| Age | Commit message (Collapse) | Author | Lines |
|---|
|
r=SparrowLii,jieyouxu
show supported register classes in error message
a simple diagnostic change that shows the supported register classes when an invalid one is found.
This information can be hard to find (especially for unstable targets), and this message now gives at least something to try or search for. I've followed the pattern for invalid clobber ABIs.
`@rustbot` label +A-inline-assembly
|
|
Rollup of 11 pull requests
Successful merges:
- #136606 (Fix long lines which rustfmt fails to format)
- #136663 (Stabilize `NonZero::count_ones`)
- #136672 (library: doc: core::alloc::Allocator: trivial typo fix)
- #136704 (Improve examples for file locking)
- #136721 (cg_llvm: Reduce visibility of some items outside the `llvm` module)
- #136813 (rustc_target: Add the fp16 target feature for AArch32)
- #136830 (fix i686-unknown-hurd-gnu x87 footnote)
- #136832 (Fix platform support table for i686-unknown-uefi)
- #136835 (Stop using span hack for contracts feature gating)
- #136837 (Overhaul how contracts are lowered on fn-like bodies)
- #136839 (fix ensure_monomorphic_enough)
r? `@ghost`
`@rustbot` modify labels: rollup
|
|
r=compiler-errors
fix ensure_monomorphic_enough
When polymorphization was still a thing, the visitor was used to only recurse into *used generic parameters* of function/closure/coroutine types and allow unused parameters (i.e. the polymorphized parameters) to remain generic.
When polymorphization got removed, this got changed to always treat all parameters as polymorphic and never recurse into them: https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/pull/133883/files#diff-210c59e321070d0ca4625c04e9fb064bf43ddc34082e7e33a7ee8a6c577e95afL44-L62
This is clearly wrong and can cause MIR opts to misbehave, for example this currently prints "false" in release mode:
```rust
#![feature(core_intrinsics)]
fn generic<T>() {}
const fn type_id_of_val<T: 'static>(_: &T) -> u128 {
std::intrinsics::type_id::<T>()
}
fn cursed_is_i32<T: 'static>() -> bool {
(const { type_id_of_val(&generic::<T>) } == const { type_id_of_val(&generic::<i32>) })
}
fn main() {
dbg!(cursed_is_i32::<i32>());
}
```
This PR reverts to the old behavior of always treating all types that contain type parameters as too generic, like we used to do without `-Zpolymorphize` before.
~~I'm not including the above as a test case here, because I think there is little value in testing code paths that have been removed and this seems unlikely to regress in a way that would be caught by a regression test, but let me know if you disagree and want me to add a test anyway.~~
|
|
Overhaul how contracts are lowered on fn-like bodies
Consolidates all of the contracts lowering logic into `lower_fn_body`, rather than having it be split between `lower_item_kind` and `lower_fn_body`. This should fix #136683.
r? celinval
|
|
Stop using span hack for contracts feature gating
The contracts machinery is a pretty straightforward case of an *external* feature using a (perma-unstable) *internal* feature within its implementation. There's no reason why it needs to be implemented any differently than other features by using global span tracking hacks to change whether the internals are gated behind the `contracts` or `contracts_internals` feature gate -- for the case of macro expansions we already have `allow_internal_unstable` for exactly this situation.
This PR changes the internal, perma-unstable AST syntax to use the `contracts_internals` gate always, and adjusts the macro expansion to use the right spans so that `allow_internal_unstable` works correctly.
As a follow-up, there's really no reason to have `contracts` be a *compiler feature* since it's at this point fully a *library feature*; the only reason it's a compiler feature today is so we can mark it as incomplete, but that seems like a weak reason. I didn't do anything in this PR for this.
r? ``@celinval``
|
|
Rollup of 7 pull requests
Successful merges:
- #136107 (Introduce CoercePointeeWellformed for coherence checks at typeck stage)
- #136155 (Enable sanitizers on MSVC CI jobs)
- #136524 (Delay bug when method confirmation cannot upcast object pick of self)
- #136584 (Prevent generic pattern types from being used in libstd)
- #136603 (compiler: gate `extern "{abi}"` in ast_lowering)
- #136821 (assign marcoieni and jdno to infra-ci PRs)
- #136825 (Update books)
r? `@ghost`
`@rustbot` modify labels: rollup
|
|
Show diff suggestion format on verbose replacement
```
error[E0610]: `{integer}` is a primitive type and therefore doesn't have fields
--> $DIR/attempted-access-non-fatal.rs:7:15
|
LL | let _ = 2.l;
| ^
|
help: if intended to be a floating point literal, consider adding a `0` after the period and a `f64` suffix
|
LL - let _ = 2.l;
LL + let _ = 2.0f64;
|
```
before:
```
error[E0610]: `{integer}` is a primitive type and therefore doesn't have fields
--> $DIR/attempted-access-non-fatal.rs:7:15
|
LL | let _ = 2.l;
| ^
|
help: if intended to be a floating point literal, consider adding a `0` after the period and a `f64` suffix
|
LL + let _ = 2.0f64;
| ~~~~
```
r? `@oli-obk`
|
|
r=compiler-errors
compiler: gate `extern "{abi}"` in ast_lowering
I don't believe low-level crates like `rustc_abi` should have to know or care about higher-level concerns like whether the ABI string is stable for users. These implementation details can be made less open to public inspection. This way the code that governs stability is near the code that enforces stability, and compiled together.
It also abstracts away certain error messages instead of constantly repeating them.
A few error messages are simply deleted outright, instead of made uniform, because they are either too dated to be useful or redundant with other diagnostic improvements we could make. These can be pursued in followups: my first concern was making sure there wasn't unnecessary diagnostics-related code in `rustc_abi`, which is not well-positioned to understand what kind of errors are going to be generated based on how it is used.
r? ``@ghost``
|
|
Prevent generic pattern types from being used in libstd
Pattern types should follow the same rules that patterns follow. So a pattern type range must not wrap and not be empty. While we reject such invalid ranges at layout computation time, that only happens during monomorphization in the case of const generics. This is the exact same issue as other const generic math has, and since there's no solution there yet, I put these pattern types behind a separate incomplete feature.
These are not necessary for the pattern types MVP (replacing the layout range attributes in libcore and rustc).
cc #136574 (new tracking issue for the `generic_pattern_types` feature gate)
r? ``@lcnr``
cc ``@scottmcm`` ``@joshtriplett``
|
|
Delay bug when method confirmation cannot upcast object pick of self
Justification is on the test comment. Simply delays a bug that we were previously ICEing on.
cc ``@adetaylor`` since this is a `arbitrary_self_types` ICE.
|
|
r=compiler-errors
Introduce CoercePointeeWellformed for coherence checks at typeck stage
Fix #135206
This is the first PR to introduce the "wellformedness" check for `derive(CoercePointee)`.
This patch introduces a new error code to cover all the prerequisites of the said macro. The checks that is enforced with this patch is whether the data is indeed `struct` and whether the layout is set to `repr(transparent)`.
A following series of patch will arrive later to address the following concern.
1. #135217 so that we would only admit one single coercion on one type parameter, and leave the rest for future consideration in tandem of development of other coercion rules.
1. Enforcement of data field requirements.
**An open question** is whether there is a good schema to encode the `#[pointee]` as well, so that we could also check if the `#[pointee]` type parameter is indeed `?Sized`.
``@rustbot`` label F-derive_coerce_pointee
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
r=Mark-Simulacrum,jieyouxu
Always set the deployment target when building std
`cc` has [a bug/feature](https://github.com/rust-lang/cc-rs/issues/1171) (I guess depending on how you look at it) where the default deployment target is taken from the SDK instead of from `rustc`. This causes `compiler-builtins` to build `compiler-rt` with the wrong deployment target on iOS.
I've been meaning to change how `cc` works in this regard, but that's a lengthy process, so let's fix it in bootstrap for now.
The behaviour can be seen locally with `./x build library --set build.optimized-compiler-builtins=true` for various target triples, and then inspecting with `otool -l build/host/stage1/lib/rustlib/*/lib/libcompiler_builtins-*.rlib | rg 'minos|version'`. I have added a rmake test that ensures that we now have the same version everywhere.
Fixes https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/issues/128419
Fixes https://github.com/rust-lang/compiler-builtins/issues/650
Fixes https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/issues/136523
See also https://github.com/rust-lang/cargo/issues/13115, https://github.com/rust-lang/cc-rs/issues/1171, https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/issues/136113
See https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/pull/133092#issuecomment-2626206772 for a description of how the change works.
try-job: i686-gnu-1
try-job: i686-gnu-2
try-job: x86_64-apple-1
try-job: aarch64-apple
try-job: dist-apple-various
try-job: dist-aarch64-apple
try-job: dist-various-2
try-job: x86_64-fuchsia
|
|
```
error[E0610]: `{integer}` is a primitive type and therefore doesn't have fields
--> $DIR/attempted-access-non-fatal.rs:7:15
|
LL | let _ = 2.l;
| ^
|
help: if intended to be a floating point literal, consider adding a `0` after the period and a `f64` suffix
|
LL - let _ = 2.l;
LL + let _ = 2.0f64;
|
```
|
|
|
|
Rollup of 6 pull requests
Successful merges:
- #136419 (adding autodiff tests)
- #136628 (ci: upgrade to crosstool-ng 1.27.0)
- #136681 (resolve `llvm-config` path properly on cross builds)
- #136714 (Update `compiler-builtins` to 0.1.146)
- #136731 (rustc_middle: parallel: TyCtxt: remove "unsafe impl DynSend/DynSync")
- #136791 (Disable DWARF in linker options for i686-unknown-uefi)
Failed merges:
- #136767 (improve host/cross target checking)
r? `@ghost`
`@rustbot` modify labels: rollup
|
|
adding autodiff tests
I'd like to get started with upstreaming some tests, even though I'm still waiting for an answer on how to best integrate the enzyme pass. Can we therefore temporarily support the -Z llvm-plugins here without too much effort? And in that case, how would that work? I saw you can do remapping, e.g. `rust-src-base`, but I don't think that will give me the path to libEnzyme.so. Do you have another suggestion?
Other than that this test simply checks that the derivative of `x*x` is `2.0 * x`, which in this case is computed as
`%0 = fadd fast double %x.0.val, %x.0.val`
(I'll add a few more tests and move it to an autodiff folder if we can use the -Z flag)
r? ``@jieyouxu``
Locally at least `-Zllvm-plugins=${PWD}/build/x86_64-unknown-linux-gnu/enzyme/build/Enzyme/libEnzyme-19.so` seems to work if I copy the command I get from x.py test and run it manually. However, running x.py test itself fails.
Tracking:
- https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/issues/124509
Zulip discussion: https://rust-lang.zulipchat.com/#narrow/channel/326414-t-infra.2Fbootstrap/topic/Enzyme.20build.20changes
|
|
r=workingjubilee
Portable SIMD subtree update
r? `@workingjubilee`
|
|
coverage: Defer part of counter-creation until codegen
Follow-up to #135481 and #135873.
One of the pleasant properties of the new counter-assignment algorithm is that we can stop partway through the process, store the intermediate state in MIR, and then resume the rest of the algorithm during codegen. This lets it take into account which parts of the control-flow graph were eliminated by MIR opts, resulting in fewer physical counters and simpler counter expressions.
Those improvements end up completely obsoleting much larger chunks of code that were previously responsible for cleaning up the coverage metadata after MIR opts, while also doing a more thorough cleanup job.
(That change also unlocks some further simplifications that I've kept out of this PR to limit its scope.)
|
|
|
|
Add amdgpu target
Add amdgpu target to rustc and enable the LLVM target.
Fix compiling `core` with the amdgpu:
The amdgpu backend makes heavy use of different address spaces. This
leads to situations, where a pointer in one addrspace needs to be casted
to a pointer in a different addrspace. `bitcast` is invalid for this
case, `addrspacecast` needs to be used.
Fix compilation failures that created bitcasts for such cases by
creating pointer casts (which creates an `addrspacecast` under the hood)
instead.
MCP: https://github.com/rust-lang/compiler-team/issues/823
Tracking issue: #135024
Kinda related to the original amdgpu tracking issue #51575 (though that one has been closed for a while).
|
|
These are either residue of a long-term migration away from something,
or are simply trying too hard to be specifically useful:
nearest-match suggestions for ABI strings should handle this.
|
|
|
|
By moving this stability check into AST lowering, we effectively make
it impossible to accidentally miss, as it must happen to generate HIR.
Also, we put the ABI-stability code next to code that actually uses it!
This allows code that wants to reason about backend ABI implementations
to stop worrying about high-level concerns like syntax stability,
while still leaving it as the authority on what ABIs actually exist.
It also makes it easy to refactor things to have more consistent errors.
For now, we only apply this to generalize the existing messages a bit.
|
|
Fix unwrap error in overflowing int literal
Fixes #136675
it's maybe `negative` only from [check_lit](https://github.com/chenyukang/rust/blob/526e3288feb68eac55013746e03fb54d6a0b9a1e/compiler/rustc_lint/src/types.rs#L546), in this scenario the fields in `TypeLimits` is none.
r? ``@oli-obk``
|
|
Emit an error if `-Zdwarf-version=1` is requested
DWARF 1 is very different than DWARF 2+[^1] and LLVM does not really seem to support DWARF 1 as Clang does not offer a `-gdwarf-1` flag[^2] and `llc` will just generate DWARF 2 with the version set to 1[^3].
Since this isn't actually supported (and it's not clear it would be useful anyway), report that DWARF 1 is not supported if it is requested.
Also add a help message to the error saying which versions are supported.
cc #103057
[^1]: https://gcc.gnu.org/onlinedocs/gcc/Debugging-Options.html#index-gdwarf
[^2]: https://clang.llvm.org/docs/ClangCommandLineReference.html#cmdoption-clang-gdwarf
[^3]: https://godbolt.org/z/s85d87n3a
|
|
crashes: more tests
try-job: aarch64-apple
try-job: x86_64-msvc-1
try-job: x86_64-gnu
try-job: dist-i586-gnu-i586-i686-musl
|
|
DWARF 1 is very different than DWARF 2+ (see the commentary in
https://gcc.gnu.org/onlinedocs/gcc/Debugging-Options.html#index-gdwarf)
and LLVM does not really seem to support DWARF 1 as Clang does not offer
a `-gdwarf-1` flag and `llc` will just generate DWARF 2 with the version
set to 1: https://godbolt.org/z/s85d87n3a.
Since this isn't actually supported (and it's not clear it would be
useful anyway), report that DWARF 1 is not supported if it is requested.
Also add a help message to the error saying which versions are supported.
|
|
Update bootstrap compiler and rustfmt
The rustfmt version we previously used formats things differently from what the latest nightly rustfmt does. This causes issues for subtrees that get formatted both in-tree and in their own repo. Updating the rustfmt used in-tree solves those issues. Also bumped the bootstrap compiler as the stage0 update command always updates both at the same
time.
|
|
Rollup of 5 pull requests
Successful merges:
- #134679 (Windows: remove readonly files)
- #136213 (Allow Rust to use a number of libc filesystem calls)
- #136530 (Implement `x perf` directly in bootstrap)
- #136601 (Detect (non-raw) borrows of null ZST pointers in CheckNull)
- #136659 (Pick the max DWARF version when LTO'ing modules with different versions )
r? `@ghost`
`@rustbot` modify labels: rollup
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
transmutability: fix ICE when passing wrong ADT to ASSUME
- Remove an incorrect assert that the `ASSUME` parameter has the type `Assume` and delay a bug instead.
- Since we checked the type of `ASSUME` is `Assume` (an ADT), its valtree must be a branch, so we can just unwrap it.
r? ```@jswrenn```
|
|
Shunpoco:issue-136223-ICE-pattern-mutability-cap-violated, r=Nadrieril
Add a comment pointing to ICE-136223
Fixes #136223
## Steps how the ICE happen
This explanation is based on the test case `&Some(Some(x)) = &Some(&mut Some(0))`.
The case should fail with E0596 error, but it catches the debug assertion instead.
1. For the first `&`: In check_pat_ref(), the value max_ref_mutbl becomes MutblCap::Not ([here](https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/blob/fdd1a3b02687817cea41f6bacae3d5fbed2b2cd0/compiler/rustc_hir_typeck/src/pat.rs#L2394-L2396)). Once max_ref_mutbl becomes Not, it will never be back to MutblCap::Mut.
2. For `&mut`: In peel_off_references(), because Some(x) doesn't have `&` nor `&mut`, `&mut` in `&mut Some(0)` is not consumed then default_binding_mode (def_br) becomes `ByRef::Yes(Mutability::Mut)` (around [here](https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/blob/fdd1a3b02687817cea41f6bacae3d5fbed2b2cd0/compiler/rustc_hir_typeck/src/pat.rs#L519-L536)). This will be inherited to the next step. So this pattern has the mismatch between `def_br=Yes(Mut)` and `max_ref_mutbl=Not` now.
3. For the value `0`: Because of the step 2, the default_binding_mode is `Yes(Mut)`, but max_ref_mutbl is `Not` from the step 1. It causes the assertion error [here](https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/blob/fdd1a3b02687817cea41f6bacae3d5fbed2b2cd0/compiler/rustc_hir_typeck/src/pat.rs#L427-L430).
## What this PR fixes
Step 1 has happened from [this commit](https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/commit/e2f3ce956809dd98adf271afe0b024c7febdf47f) by deleting `no_ref_mut_behind_and` from the if block. In my understanding, after RFC3627 is released, step 1 should happen not only 2024 edition but also other editions to track MutblCap value. But for now, it should not happen for non-2024 edition. So I put it back.
NOTE: I think there is another solution - We should return an E0596 error in calc_default_binding_mode() instead of the debug assertion. Since the assertion is caused by the mismatch between `def_br = Yes(Mut)` and `max_ref_mutbl = Not`, but in my understanding this violation is the same as E0596. check_pat_ident() does returns E0596 by a similar reason [here](https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/blob/fdd1a3b02687817cea41f6bacae3d5fbed2b2cd0/compiler/rustc_hir_typeck/src/pat.rs#L837-L856).
|
|
r=jieyouxu
Pick the max DWARF version when LTO'ing modules with different versions
Currently, when rustc compiles code with `-Clto` enabled that was built
with different choices for `-Zdwarf-version`, a warning will be
reported. It's very easy to observe this by compiling most anything (eg,
"hello world") and specifying `-Clto -Zdwarf-version=5` since the
standard library is distributed with `-Zdwarf-version=4`.
This behavior isn't actually useful for a few reasons:
- From observation, LLVM chooses to pick the highest DWARF version
anyway after issuing the warning.
- Clang specifies that in this case, the max version should be picked
without a warning and as a general principle, we want to support
x-lang LTO with Clang which implies using the same module flag merge
behaviors.
- Debuggers need to be able to handle a variety of versions within the
same debugging session as you can easily have some parts of a binary
(or some dynamic libraries within an application) all compiled with
different DWARF versions.
This commit changes the module flag merge behavior to match Clang and
use the highest version of DWARF. It also adds a test to ensure this
behavior is respected in the case of two crates being LTO'd together and
adds a test to ensure no warning is printed.
Fixes #130041 which fails due to these warnings being printed
cc #103057
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Generate correct terminate block under Wasm EH
This fixes failing LLVM assertions during insnsel.
Improves #135665.
r? bjorn3
^ you reviewed the PR bringing Wasm EH in, I assume this is within your area of expertise?
|
|
Currently, when rustc compiles code with `-Clto` enabled that was built
with different choices for `-Zdwarf-version`, a warning will be
reported. It's very easy to observe this by compiling most anything (eg,
"hello world") and specifying `-Clto -Zdwarf-version=5` since the
standard library is distributed with `-Zdwarf-version=4`.
This behavior isn't actually useful for a few reasons:
- from observation, LLVM chooses to pick the highest DWARF version
anyway after issuing the warning
- Clang specifies that in this case, the max version should be picked
without a warning and as a general principle, we want to support
x-lang LTO with Clang which implies using the same module flag merge
behaviors
- Debuggers need to be able to handle a variety of versions withing the
same debugging session as you can easily have some parts of a binary
(or some dynamic libraries within an application) all compiled with
different DWARF versions
This commit changes the module flag merge behavior to match Clang and
use the highest version of DWARF. It also adds a test to ensure this
behavior is respected in the case of two crates being LTO'd together and
updates the test added in the previous commit to ensure no warning is
printed.
|
|
|
|
Rollup of 6 pull requests
Successful merges:
- #136640 (Debuginfo for function ZSTs should have alignment of 8 bits, not 1 bit)
- #136648 (Add a missing `//@ needs-symlink` to `tests/run-make/libs-through-symlinks`)
- #136651 (Label mismatched parameters at the def site for foreign functions)
- #136691 (Remove Linkage::Private and Linkage::Appending)
- #136692 (add module level doc for bootstrap:utils:exec)
- #136700 (i686-unknown-hurd-gnu: bump baseline CPU to Pentium 4)
r? `@ghost`
`@rustbot` modify labels: rollup
|
|
|
|
Remove Linkage::Private and Linkage::Appending
Neither of them has any use case. Neither known nor theoretical.
|
|
Label mismatched parameters at the def site for foreign functions
Nice and simple. Adds parameter marking for the only missing definition type.
r? ``@compiler-errors``
|
