| Age | Commit message (Collapse) | Author | Lines |
|---|
|
r=wesleywiser,jieyouxu
Mangle rustc_std_internal_symbols functions
This reduces the risk of issues when using a staticlib or rust dylib compiled with a different rustc version in a rust program. Currently this will either (in the case of staticlib) cause a linker error due to duplicate symbol definitions, or (in the case of rust dylibs) cause rustc_std_internal_symbols functions to be silently overridden. As rust gets more commonly used inside the implementation of libraries consumed with a C interface (like Spidermonkey, Ruby YJIT (curently has to do partial linking of all rust code to hide all symbols not part of the C api), the Rusticl OpenCL implementation in mesa) this is becoming much more of an issue. With this PR the only symbols remaining with an unmangled name are rust_eh_personality (LLVM doesn't allow renaming it) and `__rust_no_alloc_shim_is_unstable`.
Helps mitigate https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/issues/104707
try-job: aarch64-gnu-debug
try-job: aarch64-apple
try-job: x86_64-apple-1
try-job: x86_64-mingw-1
try-job: i686-mingw-1
try-job: x86_64-msvc-1
try-job: i686-msvc-1
try-job: test-various
try-job: armhf-gnu
|
|
Rollup of 7 pull requests
Successful merges:
- #133870 (Stabilize `asm_goto` feature gate)
- #137449 (Denote `ControlFlow` as `#[must_use]`)
- #137465 (mir_build: Avoid some useless work when visiting "primary" bindings)
- #138349 (Emit function declarations for functions with `#[linkage="extern_weak"]`)
- #138412 (Install licenses into `share/doc/rust/licenses`)
- #138577 (rustdoc-json: Don't also include `#[deprecated]` in `Item::attrs`)
- #138588 (Avoid double lowering of idents)
Failed merges:
- #138321 ([bootstrap] Distribute split debuginfo if present)
r? `@ghost`
`@rustbot` modify labels: rollup
|
|
Shourya742:2025-02-15-change-config.toml-to-bootstrap.toml, r=onur-ozkan,jieyouxu,kobzol
change config.toml to bootstrap.toml
Currently, both Bootstrap and Cargo uses same name as their configuration file, which can be confusing. This PR is based on a discussion to rename `config.toml` to `bootstrap.toml` for Bootstrap. Closes: https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/issues/126875.
I have split the PR into atomic commits to make it easier to review. Once the changes are finalized, I will squash them. I am particularly concerned about the changes made to modules that are not part of Bootstrap. How should we handle those changes? Should we ping the respective maintainers?
|
|
rustdoc-json: Don't also include `#[deprecated]` in `Item::attrs`
Closes #138378
Not sure if this should bump `FORMAT_VERSION` or not. CC `@Enselic` `@LukeMathWalker` `@obi1kenobi`
r? `@GuillaumeGomez,` best reviewed commit-by-commit
|
|
Emit function declarations for functions with `#[linkage="extern_weak"]`
Currently, when declaring an extern weak function in Rust, we use the following syntax:
```rust
unsafe extern "C" {
#[linkage = "extern_weak"]
static FOO: Option<unsafe extern "C" fn() -> ()>;
}
```
This allows runtime-checking the extern weak symbol through the Option.
When emitting LLVM-IR, the Rust compiler currently emits this static as an i8, and a pointer that is initialized with the value of the global i8 and represents the nullabilty e.g.
```
`@FOO` = extern_weak global i8
`@_rust_extern_with_linkage_FOO` = internal global ptr `@FOO`
```
This approach does not work well with CFI, where we need to attach CFI metadata to a concrete function declaration, which was pointed out in https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/issues/115199.
This change switches to emitting a proper function declaration instead of a global i8. This allows CFI to work for extern_weak functions. Example:
```
`@_rust_extern_with_linkage_FOO` = internal global ptr `@FOO`
...
declare !type !61 !type !62 !type !63 !type !64 extern_weak void `@FOO(double)` unnamed_addr #6
```
We keep initializing the Rust internal symbol with the function declaration, which preserves the correct behavior for runtime checking the Option.
r? `@rcvalle`
cc `@jakos-sec`
try-job: test-various
|
|
mir_build: Avoid some useless work when visiting "primary" bindings
While looking over `visit_primary_bindings`, I noticed that it does a bunch of extra work to build up a collection of “user-type projections”, even though 2/3 of its call sites don't even use them. Those callers can get the same result via `thir::Pat::walk_always`.
(And it turns out that doing so also avoids creating some redundant user-type entries in MIR for some binding constructs.)
I also noticed that even when the user-type projections *are* used, the process of building them ends up eagerly cloning some nested vectors at every recursion step, even in cases where they won't be used because the current subpattern has no bindings. To avoid this, the visit method now assembles a linked list on the stack containing the information that *would* be needed to create projections, and only creates the concrete projections as needed when a primary binding is encountered.
Some relevant prior PRs:
- #55274
- https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/commit/0bfe184b1ad14db4b002c3a272adf44e1839822f in #55937
---
There should be no user-visible change in compiler output.
|
|
Stabilize `asm_goto` feature gate
Stabilize `asm_goto` feature (tracked by #119364). The issue will remain open and be updated to track `asm_goto_with_outputs`.
Reference PR: https://github.com/rust-lang/reference/pull/1693
# Stabilization Report
This feature adds a `label <block>` operand type to `asm!`. `<block>` must be a block expression with type unit or never. The address of the block is substituted and the assembly may jump to the block. When block completes the `asm!` block returns and continues execution.
The block starts a new safety context and unsafe operations within must have additional `unsafe`s; the effect of `unsafe` that surrounds `asm!` block is cancelled. See https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/issues/119364#issuecomment-2316037703 and https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/pull/131544.
It's currently forbidden to use `asm_goto` with output operands; that is still unstable under `asm_goto_with_outputs`.
Example:
```rust
unsafe {
asm!(
"jmp {}",
label {
println!("Jumped from asm!");
}
);
}
```
Tests:
- tests/ui/asm/x86_64/goto.rs
- tests/ui/asm/x86_64/goto-block-safe.stderr
- tests/ui/asm/x86_64/bad-options.rs
- tests/codegen/asm/goto.rs
|
|
|
|
For staticlib we still keep checking symbols that don't contain rust as
substring.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Document `#![register_tool]`
cc https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/issues/66079
|
|
Improve upvar analysis for deref of child capture
Two fixes to the heuristic I implemented in #123660. As I noted in the code:
> Luckily, if this function is not correct, then the program is not unsound, since we still borrowck and validate the choices made from this function -- the only side-effect is that the user may receive unnecessary borrowck errors.
This indeed fixes unnecessary borrowck errors.
r? oli-obk
---
The heuristic is only valid if we deref a `&T`, not a `&mut T` or `Box<T>`, so make sure to check the type. This fixes:
```rust
struct Foo { precise: i32 }
fn mut_ref_inside_mut(f: &mut Foo) {
let x: impl AsyncFn() = async move || {
let y = &f.precise;
};
}
```
Since the capture from `f` to `&f.precise` needs to be treated as a lending borrow from the parent coroutine-closure to the child coroutine.
---
The heuristic is also valid if *any* deref projection in the child capture's projections is a `&T`, but we were only looking at the last one. This ensures that this function is considered not to be lending:
```rust
struct Foo { precise: i32 }
fn ref_inside_mut(f: &mut &Foo) {
let x: impl Fn() -> _ = async move || {
let y = &f.precise;
};
}
```
(Specifically, checking that `impl Fn() -> _` is satisfied is exercising that the coroutine is not considered to be lending.)
|
|
GuillaumeGomez:proc-macro_add_value_retrieval_methods, r=Amanieu
Add `*_value` methods to proc_macro lib
This is the implementation of https://github.com/rust-lang/libs-team/issues/459.
It allows to get the actual value (unescaped) of the different string literals.
Part of https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/issues/136652.
r? libs-api
|
|
Currently, when declaring an extern weak function in Rust, we use the
following syntax:
```rust
unsafe extern "C" {
#[linkage = "extern_weak"]
static FOO: Option<unsafe extern "C" fn() -> ()>;
}
```
This allows runtime-checking the extern weak symbol through the Option.
When emitting LLVM-IR, the Rust compiler currently emits this static
as an i8, and a pointer that is initialized with the value of the global
i8 and represents the nullabilty e.g.
```
@FOO = extern_weak global i8
@_rust_extern_with_linkage_FOO = internal global ptr @FOO
```
This approach does not work well with CFI, where we need to attach CFI
metadata to a concrete function declaration, which was pointed out in
https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/issues/115199.
This change switches to emitting a proper function declaration instead
of a global i8. This allows CFI to work for extern_weak functions.
We keep initializing the Rust internal symbol with the function
declaration, which preserves the correct behavior for runtime checking
the Option.
Co-authored-by: Jakob Koschel <jakobkoschel@google.com>
|
|
|
|
|
|
Misc print request handling cleanups + a centralized test for print request stability gating
I was working on implementing `--print=supported-crate-types`, then I noticed some things that were mildly annoying me, so I pulled out these changes. In this PR:
- First commit adds a centralized test `tests/ui/print/stability.rs` that is responsible for exercising stability gating of the print requests.
- AFAICT we didn't have any test that systematically checks this.
- I coalesced `tests/ui/feature-gates/feature-gate-print-check-cfg.rs` (for `--print=check-cfg`) into this test too, since `--print=check-cfg` is only `-Z unstable-options`-gated like other unstable print requests, and is not additionally feature-gated. cc ``@Urgau`` in case you have any concerns.
- Second commit alphabetically sorts the `PrintKind` enum for consistency because the `PRINT_KINDS` list (using the enum) is *already* alphabetically sorted.
- Third commit pulls out two helpers:
1. A helper `check_print_request_stability` for checking stability of print requests and the diagnostics for using unstable print requests without `-Z unstable-options`, to avoid repeating the same logic over and over.
2. A helper `emit_unknown_print_request_help` for the unknown print request diagnostics to make print request collection control flow more obvious.
- Fourth commit renames `PrintKind::{TargetSpec,AllTargetSpecs}` to `PrintKind::{TargetSpecJson,AllTargetSpecsJson}` to better reflect their actual print names, `--print={target-spec-json,all-target-specs-json}`.
r? ``@nnethercote`` (or compiler/reroll)
|
|
|
|
|
|
I can't find any dedicated tests that actually exercises the stability
gating (via `-Z unstable-options`) of print requests, so here's a
dedicated one.
I coalesced `tests/ui/feature-gates/feature-gate-print-check-cfg.rs`
into this test, because AFAICT that print request is not feature gated,
but only `-Z unstable-options`-gated just like other unstable print
requests.
|
|
|
|
added some new test to check for result and options opt
Apologies for the delay. Finally have some time to get back into contributing.
## Context
- Added some tests to show optimization on result and options for 64 and 128 bits
- Relevant issue https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/issues/101210
## Some newb questions from me
- [x] My local llvm IR has `nuw` in `result_nop_match_128` etc whereas [godbolt version](https://rust.godbolt.org/z/Td9zoT5zn) doesn't have. So I put optional there, but not sure if it's desirable (maybe I'm not using the compiled llvm in the repo). I ran the test with
```bash
./x test tests/codegen/try_question_mark_nop.rs
```
- [x] Unless I'm reading it wrongly, but `option_nop_match_128` and `option_nop_traits_128` look to be **not** optimized away?
Update:
Here's the test for future reference
```rust
// CHECK-LABEL: `@option_nop_match_128`
#[no_mangle]
pub fn option_nop_match_128(x: Option<i128>) -> Option<i128> {
// CHECK: start:
// CHECK-NEXT: %trunc = trunc nuw i128 %0 to i1
// CHECK-NEXT: br i1 %trunc, label %bb3, label %bb4
// CHECK: bb3:
// CHECK-NEXT: %2 = getelementptr inbounds {{(nuw )?}}i8, ptr %_0, i64 16
// CHECK-NEXT: store i128 %1, ptr %2, align 16
// CHECK: bb4:
// CHECK-NEXT: %storemerge = phi i128 [ 1, %bb3 ], [ 0, %start ]
// CHECK-NEXT: store i128 %storemerge, ptr %_0, align 16
// CHECK-NEXT: ret void
match x {
Some(x) => Some(x),
None => None,
}
}
```
r? `@scottmcm`
|
|
Use lit span when suggesting suffix lit cast
Fixes #138392
|
|
Add codegen test for #129795
Adds test for #129795.
Min LLVM version is 20 because the optimization only happens since LLVM 20.
|
|
Clean up some tests in tests/ui
I cleaned up 3 top level tests, keeping the changes minor because it is my first PR and wanted to get feedback before doing more changes/PRs.
Tracking issues:
https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/issues/73494
https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/issues/133895
r? jieyouxu
|
|
Add RTN support to rustdoc
This adds support to rustdoc and rustdoc-json for rendering `(..)` RTN (return type notation) style generics.
---
Cleaning `rustc_middle::ty::Ty` is not correct still, though, and ends up rendering a function like:
```rust
pub fn foreign<T: Foreign<bar(..): Send>>()
where
<T as Foreign>::bar(..): 'static,
T::bar(..): Sync,
```
Into this:
```rust
pub fn foreign<T>()
where
T: Foreign,
impl Future<Output = ()>: Send + 'static + Sync,
```
This is because `clean_middle_ty` doesn't actually have sufficient context about whether the RPITIT is in its "defining scope" or not, so we don't know if the type was originally written like `-> impl Trait` or with RTN like `T::method(..)`.
Partially addresses #123996 (i.e., HIR side, not middle::ty one)
|
|
The existing method does some non-obvious extra work to collect user types and
build user-type projections, which is specifically needed by `declare_bindings`
and not by the other two callers.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Remove fake borrows of refs that are converted into non-refs in `MakeByMoveBody`
Remove fake borrows of closure captures if that capture has been replaced with a by-move version of that capture.
For example, given an async closure that looks like:
```
let f: Foo;
let c = async move || {
match f { ... }
};
```
... in this pair of coroutine-closure + coroutine, we capture `Foo` in the parent and `&Foo` in the child. We will emit two fake borrows like:
```
_2 = &fake shallow (*(_1.0: &Foo));
_3 = &fake shallow (_1.0: &Foo);
```
However, since the by-move-body transform is responsible for replacing `_1.0: &Foo` with `_1.0: Foo` (since the `AsyncFnOnce` coroutine will own `Foo` by value), that makes the second fake borrow obsolete since we never have an upvar of type `&Foo`, and we should replace it with a `nop`.
As a side-note, we don't actually even care about fake borrows here at all since they're fully a MIR borrowck artifact, and we don't need to borrowck by-move MIR bodies. But it's best to preserve as much as we can between these two bodies :)
Fixes #138501
r? oli-obk
|
|
Enforce type of const param correctly in MIR typeck
Properly intercepts and then annotates the type for a `ConstKind::Param` in the MIR.
This code should probably be cleaned up, it's kinda spaghetti, but no better structure really occurred to me when writing this case.
We could probably gate this behind the feature gate or add a fast path when the args have no free regions if perf is bad.
r? `@BoxyUwU`
|
|
Do not suggest using `-Zmacro-backtrace` for builtin macros
For macros that are implemented on the compiler, or that are annotated with `rustc_diagnostic_item`, which have arbitrary implementations from the point of view of the user and might as well be intrinsics, we do *not* mention the `-Zmacro-backtrace` flag. This includes `derive`s and standard macros like `panic!` and `format!`.
This PR adds a field to every `Span`'s `ExpnData` stating whether it comes from a builtin macro. This is determined by the macro being annotated with either `#[rustc_builtin_macro]` or `#[rustc_diagnostic_item]`. An alternative to using these attributes that already exist for other uses would be to introduce another attribute like `#[rustc_no_backtrace]` to have finer control on which macros are affected (for example, an error within `vec![]` now doesn't mention the backtrace, but one could make the case that it should). Ideally, instead of carrying this information in the `ExpnData` we'd instead try to query the `DefId` of the macro (that is already stored) to see if it is annotated in some way, but we do not have access to the `TyCtxt` from `rustc_errors`.
r? `@petrochenkov`
|
|
Fix typo in hir lowering lint diag
|
|
Fix HIR printing of parameters
HIR pretty printing does the wrong thing for anonymous parameters, and there is no test coverage for it. This PR remedies both of those things.
r? ``@lcnr``
|
|
Pass struct field HirId when check_expr_struct_fields
Fixes #138319
r? compiler
cc ``@Mark-Simulacrum``
|
|
rustc_target: Add target features for LoongArch v1.1
This patch adds new target features for LoongArch v1.1:
* div32
* lam-bh
* lamcas
* ld-seq-sa
* scq
|
|
|
|
|
|
For macros that are implemented on the compiler, we do *not* mention the `-Zmacro-backtrace` flag. This includes `derive`s and standard macros.
|
|
|
|
Provide helpful diagnostics for shebang lookalikes
When `[` is not found after a `#!`, a note will be added to the exisiting error
```
error: expected `[`, found `/`
--> src/main.rs:2:3
|
2 | #!/usr/bin/env -S cargo +nightly -Zscript
| ^ expected `[`
|
= note: the token sequence `#!` here looks like the start of a shebang interpreter directive but it is not
= help: if you meant this to be a shebang interpreter directive, move it to the very start of the file
```
Fixes #137249
r? `@fmease`
|
|
Display valid crate types in error message for --crate-type flag
This PR improves the error message for the --crate-type flag. When an invalid crate type is provided, the compiler will now show a list of valid options.
### Before
### After
I based the implementation on `OutputType::shorthands_display`
Closes #70183
|
|
Signed-off-by: xizheyin <xizheyin@smail.nju.edu.cn>
|
|
Co-authored-by: Jieyou Xu <jieyouxu@outlook.com>
|
