| Age | Commit message (Collapse) | Author | Lines |
|---|
|
Do not rely on `type_var_origin` in `OrphanCheckErr::NonLocalInputType`
The ordering of ty var unification means that we may end up with a root variable whose ty var origin is from another item's params.
Let's not rely on this by just unifying the infer vars with the params of the impl + resolving. It's kinda goofy but it's clearer IMO.
Fixes #132826.
r? `@fmease` or `@lcnr`
|
|
Suggest `-Whelp` when pass `--print lints` to rustc
Closes #138612
|
|
Add support for postfix yield expressions
We've been having a discussion about whether we want postfix yield, or want to stick with prefix yield, or have both. I figured it's easy enough to support both for now and let us play around with them while the feature is still experimental.
This PR treats `yield x` and `x.yield` as semantically equivalent. There was a suggestion to make `yield x` have a `()` type (so it only works in coroutines with `Resume = ()`. I think that'd be worth trying, either in a later PR, or before this one merges, depending on people's opinions.
#43122
|
|
Consider fields to be inhabited if they are unstable
Fixes #133885 with a simple heuristic
r? Nadrieril
Not totally certain if this needs T-lang approval or a crater run.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Some tests expect to be compiled for a specific CPU or require certain
target features to be present (or absent). These tests work fine with
default CPUs but fail in downstream builds for RHEL and Fedora, where
we use non-default CPUs such as z13 on s390x, pwr9 on ppc64le, or
x86-64-v2/x86-64-v3 on x86_64.
|
|
The channel-stack-overflow-issue-102246 regression test fails on
platforms with a small default stack size (e.g. Fuchsia, with a default
of 256KiB). Update the test to specify an exact stack size for both the
sender and receiver operations, to ensure it is platform agnostic.
Set the stack size to less than the total allocation size of the mpsc
channel, to continue to prove that the allocation is on the heap.
|
|
|
|
Remove E0773 "A builtin-macro was defined more than once."
Error E0773 "A builtin-macro was defined more than once" is triggered when using the same `#[rustc_builtin_macro(..)]` twice. However, it can only be triggered in unstable code (using a `rustc_` attribute), and there doesn't seem to be any harm in using the same implementation from `compiler/rustc_builtin_macros/…` for multiple macro definitions.
By changing the Box to an Arc in `SyntaxExtensionKind`, we can throw away the `BuiltinMacroState::{NotYetSeen, AlreadySeen}` logic, simplifying things.
|
|
Fix next solver handling of shallow trait impl check
I'm trying to remove unnecessary direct calls to `select`, and this one seemed like a good place to start 😆
r? `@compiler-errors` or `@lcnr`
|
|
zachs18:block-label-not-supported-here-loop-body-help, r=petrochenkov
If a label is placed on the block of a loop instead of the header, suggest moving it to the header.
Fixes #138585
If a label is placed on the block of a loop instead of the header, suggest to the user moving it to the loop header instead of ~~suggesting to remove it~~ emitting a tool-only suggestion to remove it.
```rs
fn main() {
loop 'a: { return; }
}
```
```diff
error: block label not supported here
--> src/main.rs:2:10
|
2 | loop 'a: { return; }
| ^^^ not supported here
+ |
+help: if you meant to label the loop, move this label before the loop
+ |
+2 - loop 'a: { return; }
+2 + 'a: loop { return; }
+ |
```
Questions for reviewer:
* The "desired output" in the linked issue had the main diagnostic be "misplaced loop label". Should the main diagnostic message the changed instead of leaving it as "block label not supported here"?
* Should this be `Applicability::MachineApplicable`?
|
|
mir_build: consider privacy when checking for irrefutable patterns
This PR fixes #137999.
Note that, since this makes the compiler reject code that was previously accepted, it will probably need a crater run.
I include a commit that factors out a common code pattern into a helper function, purely because the fact that this was repeated all over the place was bothering me. Let me know if I should split that into a separate PR instead.
|
|
Implement default methods for `io::Empty` and `io::Sink`
Implements default methods of `io::Read`, `io::BufRead`, and `io::Write` for `io::Empty` and `io::Sink`. These implementations are equivalent to the defaults, except in doing less unnecessary work.
`Read::read_to_string` and `BufRead::read_line` both have a redundant call to `str::from_utf8` which can't be inlined from `core` and `Write::write_all_vectored` has slicing logic which can't be simplified (See on [Compiler Explorer](https://rust.godbolt.org/z/KK6xcrWr4)). The rest are optimized to the minimal with `-C opt-level=3`, but this PR gives that benefit to unoptimized builds.
This includes an implementation of `Write::write_fmt` which just ignores the `fmt::Arguments<'_>`. This could be problematic whenever a user formatting impl is impure, but the docs do not guarantee that the args will be expanded.
Tracked in https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/issues/136756.
r? `@m-ou-se`
|
|
|
|
|
|
This removes E0773 "A builtin-macro was defined more than once."
|
|
|
|
Signed-off-by: xizheyin <xizheyin@smail.nju.edu.cn>
|
|
Remove existing AFIDT implementation
This experiment will need to be reworked differently; I don't think we'll be going with the `dyn* Future` approach that is currently implemented.
r? oli-obk
Fixes #136286
Fixes #137706
Fixes #137895
Tracking:
* #133119
|
|
-Zforce-unstable-if-unmarked to be uninhabited
|
|
|
|
|
|
GuillaumeGomez:proc-macro_add_value_retrieval_methods, r=Amanieu"
This reverts commit 08dfbf49e30d917c89e49eb14cb3f1e8b8a1c9ef, reversing
changes made to 10bcdad7df0de3cfb95c7bdb7b16908e73cafc09.
|
|
Stabilize `asm_goto` feature gate
Stabilize `asm_goto` feature (tracked by #119364). The issue will remain open and be updated to track `asm_goto_with_outputs`.
Reference PR: https://github.com/rust-lang/reference/pull/1693
# Stabilization Report
This feature adds a `label <block>` operand type to `asm!`. `<block>` must be a block expression with type unit or never. The address of the block is substituted and the assembly may jump to the block. When block completes the `asm!` block returns and continues execution.
The block starts a new safety context and unsafe operations within must have additional `unsafe`s; the effect of `unsafe` that surrounds `asm!` block is cancelled. See https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/issues/119364#issuecomment-2316037703 and https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/pull/131544.
It's currently forbidden to use `asm_goto` with output operands; that is still unstable under `asm_goto_with_outputs`.
Example:
```rust
unsafe {
asm!(
"jmp {}",
label {
println!("Jumped from asm!");
}
);
}
```
Tests:
- tests/ui/asm/x86_64/goto.rs
- tests/ui/asm/x86_64/goto-block-safe.stderr
- tests/ui/asm/x86_64/bad-options.rs
- tests/codegen/asm/goto.rs
|
|
|
|
|
|
Document `#![register_tool]`
cc https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/issues/66079
|
|
Improve upvar analysis for deref of child capture
Two fixes to the heuristic I implemented in #123660. As I noted in the code:
> Luckily, if this function is not correct, then the program is not unsound, since we still borrowck and validate the choices made from this function -- the only side-effect is that the user may receive unnecessary borrowck errors.
This indeed fixes unnecessary borrowck errors.
r? oli-obk
---
The heuristic is only valid if we deref a `&T`, not a `&mut T` or `Box<T>`, so make sure to check the type. This fixes:
```rust
struct Foo { precise: i32 }
fn mut_ref_inside_mut(f: &mut Foo) {
let x: impl AsyncFn() = async move || {
let y = &f.precise;
};
}
```
Since the capture from `f` to `&f.precise` needs to be treated as a lending borrow from the parent coroutine-closure to the child coroutine.
---
The heuristic is also valid if *any* deref projection in the child capture's projections is a `&T`, but we were only looking at the last one. This ensures that this function is considered not to be lending:
```rust
struct Foo { precise: i32 }
fn ref_inside_mut(f: &mut &Foo) {
let x: impl Fn() -> _ = async move || {
let y = &f.precise;
};
}
```
(Specifically, checking that `impl Fn() -> _` is satisfied is exercising that the coroutine is not considered to be lending.)
|
|
GuillaumeGomez:proc-macro_add_value_retrieval_methods, r=Amanieu
Add `*_value` methods to proc_macro lib
This is the implementation of https://github.com/rust-lang/libs-team/issues/459.
It allows to get the actual value (unescaped) of the different string literals.
Part of https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/issues/136652.
r? libs-api
|
|
moving it to the header.
|
|
|
|
|
|
Misc print request handling cleanups + a centralized test for print request stability gating
I was working on implementing `--print=supported-crate-types`, then I noticed some things that were mildly annoying me, so I pulled out these changes. In this PR:
- First commit adds a centralized test `tests/ui/print/stability.rs` that is responsible for exercising stability gating of the print requests.
- AFAICT we didn't have any test that systematically checks this.
- I coalesced `tests/ui/feature-gates/feature-gate-print-check-cfg.rs` (for `--print=check-cfg`) into this test too, since `--print=check-cfg` is only `-Z unstable-options`-gated like other unstable print requests, and is not additionally feature-gated. cc ``@Urgau`` in case you have any concerns.
- Second commit alphabetically sorts the `PrintKind` enum for consistency because the `PRINT_KINDS` list (using the enum) is *already* alphabetically sorted.
- Third commit pulls out two helpers:
1. A helper `check_print_request_stability` for checking stability of print requests and the diagnostics for using unstable print requests without `-Z unstable-options`, to avoid repeating the same logic over and over.
2. A helper `emit_unknown_print_request_help` for the unknown print request diagnostics to make print request collection control flow more obvious.
- Fourth commit renames `PrintKind::{TargetSpec,AllTargetSpecs}` to `PrintKind::{TargetSpecJson,AllTargetSpecsJson}` to better reflect their actual print names, `--print={target-spec-json,all-target-specs-json}`.
r? ``@nnethercote`` (or compiler/reroll)
|
|
|
|
I can't find any dedicated tests that actually exercises the stability
gating (via `-Z unstable-options`) of print requests, so here's a
dedicated one.
I coalesced `tests/ui/feature-gates/feature-gate-print-check-cfg.rs`
into this test, because AFAICT that print request is not feature gated,
but only `-Z unstable-options`-gated just like other unstable print
requests.
|
|
|
|
Use lit span when suggesting suffix lit cast
Fixes #138392
|
|
Clean up some tests in tests/ui
I cleaned up 3 top level tests, keeping the changes minor because it is my first PR and wanted to get feedback before doing more changes/PRs.
Tracking issues:
https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/issues/73494
https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/issues/133895
r? jieyouxu
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Enforce type of const param correctly in MIR typeck
Properly intercepts and then annotates the type for a `ConstKind::Param` in the MIR.
This code should probably be cleaned up, it's kinda spaghetti, but no better structure really occurred to me when writing this case.
We could probably gate this behind the feature gate or add a fast path when the args have no free regions if perf is bad.
r? `@BoxyUwU`
|
|
Do not suggest using `-Zmacro-backtrace` for builtin macros
For macros that are implemented on the compiler, or that are annotated with `rustc_diagnostic_item`, which have arbitrary implementations from the point of view of the user and might as well be intrinsics, we do *not* mention the `-Zmacro-backtrace` flag. This includes `derive`s and standard macros like `panic!` and `format!`.
This PR adds a field to every `Span`'s `ExpnData` stating whether it comes from a builtin macro. This is determined by the macro being annotated with either `#[rustc_builtin_macro]` or `#[rustc_diagnostic_item]`. An alternative to using these attributes that already exist for other uses would be to introduce another attribute like `#[rustc_no_backtrace]` to have finer control on which macros are affected (for example, an error within `vec![]` now doesn't mention the backtrace, but one could make the case that it should). Ideally, instead of carrying this information in the `ExpnData` we'd instead try to query the `DefId` of the macro (that is already stored) to see if it is annotated in some way, but we do not have access to the `TyCtxt` from `rustc_errors`.
r? `@petrochenkov`
|
|
Fix typo in hir lowering lint diag
|
|
Fix HIR printing of parameters
HIR pretty printing does the wrong thing for anonymous parameters, and there is no test coverage for it. This PR remedies both of those things.
r? ``@lcnr``
|
|
Pass struct field HirId when check_expr_struct_fields
Fixes #138319
r? compiler
cc ``@Mark-Simulacrum``
|
