| Age | Commit message (Collapse) | Author | Lines |
|---|
|
Run `tests/rustdoc-json/attrs/target_features` on all hosts.
Makes it more convenient to test rustdoc on non x86_64. I mainly care about the aarch64 dev-desktops.
This works because rustdoc uses all target features, not just that of the target.
|
|
New tracking issues for const_ops and const_cmp
Let's do a clean start with new tracking issues to avoid mixing things up with the previous constification.
I assume the fact that the `PartialEq` *trait* and *impls* used different feature names was a mistake (the feature name on the impl is entirely irrelevant anyway).
Part of https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/issues/143800, https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/issues/143802
r? ``@oli-obk``
|
|
r=jdonszelmann
Fix ICE for parsed attributes with longer path not handled by CheckAttribute
Fixes https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/issues/137590
Fixes https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/issues/143789
r? ```@jdonszelmann```
|
|
Disambiguate between rustc vs std having debug assertions in `run-make-support` and `run-make` tests
`NO_DEBUG_ASSERTIONS` is set by CI that threads through to the `./configure.py` script, which is somewhat fragile and "spooky action at a distance". For `fmt-write-bloat`, this is actually wrong because the test wants to gate on *std* being built with debug assertions or not, whereas `NO_DEBUG_ASSERTIONS` determines *rustc* being built with debug assertions or not. Instead, use env vars controlled by compiletest, whose debug assertion info comes from bootstrap.
https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/blob/855e0fe46e68d94e9f6147531b75ac2d488c548e/src/ci/run.sh#L137-L146
`NO_DEBUG_ASSERTIONS` controls `--enable-debug-assertions`
https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/blob/855e0fe46e68d94e9f6147531b75ac2d488c548e/src/bootstrap/configure.py#L124
which sets `--rust.debug-assertions`, which controls *rustc* debug assertions.
https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/blob/855e0fe46e68d94e9f6147531b75ac2d488c548e/src/bootstrap/configure.py#L125-L129
`--rust.debug-assertions-std` controls *std* debug assertions.
Noticed while investigating `fmt-write-bloat` in https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/pull/143669#discussion_r2200522215.
Best reviewed commit-by-commit.
r? ``@ChrisDenton`` (or compiler/bootstrap)
|
|
Some const_trait_impl test cleanups
Some tests we forgot to update when the feature gate was reimplemented
r? ``@fee1-dead`` ``@compiler-errors``
|
|
Split up the `unknown_or_malformed_diagnostic_attributes` lint
This splits up the lint into the following lint group:
- `unknown_diagnostic_attributes` - triggers if the attribute is unknown to the current compiler
- `misplaced_diagnostic_attributes` - triggers if the attribute exists but it is not placed on the item kind it's meant for
- `malformed_diagnostic_attributes` - triggers if the attribute's syntax or options are invalid
- `malformed_diagnostic_format_literals` - triggers if the format string literal is invalid, for example if it has unpaired curly braces or invalid parameters
- this pr doesn't create it, but future lints for things like deprecations can also go here.
This PR does not start emitting lints in places that previously did not.
## Motivation
I want to have finer control over what `unknown_or_malformed_diagnostic_attributes` does
I have a project with fairly low msrv that is/will have a lower msrv than future diagnostic attributes. So lints will be emitted when I or others compile it on a lower msrv.
At this time, there are two options to silence these lints:
- `#[allow(unknown_or_malformed_diagnostic_attributes)]` - this risks diagnostic regressions if I (or others) mess up using the attribute, or if the attribute's syntax ever changes.
- write a build script to detect the compiler version and emit cfgs, and then conditionally enable the attribute:
```rust
#[cfg_attr(rust_version_99, diagnostic::new_attr_in_rust_99(thing = ..))]`
struct Foo;
```
or conditionally `allow` the lint:
```rust
// lib.rs
#![cfg_attr(not(current_rust), allow(unknown_or_malformed_diagnostic_attributes))]
```
I like to avoid using build scripts if I can, so the following works much better for me. That is what this PR will let me do in the future:
```rust
#[allow(unknown_diagnostic_attribute, reason = "attribute came out in rust 1.99 but msrv is 1.70")]
#[diagnostic::new_attr_in_rust_99(thing = ..)]`
struct Foo;
|
|
|
|
Propagate from borrowed locals in CopyProp
r? cjgillot
|
|
Rollup of 9 pull requests
Successful merges:
- rust-lang/rust#143403 (Port several trait/coherence-related attributes the new attribute system)
- rust-lang/rust#143633 (fix: correct assertion to check for 'noinline' attribute presence before removal)
- rust-lang/rust#143647 (Clarify and expand documentation for std::sys_common dependency structure)
- rust-lang/rust#143716 (compiler: doc/comment some codegen-for-functions interfaces)
- rust-lang/rust#143747 (Add target maintainer information for aarch64-unknown-linux-musl)
- rust-lang/rust#143759 (Fix typos in function names in the `target_feature` test)
- rust-lang/rust#143767 (Bump `src/tools/x` to Edition 2024 and some cleanups)
- rust-lang/rust#143769 (Remove support for SwitchInt edge effects in backward dataflow)
- rust-lang/rust#143770 (build-helper: clippy fixes)
r? `@ghost`
`@rustbot` modify labels: rollup
|
|
Rollup of 8 pull requests
Successful merges:
- rust-lang/rust#142391 (rust: library: Add `setsid` method to `CommandExt` trait)
- rust-lang/rust#143302 (`tests/ui`: A New Order [27/N])
- rust-lang/rust#143303 (`tests/ui`: A New Order [28/28] FINAL PART)
- rust-lang/rust#143568 (std: sys: net: uefi: tcp4: Add timeout support)
- rust-lang/rust#143611 (Mention more APIs in `ParseIntError` docs)
- rust-lang/rust#143661 (chore: Improve how the other suggestions message gets rendered)
- rust-lang/rust#143708 (fix: Include frontmatter in -Zunpretty output )
- rust-lang/rust#143718 (Make UB transmutes really UB in LLVM)
r? `@ghost`
`@rustbot` modify labels: rollup
try-job: i686-gnu-nopt-1
try-job: test-various
|
|
Fix typos in function names in the `target_feature` test
Seems like `test1` was copy-pasted but forgotten to be renamed after.
|
|
Port several trait/coherence-related attributes the new attribute system
Part of rust-lang/rust#131229
This ports:
- `#[const_trait]`
- `#[rustc_deny_explicit_impl]`
- `#[rustc_do_not_implement_via_object]`
- `#[rustc_coinductive]`
- `#[type_const]`
- `#[rustc_specialization_trait]`
- `#[rustc_unsafe_specialization_marker]`
- `#[marker]`
- `#[fundamental]`
- `#[rustc_paren_sugar]`
- `#[rustc_allow_incoherent_impl]`
- `#[rustc_coherence_is_core]`
This also changes `#[marker]` to error on duplicates instead of warning.
cc rust-lang/rust#142838, but I don't think it matters too much, since it's unstable.
r? ``@oli-obk``
|
|
|
|
Signed-off-by: Jonathan Brouwer <jonathantbrouwer@gmail.com>
|
|
The test itself is still broken, but fix this gating separately first.
|
|
|
|
Make UB transmutes really UB in LLVM
Ralf suggested in <https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/pull/143410#discussion_r2184928123> that UB transmutes shouldn't be trapping, which happened for the one path *that* PR was changing, but there's another path as well, so *this* PR changes that other path to match.
r? codegen
|
|
fix: Include frontmatter in -Zunpretty output
In the implementation (rust-lang/rust#140035), this was left as an open question for
the tracking issue (rust-lang/rust#136889). My assumption is that this should be
carried over.
The test was carried over from rust-lang/rust#137193 which was superseded by rust-lang/rust#140035.
Thankfully, either way, `-Zunpretty` is unstable and we can always
change it even if we stabilize frontmatter.
|
|
chore: Improve how the other suggestions message gets rendered
Note: This change is part of my ongoing work to use `annotate-snippets` as `rustc`'s emitter
This change started as a way to remove some specialty code paths from `annotate-snippets`, by making the "and {} other candidates" message get rendered like a secondary message with no level, but turned into a fix for the message's Unicode output. Before this change, when using the Unicode output, the other suggestions message would get rendered outside of the main suggestion block, making it feel disconnected from what it was referring to. This change makes it so that the message is on the last line of the block, aligning its rendering with other secondary messages, and making it clear what the message is referring to.
Before:
```
error[E0433]: failed to resolve: use of undeclared type `IntoIter`
╭▸ $DIR/issue-82956.rs:28:24
│
LL │ let mut iter = IntoIter::new(self);
│ ━━━━━━━━ use of undeclared type `IntoIter`
╰╴
help: consider importing one of these structs
╭╴
LL + use std::array::IntoIter;
├╴
LL + use std::collections::binary_heap::IntoIter;
├╴
LL + use std::collections::btree_map::IntoIter;
├╴
LL + use std::collections::btree_set::IntoIter;
╰╴
and 9 other candidates
```
After:
```
error[E0433]: failed to resolve: use of undeclared type `IntoIter`
╭▸ $DIR/issue-82956.rs:28:24
│
LL │ let mut iter = IntoIter::new(self);
│ ━━━━━━━━ use of undeclared type `IntoIter`
╰╴
help: consider importing one of these structs
╭╴
LL + use std::array::IntoIter;
├╴
LL + use std::collections::binary_heap::IntoIter;
├╴
LL + use std::collections::btree_map::IntoIter;
├╴
LL + use std::collections::btree_set::IntoIter;
│
╰ and 9 other candidates
```
|
|
`tests/ui`: A New Order [28/28] FINAL PART
> [!NOTE]
>
> Intermediate commits are intended to help review, but will be squashed prior to merge.
Some `tests/ui/` housekeeping, to trim down number of tests directly under `tests/ui/`. Part of rust-lang/rust#133895.
r? ``@tgross35``
|
|
`tests/ui`: A New Order [27/N]
> [!NOTE]
>
> Intermediate commits are intended to help review, but will be squashed prior to merge.
Some `tests/ui/` housekeeping, to trim down number of tests directly under `tests/ui/`. Part of rust-lang/rust#133895.
r? ``@tgross35``
|
|
Remove support for dynamic allocas
Followup to rust-lang/rust#141811
|
|
Properly track the depth when expanding free alias types
Decrease the depth after the fold so as not to affect the depth for unrelated same-level constituent types. My bad.
Fixes rust-lang/rust#142419.
|
|
Rework borrowing suggestions to use `Expr` instead of just `Span`
In the suggestion machinery for borrowing expressions and types, always use the available obligation `Span` to find the appropriate `Expr` to perform appropriateness checks no the `ExprKind` instead of on the textual snippet corresponding to the `Span`. (We were already doing this, but only for a subset of cases.) This now better handles situations where parentheses and `<>` are needed for correct syntax (`&(foo + bar)`, `(&foo).bar()`, `<&Foo>::bar()`, etc.).
Unify the logic for the case where `&` *and* `&mut` are appropriate with the logic for only one of those cases. (Instead of having two branches for emitting the suggestion, we now have a single one, using `Diag::multipart_suggestions` always.)
Handle the case when `S::foo()` should have been `<&S>::foo()` (instead of suggesting the prior `&S::foo()`. Fix rust-lang/rust#143393.
Make `Diag::multipart_suggestions` always verbose. CC rust-lang/rust#141973.
|
|
|
|
|
|
[rustdoc-json] Add tests for `#[doc(hidden)]` handling of items.
Add tests which check:
- `#[doc(hidden)]` items are not present in rustdoc JSON output by default.
- Invoking rustdoc with `--document-hidden-items` makes `#[doc(hidden)]` items appear, and they show their `#[doc(hidden)]` status appropriately.
r? `@aDotInTheVoid`
|
|
Constify `Fn*` traits
r? `@compiler-errors` `@fee1-dead`
this should unlock a few things. A few `const_closures` tests have broken even more than before, but that feature is marked as incomplete anyway
cc rust-lang/rust#67792
|
|
emit `.att_syntax` when global/naked asm use that option
fixes https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/issues/143542
LLVM would error when using `-Cllvm-args=-x86-asm-syntax=intel` in combination with global/naked assembly with `att_syntax`. It turns out that for LLVM you do in this case need to emit `.att_syntax`.
r? `@Amanieu`
|
|
Fix weird rustdoc output when single and glob reexport conflict on a name
Fixes rust-lang/rust#143107.
The problem was that the second reexport would overwrite the first, leading to having unexpected results. To fix it, I now group items by their original `DefId` and their name and keep tracks of all imports for this item (should very rarely be more than one though, and even less often more than 2).
cc `@lolbinarycat`
|
|
use `--dynamic-list` for exporting executable symbols
closes rust-lang/rust#101610
cc rust-lang/rust#84161
https://sourceware.org/binutils/docs-2.39/ld/VERSION.html:
> --dynamic-list=dynamic-list-file
Specify the name of a dynamic list file to the linker. This is typically used when creating shared libraries to specify a list of global symbols whose references shouldn’t be bound to the definition within the shared library, or creating dynamically linked executables to specify a list of symbols which should be added to the symbol table in the executable. This option is only meaningful on ELF platforms which support shared libraries.
`ld.lld --help`:
> --dynamic-list=<file>: Similar to --export-dynamic-symbol-list. When creating a shared object, this additionally implies -Bsymbolic but does not set DF_SYMBOLIC
> --export-dynamic-symbol-list=file: Read a list of dynamic symbol patterns. Apply --export-dynamic-symbol on each pattern
> --export-dynamic-symbol=glob: (executable) Put matched symbols in the dynamic symbol table. (shared object) References to matched non-local STV_DEFAULT symbols shouldn't be bound to definitions within the shared object. Does not imply -Bsymbolic.
> --export-dynamic: Put symbols in the dynamic symbol table
Use `--dynamic-list` because it's older than `--export-dynamic-symbol-list` (binutils 2.35)
try-job: dist-i586-gnu-i586-i686-musl
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
In the suggestion machinery for borrowing expressions and types, always use the available obligation `Span` to find the appropriate `Expr` to perform appropriateness checks no the `ExprKind` instead of on the textual snippet corresponding to the `Span`.
Unify the logic for the case where `&` *and* `&mut` are appropriate with the logic for only one of those cases.
Handle the case when `S::foo()` should have been `<&S>::foo()` (instead of suggesting the prior `&S::foo()`.
|
|
So places that need `unreachable` but in the middle of a basic block can call that instead of figuring out the best way to do it.
|
|
In the implementation (#140035), this was left as an open question for
the tracking issue (#136889). My assumption is that this should be
carried over.
Thankfully, either way, `-Zunpretty` is unstable and we can always
change it even if we stabilize frontmatter.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Assorted `run-make-support` maintenance
This PR should contain no functional changes.
- Commit 1: Removes the support library's CHANGELOG. In the very beginning, I thought maybe we would try to version this library. But this is a purely internal test support library, and it's just extra busywork trying to maintain changelog/versions. It's also hopelessly outdated.
- Commit 2: Resets version number to `0.0.0`. Ditto on busywork.
- Commit 3: Bump `run-make-support` to Edition 2024. The support library was already "compliant" with Edition 2024.
- Commit 4: Slightly organizes the support library dependencies.
- Commit 5: Previously, I tried hopelessly to maintain some manual formatting, but that was annoying because it required skipping rustfmt (so export ordering etc. could not be extra formatted). Give up, and do some rearrangements / module prefix tricks to get the `lib.rs` looking at least *reasonable*. IMO this is not a strict improvement, but I rather regain the ability to auto-format it with rustfmt.
- Commit {6,7}: Noticed in rust-lang/rust#143669 that we apparently had *both* {`is_msvc`, `is_windows_msvc`}. This PR removes `is_msvc` in favor of `is_windows_msvc` to make it unambiguous (and only retain one way of gating) as there are some UEFI targets which are MSVC but not Windows.
Best reviewed commit-by-commit.
r? `@Kobzol`
|
|
Re-expose nested bodies in rustc_borrowck::consumers
After https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/pull/138499, it's not possible anymore to get borrowck information for nested bodies via `get_body_with_borrowck_facts`. This PR re-exposes nested bodies by returning a map containing the typeck root and all its nested bodies. To collect the bodies, a map is added to `BorrowCheckRootCtxt`, and a body is inserted every time `do_mir_borrowck` is called.
r? ``@lcnr``
|
|
Add checking for unnecessary delims in closure body
Fixes #136741
|
|
Rollup of 9 pull requests
Successful merges:
- rust-lang/rust#141996 (Fix `proc_macro::Ident`'s handling of `$crate`)
- rust-lang/rust#142950 (mbe: Rework diagnostics for metavariable expressions)
- rust-lang/rust#143011 (Make lint `ambiguous_glob_imports` deny-by-default and report-in-deps)
- rust-lang/rust#143265 (Mention as_chunks in the docs for chunks)
- rust-lang/rust#143270 (tests/codegen/enum/enum-match.rs: accept negative range attribute)
- rust-lang/rust#143298 (`tests/ui`: A New Order [23/N])
- rust-lang/rust#143396 (Move NaN tests to floats/mod.rs)
- rust-lang/rust#143398 (tidy: add support for `--extra-checks=auto:` feature)
- rust-lang/rust#143644 (Add triagebot stdarch mention ping)
r? `@ghost`
`@rustbot` modify labels: rollup
|
|
|
|
|
|
`tests/ui`: A New Order [23/N]
> [!NOTE]
>
> Intermediate commits are intended to help review, but will be squashed prior to merge.
Some `tests/ui/` housekeeping, to trim down number of tests directly under `tests/ui/`. Part of rust-lang/rust#133895.
r? ``@tgross35``
|
|
tests/codegen/enum/enum-match.rs: accept negative range attribute
The test current fails when `rustc` is built with HEAD LLVM: https://buildkite.com/llvm-project/rust-llvm-integrate-prototype/builds/38097/steps/canvas?sid=0197c492-5661-4c42-8ae7-3d789e85c6ca
I suspect the change was caused by https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/commit/545cdca4883552b147a0f1adfac713f76fc22305
``@rustbot`` label llvm-main
|
|
r=petrochenkov
Make lint `ambiguous_glob_imports` deny-by-default and report-in-deps
This pr aims to finish the second part of rust-lang/rust#114095. It converts the `ambiguous_glob_imports` lint from a warning to an error.
Currently, only the lint definition and the related tests are changed, a crater run should provide us with information on whether we should go for this.
|
