| Age | Commit message (Collapse) | Author | Lines |
|---|
|
Implement builtin # syntax and use it for offset_of!(...)
Add `builtin #` syntax to the parser, as well as a generic infrastructure to support both item and expression position builtin syntaxes. The PR also uses this infrastructure for the implementation of the `offset_of!` macro, added by #106934.
cc `@petrochenkov` `@DrMeepster`
cc #110680 `builtin #` tracking issue
cc #106655 `offset_of!` tracking issue
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Remove type ascription from parser and diagnostics
Mostly based on https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/pull/106826
Part of #101728
r? `@estebank`
|
|
Add `ConstParamTy` trait
This is a bit sketch, but idk.
r? `@BoxyUwU`
Yet to be done:
- [x] ~~Figure out if it's okay to implement `StructuralEq` for primitives / possibly remove their special casing~~ (it should be okay, but maybe not in this PR...)
- [ ] Maybe refactor the code a little bit
- [x] Use a macro to make impls a bit nicer
Future work:
- [ ] Actually™ use the trait when checking if a `const` generic type is allowed
- [ ] _Really_ refactor the surrounding code
- [ ] Refactor `marker.rs` into multiple modules for each "theme" of markers
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
My type ascription
Oh rip it out
Ah
If you think we live too much then
You can sacrifice diagnostics
Don't mix your garbage
Into my syntax
So many weird hacks keep diagnostics alive
Yet I don't even step outside
So many bad diagnostics keep tyasc alive
Yet tyasc doesn't even bother to survive!
|
|
|
|
|
|
Tweak output for 'add line' suggestion
Closes #108174
|
|
|
|
|
|
Revert "Don't recover lifetimes/labels containing emojis as character literals"
Reverts PR #108031 per https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/pull/109754#issuecomment-1490452045
Fixes (doesnt close until beta backported) #109746
This reverts commit e3f9db5fc319c6d8eee5d47d216ea6a426070c41.
This reverts commit 98b82aedba3f3f581e89df54352914b27f42c6f7.
This reverts commit 380fa264132ad481e73cbbf0f3a0feefd99a1d78.
|
|
Update `error [E0449]: unnecessary visibility qualifier` to be more clear
This updates the error message `error[E0449]: unnecessary visibility qualifier` by clearly indicating that visibility qualifiers already inherit their visibility from a parent item. The error message previously implied that the qualifiers were permitted, which is not the case anymore.
Resolves #109822.
|
|
Reverts PR #108031
Fixes (doesnt close until beta backported) #109746
This reverts commit e3f9db5fc319c6d8eee5d47d216ea6a426070c41.
This reverts commit 98b82aedba3f3f581e89df54352914b27f42c6f7.
This reverts commit 380fa264132ad481e73cbbf0f3a0feefd99a1d78.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Remove `identity_future` indirection
This was previously needed because the indirection used to hide some unexplained lifetime errors, which it turned out were related to the `min_choice` algorithm.
Removing the indirection also solves a couple of cycle errors, large moves and makes async blocks support the `#[track_caller]`annotation.
Fixes https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/issues/104826.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
This was previously needed because the indirection used to hide some unexplained lifetime errors, which it turned out were related to the `min_choice` algorithm.
Removing the indirection also solves a couple of cycle errors, large moves and makes async blocks support the `#[track_caller]` annotation.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Rollup of 10 pull requests
Successful merges:
- #108376 (compiler/rustc_session: fix sysroot detection logic)
- #108400 (add llvm cgu instructions stats to perf)
- #108496 (fix #108495, postfix decrement and prefix decrement has no warning)
- #108505 (Further unify validity intrinsics)
- #108520 (Small cleanup to `one_bound_for_assoc_type`)
- #108560 (Some `infer/mod.rs` cleanups)
- #108563 (Make mailmap more correct)
- #108564 (Fix `x clean` with specific paths)
- #108571 (Add contains_key to SortedIndexMultiMap)
- #108578 (Update Fuchsia platform team members)
Failed merges:
r? `@ghost`
`@rustbot` modify labels: rollup
|
|
fix #108495, postfix decrement and prefix decrement has no warning
Fixes #108495
|
|
Exit when there are unmatched delims to avoid noisy diagnostics
From https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/pull/104012#issuecomment-1311764832
r? ``@petrochenkov``
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Don't recover lifetimes/labels containing emojis as character literals
Fixes #108019.
Note that at the time of this commit, `unic-emoji-char` seems to have data tables only up to Unicode 5.0, but Unicode is already newer than this.
A newer emoji such as `🥺` will not be recognized as an emoji but older emojis such as `🐱` will.
This PR leaves a couple of FIXMEs where `unic_emoji_char::is_emoji` is used.
|
|
|
|
Suggest fix for misplaced generic params on fn item #103366
fixes #103366
This still has some work to go, but works for 2/3 of the initial base cases described in #1033366
simple fn:
```
error: expected identifier, found `<`
--> shreys/test_1.rs:1:3
|
1 | fn<T> id(x: T) -> T { x }
| ^ expected identifier
|
help: help: place the generic parameter list after the function name:
|
1 | fn id<T>(x: T) -> T { x }
| ~~~~
```
Complicated bounds
```
error: expected identifier, found `<`
--> spanishpear/test_2.rs:1:3
|
1 | fn<'a, B: 'a + std::ops::Add<Output = u32>> f(_x: B) { }
| ^ expected identifier
|
help: help: place the generic parameter list after the function name:
|
1 | fn f<'a, B: 'a + std::ops::Add<Output = u32>>(_x: B) { }
| ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
```
Opening a draft PR for comments on approach, particularly I have the following questions:
- [x] Is it okay to be using `err.span_suggestion` over struct derives? I struggled to get the initial implementation (particularly the correct suggestion message) on struct derives, although I think given what I've learned since starting, I could attempt re-doing it with that approach.
- [x] in the case where the snippet cannot be obtained from a span, is the `help` but no suggestion okay? I think yes (also, when does this case occur?)
- [x] are there any red flags for the generalisation of this work for relevant item kinds (i.e. `struct`, `enum`, `trait`, and `union`). My basic testing indicates it does work for those types except the help tip is currently hardcoded to `after the function name` - which should change dependent on the item.
- [x] I am planning to not show the suggestion if there is already a `<` after the item identifier, (i.e. if there are already generics, as after a function name per the original issue). Any major objections?
- [x] Is the style of error okay? I wasn't sure if there was a way to make it display nicer, or if thats handled by span_suggestion
These aren't blocking questions, and I will keep working on:
- check if there is a `<` after the ident (and if so, not showing the suggestion)
- generalize the help message
- figuring out how to write/run/etc ui tests (including reading the docs for them)
- logic cleanups
|
|
|
