesn’t come back in the future.
Please let me know if there's anything I should improve or revise!
|
|
|
|
|
|
UI tests: add missing diagnostic kinds where possible
The subset of https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/pull/139427 that only adds diagnostic kinds to line annotations, without changing any other things in annotations or compiletest.
After this only non-viral `NOTE`s and `HELP`s should be missing.
r? `@jieyouxu`
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Enforce type of const param correctly in MIR typeck
Properly intercepts and then annotates the type for a `ConstKind::Param` in the MIR.
This code should probably be cleaned up, it's kinda spaghetti, but no better structure really occurred to me when writing this case.
We could probably gate this behind the feature gate or add a fast path when the args have no free regions if perf is bad.
r? `@BoxyUwU`
|
|
For macros that are implemented on the compiler, we do *not* mention the `-Zmacro-backtrace` flag. This includes `derive`s and standard macros.
|
|
|
|
|
|
Rollup of 10 pull requests
Successful merges:
- #137715 (Allow int literals for pattern types with int base types)
- #138002 (Disable CFI for weakly linked syscalls)
- #138051 (Add support for downloading GCC from CI)
- #138231 (Prevent ICE in autodiff validation by emitting user-friendly errors)
- #138245 (stabilize `ci_rustc_if_unchanged_logic` test for local environments)
- #138256 (Do not feed anon const a type that references generics that it does not have)
- #138284 (Do not write user type annotation for const param value path)
- #138296 (Remove `AdtFlags::IS_ANONYMOUS` and `Copy`/`Clone` condition for anonymous ADT)
- #138352 (miri native_calls: ensure we actually expose *mutable* provenance to the memory FFI can access)
- #138354 (remove redundant `body` arguments)
r? `@ghost`
`@rustbot` modify labels: rollup
|
|
Do not write user type annotation for const param value path
As I noted in the code comment, `DefKind::ConstParam` isn't actually *generic* over its own args, we just use the identity args from the body when lowering the value path so we have something to plug into the `EarlyBinder` we get back from `type_of` for the const param. So skip over it in `write_user_type_annotation_from_args`.
Somewhat unrelated, but I left an explanation for a somewhat mysterious quirk in the THIR lowering of user type annotations for patterns having to do with ctors and their `type_of` not actually being the type of the pattern node it's ascribing.
Fixes #138048
r? ``@BoxyUwU``
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Check signature WF when lowering MIR body
Alternative to #137233.
https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/pull/137233#issuecomment-2667879143
Fixes https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/issues/137186
We do this check in `mir_drops_elaborated_and_const_checked` and not during `mir_promoted` because that may result in borrowck cycles if WF requires looking into an opaque hidden type. This causes some TAIT tests to fail unnecessarily.
r? lcnr
try-job: test-various
|
|
When `#![feature(min_generic_const_args)]` is enabled, we now lower all
const paths in generic arg position to `hir::ConstArgKind::Path`. We
then lower assoc const paths to `ty::ConstKind::Unevaluated` since we
can no longer use the anon const expression lowering machinery. In the
process of implementing this, I factored out `hir_ty_lowering` code that
is now shared between lowering assoc types and assoc consts.
This PR also introduces a `#[type_const]` attribute for trait assoc
consts that are allowed as const args. However, we still need to
implement code to check that assoc const definitions satisfy
`#[type_const]` if present (basically is it a const path or a
monomorphic anon const).
|
|
|
|
Introduce `feature(generic_const_parameter_types)`
Allows to define const generic parameters whose type depends on other generic parameters, e.g. `Foo<const N: usize, const ARR: [u8; N]>;`
Wasn't going to implement for this for a while until we could implement it with `bad_inference.rs` resolved but apparently the project simd folks would like to be able to use this for some intrinsics and the inference issue isn't really a huge problem there aiui. (cc ``@workingjubilee`` )
|
|
Tweak output of const panic diagnostic
### Shorten span of panic failures in const context
Previously, we included a redundant prefix on the panic message and a postfix of the location of the panic. The prefix didn't carry any additional information beyond "something failed", and the location of the panic is redundant with the diagnostic's span, which gets printed out even if its code is not shown.
```
error[E0080]: evaluation of constant value failed
--> $DIR/assert-type-intrinsics.rs:11:9
|
LL | MaybeUninit::<!>::uninit().assume_init();
| ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^ panic: aborted execution: attempted to instantiate uninhabited type `!`
```
```
error[E0080]: evaluation of `Fail::<i32>::C` failed
--> $DIR/collect-in-dead-closure.rs:9:19
|
LL | const C: () = panic!();
| ^^^^^^^^ explicit panic
|
= note: this error originates in the macro `$crate::panic::panic_2015` which comes from the expansion of the macro `panic` (in Nightly builds, run with -Z macro-backtrace for more info)
```
```
error[E0080]: evaluation of constant value failed
--> $DIR/uninhabited.rs:87:9
|
LL | assert!(false);
| ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^ assertion failed: false
|
= note: this error originates in the macro `assert` (in Nightly builds, run with -Z macro-backtrace for more info)
```
### Remove duplicated span from const eval frame list
When the primary span for a const error is the same as the first frame in the const error report, skip it.
```
error[E0080]: evaluation of constant value failed
--> $DIR/issue-88434-removal-index-should-be-less.rs:3:24
|
LL | const _CONST: &[u8] = &f(&[], |_| {});
| ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^ explicit panic
|
note: inside `f::<{closure@$DIR/issue-88434-removal-index-should-be-less.rs:3:31: 3:34}>`
--> $DIR/issue-88434-removal-index-should-be-less.rs:10:5
|
LL | panic!()
| ^^^^^^^^ the failure occurred here
= note: this error originates in the macro `$crate::panic::panic_2015` which comes from the expansion of the macro `panic` (in Nightly builds, run with -Z macro-backtrace for more info)
```
instead of
```
error[E0080]: evaluation of constant value failed
--> $DIR/issue-88434-removal-index-should-be-less.rs:10:5
|
LL | panic!()
| ^^^^^^^^ explicit panic
|
note: inside `f::<{closure@$DIR/issue-88434-removal-index-should-be-less.rs:3:31: 3:34}>`
--> $DIR/issue-88434-removal-index-should-be-less.rs:10:5
|
LL | panic!()
| ^^^^^^^^
note: inside `_CONST`
--> $DIR/issue-88434-removal-index-should-be-less.rs:3:24
|
LL | const _CONST: &[u8] = &f(&[], |_| {});
| ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
= note: this error originates in the macro `$crate::panic::panic_2015` which comes from the expansion of the macro `panic` (in Nightly builds, run with -Z macro-backtrace for more info)
note: erroneous constant encountered
--> $DIR/issue-88434-removal-index-should-be-less.rs:3:23
|
LL | const _CONST: &[u8] = &f(&[], |_| {});
| ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
```
r? ``@oli-obk``
|
|
|
