| Age | Commit message (Collapse) | Author | Lines |
|---|
|
`-Zrandomize-layout` harder. `Foo<T> != Foo<U>`
Tracking issue: #106764
Previously randomize-layout only used a deterministic shuffle based on the seed stored in an Adt's ReprOptions, meaning that `Foo<T>` and `Foo<U>` were shuffled by the same seed. This change adds a similar seed to each calculated LayoutData so that a struct can be randomized both based on the layout of its fields and its per-type seed.
Primitives start with simple seed derived from some of their properties. Though some types can no longer be distinguished at that point, e.g. usize and u64 will still be treated the same.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
previously field ordering was using the same seed for all instances of Foo,
now we pass seed values through the layout tree so that not only
the struct itself affects layout but also its fields
|
|
r=oli-obk
Account for identity substituted items in symbol mangling
See the inline comment.
r? oli-obk
Fixes #135235
|
|
Make `lit_to_mir_constant` and `lit_to_const` infallible
My motivation for this change is just that it's annoying to check everywhere, especially since all but one call site was just ICEing on errors anyway right there.
They can still fail, but now just return an error constant instead of having the caller handle the error.
fixes #114317
fixes #126182
|
|
|
|
|
|
Rollup of 5 pull requests
Successful merges:
- #135212 (Remove outdated information in the `unreachable_pub` lint description)
- #135225 (Explicitly build proc macro test with panic=unwind)
- #135242 (add missing provenance APIs on NonNull)
- #135247 (Add a list of symbols for stable standard library crates)
- #135269 (Remove some unnecessary `.into()` calls)
r? `@ghost`
`@rustbot` modify labels: rollup
|
|
|
|
Explicitly build proc macro test with panic=unwind
Fuchsia explicitly builds rust and all rust targets with `-C panic=abort` to minimize code generation size. However, when compiling a proc-macro with this setting it can cause a warning to be emitted, which breaks `tests/ui/invalid-compile-flags/crate-type-flag.rs`. This hasn't been a problem in the past for us since we compile our proc macros on host, rather than inside Fuchsia.
This attempts to fix the issue by explicitly requiring that we're using the unwinder when compiling this test to avoid the warning being emitted.
Fixes #135223
|
|
[mir-opt] GVN some more transmute cases
We already did `Transmute`-then-`PtrToPtr`; this adds the nearly-identical `PtrToPtr`-then-`Transmute`.
It also adds `transmute(Foo(x))` → `transmute(x)`, when `Foo` is a single-field transparent type. That's useful for things like `NonNull { pointer: p }.as_ptr()`. It also detects when a `Transmute` is just an identity-for-the-value `PtrCast` between different raw pointer types, to help such things fold with other GVN passes.
Found these as I was looking at <https://github.com/rust-lang/compiler-team/issues/807>-related changes. This also removes the questionably-useful "turn a transmute into a field projection" part of instsimplify (which I added ages ago without an obvious need for it) since that would just put back the field projections that MCP807 is trying to ban.
r? mir-opt
|
|
Implement `const Destruct` in old solver
Self-explanatory. Not totally settled that this is the best structure for built-in trait impls for effect goals in the new solver, but it's almost certainly the simplest.
r? lcnr or re-roll
|
|
Add new `{x86_64,i686}-win7-windows-gnu` targets
These are in symmetry with `{x86_64,i686}-win7-windows-msvc`.
> ## Tier 3 target policy
>
> At this tier, the Rust project provides no official support for a target, so we
> place minimal requirements on the introduction of targets.
>
> A proposed new tier 3 target must be reviewed and approved by a member of the
> compiler team based on these requirements. The reviewer may choose to gauge
> broader compiler team consensus via a [Major Change Proposal (MCP)][https://forge.rust-lang.org/compiler/mcp.html].
>
> A proposed target or target-specific patch that substantially changes code
> shared with other targets (not just target-specific code) must be reviewed and
> approved by the appropriate team for that shared code before acceptance.
>
> - A tier 3 target must have a designated developer or developers (the "target
> maintainers") on record to be CCed when issues arise regarding the target.
> (The mechanism to track and CC such developers may evolve over time.)
This is me, `@tbu-` on github.
> - Targets must use naming consistent with any existing targets; for instance, a
> target for the same CPU or OS as an existing Rust target should use the same
> name for that CPU or OS. Targets should normally use the same names and
> naming conventions as used elsewhere in the broader ecosystem beyond Rust
> (such as in other toolchains), unless they have a very good reason to
> diverge. Changing the name of a target can be highly disruptive, especially
> once the target reaches a higher tier, so getting the name right is important
> even for a tier 3 target.
> - Target names should not introduce undue confusion or ambiguity unless
> absolutely necessary to maintain ecosystem compatibility. For example, if
> the name of the target makes people extremely likely to form incorrect
> beliefs about what it targets, the name should be changed or augmented to
> disambiguate it.
> - If possible, use only letters, numbers, dashes and underscores for the name.
> Periods (`.`) are known to cause issues in Cargo.
Consistent with `{x86_64,i686}-win7-windows-msvc`, see also #118150.
> - Tier 3 targets may have unusual requirements to build or use, but must not
> create legal issues or impose onerous legal terms for the Rust project or for
> Rust developers or users.
> - The target must not introduce license incompatibilities.
> - Anything added to the Rust repository must be under the standard Rust
> license (`MIT OR Apache-2.0`).
> - The target must not cause the Rust tools or libraries built for any other
> host (even when supporting cross-compilation to the target) to depend
> on any new dependency less permissive than the Rust licensing policy. This
> applies whether the dependency is a Rust crate that would require adding
> new license exceptions (as specified by the `tidy` tool in the
> rust-lang/rust repository), or whether the dependency is a native library
> or binary. In other words, the introduction of the target must not cause a
> user installing or running a version of Rust or the Rust tools to be
> subject to any new license requirements.
> - Compiling, linking, and emitting functional binaries, libraries, or other
> code for the target (whether hosted on the target itself or cross-compiling
> from another target) must not depend on proprietary (non-FOSS) libraries.
> Host tools built for the target itself may depend on the ordinary runtime
> libraries supplied by the platform and commonly used by other applications
> built for the target, but those libraries must not be required for code
> generation for the target; cross-compilation to the target must not require
> such libraries at all. For instance, `rustc` built for the target may
> depend on a common proprietary C runtime library or console output library,
> but must not depend on a proprietary code generation library or code
> optimization library. Rust's license permits such combinations, but the
> Rust project has no interest in maintaining such combinations within the
> scope of Rust itself, even at tier 3.
> - "onerous" here is an intentionally subjective term. At a minimum, "onerous"
> legal/licensing terms include but are *not* limited to: non-disclosure
> requirements, non-compete requirements, contributor license agreements
> (CLAs) or equivalent, "non-commercial"/"research-only"/etc terms,
> requirements conditional on the employer or employment of any particular
> Rust developers, revocable terms, any requirements that create liability
> for the Rust project or its developers or users, or any requirements that
> adversely affect the livelihood or prospects of the Rust project or its
> developers or users.
AFAICT, it's the same legal situation as the tier 1 `{x86_64,i686}-pc-windows-gnu`.
> - Neither this policy nor any decisions made regarding targets shall create any
> binding agreement or estoppel by any party. If any member of an approving
> Rust team serves as one of the maintainers of a target, or has any legal or
> employment requirement (explicit or implicit) that might affect their
> decisions regarding a target, they must recuse themselves from any approval
> decisions regarding the target's tier status, though they may otherwise
> participate in discussions.
> - This requirement does not prevent part or all of this policy from being
> cited in an explicit contract or work agreement (e.g. to implement or
> maintain support for a target). This requirement exists to ensure that a
> developer or team responsible for reviewing and approving a target does not
> face any legal threats or obligations that would prevent them from freely
> exercising their judgment in such approval, even if such judgment involves
> subjective matters or goes beyond the letter of these requirements.
Understood.
> - Tier 3 targets should attempt to implement as much of the standard libraries
> as possible and appropriate (`core` for most targets, `alloc` for targets
> that can support dynamic memory allocation, `std` for targets with an
> operating system or equivalent layer of system-provided functionality), but
> may leave some code unimplemented (either unavailable or stubbed out as
> appropriate), whether because the target makes it impossible to implement or
> challenging to implement. The authors of pull requests are not obligated to
> avoid calling any portions of the standard library on the basis of a tier 3
> target not implementing those portions.
This target supports the whole libstd surface, since it's essentially reusing all of the x86_64-pc-windows-gnu target. Understood.
> - The target must provide documentation for the Rust community explaining how
> to build for the target, using cross-compilation if possible. If the target
> supports running binaries, or running tests (even if they do not pass), the
> documentation must explain how to run such binaries or tests for the target,
> using emulation if possible or dedicated hardware if necessary.
I tried to write some documentation on that.
> - Tier 3 targets must not impose burden on the authors of pull requests, or
> other developers in the community, to maintain the target. In particular,
> do not post comments (automated or manual) on a PR that derail or suggest a
> block on the PR based on a tier 3 target. Do not send automated messages or
> notifications (via any medium, including via ``@`)` to a PR author or others
> involved with a PR regarding a tier 3 target, unless they have opted into
> such messages.
> - Backlinks such as those generated by the issue/PR tracker when linking to
> an issue or PR are not considered a violation of this policy, within
> reason. However, such messages (even on a separate repository) must not
> generate notifications to anyone involved with a PR who has not requested
> such notifications.
Understood.
> - Patches adding or updating tier 3 targets must not break any existing tier 2
> or tier 1 target, and must not knowingly break another tier 3 target without
> approval of either the compiler team or the maintainers of the other tier 3
> target.
> - In particular, this may come up when working on closely related targets,
> such as variations of the same architecture with different features. Avoid
> introducing unconditional uses of features that another variation of the
> target may not have; use conditional compilation or runtime detection, as
> appropriate, to let each target run code supported by that target.
> - Tier 3 targets must be able to produce assembly using at least one of
> rustc's supported backends from any host target. (Having support in a fork
> of the backend is not sufficient, it must be upstream.)
Understood.
> If a tier 3 target stops meeting these requirements, or the target maintainers
> no longer have interest or time, or the target shows no signs of activity and
> has not built for some time, or removing the target would improve the quality
> of the Rust codebase, we may post a PR to remove it; any such PR will be CCed
> to the target maintainers (and potentially other people who have previously
> worked on the target), to check potential interest in improving the situation.
>
Understood.
r? compiler-team
|
|
Suggest Replacing Comma with Semicolon in Incorrect Repeat Expressions
Fixes #80173
This PR detects typos in repeat expressions like `["_", 10]` and `vec![String::new(), 10]` and suggests replacing comma with semicolon.
Also, improves code in other place by adding doc comments and making use of a helper function to check if a type implements `Clone`.
References:
1. For `vec![T; N]`: https://doc.rust-lang.org/std/macro.vec.html
2. For `[T; N]`: https://doc.rust-lang.org/std/primitive.array.html
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
We already did `Transmute`-then-`PtrToPtr`; this adds the nearly-identical `PtrToPtr`-then-`Transmute`.
It also adds `transmute(Foo(x))` → `transmute(x)`, when `Foo` is a single-field transparent type. That's useful for things like `NonNull { pointer: p }.as_ptr()`.
Found these as I was looking at MCP807-related changes.
|
|
Rollup of 6 pull requests
Successful merges:
- #134228 (Exhaustively handle expressions in patterns)
- #135194 (triagebot: mark tidy changes with a more specific `A-tidy` label)
- #135222 (Ensure that we don't try to access fields on a non-struct pattern type)
- #135250 (A couple simple borrowck cleanups)
- #135252 (Fix release notes link)
- #135253 (Revert #131365)
Failed merges:
- #135195 (Make `lit_to_mir_constant` and `lit_to_const` infallible)
r? `@ghost`
`@rustbot` modify labels: rollup
|
|
|
|
Fuchsia explicitly builds rust and all rust targets with `-C
panic=abort` to minimize code generation size. However, when compiling a
proc-macro with this setting it can cause a warning to be emitted, which
breaks `tests/ui/invalid-compile-flags/crate-type-flag.rs`. This hasn't
been a problem in the past for us since we compile our proc macros on
host, rather than inside Fuchsia.
This attempts to fix the issue by explicitly requiring that we're using
the unwinder when compiling this test to avoid the warning being
emitted.
Fixes #135223
|
|
Ensure that we don't try to access fields on a non-struct pattern type
Fix #135209.
|
|
Exhaustively handle expressions in patterns
We currently have this invariant in HIR that a `PatKind::Lit` or a `PatKind::Range` only contains
* `ExprKind::Lit`
* `ExprKind::UnOp(Neg, ExprKind::Lit)`
* `ExprKind::Path`
* `ExprKind::ConstBlock`
So I made `PatKind::Lit` and `PatKind::Range` stop containing `Expr`, and instead created a `PatLit` type whose `kind` enum only contains those variants.
The only place code got more complicated was in clippy, as it couldn't share as much anymore with `Expr` handling
It may be interesting on merging `ExprKind::{Path,Lit,ConstBlock}` in the future and using the same `PatLit` type (under a new name).
Then it should also be easier to eliminate any and all `UnOp(Neg, Lit) | Lit` matching that we have across the compiler. Some day we should fold the negation into the literal itself and just store it on the numeric literals
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
potential violations
|
|
`best_blame_constraint`: Blame better constraints when the region graph has cycles from invariance or `'static`
This fixes #132749 by changing which constraint is blamed for region errors in several cases. `best_blame_constraint` had a heuristic that tried to pinpoint the constraint causing an error by filtering out any constraints where the outliving region is unified with the ultimate target region being outlived. However, it used the SCCs of the region graph to do this, which is unreliable; in particular, if the target region is `'static`, or if there are cycles from the presence of invariant types, it was skipping over the constraints it should be blaming. As is the case in that issue, this could lead to confusing diagnostics. The simplest fix seems to work decently, judging by test stderr: this makes `best_blame_constraint` no longer filter constraints by their outliving region's SCC.
There are admittedly some quirks in the test output. In many cases, subdiagnostics that depend on the particular constraint being blamed have either started or stopped being emitted. After starting at this for quite a while, I think anything too fickle about whether it outputs based on the particular constraint being blamed should instead be looking at the constraint path as a whole, similar to what's done for [the placeholder-from-predicate note](https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/compare/master...dianne:rust:better-blame-constraints-for-static#diff-3c0de6462469af483c9ecdf2c4b00cb26192218ef2d5c62a0fde75107a74caaeR506).
Very many tests involving invariant types gained a note pointing out the types' invariance, but in a few cases it was lost. A particularly illustrative example is [tests/ui/lifetimes/copy_modulo_regions.stderr](https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/compare/master...dianne:rust:better-blame-constraints-for-static?expand=1#diff-96e1f8b29789b3c4ce2f77a5e0fba248829b97ef9d1ce39e7d2b4aa57b2cf4f0); I'd argue the new constraint is a better one to blame, but it lacks the variance diagnostic information that's elsewhere in the constraint path. If desired, I can try making that note check the whole path rather than just the blamed constraint.
The subdiagnostic [`BorrowExplanation::add_object_lifetime_default_note`](https://doc.rust-lang.org/nightly/nightly-rustc/rustc_borrowck/diagnostics/explain_borrow/enum.BorrowExplanation.html#method.add_object_lifetime_default_note) depends on a `Cast` being blamed, so [a special case](https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/pull/133858/commits/364ca7f99c12fb5220e6b568ac391979317ce878) was necessary to keep it from disappearing from tests specifically testing for it. However, see the FIXME comment in that commit; I think the special case should be removed once that subdiagnostic works properly, but it's nontrivial enough to warrant a separate PR. Incidentally, this removes the note from a test where it was being added erroneously: in [tests/ui/borrowck/two-phase-surprise-no-conflict.stderr](https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/compare/master...dianne:rust:better-blame-constraints-for-static?expand=1#diff-8cf085af8203677de6575a45458c9e6b03412a927df879412adec7e4f7ff5e14), the object lifetime is explicitly provided and it's not `'static`.
|
|
|
|
|
|
warn about broken simd not only on structs but also enums and unions when we didn't opt in to it
addresses https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/issues/135208#issuecomment-2576015186
r? ``@Noratrieb``
|
|
arm: add unstable soft-float target feature
This has an actual usecase as mentioned [here](https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/issues/116344#issuecomment-2575324988), and with my recent ARM float ABI changes there shouldn't be any soundness concerns any more. We will reject enabling this feature on `hf` targets, but disabling it on non-`hf` targets is entirely fine -- the target feature refers to whether softfloat emulation is used for float instructions, and is independent of the ABI which we set separately via `llvm_floatabi`.
Cc ``@workingjubilee``
|
|
|
|
|
|
diagnostic
Fix #135209.
|
|
r=GuillaumeGomez
rustdoc: use stable paths as preferred canonical paths
This accomplishes something like 16a4ad7d7b0d163f7be6803c786c3b83d42913bb, but with the `rustc_allowed_through_unstable_modules` attribute instead of the path length.
Fixes #131676
|
|
Use a post-monomorphization typing env when mangling components that come from impls
When mangling associated methods of impls, we were previously using the wrong param-env. Instead of using a fully monomorphized param-env like we usually do in codegen, we were taking the post-analysis param-env, and treating it as an early binder to *re-substitute* the impl args. I've pointed out the problematic old code in an inline comment.
This would give us param-envs with possibly trivial predicates that would prevent normalization via param-env shadowing.
In the example test linked below, `tests/ui/symbol-names/normalize-in-param-env.rs`, this happens when we mangle the impl `impl<P: Point2> MyFrom<P::S> for P` with the substitution `P = Vec2`. Because the where clause of the impl is `P: Point2`, which elaborates to `[P: Point2, P: Point, <P as Point>::S projects-to <P as Point2>::S2]` and the fact that `impl Point2 for Vec2` normalizes `Vec2::S2` to `Vec2::S`, this causes a cycle.
The proper fix here is to use a fully monomorphized param-env for the case where the impl is properly substituted.
Fixes #135143
While #134081 uncovered this bug for legacy symbol mangling, it was preexisting for v0 symbol mangling. This PR fixes both. The test requires a "hack" because we strip the args of the instance we're printing for legacy symbol mangling except for drop glue, so we box a closure to ensure we generate drop glue.
r? oli-obk
|
|
Lower Guard Patterns to HIR.
Implements lowering of [guard patterns](https://rust-lang.github.io/rfcs/3637-guard-patterns.html) (see the [tracking issue](#129967)) to HIR.
|
|
Normalize each signature input/output in `typeck_with_fallback` with its own span
Applies the same hack as #106582 but to the args in typeck. Greatly improves normalization error spans from a signature.
|
|
didn't opt in to it
|
|
|
|
Transmute from NonNull to pointer when elaborating a box deref (MCP807)
Since per https://github.com/rust-lang/compiler-team/issues/807 we have to stop projecting into `NonNull`.
cc https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/issues/133652
|
|
[AIX] Port test case run-make/reproducible-build
The test case `run-make/reproducible-build` verifies that two identical invocations of the compiler produce the same output by comparing the linker arguments, resulting binaries, and other artifacts. However, the AIX linker command includes an argument that specifies the file containing exported symbols, with a file path that contains a randomly generated substring to prevent collisions between different linking processes. Additionally, the AIX XCOFF file header includes a 4-byte timestamp. This PR replaces the random substring with a placeholder and nullifies the timestamp field in the XCOFF files for the comparisons.
|
|
[generic_assert] Constify methods used by the formatting system
cc #44838
Starts the "constification" of all the elements required to allow the execution of the formatting system in constant environments.
```rust
const _: () = { panic!("{:?}", 1i32); };
```
Further stuff is blocked by #133999.
|
|
mark deprecated option as deprecated in rustc_session to remove copypasta and small refactor
This marks deprecated options as deprecated via flag in options table in rustc_session, which removes copypasted deprecation text from rustc_driver_impl.
This also adds warning for deprecated `-C ar` option, which didn't emitted any warnings before.
Makes `inline_threshold` `[UNTRACKED]`, as it do nothing.
Adds few tests.
See individual commits.
|
|
rustdoc: Fix mismatched capitalization in sidebar
Previously, the main content used "Aliased Type", while the sidebar said "Aliased type". Now, they both say "Aliased Type", which is the more common capitalization in Rustdoc.
See the following link for an example.
https://doc.rust-lang.org/1.83.0/std/io/type.Result.html
|
|
r=lqd,jieyouxu
Suggest to replace tuple constructor through projection
See the code example. when `Self::Assoc` normalizes to a struct that has a tuple constructor, you cannot construct the type via `Self::Assoc(field, field)`. Instead, suggest to replace it with the correct named struct.
Fixes #120871
|
|
Don't ice on bad transmute in typeck in new solver
Old trait solver ends up getting its infcx tainted because we try to normalize the type, but the new trait solver doesn't. This means we try to compute the stalled transmute obligations, which tries to normalize a type an ICEs. Let's make this a delayed bug.
r? lcnr
|
