| Age | Commit message (Collapse) | Author | Lines |
|---|
|
Add regression test for #117058
The new behavior in nightly is correct, so add a test that it stays this way.
Closes #117058
|
|
Validate `feature` and `since` values inside `#[stable(…)]`
Previously the string passed to `#[unstable(feature = "...")]` would be validated as an identifier, but not `#[stable(feature = "...")]`. In the standard library there were `stable` attributes containing the empty string, and kebab-case string, neither of which should be allowed.
Pre-existing validation of `unstable`:
```rust
// src/lib.rs
#![allow(internal_features)]
#![feature(staged_api)]
#![unstable(feature = "kebab-case", issue = "none")]
#[unstable(feature = "kebab-case", issue = "none")]
pub struct Struct;
```
```console
error[E0546]: 'feature' is not an identifier
--> src/lib.rs:5:1
|
5 | #![unstable(feature = "kebab-case", issue = "none")]
| ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
```
For an `unstable` attribute, the need for an identifier is obvious because the downstream code needs to write a `#![feature(...)]` attribute containing that identifier. `#![feature(kebab-case)]` is not valid syntax and `#![feature(kebab_case)]` would not work if that is not the name of the feature.
Having a valid identifier even in `stable` is less essential but still useful because it allows for informative diagnostic about the stabilization of a feature. Compare:
```rust
// src/lib.rs
#![allow(internal_features)]
#![feature(staged_api)]
#![stable(feature = "kebab-case", since = "1.0.0")]
#[stable(feature = "kebab-case", since = "1.0.0")]
pub struct Struct;
```
```rust
// src/main.rs
#![feature(kebab_case)]
use repro::Struct;
fn main() {}
```
```console
error[E0635]: unknown feature `kebab_case`
--> src/main.rs:3:12
|
3 | #![feature(kebab_case)]
| ^^^^^^^^^^
```
vs the situation if we correctly use `feature = "snake_case"` and `#![feature(snake_case)]`, as enforced by this PR:
```console
warning: the feature `snake_case` has been stable since 1.0.0 and no longer requires an attribute to enable
--> src/main.rs:3:12
|
3 | #![feature(snake_case)]
| ^^^^^^^^^^
|
= note: `#[warn(stable_features)]` on by default
```
|
|
|
|
Handle `ReErased` in responses in new solver
There are legitimate cases in the compiler where we return `ReErased` for lifetimes that are uncaptured in the hidden type of an opaque. For example, in the test committed below, we ignore ignore the bivariant lifetimes of an opaque when it's inferred as the hidden type of another opaque. This may result in a `type_of(Opaque)` call returning a type that references `ReErased`. Let's handle this gracefully in the new solver.
Also added a `rustc_hidden_type_of_opaques` attr to print hidden types. This seems useful for opaques.
r? lcnr
|
|
This flag has to be used in combination with `-Zunstable-options`,
and is added in advance of adding branch coverage instrumentation.
|
|
By making some case more complex, adding some new cases, tweaking
formatting, and removing unnecessary `rustfmt` attributes.
|
|
By adding tests (or placeholders, or comments) for missing AST variants.
|
|
Currently it only tests AST pretty-printing. This commit changes it to
run every example through both AST pretty-printing and TokenStream
pretty-printing. This makes it clear where there two pretty-printing
approaches produce different results.
|
|
|
|
|
|
Separate move path tracking between borrowck and drop elaboration.
The primary goal of this PR is to skip creating a `MovePathIndex` for path that do not need dropping in drop elaboration.
The 2 first commits are cleanups.
The next 2 commits displace `move` errors from move-path builder to borrowck. Move-path builder keeps the same logic, but does not carry error information any more.
The remaining commits allow to filter `MovePathIndex` creation according to types. This is used in drop elaboration, to avoid computing dataflow for paths that do not need dropping.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Rollup of 6 pull requests
Successful merges:
- #107159 (rand use getrandom for freebsd (available since 12.x))
- #116859 (Make `ty::print::Printer` take `&mut self` instead of `self`)
- #117046 (return unfixed len if pat has reported error)
- #117070 (rustdoc: wrap Type with Box instead of Generics)
- #117074 (Remove smir from triage and add me to stablemir)
- #117086 (Update .mailmap to promote my livename)
r? `@ghost`
`@rustbot` modify labels: rollup
|
|
Detect if there is a potential typo where the `{` meant to open the
closure body was written before the body.
```
error[E0277]: expected a `FnOnce<({integer},)>` closure, found `Option<usize>`
--> $DIR/ruby_style_closure_successful_parse.rs:3:31
|
LL | let p = Some(45).and_then({|x|
| ______________________--------_^
| | |
| | required by a bound introduced by this call
LL | | 1 + 1;
LL | | Some(x * 2)
| | ----------- this tail expression is of type `Option<usize>`
LL | | });
| |_____^ expected an `FnOnce<({integer},)>` closure, found `Option<usize>`
|
= help: the trait `FnOnce<({integer},)>` is not implemented for `Option<usize>`
note: required by a bound in `Option::<T>::and_then`
--> $SRC_DIR/core/src/option.rs:LL:COL
help: you might have meant to open the closure body instead of placing a closure within a block
|
LL - let p = Some(45).and_then({|x|
LL + let p = Some(45).and_then(|x| {
|
```
Detect the potential typo where the closure header is missing.
```
error[E0277]: expected a `FnOnce<(&bool,)>` closure, found `bool`
--> $DIR/block_instead_of_closure_in_arg.rs:3:23
|
LL | Some(true).filter({
| _________________------_^
| | |
| | required by a bound introduced by this call
LL | |/ if number % 2 == 0 {
LL | || number == 0
LL | || } else {
LL | || number != 0
LL | || }
| ||_________- this tail expression is of type `bool`
LL | | });
| |______^ expected an `FnOnce<(&bool,)>` closure, found `bool`
|
= help: the trait `for<'a> FnOnce<(&'a bool,)>` is not implemented for `bool`
note: required by a bound in `Option::<T>::filter`
--> $SRC_DIR/core/src/option.rs:LL:COL
help: you might have meant to create the closure instead of a block
|
LL | Some(true).filter(|_| {
| +++
```
Partially address #27300.
|
|
return unfixed len if pat has reported error
- Fixes #116186
- Fixes #113021
This issue arises due to the creation of a fixed-length pattern, as a result of the mir body corruption. The corruption taints `tcx.eval_to_allocation_raw`, causing it to return `AlreadyReported`. Consequently, this prevents `len.try_eval_target_usize` from evaluating correctly and returns `None`. Lastly, it results in the return of `[usize; min_len]`.
To rectify this issue, my approach is that to return unfixed when encountering `ErrorHandled::Reported`. Additionally, in instances of `ErrorHandled::TooGeneric`, the previous logic has been reinstated.
|
|
report `unused_import` for empty reexports even it is pub
Fixes #116032
An easy fix. r? `@petrochenkov`
(Discovered this issue while reviewing #115993.)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
coverage: Add UI tests for values accepted by `-Cinstrument-coverage`
I wanted to clean up the code in `parse_instrument_coverage`, but it occurred to me that we currently don't have any UI tests for the various stable and unstable values supported by this flag.
---
Normally it might be overkill to individually test all the different variants of `on`/`off`, but in this case the parsing of those values is mixed in with some other custom code, so I think it's worthwhile being thorough.
|
|
Location-insensitive polonius: consider a loan escaping if an SCC has member constraints applied only
The location-insensitive analysis considered loans to escape if there were member constraints, which makes *some* sense for scopes and matches the scopes that NLL computes on all the tests.
However, polonius and NLLs differ on the fuzzed case #116657, where an SCC has member constraints but no applied ones (and is kinda surprising). The existing UI tests with member constraints impacting scopes all have some constraint applied.
This PR changes the location-insensitive analysis to consider a loan to escape if there are applied member constraints, and for extra paranoia/insurance via fuzzing and crater: actually checks the constraint's min choice is indeed a universal region as we expect. (This could be turned into a `debug_assert` and early return as a slight optimization after these periods of verification)
The 4 UI tests where member constraints are meaningful for computing scopes still pass obviously, and this also fixes #116657.
r? `@matthewjasper`
|
|
|
|
|
|
Avoid a `track_errors` by bubbling up most errors from `check_well_formed`
I believe `track_errors` is mostly papering over issues that a sufficiently convoluted query graph can hit. I made this change, while the actual change I want to do is to stop bailing out early on errors, and instead use this new `ErrorGuaranteed` to invoke `check_well_formed` for individual items before doing all the `typeck` logic on them.
This works towards resolving https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/issues/97477 and various other ICEs, as well as allowing us to use parallel rustc more (which is currently rather limited/bottlenecked due to the very sequential nature in which we do `rustc_hir_analysis::check_crate`)
cc `@SparrowLii` `@Zoxc` for the new `try_par_for_each_in` function
|
|
|
|
Suggest removing redundant arguments in format!()
Closes #105225. This is also a follow-up to #105635, which seems to have become stale.
r? `@estebank`
|
|
|
|
Add test for rust-lang#114912
Closes #114912
|
|
Don't crash on empty match in the `nonexhaustive_omitted_patterns` lint
Oops
Fixes https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/issues/117033
|
|
|
|
Mention the syntax for `use` on `mod foo;` if `foo` doesn't exist
Newcomers might get confused that `mod` is the only way of defining scopes, and that it can be used as if it were `use`.
Fix #69492.
|
|
Newcomers might get confused that `mod` is the only way of defining
scopes, and that it can be used as if it were `use`.
Fix #69492.
|
|
|
|
Rollup of 3 pull requests
Successful merges:
- #106601 (Suggest `;` after bare `match` expression E0308)
- #116975 (Move `invalid-llvm-passes` test to `invalid-compile-flags` folder)
- #117019 (fix spans for removing `.await` on `for` expressions)
r? `@ghost`
`@rustbot` modify labels: rollup
|
|
fix spans for removing `.await` on `for` expressions
We need to use a span with the outer syntax context of a desugared `for` expression to join it with the `.await` span.
fixes https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/issues/117014
|
|
Move `invalid-llvm-passes` test to `invalid-compile-flags` folder
Nowadays there is an `invalid-compile-flags` folder, thus move this one there.
|
|
Suggest `;` after bare `match` expression E0308
Fix #72634.
|
|
|
|
Lint `non_exhaustive_omitted_patterns` by columns
This is a rework of the `non_exhaustive_omitted_patterns` lint to make it more consistent. The intent of the lint is to help consumers of `non_exhaustive` enums ensure they stay up-to-date with all upstream variants. This rewrite fixes two cases we didn't handle well before:
First, because of details of exhaustiveness checking, the following wouldn't lint `Enum::C` as missing:
```rust
match Some(x) {
Some(Enum::A) => {}
Some(Enum::B) => {}
_ => {}
}
```
Second, because of the fundamental workings of exhaustiveness checking, the following would treat the `true` and `false` cases separately and thus lint about missing variants:
```rust
match (true, x) {
(true, Enum::A) => {}
(true, Enum::B) => {}
(false, Enum::C) => {}
_ => {}
}
```
Moreover, it would correctly not lint in the case where the pair is flipped, because of asymmetry in how exhaustiveness checking proceeds.
A drawback is that it no longer makes sense to set the lint level per-arm. This will silently break the lint for current users of it (but it's behind a feature gate so that's ok).
The new approach is now independent of the exhaustiveness algorithm; it's a separate pass that looks at patterns column by column. This is another of the motivations for this: I'm glad to move it out of the algorithm, it was akward there.
This PR is almost identical to https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/pull/111651. cc `@eholk` who reviewed it at the time. Compared to then, I'm more confident this is the right approach.
|
|
|
|
Point at assoc fn definition on type param divergence
When the number of type parameters in the associated function of an impl and its trait differ, we now *always* point at the trait one, even if it comes from a foreign crate. When it is local, we point at the specific params, when it is foreign, we point at the whole associated item.
Fix #69944.
|
|
Mention `into_iter` on borrow errors suggestions when appropriate
If we encounter a borrow error on `vec![1, 2, 3].iter()`, suggest `into_iter`.
Fix #68445.
|
|
Typo suggestion to change bindings with leading underscore
When encountering a binding that isn't found but has a typo suggestion for a binding with a leading underscore, suggest changing the binding definition instead of the use place.
Fix #60164.
|
|
Suggest relaxing implicit `type Assoc: Sized;` bound
Fix #85378.
|
|
When the number of type parameters in the associated function of an impl
and its trait differ, we now *always* point at the trait one, even if it
comes from a foreign crate. When it is local, we point at the specific
params, when it is foreign, we point at the whole associated item.
Fix #69944.
|
|
|
