| Age | Commit message (Collapse) | Author | Lines |
|---|
|
* The phrasing "only does something for" made sense back when this
diagnostic was a (hard) warning. Now however, it's simply a hard
error and thus completely rules out "doing something".
* The primary message was way too long
* The new wording more closely mirrors the wording we use for applying
other bound modifiers (like `const` and `async`) to incompatible
traits.
* "all other traits are not bound by default" is no longer accurate
under Sized Hierarchy. E.g., traits and assoc tys are (currently)
bounded by `MetaSized` by default but can't be relaxed using
`?MetaSized` (instead, you relax it by adding `PointeeSized`).
* I've decided against adding any diagnositic notes or suggestions
for now like "trait `Trait` can't be relaxed as it's not bound by
default" which would be incorrect for `MetaSized` and assoc tys
as mentioned above) or "consider changing `?MetaSized` to
`PointeeSized`" as the Sized Hierarchy impl is still WIP)
|
|
Signed-off-by: xizheyin <xizheyin@smail.nju.edu.cn>
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Remove the deprecated unstable `concat_idents!` macro
In [rust-lang/rust#137653], the lang and libs-API teams did a joint FCP to deprecate
and eventually remove the long-unstable `concat_idents!` macro. The
deprecation is landing in 1.88, so do the removal here (target version
1.90).
This macro has been superseded by the more recent `${concat(...)}`
metavariable expression language feature, which avoids some of the
limitations of `concat_idents!`. The metavar expression is unstably
available under the [`macro_metavar_expr_concat`] feature.
History is mildly interesting here: `concat_idents!` goes back to 2011
when it was introduced with 513276e595f8 ("Add #concat_idents[] and
#ident_to_str[]"). The syntax looks a bit different but it still works
about the same:
let asdf_fdsa = "<.<";
assert(#concat_idents[asd,f_f,dsa] == "<.<");
assert(#ident_to_str[use_mention_distinction]
== "use_mention_distinction");
(That test existed from introduction until its removal here.)
Closes: https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/issues/29599
[rust-lang/rust#137653]: https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/pull/137653
[`macro_metavar_expr_concat`]: https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/issues/124225
|
|
These tests were updated in the previous commit; while they are being
cleaned up, move them to a non-issue directory.
|
|
`concat_idents!` is in the process of being removed, but a few things it
is used to test will still be relevant. Migrate these tests to something
other than `concat_idents`.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Unimplement unsized_locals
Implements https://github.com/rust-lang/compiler-team/issues/630
Tracking issue here: https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/issues/111942
Note that this just removes the feature, not the implementation, and does not touch `unsized_fn_params`. This is because it is required to support `Box<dyn FnOnce()>: FnOnce()`.
There may be more that should be removed (possibly in follow up prs)
- the `forget_unsized` function and `forget` intrinsic.
- the `unsized_locals` test directory; I've just fixed up the tests for now
- various codegen support for unsized values and allocas
cc ``@JakobDegen`` ``@oli-obk`` ``@Noratrieb`` ``@programmerjake`` ``@bjorn3``
``@rustbot`` label F-unsized_locals
Fixes rust-lang/rust#79409
|
|
|
|
Lint on fn pointers comparisons in external macros
This PR extends the recently stabilized `unpredictable_function_pointer_comparisons` lint ~~to also lint on `Option<{function pointer}>` and~~ as well as linting in external macros (as to catch `assert_eq!` and others).
```rust
assert_eq!(Some::<FnPtr>(func), Some(func as unsafe extern "C" fn()));
//~^ WARN function pointer comparisons
#[derive(PartialEq, Eq)]
struct A {
f: fn(),
//~^ WARN function pointer comparisons
}
```
Fixes https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/issues/134527
|
|
|
|
```
error[E0621]: explicit lifetime required in the type of `x`
--> $DIR/42701_one_named_and_one_anonymous.rs:10:9
|
LL | &*x
| ^^^ lifetime `'a` required
|
help: add explicit lifetime `'a` to the type of `x`
|
LL | fn foo2<'a>(a: &'a Foo, x: &'a i32) -> &'a i32 {
| ++
```
|
|
const-eval error: always say in which item the error occurred
I don't see why "is this generic" should make a difference. It may be reasonable to key this on whether the error occurs in a `const fn` that was invoked by a const (making it non-obvious which constant it is) vs inside the body of the const.
r? `@oli-obk`
|
|
also adjust the wording a little so that we don't say "the error occurred here" for two different spans
|
|
Make cast suggestions verbose
```
error[E0604]: only `u8` can be cast as `char`, not `u32`
--> $DIR/E0604.rs:2:5
|
LL | 1u32 as char;
| ^^^^^^^^^^^^ invalid cast
|
help: try `char::from_u32` instead
|
LL - 1u32 as char;
LL + char::from_u32(1u32);
|
```
```
error[E0620]: cast to unsized type: `&[u8]` as `[char]`
--> $DIR/cast-to-slice.rs:6:5
|
LL | arr as [char];
| ^^^^^^^^^^^^^
|
help: try casting to a reference instead
|
LL | arr as &[char];
| +
```
```
error[E0620]: cast to unsized type: `Box<{integer}>` as `dyn Send`
--> $DIR/cast-to-unsized-trait-object-suggestion.rs:3:5
|
LL | Box::new(1) as dyn Send;
| ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
|
help: you can cast to a `Box` instead
|
LL | Box::new(1) as Box<dyn Send>;
| ++++ +
```
Part of rust-lang/rust#141973.
|
|
|
|
```
error[E0604]: only `u8` can be cast as `char`, not `u32`
--> $DIR/E0604.rs:2:5
|
LL | 1u32 as char;
| ^^^^^^^^^^^^ invalid cast
|
help: try `char::from_u32` instead
|
LL - 1u32 as char;
LL + char::from_u32(1u32);
|
```
```
error[E0620]: cast to unsized type: `&[u8]` as `[char]`
--> $DIR/cast-to-slice.rs:6:5
|
LL | arr as [char];
| ^^^^^^^^^^^^^
|
help: try casting to a reference instead
|
LL | arr as &[char];
| +
```
```
error[E0620]: cast to unsized type: `Box<{integer}>` as `dyn Send`
--> $DIR/cast-to-unsized-trait-object-suggestion.rs:3:5
|
LL | Box::new(1) as dyn Send;
| ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
|
help: you can cast to a `Box` instead
|
LL | Box::new(1) as Box<dyn Send>;
| ++++ +
```
|
|
r=traviscross,jieyouxu
Add a new `mismatched-lifetime-syntaxes` lint
The lang-team [discussed this](https://hackmd.io/nf4ZUYd7Rp6rq-1svJZSaQ) and I attempted to [summarize](https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/pull/120808#issuecomment-2701863833) their decision. The summary-of-the-summary is:
- Using two different kinds of syntax for elided lifetimes is confusing. In rare cases, it may even [lead to unsound code](https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/issues/48686)! Some examples:
```rust
// Lint will warn about these
fn(v: ContainsLifetime) -> ContainsLifetime<'_>;
fn(&'static u8) -> &u8;
```
- Matching up references with no lifetime syntax, references with anonymous lifetime syntax, and paths with anonymous lifetime syntax is an exception to the simplest possible rule:
```rust
// Lint will not warn about these
fn(&u8) -> &'_ u8;
fn(&'_ u8) -> &u8;
fn(&u8) -> ContainsLifetime<'_>;
```
- Having a lint for consistent syntax of elided lifetimes will make the [future goal](https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/issues/91639) of warning-by-default for paths participating in elision much simpler.
---
This new lint attempts to accomplish the goal of enforcing consistent syntax. In the process, it supersedes and replaces the existing `elided-named-lifetimes` lint, which means it starts out life as warn-by-default.
|
|
Rollup of 11 pull requests
Successful merges:
- rust-lang/rust#141890 (Add link to correct documentation in htmldocck.py)
- rust-lang/rust#141932 (Fix for async drop inside async gen fn)
- rust-lang/rust#141960 (Use non-2015 edition paths in tests that do not test for their resolution)
- rust-lang/rust#141968 (Run wfcheck in one big loop instead of per module)
- rust-lang/rust#141969 (Triagebot: Remove `assign.users_on_vacation`)
- rust-lang/rust#141985 (Ensure query keys are printed with reduced queries)
- rust-lang/rust#141999 (Visit the ident in `PreciseCapturingNonLifetimeArg`.)
- rust-lang/rust#142005 (Change `tag_field` to `FieldIdx` in `Variants::Multiple`)
- rust-lang/rust#142017 (Fix incorrect use of "recommend" over "recommended")
- rust-lang/rust#142024 (Don't refer to 'this tail expression' in expansion.)
- rust-lang/rust#142025 (Don't refer to 'local binding' in extern macro.)
r? `@ghost`
`@rustbot` modify labels: rollup
|
|
Use non-2015 edition paths in tests that do not test for their resolution
This allows for testing these tests on editions other than 2015
Follow up to https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/pull/141888
|
|
|
|
r=compiler-errors
Add more missing 2015 edition directives
These tests specifically test 2015 edition behavior, so ensure that they can only be run with this edition
|
|
Add missing `dyn` keywords to tests that do not test for them Part 2
Some more tests that were found
|
|
This allows for testing these tests on editions other than 2015
|
|
|
|
These tests specifically test 2015 edition behavior, so ensure that they can only be run with this edition
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Avoid extra path trimming in method not found error
Method errors have an extra check that force trim paths whenever the normal string is longer than 10 characters, which can be quite unhelpful when multiple items have the same name (for example an `Error`).
A user reported this force trimming as being quite unhelpful when they had a method error where the precise path of the `Error` mattered.
The code uses `tcx.short_string` already to get the normal path, which tries to be clever around trimming paths if necessary, so there is no reason for this extra force trimming.
|
|
Method errors have an extra check that force trim paths whenever the
normal string is longer than 10 characters, which can be quite unhelpful
when multiple items have the same name (for example an `Error`).
A user reported this force trimming as being quite unhelpful when they
had a method error where the precise path of the `Error` mattered.
The code uses `tcx.short_string` already to get the normal path, which
tries to be clever around trimming paths if necessary, so there is no
reason for this extra force trimming.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Rollup of 11 pull requests
Successful merges:
- #136160 (Remove backticks from `ShouldPanic::YesWithMessage`'s `TrFailedMsg`)
- #139059 (uses_power_alignment: wording tweaks)
- #139192 (mention provenance in the pointer::wrapping_offset docs)
- #140312 (Improve pretty-printing of braces)
- #140404 (rm `TypeVistable` impls for `Canonical`)
- #140437 (enable msa feature for mips in codegen tests)
- #140438 (Add `rust.debug-assertions-tools` option)
- #140439 (miri: algebraic intrinsics: bring back float non-determinism)
- #140445 (Treat ManuallyDrop as ~const Destruct)
- #140446 (chore: fix some tests)
- #140448 (Rename `rustc_query_append!` to `rustc_with_all_queries!`)
r? `@ghost`
`@rustbot` modify labels: rollup
|
|
chore: fix some tests
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Deprecate the unstable `concat_idents!`
`concat_idents` has been around unstably for a long time, but there is now a better (but still unstable) way to join identifiers using `${concat(...)}` syntax with `macro_metavar_expr_concat`. This resolves a lot of the problems with `concat_idents` and is on a better track toward stabilization, so there is no need to keep both versions around. `concat_idents!` still has a lot of use in the ecosystem so deprecate it before removing, as discussed in [1].
Link: https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/issues/124225
[1]: https://rust-lang.zulipchat.com/#narrow/channel/219381-t-libs/topic/Removing.20.60concat_idents.60
|
