| Age | Commit message (Collapse) | Author | Lines |
|---|
|
r=tgross35
stabilize `inherent_str_constructors`
fcp done in https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/issues/131114#issuecomment-2668859969.
tracking issue: #131114
closes: #131114
|
|
Pattern Migration 2024: properly label `&` patterns whose subpatterns are from macro expansions
See the failing test output in the first commit for an example of what this going wrong looks like. The error/lint diagnostic tries to point to just the `&` or `&mut` of reference patterns when labeling the causes, to make the output clearer (#134394). The trimming there wasn't quite right though: it used the interior of the reference pattern as a cutoff and extended backwards to find where to trim the pattern's span, but this breaks if the `&` and the interior are from different sources. This PR instead trims by starting at the start of the pattern and ending at the final character of the `&` (or `&mut`, `ref`, `ref mut`, or `mut`, depending on what the error/lint is labeling); that way, there's no opportunity for failure from mixing sources.
I'm not 100% happy with this approach, but I'm also not sure what the best practices are as far as hacky `SourceMap` munching goes, so please let me know if something else would be preferred.
Since `SourceMap::span_through_char` can't change the syntax context of the span, I've also removed a call to `Span::with_ctxt` (we care about the edition of the span in question since this is a hard error in Rust 2024). If we want to be extra safe in case that changes, I can re-add it or track error hardness separately in the `rust_2024_migration_desugared_pats` table.
|
|
Restrict `bevy_ecs` `ParamSet` hack
This limits the bevy WF hack to only apply to ADTs named `ParamSet` that come from crates named `bevy_ecs`, and references to the latter.
Previously, we were applying it to all ADTs that contained the substring `"ParamSet"`. This could show up anywhere in the ADT name, and it could come from any crate. It's a bit concerning since other code could theoretically begin to rely on this behavior too (though I don't expect it to)
This simplifies the logic a bit and turns it into a visitor.
r? `@jackh726`
|
|
Rollup of 8 pull requests
Successful merges:
- #120580 (Add `MAX_LEN_UTF8` and `MAX_LEN_UTF16` Constants)
- #132268 (Impl TryFrom<Vec<u8>> for String)
- #136093 (Match Ergonomics 2024: update old-edition behavior of feature gates)
- #136344 (Suggest replacing `.` with `::` in more error diagnostics.)
- #136690 (Use more explicit and reliable ptr select in sort impls)
- #136815 (CI: Stop /msys64/bin from being prepended to PATH in msys2 shell)
- #136923 (Lint `#[must_use]` attributes applied to methods in trait impls)
- #137155 (Organize `OsString`/`OsStr` shims)
r? `@ghost`
`@rustbot` modify labels: rollup
|
|
Lint `#[must_use]` attributes applied to methods in trait impls
The `#[must_use]` attribute has no effect when applied to methods in trait implementations. This PR adds it to the unused `#[must_use]` lint, and cleans the extra attributes in portable-simd and Clippy.
|
|
Suggest replacing `.` with `::` in more error diagnostics.
First commit makes the existing "help: use the path separator to refer to an item" also work when the base is a type alias, not just a trait/module/struct.
The existing unconditional `DefKind::Mod | DefKind::Trait` match arm is changed to a conditional `DefKind::Mod | DefKind::Trait | DefKind::TyAlias` arm that only matches if the `path_sep` suggestion-adding closure succeeds, so as not to stop the later `DefKind::TyAlias`-specific suggestions if the path-sep suggestion does not apply. This shouldn't change behavior for `Mod` or `Trait` (due to the default arm's `return false` etc).
This commit also updates `tests/ui/resolve/issue-22692.rs` to reflect this, and also renames it to something more meaningful.
This commit also makes the `bad_struct_syntax_suggestion` closure take `err` as a parameter instead of capturing it, since otherwise caused borrowing errors due to the change to using `path_sep` in a pattern guard.
<details> <summary> Type alias diagnostic example </summary>
```rust
type S = String;
fn main() {
let _ = S.new;
}
```
```diff
error[E0423]: expected value, found type alias `S`
--> diag7.rs:4:13
|
4 | let _ = S.new;
| ^
|
- = note: can't use a type alias as a constructor
+ help: use the path separator to refer to an item
+ |
+4 | let _ = S::new;
+ | ~~
```
</details>
Second commit adds some cases for `enum`s, where if there is a field/method expression where the field/method has the name of a unit/tuple variant, we assume the user intended to create that variant[^1] and suggest replacing the `.` from the field/method suggestion with a `::` path separator. If no such variant is found (or if the error is not a field/method expression), we give the existing suggestion that suggests adding `::TupleVariant(/* fields */)` after the enum.
<details> <summary> Enum diagnostic example </summary>
```rust
enum Foo {
A(u32),
B,
C { x: u32 },
}
fn main() {
let _ = Foo.A(42); // changed
let _ = Foo.B; // changed
let _ = Foo.D(42); // no change
let _ = Foo.D; // no change
let _ = Foo(42); // no change
}
```
```diff
error[E0423]: expected value, found enum `Foo`
--> diag8.rs:8:13
|
8 | let _ = Foo.A(42); // changed
| ^^^
|
note: the enum is defined here
--> diag8.rs:1:1
|
1 | / enum Foo {
2 | | A(u32),
3 | | B,
4 | | C { x: u32 },
5 | | }
| |_^
-help: you might have meant to use the following enum variant
- |
-8 | let _ = Foo::B.A(42); // changed
- | ~~~~~~
-help: alternatively, the following enum variant is available
+help: use the path separator to refer to a variant
|
-8 | let _ = (Foo::A(/* fields */)).A(42); // changed
- | ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
+8 | let _ = Foo::A(42); // changed
+ | ~~
error[E0423]: expected value, found enum `Foo`
--> diag8.rs:9:13
|
9 | let _ = Foo.B; // changed
| ^^^
|
note: the enum is defined here
--> diag8.rs:1:1
|
1 | / enum Foo {
2 | | A(u32),
3 | | B,
4 | | C { x: u32 },
5 | | }
| |_^
-help: you might have meant to use the following enum variant
- |
-9 | let _ = Foo::B.B; // changed
- | ~~~~~~
-help: alternatively, the following enum variant is available
+help: use the path separator to refer to a variant
|
-9 | let _ = (Foo::A(/* fields */)).B; // changed
- | ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
+9 | let _ = Foo::B; // changed
+ | ~~
error[E0423]: expected value, found enum `Foo`
--> diag8.rs:10:13
|
10 | let _ = Foo.D(42); // no change
| ^^^
|
note: the enum is defined here
--> diag8.rs:1:1
|
1 | / enum Foo {
2 | | A(u32),
3 | | B,
4 | | C { x: u32 },
5 | | }
| |_^
help: you might have meant to use the following enum variant
|
10 | let _ = Foo::B.D(42); // no change
| ~~~~~~
help: alternatively, the following enum variant is available
|
10 | let _ = (Foo::A(/* fields */)).D(42); // no change
| ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
error[E0423]: expected value, found enum `Foo`
--> diag8.rs:11:13
|
11 | let _ = Foo.D; // no change
| ^^^
|
note: the enum is defined here
--> diag8.rs:1:1
|
1 | / enum Foo {
2 | | A(u32),
3 | | B,
4 | | C { x: u32 },
5 | | }
| |_^
help: you might have meant to use the following enum variant
|
11 | let _ = Foo::B.D; // no change
| ~~~~~~
help: alternatively, the following enum variant is available
|
11 | let _ = (Foo::A(/* fields */)).D; // no change
| ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
error[E0423]: expected function, tuple struct or tuple variant, found enum `Foo`
--> diag8.rs:12:13
|
12 | let _ = Foo(42); // no change
| ^^^ help: try to construct one of the enum's variants: `Foo::A`
|
= help: you might have meant to construct the enum's non-tuple variant
note: the enum is defined here
--> diag8.rs:1:1
|
1 | / enum Foo {
2 | | A(u32),
3 | | B,
4 | | C { x: u32 },
5 | | }
| |_^
error: aborting due to 5 previous errors
```
</details>
[^1]: or if it's a field expression and a tuple variant, that they meant to refer the variant constructor.
|
|
Match Ergonomics 2024: update old-edition behavior of feature gates
This updates the behavior of the feature gates `ref_pat_eat_one_layer_2024_structural` and `ref_pat_eat_one_layer_2024` in Editions 2021 and earlier to correspond to the left and right typing rules compared [here](https://nadrieril.github.io/typing-rust-patterns/?opts1=AQEBAQIBAQEBAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAA%3D&style=UserVisible&compare=true&opts2=AQEBAQIBAQABAAAAAQEBAAEBAAABAAA%3D&mode=rules), respectively. Compared to the `stable_rust` rules:
- they both allow reference patterns to match a lone inherited ref,
- they both allow `&` patterns to eat `&mut` reference types (and lone `&mut` inherited refs) as if they're shared,
- they both allow `&mut` patterns to eat `&` reference types when there's a `&mut` inherited reference to also eat,
- and the left ruleset has RFC 3627's Rule 3: after encountering a shared reference type in the scrutinee, the default binding mode will be treated as by-shared-ref when it would otherwise be by-mutable-ref.
I think there's already tests for all of those typing rules, so I've added revisions to use the existing tests with the new rulesets. Additionally, I've added a few tests to make sure we handle mixed-edition patterns appropriately, and I've added references to the unstable book.
Relevant tracking issue: #123076
r? ``@ghost``
|
|
```
warning: cannot find macro `in_root` in the crate root
--> $DIR/key-value-expansion-scope.rs:1:10
|
LL | #![doc = in_root!()]
| ^^^^^^^ not found in the crate root
|
= warning: this was previously accepted by the compiler but is being phased out; it will become a hard error in a future release!
= note: for more information, see issue #124535 <https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/issues/124535>
= help: import `macro_rules` with `use` to make it callable above its definition
= note: `#[warn(out_of_scope_macro_calls)]` on by default
```
|
|
|
|
This commit removes the `avr-unknown-gnu-atmega328` target and replaces
it with a more generic `avr-none` variant that must be specialized with
the `-C target-cpu` flag (e.g. `-C target-cpu=atmega328p`).
|
|
Don't mention `FromResidual` on bad `?`
Unless `try_trait_v2` is enabled, don't mention that `FromResidual` isn't implemented for a specific type when the implicit `From` conversion of a `?` fails. For the end user on stable, `?` might as well be a compiler intrinsic, so we remove that note to avoid further confusion and allowing other parts of the error to be more prominent.
```
error[E0277]: `?` couldn't convert the error to `u8`
--> $DIR/bad-interconversion.rs:4:20
|
LL | fn result_to_result() -> Result<u64, u8> {
| --------------- expected `u8` because of this
LL | Ok(Err(123_i32)?)
| ------------^ the trait `From<i32>` is not implemented for `u8`
| |
| this can't be annotated with `?` because it has type `Result<_, i32>`
|
= note: the question mark operation (`?`) implicitly performs a conversion on the error value using the `From` trait
= help: the following other types implement trait `From<T>`:
`u8` implements `From<Char>`
`u8` implements `From<bool>`
```
|
|
When encountering a doc comment without an identifier after, we'd unconditionally state "this doc comment doesn't document anything", swallowing the *actual* error which is that the thing *after* the doc comment wasn't expected. Added a check that the found token is something that "conceptually" closes the previous item before emitting that error, otherwise just complain about the missing identifier.
In both of the following cases, the syntax error follows a doc comment:
```
error: expected identifier, found keyword `Self`
--> $DIR/doc-before-bad-variant.rs:4:5
|
LL | enum TestEnum {
| -------- while parsing this enum
...
LL | Self,
| ^^^^ expected identifier, found keyword
|
= help: enum variants can be `Variant`, `Variant = <integer>`, `Variant(Type, ..., TypeN)` or `Variant { fields: Types }`
```
```
error: expected identifier, found `<`
--> $DIR/doc-before-syntax-error.rs:2:1
|
LL | <>
| ^ expected identifier
```
Fix #71982.
|
|
|
|
|
|
Emit dropck normalization errors in borrowck
Borrowck generally assumes that any queries it runs for type checking will succeed, thinking that HIR typeck will have errored first if there was a problem. However as of #98641, dropck isn't run on HIR, so there's no direct guarantee that it doesn't error. While a type being well-formed might be expected to ensure that its fields are well-formed, this is not the case for types containing a type projection:
```rust
pub trait AuthUser {
type Id;
}
pub trait AuthnBackend {
type User: AuthUser;
}
pub struct AuthSession<Backend: AuthnBackend> {
data: Option<<<Backend as AuthnBackend>::User as AuthUser>::Id>,
}
pub trait Authz: Sized {
type AuthnBackend: AuthnBackend<User = Self>;
}
pub fn run_query<User: Authz>(auth: AuthSession<User::AuthnBackend>) {}
// ^ No User: AuthUser bound is required or inferred.
```
While improvements to trait solving might fix this in the future, for now we go for a pragmatic solution of emitting an error from borrowck (by rerunning dropck outside of a query) and making drop elaboration check if an error has been emitted previously before panicking for a failed normalization.
Closes #103899
Closes #135039
r? `@compiler-errors` (feel free to re-assign)
|
|
Rollup of 9 pull requests
Successful merges:
- #136936 (Use 'yes' instead of 'while-echo' in tests/ui/process/process-sigpipe.rs except 'nto')
- #137026 (Stabilize (and const-stabilize) `integer_sign_cast`)
- #137059 (fix: Alloc new errorcode E0803 for E0495)
- #137177 (Update `minifier-rs` version to `0.3.5`)
- #137210 (compiler: Stop reexporting stuff in cg_llvm::abi)
- #137213 (Remove `rustc_middle::mir::tcx` module.)
- #137216 (eval_outlives: bail out early if both regions are in the same SCC)
- #137228 (Fix typo in hidden internal docs of `TrustedRandomAccess`)
- #137242 (Add reference annotations for the `do_not_recommend` attribute)
r? `@ghost`
`@rustbot` modify labels: rollup
|
|
|
|
My reasoning: the ruleset implemented by the same feature gate in
Edition 2024 always tries to eat the inherited reference first. For
consistency, it makes sense to me to say across all editions that users
should consider the inherited reference's mutability when wondering if a
`&mut` pattern will type.
|
|
|
|
|
|
deref rules
|
|
These are superseded by the old-edition revisions on the shared tests.
|
|
This also adds `#[cfg]` attributes to tests for bindings' types,
to make it visually clearer which revisions type successfully.
|
|
x86: use SSE2 to pass float and SIMD types
This builds on the new X86Sse2 ABI landed in https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/pull/137037 to actually make it a separate ABI from the default x86 ABI, and use SSE2 registers. Specifically, we use it in two ways: to return `f64` values in a register rather than by-ptr, and to pass vectors of size up to 128bit in a register (or, well, whatever LLVM does when passing `<4 x float>` by-val, I don't actually know if this ends up in a register).
Cc `@workingjubilee`
Fixes #133611
try-job: aarch64-apple
try-job: aarch64-gnu
try-job: aarch64-gnu-debug
try-job: test-various
try-job: x86_64-gnu-nopt
try-job: dist-i586-gnu-i586-i686-musl
try-job: x86_64-msvc-1
|
|
Add reference annotations for the `do_not_recommend` attribute
This adds reference rule identifiers for the tests of the `diagnostic::do_not_recommend` attribute.
|
|
fix: Alloc new errorcode E0803 for E0495
As discussion in #136827, I alloc a new errorcode.
|
|
Use 'yes' instead of 'while-echo' in tests/ui/process/process-sigpipe.rs except 'nto'
The `sh` of AIX prints a message about a broken pipe when using the `while-echo` command. It works as expected when using the `yes` command instead. `yes` was originally used in this test but was later replaced with `while-echo` because QNX Neutrino does not have `yes` ([Replace yes command by while-echo in test tests/ui/process/process-sigpipe.rs](https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/pull/109379)). This PR updates the test to use `while-echo` for QNX Neutrino while reverting to `yes` for other platforms.
|
|
|
|
|
|
The `#[must_use]` attribute has no effect when applied to methods in
trait implementations. This case was not linted before.
|
|
giving a type,
make it also work when the rhs is a type alias, not just a struct.
|
|
Suggest replacing `.` with `::` when encountering "expected value, found enum":
- in a method-call expression and the method has the same name as a tuple variant
- in a field-access expression and the field has the same name as a unit or tuple variant
|
|
When `Foo.field` or `Foo.method()` exprs are encountered, suggest `Foo::field` or `Foo::method()` when Foo is a type alias, not just
a struct, trait, or module.
Also rename test for this suggestion from issue-22692.rs to something more meaningful.
|
|
|
|
misc `layout_of` cleanup
See individual commits for details.
r? `@oli-obk` but feel free to reassign
|
|
r=Nadrieril
Pattern Migration 2024: fix incorrect messages/suggestions when errors arise in macro expansions
See the diff between the two commits for how this affected the error message and suggestion. In order to decide how to format those, the pattern migration diagnostic keeps track of which parts of the user's pattern cause problems in Edition 2024. However, it neglected to do some of this bookkeeping when pointing to macro expansion sites. This fixes that.
|
|
Deeply normalize item bounds in new solver
Built on #136863.
Fixes https://github.com/rust-lang/trait-system-refactor-initiative/issues/142.
Fixes https://github.com/rust-lang/trait-system-refactor-initiative/issues/151.
cc https://github.com/rust-lang/trait-system-refactor-initiative/issues/116
First commit reworks candidate preference for projection bounds to prefer param-env projection clauses even if the corresponding trait ref doesn't come from the param-env.
Second commit adjusts the associated type item bounds check to deeply normalize in the new solver. This causes some test fallout which I will point out.
r? lcnr
|
|
Do not ICE on default_field_value const with lifetimes
`#![feature(default_field_values)]` uses a `const` body that should be treated as inline `const`s, but is actually being detected otherwise. This is similar to the situation in #78174, so we take the same solution: we check if the const actually comes from a field, and if it does, we use that logic to get the appropriate lifetimes and not ICE during borrowck.
Fix #135649.
|
|
Unless `try_trait_v2` is enabled, don't mention that `FromResidual` isn't implemented for a specific type when the implicit `From` conversion of a `?` fails. For the end user on stable, `?` might as well be a compiler intrinsic, so we remove that note to avoid further confusion and allowing other parts of the error to be more prominent.
```
error[E0277]: `?` couldn't convert the error to `u8`
--> $DIR/bad-interconversion.rs:4:20
|
LL | fn result_to_result() -> Result<u64, u8> {
| --------------- expected `u8` because of this
LL | Ok(Err(123_i32)?)
| ------------^ the trait `From<i32>` is not implemented for `u8`
| |
| this can't be annotated with `?` because it has type `Result<_, i32>`
|
= note: the question mark operation (`?`) implicitly performs a conversion on the error value using the `From` trait
= help: the following other types implement trait `From<T>`:
`u8` implements `From<Char>`
`u8` implements `From<bool>`
```
|
|
|
|
|
|
- group the fluent slugs together
- reword (internal-only) "too generic" error to be more in line with
the other errors
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Takes crash tests from #135039, #103899, #91985 and #105299 and turns them into ui tests
|
|
Rollup of 7 pull requests
Successful merges:
- #137095 (Replace some u64 hashes with Hash64)
- #137100 (HIR analysis: Remove unnecessary abstraction over list of clauses)
- #137105 (Restrict DerefPure for Cow<T> impl to T = impl Clone, [impl Clone], str.)
- #137120 (Enable `relative-path-include-bytes-132203` rustdoc-ui test on Windows)
- #137125 (Re-add missing empty lines in the releases notes)
- #137145 (use add-core-stubs / minicore for a few more tests)
- #137149 (Remove SSE ABI from i586-pc-windows-msvc)
r? `@ghost`
`@rustbot` modify labels: rollup
|
|
use add-core-stubs / minicore for a few more tests
See https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/issues/131485 for context. These are some tests I worked on in the past so I figured I'd see if `minicore` works for them. :)
|
|
Fix const items not being allowed to be called `r#move` or `r#static`
Because of an ambiguity with const closures, the parser needs to ensure that for a const item, the `const` keyword isn't followed by a `move` or `static` keyword, as that would indicate a const closure:
```rust
fn main() {
const move // ...
}
```
This check did not take raw identifiers into account, therefore being unable to distinguish between `const move` and `const r#move`. The latter is obviously not a const closure, so it should be allowed as a const item.
This fixes the check in the parser to only treat `const ...` as a const closure if it's followed by the *proper keyword*, and not a raw identifier.
Additionally, this adds a large test that tests for all raw identifiers in all kinds of positions, including `const`, to prevent issues like this one from occurring again.
fixes #137128
|
|
`invalid_from_utf8[_unchecked]`: also lint inherent methods
Addressing https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/issues/131114#issuecomment-2646663535
Also corrected a typo: "_an_ invalid literal", not "_a_ invalid literal".
|
