| Age | Commit message (Collapse) | Author | Lines |
|---|
|
|
|
Various changes to name resolution of anon consts
Sorry this PR is kind of all over the place ^^'
Fixes #111012
- Rewrites anon const nameres to all go through `fn resolve_anon_const` explicitly instead of `visit_anon_const` to ensure that we do not accidentally resolve anon consts as if they are allowed to use generics when they aren't. Also means that we dont have bits of code for resolving anon consts that will get out of sync (i.e. legacy const generics and resolving path consts that were parsed as type arguments)
- Renames two of the `LifetimeRibKind`, `AnonConst -> ConcreteAnonConst` and `ConstGeneric -> ConstParamTy`
- Noticed while doing this that under `generic_const_exprs` all lifetimes currently get resolved to errors without any error being emitted which was causing a bunch of tests to pass without their bugs having been fixed, incidentally fixed that in this PR and marked those tests as `// known-bug:`. I'm fine to break those since `generic_const_exprs` is a very unstable incomplete feature and this PR _does_ make generic_const_exprs "less broken" as a whole, also I can't be assed to figure out what the underlying causes of all of them are. This PR reopens #77357 #83993
- Changed `generics_of` to stop providing generics and predicates to enum variant discriminant anon consts since those are not allowed to use generic parameters
- Updated the error for non 'static lifetime in const arguments and the error for non 'static lifetime in const param tys to use `derive(Diagnostic)`
I have a vague idea why const-arg-in-const-arg.rs, in-closure.rs and simple.rs have started failing which is unfortunate since these were deliberately made to work, I think lifetime resolution being broken just means this regressed at some point and nobody noticed because the tests were not testing anything :( I'm fine breaking these too for the same reason as the tests for #77357 #83993. I couldn't get `// known-bug` to work for these ICEs and just kept getting different stderr between CI and local `--bless` so I just removed them and will create an issue to track re-adding (and fixing) the bugs if this PR lands.
r? `@cjgillot` cc `@compiler-errors`
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
* account
* achieved
* advising
* always
* ambiguous
* analysis
* annotations
* appropriate
* build
* candidates
* cascading
* category
* character
* clarification
* compound
* conceptually
* constituent
* consts
* convenience
* corresponds
* debruijn
* debug
* debugable
* debuggable
* deterministic
* discriminant
* display
* documentation
* doesn't
* ellipsis
* erroneous
* evaluability
* evaluate
* evaluation
* explicitly
* fallible
* fulfill
* getting
* has
* highlighting
* illustrative
* imported
* incompatible
* infringing
* initialized
* into
* intrinsic
* introduced
* javascript
* liveness
* metadata
* monomorphization
* nonexistent
* nontrivial
* obligation
* obligations
* offset
* opaque
* opportunities
* opt-in
* outlive
* overlapping
* paragraph
* parentheses
* poisson
* precisely
* predecessors
* predicates
* preexisting
* propagated
* really
* reentrant
* referent
* responsibility
* rustonomicon
* shortcircuit
* simplifiable
* simplifications
* specify
* stabilized
* structurally
* suggestibility
* translatable
* transmuting
* two
* unclosed
* uninhabited
* visibility
* volatile
* workaround
Signed-off-by: Josh Soref <2119212+jsoref@users.noreply.github.com>
|
|
|
|
Update `error [E0449]: unnecessary visibility qualifier` to be more clear
This updates the error message `error[E0449]: unnecessary visibility qualifier` by clearly indicating that visibility qualifiers already inherit their visibility from a parent item. The error message previously implied that the qualifiers were permitted, which is not the case anymore.
Resolves #109822.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Consider `tests/ui/const-generics/generic_const_exprs/issue-102768.stderr`,
the error message where it gives additional notes about where the associated
type is defined, and how the dead code lint doesn't have an article,
like in `tests/ui/lint/dead-code/issue-85255.stderr`. They don't have
articles, so it seems unnecessary to have one here.
|
|
|
|
More accurate spans for arg removal suggestion
Partially address #106304.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Adds the extended error documentation for E0523 to indicate that the
error is no longer produced by the compiler.
Update the E0464 documentation to include example code that produces the
error.
Remove the error message E0523 from the compiler and replace it with an
internal compiler error.
|
|
The previous output was unintuitive to users.
|
|
|
|
Tweak E0597
CC #99430
|
|
|
|
document + UI test `E0208` and make its output more user-friendly
Cleans up `E0208`'s output a lot. It could actually be useful for someone learning about variance now. I also added a UI test for it in `tests/ui/error-codes/` and wrote some docs for it.
r? `@GuillaumeGomez` another error code, can't be bothered to find the issue :P. Obviously there's some compiler stuff, so you'll have to hand it off.
Part of https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/issues/61137.
|
|
|
|
|
|
misc fixes
|
|
CC #99430
|
|
When suggesting writing a fully qualified path probe for appropriate types
Address the more common part of #46585.
|
|
|
|
Rollup of 8 pull requests
Successful merges:
- #103236 (doc: rewrite doc for signed int::{carrying_add,borrowing_sub})
- #103800 (Stabilize `::{core,std}::pin::pin!`)
- #106097 (Migrate mir_build diagnostics 2 of 3)
- #106170 (Move autoderef to `rustc_hir_analysis`)
- #106323 (Stabilize f16c_target_feature)
- #106360 (Tweak E0277 `&`-removal suggestions)
- #106524 (Label `struct/enum constructor` instead of `fn item`, mention that it should be called on type mismatch)
- #106739 (Remove `<dyn AstConv<'tcx>>::fun(c, ...)` calls in favour of `c.astconv().fun(...)`)
Failed merges:
r? `@ghost`
`@rustbot` modify labels: rollup
|
|
Migrate mir_build diagnostics 2 of 3
The first three commits are fairly boring, however I've made some changes to the output of the match checking diagnostics.
|
|
Fix invalid syntax and incomplete suggestion in impl Trait parameter type suggestions for E0311
Fixes #105544
The problems: The suggestion given for E0311 has invalid syntax when the synthetic type parameter is used for Trait type in function declaration:
```rust
fn foo(d: impl Sized) -> impl Sized
```
instead of explicitly specified like the following:
```rust
fn foo<T: Sized>(d: T) -> impl Sized
```
In addition to the syntax error, the suggestions given for E0311 are not complete when multiple elided lifetimes are involved in lifetime bounds, not all involved parameters are given the named lifetime in the suggestions. For the following test case:
```
fn foo(d: impl Sized, p: &mut ()) -> impl Sized + '_ {
(d, p)
}
```
a good suggestion should add the lifetime 'a to both d and p, instead of d only:
```
fn foo<'a>(d: impl Sized + 'a, p: &'a mut ()) -> impl Sized + '_ {
(d, p)
}
```
The Solution: Fix the syntax problem in the suggestions when synthetic type parameter is used, and also add lifetimes for all involved parameters.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Fix #46585.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
