about summary refs log tree commit diff
path: root/tests/ui/consts
AgeCommit message (Collapse)AuthorLines
2025-06-29Fix the span of trait bound modifier `[const]`León Orell Valerian Liehr-34/+34
2025-06-27Rollup merge of #143092 - RalfJung:const-check-lifetime-ext, r=oli-obkMatthias Krüger-58/+132
const checks for lifetime-extended temporaries: avoid 'top-level scope' terminology This error recently got changed in https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/pull/140942 to use the terminology of "top-level scope", but after further discussion in https://github.com/rust-lang/reference/pull/1865 it seems the reference will not be using that terminology after all. So let's also remove it from the compiler again, and let's focus on what actually happens with these temporaries: their lifetime is extended until the end of the program. r? ``@oli-obk`` ``@traviscross``
2025-06-27Rollup merge of #143046 - RalfJung:zst-unsafe-cell, r=lcnr,oli-obkMatthias Krüger-0/+15
const validation: properly ignore zero-sized UnsafeCell Fixes https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/issues/142948 r? `@oli-obk`
2025-06-27Rollup merge of #142806 - compiler-errors:norm-ct-has-ty, r=lcnr,BoxyUwUMatthias Krüger-0/+28
Normalize before computing ConstArgHasType goal in new solver This is a fix for rust-lang/rust#139905. See the description I left in the test. I chose to fix this by normalizing the type before matching on its `.kind()` in `compute_const_arg_has_type_goal` (since it feels somewhat consistent with how we normalize types before assembling their candidates, for example); however, there are several other solutions that come to mind for fixing this ICE: 1. (this solution) 2. Giving `ConstKind::Error` a proper type, like `ConstKind::Value`, so that consts don't go from failing to passing `ConstArgHasType` goals after normalization (i.e. `UNEVALUATED` would normalize into a `ConstKind::Error(_, bool)` type rather than losing its type altogether). 3. Just suppressing the errors and accepting the fact that goals can go from fail->pass after normalization. Thoughts? Happy to discuss this fix further. r? `@BoxyUwU`
2025-06-27Rollup merge of #139858 - oli-obk:new-const-traits-syntax, r=fee1-deadMatthias Krüger-110/+110
New const traits syntax This PR only affects the AST and doesn't actually change anything semantically. All occurrences of `~const` outside of libcore have been replaced by `[const]`. Within libcore we have to wait for rustfmt to be bumped in the bootstrap compiler. This will happen "automatically" (when rustfmt is run) during the bootstrap bump, as rustfmt converts `~const` into `[const]`. After this we can remove the `~const` support from the parser Caveat discovered during impl: there is no legacy bare trait object recovery for `[const] Trait` as that snippet in type position goes down the slice /array parsing code and will error r? ``@fee1-dead`` cc ``@nikomatsakis`` ``@traviscross`` ``@compiler-errors``
2025-06-27const checks: avoid 'top-level scope' terminologyRalf Jung-58/+132
2025-06-27const-eval: error when initializing a static writes to that staticRalf Jung-15/+61
2025-06-26clarify and unify 'transient mutable borrow' errorsRalf Jung-49/+49
2025-06-26add more sensible mut-ref-to-immutable testRalf Jung-8/+21
2025-06-26const-eval: allow constants to refer to mutable/external memory, but reject ↵Ralf Jung-121/+117
such constants as patterns
2025-06-26Change const trait bound syntax from ~const to [const]Oli Scherer-110/+110
2025-06-26const validation: properly ignore zero-sized UnsafeCellRalf Jung-0/+15
2025-06-25Normalize before computing ConstArgHasType goalMichael Goulet-0/+28
2025-06-23Make `PartialEq` a `const_trait`Oli Scherer-56/+74
2025-06-22Implement DesugaringKind::FormatLiteralmejrs-1/+1
2025-06-18Bless/update tests.Mara Bos-3/+5
2025-06-18Remove 'this error originates in format_args_nl' from test output.Mara Bos-2/+1
This message is no longer generated. This is probably a good thing. The relevant span is entirely in user code, and "format_args_nl" is an implementation detail with a name that isn't even public.
2025-06-16tests: `PointeeSized` bounds with extern typesDavid Wood-9/+23
These tests necessarily need to change now that `?Sized` is not sufficient to accept extern types and `PointeeSized` is now necessary. In addition, the `size_of_val`/`align_of_val` test can now be changed to expect an error.
2025-06-14Rollup merge of #140593 - m-ou-se:some-temp, r=NadrierilMatthias Krüger-77/+39
Temporary lifetime extension through tuple struct and tuple variant constructors This makes temporary lifetime extension work for tuple struct and tuple variant constructors, such as `Some()`. Before: ```rust let a = &temp(); // Extended let a = Some(&temp()); // Not extended :( let a = Some { 0: &temp() }; // Extended ``` After: ```rust let a = &temp(); // Extended let a = Some(&temp()); // Extended let a = Some { 0: &temp() }; // Extended ``` So, with this change, this works: ```rust let a = Some(&String::from("hello")); // New: String lifetime now extended! println!("{a:?}"); ``` Until now, we did not extend through tuple struct/variant constructors (like `Some`), because they are function calls syntactically, and we do not want to extend the String lifetime in: ```rust let a = some_function(&String::from("hello")); // String not extended! ``` However, it turns out to be very easy to distinguish between regular functions and constructors at the point where we do lifetime extension. In practice, constructors nearly always use UpperCamelCase while regular functions use lower_snake_case, so it should still be easy to for a human programmer at the call site to see whether something qualifies for lifetime extension or not. This needs a lang fcp. --- More examples of what will work after this change: ```rust let x = Person { name: "Ferris", job: Some(&Job { // `Job` now extended! title: "Chief Rustacean", organisation: "Acme Ltd.", }), }; dbg!(x); ``` ```rust let file = if use_stdout { None } else { Some(&File::create("asdf")?) // `File` now extended! }; set_logger(file); ``` ```rust use std::path::Component; let c = Component::Normal(&OsString::from(format!("test-{num}"))); // OsString now extended! assert_eq!(path.components.first().unwrap(), c); ```
2025-06-13Auto merge of #142442 - matthiaskrgr:rollup-6yodjfx, r=matthiaskrgrbors-16/+16
Rollup of 10 pull requests Successful merges: - rust-lang/rust#134847 (Implement asymmetrical precedence for closures and jumps) - rust-lang/rust#141491 (Delegate `<CStr as Debug>` to `ByteStr`) - rust-lang/rust#141770 (Merge `Cfg::render_long_html` and `Cfg::render_long_plain` methods common code) - rust-lang/rust#142069 (Introduce `-Zmacro-stats`) - rust-lang/rust#142158 (Tracking the old name of renamed unstable library features) - rust-lang/rust#142221 ([AIX] strip underlying xcoff object) - rust-lang/rust#142340 (miri: we can use apfloat's mul_add now) - rust-lang/rust#142379 (Add bootstrap option to compile a tool with features) - rust-lang/rust#142410 (intrinsics: rename min_align_of to align_of) - rust-lang/rust#142413 (rustc-dev-guide subtree update) r? `@ghost` `@rustbot` modify labels: rollup
2025-06-13Update tests.Mara Bos-77/+39
2025-06-12Rollup merge of #141162 - mejrs:gated, r=fee1-deadMatthias Krüger-3/+6
refactor `AttributeGate` and `rustc_attr!` to emit notes during feature checking First commit changes the following: - `AttributeGate ` from an enum with (four) tuple fields to (five) named fields - adds a `notes` fields that is emitted as notes in the `PostExpansionVisitor` pass - removes the `this compiler was built on YYYY-MM-DD; consider upgrading it if it is out of date` note if the feature gate is `rustc_attrs`. - various phrasing changes and touchups - and finally, the reason why I went down this path to begin with: tell people they can use the diagnostic namespace when they hit the rustc_on_unimplemented feature gate 🙈 Second commit removes unused machinery for deprecated attributes
2025-06-12intrinsics: rename min_align_of to align_ofRalf Jung-16/+16
2025-06-09refactor `AttributeGate` and `rustc_attr!` to emit notes during feature ↵mejrs-3/+6
checking
2025-06-08Auto merge of #142008 - RalfJung:const-eval-error-here, r=oli-obkbors-858/+858
const-eval error: always say in which item the error occurred I don't see why "is this generic" should make a difference. It may be reasonable to key this on whether the error occurs in a `const fn` that was invoked by a const (making it non-obvious which constant it is) vs inside the body of the const. r? `@oli-obk`
2025-06-07const-eval error: always say in which item the error occurredRalf Jung-858/+858
also adjust the wording a little so that we don't say "the error occurred here" for two different spans
2025-06-07Rollup merge of #142131 - estebank:cast-sugg, r=UrgauJacob Pratt-1/+1
Make cast suggestions verbose ``` error[E0604]: only `u8` can be cast as `char`, not `u32` --> $DIR/E0604.rs:2:5 | LL | 1u32 as char; | ^^^^^^^^^^^^ invalid cast | help: try `char::from_u32` instead | LL - 1u32 as char; LL + char::from_u32(1u32); | ``` ``` error[E0620]: cast to unsized type: `&[u8]` as `[char]` --> $DIR/cast-to-slice.rs:6:5 | LL | arr as [char]; | ^^^^^^^^^^^^^ | help: try casting to a reference instead | LL | arr as &[char]; | + ``` ``` error[E0620]: cast to unsized type: `Box<{integer}>` as `dyn Send` --> $DIR/cast-to-unsized-trait-object-suggestion.rs:3:5 | LL | Box::new(1) as dyn Send; | ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^ | help: you can cast to a `Box` instead | LL | Box::new(1) as Box<dyn Send>; | ++++ + ``` Part of rust-lang/rust#141973.
2025-06-07Rollup merge of #142045 - estebank:obligation-cause-code-suggestion, ↵Jacob Pratt-19/+22
r=compiler-errors Make obligation cause code suggestions verbose ``` error[E0277]: `()` is not a future --> $DIR/unnecessary-await.rs:28:10 | LL | e!().await; | ^^^^^ `()` is not a future | = help: the trait `Future` is not implemented for `()` = note: () must be a future or must implement `IntoFuture` to be awaited = note: required for `()` to implement `IntoFuture` help: remove the `.await` | LL - e!().await; LL + e!(); | ``` ``` error[E0277]: the trait bound `String: Copy` is not satisfied --> $DIR/const-fn-in-vec.rs:1:47 | LL | static _MAYBE_STRINGS: [Option<String>; 5] = [None; 5]; | ^^^^ the trait `Copy` is not implemented for `String` | = note: required for `Option<String>` to implement `Copy` = note: the `Copy` trait is required because this value will be copied for each element of the array help: create an inline `const` block | LL | static _MAYBE_STRINGS: [Option<String>; 5] = [const { None }; 5]; | +++++++ + ``` Part of rust-lang/rust#141973
2025-06-06reword suggestion messageEsteban Küber-1/+1
2025-06-06Make obligation cause code suggestions verboseEsteban Küber-19/+22
``` error[E0277]: `()` is not a future --> $DIR/unnecessary-await.rs:28:10 | LL | e!().await; | ^^^^^ `()` is not a future | = help: the trait `Future` is not implemented for `()` = note: () must be a future or must implement `IntoFuture` to be awaited = note: required for `()` to implement `IntoFuture` help: remove the `.await` | LL - e!().await; LL + e!(); | ``` ``` error[E0277]: the trait bound `String: Copy` is not satisfied --> $DIR/const-fn-in-vec.rs:1:47 | LL | static _MAYBE_STRINGS: [Option<String>; 5] = [None; 5]; | ^^^^ the trait `Copy` is not implemented for `String` | = note: required for `Option<String>` to implement `Copy` = note: the `Copy` trait is required because this value will be copied for each element of the array help: create an inline `const` block | LL | static _MAYBE_STRINGS: [Option<String>; 5] = [const { None }; 5]; | +++++++ + ```
2025-06-05Rollup merge of #142015 - oli-obk:wrong-instance, r=RalfJungMatthias Krüger-2/+3
Report the actual item that evaluation failed for instead of id of the last frame in the evaluation stack r? ``@RalfJung`` fixes rust-lang/rust#142010
2025-06-04Report the actual item that evaluation failed forOli Scherer-2/+3
2025-06-04Rollup merge of #141888 - ferrocene:lw/decouple-tests-from-2015, ↵Matthias Krüger-6/+6
r=compiler-errors Use non-2015 edition paths in tests that do not test for their resolution This allows for testing these tests on editions other than 2015
2025-06-03Use non-2015 edition paths in tests that do not test for their resolutionLukas Wirth-6/+6
This allows for testing these tests on editions other than 2015
2025-06-02Clarify why we are talking about a failed const eval at a random placeOli Scherer-881/+881
2025-06-02Use the informative error as the main const eval error messageOli Scherer-3871/+3731
2025-05-29Rollup merge of #141571 - RalfJung:float-tests, r=tgross35Jacob Pratt-46/+0
coretests: extend and simplify float tests Also de-duplicate tests by removing a ui test that duplicates the tests in core. r? `@tgross35`
2025-05-28coretests: add abs() and copysign() tests, and remove now-unnecessary ui testRalf Jung-46/+0
2025-05-28Auto merge of #141668 - tgross35:rollup-03gg6lf, r=tgross35bors-39/+26
Rollup of 8 pull requests Successful merges: - rust-lang/rust#140367 (add `asm_cfg`: `#[cfg(...)]` within `asm!`) - rust-lang/rust#140894 (Make check-cfg diagnostics work in `#[doc(cfg(..))]`) - rust-lang/rust#141252 (gvn: bail out unavoidable non-ssa locals in repeat) - rust-lang/rust#141517 (rustdoc: use descriptive tooltip if doctest is conditionally ignored) - rust-lang/rust#141551 (Make two transmute-related MIR lints into HIR lint) - rust-lang/rust#141591 (ci: fix llvm test coverage) - rust-lang/rust#141647 (Bump master `stage0` compiler) - rust-lang/rust#141659 (Add `Result::map_or_default` and `Option::map_or_default`) r? `@ghost` `@rustbot` modify labels: rollup
2025-05-27Rollup merge of #141551 - compiler-errors:hir-lints, r=BoxyUwUTrevor Gross-39/+26
Make two transmute-related MIR lints into HIR lint Make `PTR_TO_INTEGER_TRANSMUTE_IN_CONSTS` (rust-lang/rust#130540) and `UNNECESSARY_TRANSMUTES` (rust-lang/rust#136083) into "normal" HIR-based lints. Funny enough this came up in the review of the latter (https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/pull/136083#issuecomment-2614301413), but I guess it just was overlooked. But anywyas, there's no reason for these to be MIR lints; in fact, it makes the suggestions for them a bit more complicated than necessary. Note that there's probably a few more simplifications and improvements to be done here. Follow-ups can be done in a separate PR, especially if they're about the messaging and suggestions themselves, which I didn't write.
2025-05-27Auto merge of #129658 - saethlin:spare-a-crumb, r=jhprattbors-62/+9
Add some track_caller info to precondition panics Currently, when you encounter a precondition check, you'll always get the caller location of the implementation of the precondition checks. But with this PR, you'll be told the location of the invalid call. Which is useful. I thought of this while looking at https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/pull/129642#issuecomment-2311703898. The changes to `tests/ui/const*` happen because the const-eval interpreter skips `#[track_caller]` frames in its backtraces. The perf implications of this are: * Increased debug binary sizes. The caller_location implementation requires that the additional data we want to display here be stored in const allocations, which are deduplicated but not across crates. There is no impact on optimized build sizes. The panic path and the caller location data get optimized out. * The compile time hit to opt-incr-patched bitmaps happens because the patch changes the line number of some function calls with precondition checks, causing us to go from 0 dirty CGUs to 1 dirty CGU. * The other compile time hits are marginal but real, and due to doing a handful of new queries. Adding more useful data isn't completely free.
2025-05-25const-check: stop recommending the use of rustc_allow_const_fn_unstableRalf Jung-120/+20
2025-05-25Make PTR_TO_INTEGER_TRANSMUTE_IN_CONSTS into a HIR lintMichael Goulet-39/+26
2025-05-21Add some track_caller info to precondition panicsBen Kimock-62/+9
2025-05-20make std::intrinsic functions actually be intrinsicsRalf Jung-26/+12
2025-05-17Rollup merge of #135808 - tiif:conv_display, r=workingjubileeMatthias Krüger-2/+2
Implement Display for ``rustc_target::callconv::Conv`` Follow up of https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/pull/133103#discussion_r1885552854
2025-05-10Auto merge of #140895 - matthiaskrgr:rollup-rfvqv4t, r=matthiaskrgrbors-11/+11
Rollup of 7 pull requests Successful merges: - #129334 (Implement (part of) ACP 429: add `DerefMut` to `Lazy[Cell/Lock]`) - #139562 (rustdoc: add a handle that makes sidebar resizing more obvious) - #140151 (remove intrinsics::drop_in_place) - #140660 (remove 'unordered' atomic intrinsics) - #140783 (Update documentation of OnceLock::get_or_init.) - #140789 (Update hermit-abi to 0.5.1) - #140879 (1.87.0 release notes: remove nonsensical `~` operator) r? `@ghost` `@rustbot` modify labels: rollup
2025-05-10Rollup merge of #140151 - RalfJung:drop_in_place-is-not-an-intrinsic, ↵Matthias Krüger-11/+11
r=Mark-Simulacrum remove intrinsics::drop_in_place This was only ever accidentally stable, and has been marked as deprecated since Rust 1.52, released almost 4 years ago. We've removed the old serialization `derive`s, maybe we can remove this one as well? As suggested by ``@jhpratt,`` let's see what crater says for this one.
2025-05-09Merge typeck loop with static/const item eval loopOli Scherer-12/+12
2025-05-04Rollup merge of #137280 - RalfJung:const_swap_nonoverlapping, r=lcnrTrevor Gross-8/+6
stabilize ptr::swap_nonoverlapping in const Closes https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/issues/133668 The blocking issue mentioned there is resolved by documentation. We may in the future actually support such code, but that is blocked on https://github.com/rust-lang/const-eval/issues/72 which is non-trivial to implement. Meanwhile, this completes stabilization of all `const fn` in `ptr`. :) Here's a version of the problematic example to play around with: https://play.rust-lang.org/?version=nightly&mode=debug&edition=2021&gist=6c390452379fb593e109b8f8ee854d2a Should be FCP'd with both `@rust-lang/libs-api` and `@rust-lang/lang` since `swap_nonoverlapping` is documented to work as an "untyped" operation but due to the limitation mentioned above, that's not entirely true during const evaluation. I expect this limitation will only be hit in niche corner cases, so the benefits of having this function work most of the time outweigh the downsides of users running into this problem. (Note that unsafe code could already hit this limitation before this PR by doing cursed pointer casts, but having it hidden inside `swap_nonoverlapping` feels a bit different.)