| Age | Commit message (Collapse) | Author | Lines |
|---|
|
Stop using span hack for contracts feature gating
The contracts machinery is a pretty straightforward case of an *external* feature using a (perma-unstable) *internal* feature within its implementation. There's no reason why it needs to be implemented any differently than other features by using global span tracking hacks to change whether the internals are gated behind the `contracts` or `contracts_internals` feature gate -- for the case of macro expansions we already have `allow_internal_unstable` for exactly this situation.
This PR changes the internal, perma-unstable AST syntax to use the `contracts_internals` gate always, and adjusts the macro expansion to use the right spans so that `allow_internal_unstable` works correctly.
As a follow-up, there's really no reason to have `contracts` be a *compiler feature* since it's at this point fully a *library feature*; the only reason it's a compiler feature today is so we can mark it as incomplete, but that seems like a weak reason. I didn't do anything in this PR for this.
r? ``@celinval``
|
|
Rollup of 7 pull requests
Successful merges:
- #136107 (Introduce CoercePointeeWellformed for coherence checks at typeck stage)
- #136155 (Enable sanitizers on MSVC CI jobs)
- #136524 (Delay bug when method confirmation cannot upcast object pick of self)
- #136584 (Prevent generic pattern types from being used in libstd)
- #136603 (compiler: gate `extern "{abi}"` in ast_lowering)
- #136821 (assign marcoieni and jdno to infra-ci PRs)
- #136825 (Update books)
r? `@ghost`
`@rustbot` modify labels: rollup
|
|
r=compiler-errors
compiler: gate `extern "{abi}"` in ast_lowering
I don't believe low-level crates like `rustc_abi` should have to know or care about higher-level concerns like whether the ABI string is stable for users. These implementation details can be made less open to public inspection. This way the code that governs stability is near the code that enforces stability, and compiled together.
It also abstracts away certain error messages instead of constantly repeating them.
A few error messages are simply deleted outright, instead of made uniform, because they are either too dated to be useful or redundant with other diagnostic improvements we could make. These can be pursued in followups: my first concern was making sure there wasn't unnecessary diagnostics-related code in `rustc_abi`, which is not well-positioned to understand what kind of errors are going to be generated based on how it is used.
r? ``@ghost``
|
|
Prevent generic pattern types from being used in libstd
Pattern types should follow the same rules that patterns follow. So a pattern type range must not wrap and not be empty. While we reject such invalid ranges at layout computation time, that only happens during monomorphization in the case of const generics. This is the exact same issue as other const generic math has, and since there's no solution there yet, I put these pattern types behind a separate incomplete feature.
These are not necessary for the pattern types MVP (replacing the layout range attributes in libcore and rustc).
cc #136574 (new tracking issue for the `generic_pattern_types` feature gate)
r? ``@lcnr``
cc ``@scottmcm`` ``@joshtriplett``
|
|
Delay bug when method confirmation cannot upcast object pick of self
Justification is on the test comment. Simply delays a bug that we were previously ICEing on.
cc ``@adetaylor`` since this is a `arbitrary_self_types` ICE.
|
|
r=compiler-errors
Introduce CoercePointeeWellformed for coherence checks at typeck stage
Fix #135206
This is the first PR to introduce the "wellformedness" check for `derive(CoercePointee)`.
This patch introduces a new error code to cover all the prerequisites of the said macro. The checks that is enforced with this patch is whether the data is indeed `struct` and whether the layout is set to `repr(transparent)`.
A following series of patch will arrive later to address the following concern.
1. #135217 so that we would only admit one single coercion on one type parameter, and leave the rest for future consideration in tandem of development of other coercion rules.
1. Enforcement of data field requirements.
**An open question** is whether there is a good schema to encode the `#[pointee]` as well, so that we could also check if the `#[pointee]` type parameter is indeed `?Sized`.
``@rustbot`` label F-derive_coerce_pointee
|
|
|
|
|
|
```
error[E0610]: `{integer}` is a primitive type and therefore doesn't have fields
--> $DIR/attempted-access-non-fatal.rs:7:15
|
LL | let _ = 2.l;
| ^
|
help: if intended to be a floating point literal, consider adding a `0` after the period and a `f64` suffix
|
LL - let _ = 2.l;
LL + let _ = 2.0f64;
|
```
|
|
|
|
|
|
the time being
|
|
Co-authored-by: Ookiineko <chiisaineko@protonmail.com>
Co-authored-by: nora <48135649+Noratrieb@users.noreply.github.com>
Co-authored-by: Jubilee <workingjubilee@gmail.com>
|
|
Add amdgpu target
Add amdgpu target to rustc and enable the LLVM target.
Fix compiling `core` with the amdgpu:
The amdgpu backend makes heavy use of different address spaces. This
leads to situations, where a pointer in one addrspace needs to be casted
to a pointer in a different addrspace. `bitcast` is invalid for this
case, `addrspacecast` needs to be used.
Fix compilation failures that created bitcasts for such cases by
creating pointer casts (which creates an `addrspacecast` under the hood)
instead.
MCP: https://github.com/rust-lang/compiler-team/issues/823
Tracking issue: #135024
Kinda related to the original amdgpu tracking issue #51575 (though that one has been closed for a while).
|
|
These are either residue of a long-term migration away from something,
or are simply trying too hard to be specifically useful:
nearest-match suggestions for ABI strings should handle this.
|
|
|
|
By moving this stability check into AST lowering, we effectively make
it impossible to accidentally miss, as it must happen to generate HIR.
Also, we put the ABI-stability code next to code that actually uses it!
This allows code that wants to reason about backend ABI implementations
to stop worrying about high-level concerns like syntax stability,
while still leaving it as the authority on what ABIs actually exist.
It also makes it easy to refactor things to have more consistent errors.
For now, we only apply this to generalize the existing messages a bit.
|
|
|
|
Fix unwrap error in overflowing int literal
Fixes #136675
it's maybe `negative` only from [check_lit](https://github.com/chenyukang/rust/blob/526e3288feb68eac55013746e03fb54d6a0b9a1e/compiler/rustc_lint/src/types.rs#L546), in this scenario the fields in `TypeLimits` is none.
r? ``@oli-obk``
|
|
Emit an error if `-Zdwarf-version=1` is requested
DWARF 1 is very different than DWARF 2+[^1] and LLVM does not really seem to support DWARF 1 as Clang does not offer a `-gdwarf-1` flag[^2] and `llc` will just generate DWARF 2 with the version set to 1[^3].
Since this isn't actually supported (and it's not clear it would be useful anyway), report that DWARF 1 is not supported if it is requested.
Also add a help message to the error saying which versions are supported.
cc #103057
[^1]: https://gcc.gnu.org/onlinedocs/gcc/Debugging-Options.html#index-gdwarf
[^2]: https://clang.llvm.org/docs/ClangCommandLineReference.html#cmdoption-clang-gdwarf
[^3]: https://godbolt.org/z/s85d87n3a
|
|
DWARF 1 is very different than DWARF 2+ (see the commentary in
https://gcc.gnu.org/onlinedocs/gcc/Debugging-Options.html#index-gdwarf)
and LLVM does not really seem to support DWARF 1 as Clang does not offer
a `-gdwarf-1` flag and `llc` will just generate DWARF 2 with the version
set to 1: https://godbolt.org/z/s85d87n3a.
Since this isn't actually supported (and it's not clear it would be
useful anyway), report that DWARF 1 is not supported if it is requested.
Also add a help message to the error saying which versions are supported.
|
|
Rollup of 5 pull requests
Successful merges:
- #134679 (Windows: remove readonly files)
- #136213 (Allow Rust to use a number of libc filesystem calls)
- #136530 (Implement `x perf` directly in bootstrap)
- #136601 (Detect (non-raw) borrows of null ZST pointers in CheckNull)
- #136659 (Pick the max DWARF version when LTO'ing modules with different versions )
r? `@ghost`
`@rustbot` modify labels: rollup
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
transmutability: fix ICE when passing wrong ADT to ASSUME
- Remove an incorrect assert that the `ASSUME` parameter has the type `Assume` and delay a bug instead.
- Since we checked the type of `ASSUME` is `Assume` (an ADT), its valtree must be a branch, so we can just unwrap it.
r? ```@jswrenn```
|
|
Shunpoco:issue-136223-ICE-pattern-mutability-cap-violated, r=Nadrieril
Add a comment pointing to ICE-136223
Fixes #136223
## Steps how the ICE happen
This explanation is based on the test case `&Some(Some(x)) = &Some(&mut Some(0))`.
The case should fail with E0596 error, but it catches the debug assertion instead.
1. For the first `&`: In check_pat_ref(), the value max_ref_mutbl becomes MutblCap::Not ([here](https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/blob/fdd1a3b02687817cea41f6bacae3d5fbed2b2cd0/compiler/rustc_hir_typeck/src/pat.rs#L2394-L2396)). Once max_ref_mutbl becomes Not, it will never be back to MutblCap::Mut.
2. For `&mut`: In peel_off_references(), because Some(x) doesn't have `&` nor `&mut`, `&mut` in `&mut Some(0)` is not consumed then default_binding_mode (def_br) becomes `ByRef::Yes(Mutability::Mut)` (around [here](https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/blob/fdd1a3b02687817cea41f6bacae3d5fbed2b2cd0/compiler/rustc_hir_typeck/src/pat.rs#L519-L536)). This will be inherited to the next step. So this pattern has the mismatch between `def_br=Yes(Mut)` and `max_ref_mutbl=Not` now.
3. For the value `0`: Because of the step 2, the default_binding_mode is `Yes(Mut)`, but max_ref_mutbl is `Not` from the step 1. It causes the assertion error [here](https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/blob/fdd1a3b02687817cea41f6bacae3d5fbed2b2cd0/compiler/rustc_hir_typeck/src/pat.rs#L427-L430).
## What this PR fixes
Step 1 has happened from [this commit](https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/commit/e2f3ce956809dd98adf271afe0b024c7febdf47f) by deleting `no_ref_mut_behind_and` from the if block. In my understanding, after RFC3627 is released, step 1 should happen not only 2024 edition but also other editions to track MutblCap value. But for now, it should not happen for non-2024 edition. So I put it back.
NOTE: I think there is another solution - We should return an E0596 error in calc_default_binding_mode() instead of the debug assertion. Since the assertion is caused by the mismatch between `def_br = Yes(Mut)` and `max_ref_mutbl = Not`, but in my understanding this violation is the same as E0596. check_pat_ident() does returns E0596 by a similar reason [here](https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/blob/fdd1a3b02687817cea41f6bacae3d5fbed2b2cd0/compiler/rustc_hir_typeck/src/pat.rs#L837-L856).
|
|
r=jieyouxu
Pick the max DWARF version when LTO'ing modules with different versions
Currently, when rustc compiles code with `-Clto` enabled that was built
with different choices for `-Zdwarf-version`, a warning will be
reported. It's very easy to observe this by compiling most anything (eg,
"hello world") and specifying `-Clto -Zdwarf-version=5` since the
standard library is distributed with `-Zdwarf-version=4`.
This behavior isn't actually useful for a few reasons:
- From observation, LLVM chooses to pick the highest DWARF version
anyway after issuing the warning.
- Clang specifies that in this case, the max version should be picked
without a warning and as a general principle, we want to support
x-lang LTO with Clang which implies using the same module flag merge
behaviors.
- Debuggers need to be able to handle a variety of versions within the
same debugging session as you can easily have some parts of a binary
(or some dynamic libraries within an application) all compiled with
different DWARF versions.
This commit changes the module flag merge behavior to match Clang and
use the highest version of DWARF. It also adds a test to ensure this
behavior is respected in the case of two crates being LTO'd together and
adds a test to ensure no warning is printed.
Fixes #130041 which fails due to these warnings being printed
cc #103057
|
|
|
|
|
|
Currently, when rustc compiles code with `-Clto` enabled that was built
with different choices for `-Zdwarf-version`, a warning will be
reported. It's very easy to observe this by compiling most anything (eg,
"hello world") and specifying `-Clto -Zdwarf-version=5` since the
standard library is distributed with `-Zdwarf-version=4`.
This behavior isn't actually useful for a few reasons:
- from observation, LLVM chooses to pick the highest DWARF version
anyway after issuing the warning
- Clang specifies that in this case, the max version should be picked
without a warning and as a general principle, we want to support
x-lang LTO with Clang which implies using the same module flag merge
behaviors
- Debuggers need to be able to handle a variety of versions withing the
same debugging session as you can easily have some parts of a binary
(or some dynamic libraries within an application) all compiled with
different DWARF versions
This commit changes the module flag merge behavior to match Clang and
use the highest version of DWARF. It also adds a test to ensure this
behavior is respected in the case of two crates being LTO'd together and
updates the test added in the previous commit to ensure no warning is
printed.
|
|
|
|
Rollup of 6 pull requests
Successful merges:
- #136640 (Debuginfo for function ZSTs should have alignment of 8 bits, not 1 bit)
- #136648 (Add a missing `//@ needs-symlink` to `tests/run-make/libs-through-symlinks`)
- #136651 (Label mismatched parameters at the def site for foreign functions)
- #136691 (Remove Linkage::Private and Linkage::Appending)
- #136692 (add module level doc for bootstrap:utils:exec)
- #136700 (i686-unknown-hurd-gnu: bump baseline CPU to Pentium 4)
r? `@ghost`
`@rustbot` modify labels: rollup
|
|
|
|
Remove Linkage::Private and Linkage::Appending
Neither of them has any use case. Neither known nor theoretical.
|
|
Label mismatched parameters at the def site for foreign functions
Nice and simple. Adds parameter marking for the only missing definition type.
r? ``@compiler-errors``
|
|
Rollup of 7 pull requests
Successful merges:
- #135179 (Make sure to use `Receiver` trait when extracting object method candidate)
- #136554 (Add `opt_alias_variances` and use it in outlives code)
- #136556 ([AIX] Update tests/ui/wait-forked-but-failed-child.rs to accomodate exiting and idle processes.)
- #136589 (Enable "jump to def" feature on rustc docs)
- #136615 (sys: net: Add UEFI stubs)
- #136635 (Remove outdated `base_port` calculation in std net test)
- #136682 (Move two windows process tests to tests/ui)
r? `@ghost`
`@rustbot` modify labels: rollup
|
|
Signed-off-by: Shunpoco <tkngsnsk313320@gmail.com>
|
|
Move two windows process tests to tests/ui
Spawning processes from std unit tests is not something it's well suited for so moving them into tests/ui is more robust and means we don't need to hack around `cmd.exe`.
Follow up to #136630
|
|
amy-kwan:amy-kwan/update_wait-forked-but-failed-child.rs, r=joboet
[AIX] Update tests/ui/wait-forked-but-failed-child.rs to accomodate exiting and idle processes.
The `wait-forked-but-failed-child.rs` test expects to see an integer PPID in the
output of the command: `ps -A -o pid,ppid,args`.
However, on AIX, sometimes an integer PPID is not available when a process is
either exiting or idle, as documented in https://www.ibm.com/docs/en/aix/7.3?topic=p-ps-command.
In these situations, a `-` is instead shown in the PPID column of the `ps` output.
This PR updates the test to accommodate this behaviour on AIX by first filtering out the
lines of the `ps` output where a `-` is found in the `PPID` column.
|
|
Add `opt_alias_variances` and use it in outlives code
...so to fix some subtle outlives bugs with precise capturing in traits, and eventually make it easier to compute variances for "forced unconstrained" trait lifetimes.
r? lcnr
|
|
Make sure to use `Receiver` trait when extracting object method candidate
In method confirmation, the `extract_existential_trait_ref` function re-extracts the object type by derefing until it reaches an object. If we're assembling methods via the `Receiver` trait, make sure we re-do our work also using the receiver trait.
Fixes #135155
cc ``@adetaylor``
|
|
Fix suggestion for `dependency_on_unit_never_type_fallback` involving closures + format args expansions
fixes #136562
r? wafflelapkin or reassign
|
|
r=Nadrieril
Pattern Migration 2024: try to suggest eliding redundant binding modifiers
This is based on #136475. Only the last commit is new.
This is a simpler, more restrictive alternative to #136496, meant to partially address #136047. If a pattern can be migrated to Rust 2024 solely by removing redundant binding modifiers, this will make that suggestion; otherwise, it uses the old suggestion of making the pattern fully explicit.
Relevant tracking issue: #131414
``@rustbot`` label A-diagnostics A-patterns A-edition-2024
r? ``@Nadrieril``
|
|
Remove some unnecessary parens in `assert!` conditions
While working on #122661, some of these started triggering our "unnecessary parens" lints due to a change in the `assert!` desugaring. A cursory search identified a few more. Some of these have been carried from before 1.0, were a bulk rename from the previous name of `assert!` left them in that state. I went and removed as many of these unnecessary parens as possible in order to have fewer annoyances in the future if we make the lint smarter.
|
|
r=compiler-errors
Stabilize `feature(trait_upcasting)`
This feature was "done" for a while now, I think it's finally time to stabilize it! Stabilization report: https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/pull/134367#issuecomment-2545839841.
cc reference PR: https://github.com/rust-lang/reference/pull/1622.
Closes #65991 (tracking issue), closes #89460 (the lint is no longer future incompat).
r? compiler-errors
|
|
This is the same as Linkage::Internal except that it doesn't emit any
symbol. Some backends may not support it and it isn't all that useful
anyway.
|
|
fix tail call checks wrt `#[track_caller]`
Only check the caller + disallow caller having the attribute.
fixes #134336
r? `@compiler-errors`
<sub>apparently there were no tests for `#[track_caller]` before... ooops</sub>
|
|
|
