| Age | Commit message (Collapse) | Author | Lines | 
|---|
|  | When encountering an unmet trait bound, point at local type that doesn't implement the trait:
```
error[E0277]: the trait bound `Bar<T>: Foo` is not satisfied
  --> $DIR/issue-64855.rs:9:19
   |
LL | pub struct Bar<T>(<Self as Foo>::Type) where Self: ;
   |                   ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^ unsatisfied trait bound
   |
help: the trait `Foo` is not implemented for `Bar<T>`
  --> $DIR/issue-64855.rs:9:1
   |
LL | pub struct Bar<T>(<Self as Foo>::Type) where Self: ;
   | ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
``` | 
|  |  | 
|  | When suggesting field access which would encounter a method not found, do not suggest pinning when those methods are on `impl Pin` itself.
```
error[E0599]: no method named `get_ref` found for tuple `(BufReader<File>,)` in the current scope
  --> $DIR/missing-field-access.rs:11:15
   |
LL |     let x = f.get_ref();
   |               ^^^^^^^ method not found in `(BufReader<File>,)`
   |
help: one of the expressions' fields has a method of the same name
   |
LL |     let x = f.0.get_ref();
   |               ++
```
instead of
```
error[E0599]: no method named `get_ref` found for tuple `(BufReader<File>,)` in the current scope
  --> $DIR/missing-field-access.rs:11:15
   |
LL |     let x = f.get_ref();
   |               ^^^^^^^ method not found in `(BufReader<File>,)`
   |
help: one of the expressions' fields has a method of the same name
   |
LL |     let x = f.0.get_ref();
   |               ++
help: consider pinning the expression
   |
LL ~     let mut pinned = std::pin::pin!(f);
LL ~     let x = pinned.as_ref().get_ref();
   |
``` | 
|  | When looking for the field names and types of a given type, account for tuples. This allows suggestions for incorrectly nested field accesses and field name typos to trigger as intended. Previously these suggestions only worked on `ty::Adt`, including tuple structs which are no different to tuples, so they should behave the same in suggestions.
```
error[E0599]: no method named `get_ref` found for tuple `(BufReader<File>,)` in the current scope
  --> $DIR/missing-field-access.rs:11:15
   |
LL |     let x = f.get_ref();
   |               ^^^^^^^ method not found in `(BufReader<File>,)`
   |
help: one of the expressions' fields has a method of the same name
   |
LL |     let x = f.0.get_ref();
   |               ++
``` | 
|  |  | 
|  |  | 
|  | ```
error[E0610]: `{integer}` is a primitive type and therefore doesn't have fields
  --> $DIR/attempted-access-non-fatal.rs:7:15
   |
LL |     let _ = 2.l;
   |               ^
   |
help: if intended to be a floating point literal, consider adding a `0` after the period and a `f64` suffix
   |
LL -     let _ = 2.l;
LL +     let _ = 2.0f64;
   |
``` | 
|  | ```
help: consider restricting type parameter `T` with traits `Copy` and `Trait`
   |
LL | fn duplicate_custom<T: Copy + Trait>(t: S<T>) -> (S<T>, S<T>) {
   |                      ++++++++++++++
```
```
help: consider restricting type parameter `V` with trait `Copy`
   |
LL | fn index<'a, K, V: std::marker::Copy>(map: &'a HashMap<K, V>, k: K) -> &'a V {
   |                  +++++++++++++++++++
``` | 
|  |  | 
|  | On nightly, we mention the trait is unstable
```
error[E0277]: the trait bound `T: Unstable` is not satisfied
  --> $DIR/unstable-trait-suggestion.rs:13:9
   |
LL |     foo(t)
   |     --- ^ the trait `Unstable` is not implemented for `T`
   |     |
   |     required by a bound introduced by this call
   |
note: required by a bound in `foo`
  --> $DIR/unstable-trait-suggestion.rs:9:11
   |
LL | fn foo<T: Unstable>(_: T) {}
   |           ^^^^^^^^ required by this bound in `foo`
help: consider restricting type parameter `T` but it is an `unstable` trait
   |
LL | pub fn demo<T: Unstable>(t: T) {
   |              ++++++++++
```
On stable, we don't suggest the trait at all
```
error[E0277]: the trait bound `T: Unstable` is not satisfied
  --> $DIR/unstable-trait-suggestion.rs:13:9
   |
LL |     foo(t)
   |     --- ^ the trait `Unstable` is not implemented for `T`
   |     |
   |     required by a bound introduced by this call
   |
note: required by a bound in `foo`
  --> $DIR/unstable-trait-suggestion.rs:9:11
   |
LL | fn foo<T: Unstable>(_: T) {}
   |           ^^^^^^^^ required by this bound in `foo`
``` | 
|  | Fix error message
Fix tests
Format | 
|  |  | 
|  |  | 
|  | Co-authored-by: Adrian <adrian.iosdev@gmail.com> | 
|  |  | 
|  | When encountering a `Result<T, _>` or `Option<T>` where `T` has a field
that's being accessed, suggest calling `.unwrap()` to get to the field. | 
|  | Take into account implicit dereferences when suggesting fields.
```
error[E0609]: no field `longname` on type `Arc<S>`
  --> $DIR/suggest-field-through-deref.rs:10:15
   |
LL |     let _ = x.longname;
   |               ^^^^^^^^ help: a field with a similar name exists: `long_name`
```
CC https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/issues/78374#issuecomment-719564114 | 
|  |  | 
|  |  | 
|  | - Either explicitly annotate `let x: () = expr;` where `x` has unit
  type, or remove the unit binding to leave only `expr;` instead.
- Fix disjoint-capture-in-same-closure test | 
|  | to avoid going over the existing limit now that the ui-fulldeps tests have
been moved to ui. | 
|  |  | 
|  |  | 
|  |  | 
|  |  | 
|  |  | 
|  |  | 
|  | The previous output was unintuitive to users. | 
|  |  |