| Age | Commit message (Collapse) | Author | Lines |
|---|
|
r=jdonszelmann,ralfjung,traviscross
Implement `#[rustc_align_static(N)]` on `static`s
Tracking issue: https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/issues/146177
```rust
#![feature(static_align)]
#[rustc_align_static(64)]
static SO_ALIGNED: u64 = 0;
```
We need a different attribute than `rustc_align` because unstable attributes are tied to their feature (we can't have two unstable features use the same unstable attribute). Otherwise this uses all of the same infrastructure as `#[rustc_align]`.
r? `@traviscross`
|
|
inclusive `Range`s: change `end` to `last`
Tracking issue: rust-lang/rust#125687
ACP: rust-lang/libs-team#511
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
We need a different attribute than `rustc_align` because unstable attributes are
tied to their feature (we can't have two unstable features use the same
unstable attribute). Otherwise this uses all of the same infrastructure
as `#[rustc_align]`.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
fix APITIT being treated as a normal generic parameter in suggestions
closes rust-lang/rust#126395
|
|
Reject invalid literal suffixes in tuple indexing, tuple struct indexing, and struct field name position
Tracking issue: rust-lang/rust#60210
Closes rust-lang/rust#60210
## Summary
Bump the ["suffixes on a tuple index are invalid" non-lint pseudo future-incompatibility warning (#60210)][issue-60210][^non-lint] to a **hard error** across all editions, rejecting the remaining carve outs from accidentally accepted invalid suffixes since Rust **1.27**.
- We accidentally accepted invalid suffixes in tuple indexing positions in Rust **1.27**. Originally reported at https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/issues/59418.
- We tried to hard reject all invalid suffixes in https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/pull/59421, but unfortunately it turns out there were proc macros accidentally relying on it: https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/issues/60138.
- We temporarily accepted `{i,u}{32,size}` in https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/pull/60186 (the "*carve outs*") to mitigate *immediate* ecosystem impact, but it came with an FCW warning indicating that we wanted to reject it after a few Rust releases.
- Now (1.89.0) is a few Rust releases later (1.35.0), thus I'm proposing to **also reject the carve outs**.
- `std::mem::offset_of!` stabilized in Rust **1.77.0** happens to use the same "don't expect suffix" code path which has the carve outs, so it also accepted the carve out suffixes. I'm proposing to **reject this case as well**.
## What specifically breaks?
Code that still relied on invalid `{i,u}{32,size}` suffixes being temporarily accepted by rust-lang/rust#60186 as an ecosystem impact mitigation measure (cf. rust-lang/rust#60138). Specifically, the following cases (particularly the construction of these forms in proc macros like reported in rust-lang/rust#60138):
### Position 1: Invalid `{i,u}{32,size}` suffixes in tuple indexing
```rs
fn main() {
let _x = (42,).0invalid; // Already error, already rejected by #59421
let _x = (42,).0i8; // Already error, not one of the #60186 carve outs.
let _x = (42,).0usize; // warning: suffixes on a tuple index are invalid
}
```
### Position 2: Invalid `{i,u}{32,size}` suffixes in tuple struct indexing
```rs
fn main() {
struct X(i32);
let _x = X(42);
let _x = _x.0invalid; // Already error, already rejected by #59421
let _x = _x.0i8; // Already error, not one of the #60186 carve outs.
let _x = _x.0usize; // warning: suffixes on a tuple index are invalid
}
```
### Position 3: Invalid `{i,u}{32,size}` suffixes in numeric struct field names
```rs
fn main() {
struct X(i32, i32, i32);
let _x = X(1, 2, 3);
let _y = X { 0usize: 42, 1: 42, 2: 42 }; // warning: suffixes on a tuple index are invalid
match _x {
X { 0usize: 1, 1: 2, 2: 3 } => todo!(), // warning: suffixes on a tuple index are invalid
_ => {}
}
}
```
### Position 4: Invalid `{i,u}{32,size}` suffixes in `std::mem::offset_of!`
While investigating the warning, unfortunately I noticed `std::mem::offset_of!` also happens to use the "expect no suffix" code path which had the carve outs. So this was accepted since Rust **1.77.0** with the same FCW:
```rs
fn main() {
#[repr(C)]
pub struct Struct<T>(u8, T);
assert_eq!(std::mem::offset_of!(Struct<u32>, 0usize), 0);
//~^ WARN suffixes on a tuple index are invalid
}
```
### The above forms in proc macros
For instance, constructions like (see tracking issue rust-lang/rust#60210):
```rs
let i = 0;
quote! { foo.$i }
```
where the user needs to actually write
```rs
let i = syn::Index::from(0);
quote! { foo.$i }
```
### Crater results
Conducted a crater run (https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/pull/145463#issuecomment-3194920383).
- https://github.com/AmlingPalantir/r4/tree/256af3c72f094b298cd442097ef7c571d8001f29: genuine regression; "invalid suffix `usize`" in derive macro. Has a ton of other build warnings, last updated 6 years ago.
- Exactly the kind of intended breakage. Minimized down to https://github.com/AmlingPalantir/r4/blob/256af3c72f094b298cd442097ef7c571d8001f29/validates_derive/src/lib.rs#L71-L75, where when interpolation uses `quote`'s `ToTokens` on a `usize` index (i.e. on tuple struct `Tup(())`), the generated suffix becomes `.0usize` (cf. Position 2).
- Notified crate author of breakage in https://github.com/AmlingPalantir/r4/issues/1.
- Other failures are unrelated or spurious.
## Review remarks
- Commits 1-3 expands the test coverage to better reflect the current situation before doing any functional changes.
- Commit 4 is an intentional **breaking change**. We bump the non-lint "suffixes on a tuple index are invalid" warning into a hard error. Thus, this will need a crater run and a T-lang FCP.
## Tasks
- [x] Run crater to check if anyone is still relying on this being not a hard error. Determine degree of ecosystem breakage.
- [x] If degree of breakage seems acceptable, draft nomination report for T-lang for FCP.
- [x] Determine hard error on Edition 2024+, or on all editions.
## Accompanying Reference update
- https://github.com/rust-lang/reference/pull/1966
[^non-lint]: The FCW was implemented as a *non-lint* warning (meaning it has no associated lint name, and you can't `#![deny(..)]` it) because spans coming from proc macros could not be distinguished from regular field access. This warning was also intentionally impossible to silence. See https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/pull/60186#issuecomment-485581694.
[issue-60210]: https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/issues/60210
|
|
const-eval: disable pointer fragment support
This fixes https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/issues/146291 by disabling pointer fragment support for const-eval. I want to properly fix this eventually, but won't get to it in the next few weeks, so this is an emergency patch to prevent the buggy implementation from landing on stable. The beta cutoff is on Sep 12th so if this PR lands after that, we'll need a backport.
|
|
compiler: Include span of too huge array with `-Cdebuginfo=2`
We have a few ui tests to ensure we emit an error if we encounter too big arrays. Before this fix, compiling the tests with `-Cdebuginfo=2` would not include the spans of the instantiation sites, because the error is then emitted from a different code path that does not include the span.
Propagate the span to the error also in the debuginfo case, so the tests passes regardless of debuginfo level.
r? ``@wesleywiser`` since this is a natural continuation of https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/pull/145967 that you approved (thanks!).
cc https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/issues/61117 since this takes is one step closer to increasing `rust.debuginfo-level-tests` to `2` in the **x86_64-gnu-debug** CI job.
## Test failure output without the fix
<details>
<summary>
Here is what the test failures look like if you run the tests without the fix. (Click to expand.)
</summary>
```
$ ./x test --set rust.debuginfo-level-tests=2 tests/ui/limits/huge-array-simple-64.rs tests/ui/limits/huge-array.rs tests/ui/limits/issue-15919-64.rs
Building bootstrap
Finished `dev` profile [unoptimized] target(s) in 0.16s
/home/martin/src/rust/build/x86_64-unknown-linux-gnu/ci-llvm/bin/llvm-strip does not exist; skipping copy
Building stage1 compiler artifacts (stage0 -> stage1, x86_64-unknown-linux-gnu)
Finished `release` profile [optimized + debuginfo] target(s) in 0.40s
Creating a sysroot for stage1 compiler (use `rustup toolchain link 'name' build/host/stage1`)
Building stage1 lld-wrapper (stage0 -> stage1, x86_64-unknown-linux-gnu)
Finished `release` profile [optimized + debuginfo] target(s) in 0.08s
Building stage1 library artifacts (stage1 -> stage1, x86_64-unknown-linux-gnu)
Compiling addr2line v0.25.0
Compiling std v0.0.0 (/home/martin/src/rust/library/std)
Compiling rustc-std-workspace-std v1.99.0 (/home/martin/src/rust/library/rustc-std-workspace-std)
Compiling unicode-width v0.2.1
Compiling rustc-literal-escaper v0.0.5
Compiling proc_macro v0.0.0 (/home/martin/src/rust/library/proc_macro)
Compiling getopts v0.2.23
Compiling test v0.0.0 (/home/martin/src/rust/library/test)
Compiling sysroot v0.0.0 (/home/martin/src/rust/library/sysroot)
Finished `release` profile [optimized + debuginfo] target(s) in 14.43s
Building stage1 compiletest (stage0 -> stage1, x86_64-unknown-linux-gnu)
Finished `release` profile [optimized + debuginfo] target(s) in 0.14s
Testing stage2 compiletest suite=ui mode=ui (stage1 -> stage2, x86_64-unknown-linux-gnu)
running 6 tests
[ui] tests/ui/limits/huge-array.rs#full-debuginfo ... F
[ui] tests/ui/limits/issue-15919-64.rs#full-debuginfo ... F
[ui] tests/ui/limits/huge-array-simple-64.rs#full-debuginfo ... F
...
failures:
---- [ui] tests/ui/limits/huge-array.rs#full-debuginfo stdout ----
Saved the actual stderr to `/home/martin/src/rust/build/x86_64-unknown-linux-gnu/test/ui/limits/huge-array.full-debuginfo/huge-array.full-debuginfo.stderr`
diff of stderr:
1 error: values of the type `[[u8; 1518599999]; 1518600000]` are too big for the target architecture
- --> $DIR/huge-array.rs:9:9
- |
- LL | let s: [T; 1518600000] = [t; 1518600000];
- | ^
6
7 error: aborting due to 1 previous error
8
The actual stderr differed from the expected stderr
To update references, rerun the tests and pass the `--bless` flag
To only update this specific test, also pass `--test-args limits/huge-array.rs`
error in revision `full-debuginfo`: 1 errors occurred comparing output.
status: exit status: 1
command: env -u RUSTC_LOG_COLOR RUSTC_ICE="0" RUST_BACKTRACE="short" "/home/martin/src/rust/build/x86_64-unknown-linux-gnu/stage1/bin/rustc" "/home/martin/src/rust/tests/ui/limits/huge-array.rs" "-Zthreads=1" "-Zsimulate-remapped-rust-src-base=/rustc/FAKE_PREFIX" "-Ztranslate-remapped-path-to-local-path=no" "-Z" "ignore-directory-in-diagnostics-source-blocks=/home/martin/.cargo" "-Z" "ignore-directory-in-diagnostics-source-blocks=/home/martin/src/rust/vendor" "--sysroot" "/home/martin/src/rust/build/x86_64-unknown-linux-gnu/stage1" "--target=x86_64-unknown-linux-gnu" "--cfg" "full_debuginfo" "--check-cfg" "cfg(test,FALSE,no_debuginfo,full_debuginfo)" "--error-format" "json" "--json" "future-incompat" "-Ccodegen-units=1" "-Zui-testing" "-Zdeduplicate-diagnostics=no" "-Zwrite-long-types-to-disk=no" "-Cstrip=debuginfo" "-C" "prefer-dynamic" "--out-dir" "/home/martin/src/rust/build/x86_64-unknown-linux-gnu/test/ui/limits/huge-array.full-debuginfo" "-A" "unused" "-A" "internal_features" "-A" "unused_parens" "-A" "unused_braces" "-Crpath" "-Lnative=/home/martin/src/rust/build/x86_64-unknown-linux-gnu/native/rust-test-helpers" "-Cdebuginfo=2"
stdout: none
--- stderr -------------------------------
error: values of the type `[[u8; 1518599999]; 1518600000]` are too big for the target architecture
error: aborting due to 1 previous error
------------------------------------------
---- [ui] tests/ui/limits/huge-array.rs#full-debuginfo stdout end ----
---- [ui] tests/ui/limits/issue-15919-64.rs#full-debuginfo stdout ----
Saved the actual stderr to `/home/martin/src/rust/build/x86_64-unknown-linux-gnu/test/ui/limits/issue-15919-64.full-debuginfo/issue-15919-64.full-debuginfo.stderr`
diff of stderr:
1 error: values of the type `[usize; usize::MAX]` are too big for the target architecture
- --> $DIR/issue-15919-64.rs:10:9
- |
- LL | let x = [0usize; 0xffff_ffff_ffff_ffff];
- | ^
6
7 error: aborting due to 1 previous error
8
The actual stderr differed from the expected stderr
To update references, rerun the tests and pass the `--bless` flag
To only update this specific test, also pass `--test-args limits/issue-15919-64.rs`
error in revision `full-debuginfo`: 1 errors occurred comparing output.
status: exit status: 1
command: env -u RUSTC_LOG_COLOR RUSTC_ICE="0" RUST_BACKTRACE="short" "/home/martin/src/rust/build/x86_64-unknown-linux-gnu/stage1/bin/rustc" "/home/martin/src/rust/tests/ui/limits/issue-15919-64.rs" "-Zthreads=1" "-Zsimulate-remapped-rust-src-base=/rustc/FAKE_PREFIX" "-Ztranslate-remapped-path-to-local-path=no" "-Z" "ignore-directory-in-diagnostics-source-blocks=/home/martin/.cargo" "-Z" "ignore-directory-in-diagnostics-source-blocks=/home/martin/src/rust/vendor" "--sysroot" "/home/martin/src/rust/build/x86_64-unknown-linux-gnu/stage1" "--target=x86_64-unknown-linux-gnu" "--cfg" "full_debuginfo" "--check-cfg" "cfg(test,FALSE,no_debuginfo,full_debuginfo)" "--error-format" "json" "--json" "future-incompat" "-Ccodegen-units=1" "-Zui-testing" "-Zdeduplicate-diagnostics=no" "-Zwrite-long-types-to-disk=no" "-Cstrip=debuginfo" "-C" "prefer-dynamic" "--out-dir" "/home/martin/src/rust/build/x86_64-unknown-linux-gnu/test/ui/limits/issue-15919-64.full-debuginfo" "-A" "unused" "-A" "internal_features" "-A" "unused_parens" "-A" "unused_braces" "-Crpath" "-Lnative=/home/martin/src/rust/build/x86_64-unknown-linux-gnu/native/rust-test-helpers" "-Cdebuginfo=2"
stdout: none
--- stderr -------------------------------
error: values of the type `[usize; usize::MAX]` are too big for the target architecture
error: aborting due to 1 previous error
------------------------------------------
---- [ui] tests/ui/limits/issue-15919-64.rs#full-debuginfo stdout end ----
---- [ui] tests/ui/limits/huge-array-simple-64.rs#full-debuginfo stdout ----
Saved the actual stderr to `/home/martin/src/rust/build/x86_64-unknown-linux-gnu/test/ui/limits/huge-array-simple-64.full-debuginfo/huge-array-simple-64.full-debuginfo.stderr`
diff of stderr:
1 error: values of the type `[u8; 2305843011361177600]` are too big for the target architecture
- --> $DIR/huge-array-simple-64.rs:12:9
- |
- LL | let _fat: [u8; (1<<61)+(1<<31)] =
- | ^^^^
6
7 error: aborting due to 1 previous error
8
The actual stderr differed from the expected stderr
To update references, rerun the tests and pass the `--bless` flag
To only update this specific test, also pass `--test-args limits/huge-array-simple-64.rs`
error in revision `full-debuginfo`: 1 errors occurred comparing output.
status: exit status: 1
command: env -u RUSTC_LOG_COLOR RUSTC_ICE="0" RUST_BACKTRACE="short" "/home/martin/src/rust/build/x86_64-unknown-linux-gnu/stage1/bin/rustc" "/home/martin/src/rust/tests/ui/limits/huge-array-simple-64.rs" "-Zthreads=1" "-Zsimulate-remapped-rust-src-base=/rustc/FAKE_PREFIX" "-Ztranslate-remapped-path-to-local-path=no" "-Z" "ignore-directory-in-diagnostics-source-blocks=/home/martin/.cargo" "-Z" "ignore-directory-in-diagnostics-source-blocks=/home/martin/src/rust/vendor" "--sysroot" "/home/martin/src/rust/build/x86_64-unknown-linux-gnu/stage1" "--target=x86_64-unknown-linux-gnu" "--cfg" "full_debuginfo" "--check-cfg" "cfg(test,FALSE,no_debuginfo,full_debuginfo)" "--error-format" "json" "--json" "future-incompat" "-Ccodegen-units=1" "-Zui-testing" "-Zdeduplicate-diagnostics=no" "-Zwrite-long-types-to-disk=no" "-Cstrip=debuginfo" "-C" "prefer-dynamic" "--out-dir" "/home/martin/src/rust/build/x86_64-unknown-linux-gnu/test/ui/limits/huge-array-simple-64.full-debuginfo" "-A" "unused" "-A" "internal_features" "-A" "unused_parens" "-A" "unused_braces" "-Crpath" "-Lnative=/home/martin/src/rust/build/x86_64-unknown-linux-gnu/native/rust-test-helpers" "-Cdebuginfo=2"
stdout: none
--- stderr -------------------------------
error: values of the type `[u8; 2305843011361177600]` are too big for the target architecture
error: aborting due to 1 previous error
------------------------------------------
---- [ui] tests/ui/limits/huge-array-simple-64.rs#full-debuginfo stdout end ----
failures:
[ui] tests/ui/limits/huge-array.rs#full-debuginfo
[ui] tests/ui/limits/issue-15919-64.rs#full-debuginfo
[ui] tests/ui/limits/huge-array-simple-64.rs#full-debuginfo
test result: FAILED. 3 passed; 3 failed; 0 ignored; 0 measured; 19720 filtered out; finished in 117.18ms
Some tests failed in compiletest suite=ui mode=ui host=x86_64-unknown-linux-gnu target=x86_64-unknown-linux-gnu
Build completed unsuccessfully in 0:00:17
```
</details>
As can be seen, the span info is missing with debuginfo=2 without the fix.
|
|
Port limit attributes to the new attribute parsing infrastructure
Doesn't pass tests, to be rebased on https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/pull/145792 which will solve that
r? `@fmease`
|
|
|
|
|
|
eagerly compute `sub_unification_table` again
Previously called `sub_relations`. We still only using them for diagnostics right now. This mostly reverts rust-lang/rust#119989. Necessary for type inference guidance due to not-yet defined opaque types, cc https://github.com/rust-lang/trait-system-refactor-initiative/issues/182.
We could use them for cycle detection in generalization and it seems desirable to do so in the future. However, this is unsound with the old trait solver as its cache does not track these `sub_unification_table` in any way.
We now properly track the `sub_unification_table` when canonicalizing so using them in the new solver is totally sound and the performance impact is far more manageable than I thought back in rust-lang/rust#119989.
r? `@compiler-errors`
|
|
This test currently only runs on RISC-V and loongarch hosts, but assumes
that the host target is the -gnu target. By using minicore, we can
run this test on all host targets, regardless of architecture, as long
as the LLVM components are built.
This also fixes this test on musl hosts of these architectures.
Signed-off-by: Jens Reidel <adrian@travitia.xyz>
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
there is no reason this should not work, really, we're just cutting some scope for now
|
|
|
|
Rollup of 7 pull requests
Successful merges:
- rust-lang/rust#146111 (Migrate more things in the new solver to specific `DefId`s)
- rust-lang/rust#146298 (GVN: Ensure indirect is first projection in try_as_place.)
- rust-lang/rust#146299 (docs(std): add error docs for path canonicalize)
- rust-lang/rust#146310 (Allow static regions in `type_name`.)
- rust-lang/rust#146313 (Some `rustc_middle` cleanups)
- rust-lang/rust#146319 (Fix typo in default.rs)
- rust-lang/rust#146320 (rustc-dev-guide subtree update)
r? `@ghost`
`@rustbot` modify labels: rollup
|
|
|
|
|
|
That test causes a large amount of crashes. If a system
has a /proc/sys/kernel/core_pattern that uploads core dumps enabled,
it will take a long time to complete. Set dumpable to 0 to avoid that.
Before:
$ time ./panic-uninitialized-zeroed
real 0m47.457s
user 0m0.023s
sys 0m0.021s
After:
$ ./panic-uninitialized-zeroed
real 0m0.029s
user 0m0.019s
sys 0m0.010s
|
|
Allow static regions in `type_name`.
Fixes rust-lang/rust#146249.
r? `@lcnr`
|
|
improve c-variadic error reporting
tracking issue: https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/issues/44930
The parts of https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/pull/143546 that don't require any particular knowledge about c-variadic functions.
This prepares the way for rejecting c-variadic functions that are also coroutines, safe functions, or associated functions.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Fixes #146249.
|
|
Ignore intrinsic calls in cross-crate-inlining cost model
I noticed in a side project that a function which just compares to `[u64; 2]` for equality is not cross-crate-inlinable. That was surprising to me because I didn't think that code contained a function call, but of course our array comparisons are lowered to an intrinsic. Intrinsic calls don't make a function no longer a leaf, so it makes sense to add this as an exception to the "only leaves" cross-crate-inline heuristic.
This is the useful compare link: https://perf.rust-lang.org/compare.html?start=7cb1a81145a739c4fd858abe3c624ce8e6e5f9cd&end=c3f0a64dbf9fba4722dacf8e39d2fe00069c995e&stat=instructions%3Au because it disables CGU merging in both commits, so effects that cause changes in the sysroot to perturb partitioning downstream are excluded. Perturbations to what is and isn't cross-crate-inlinable in the sysroot has chaotic effects on what items are in which CGUs after merging. It looks like before this PR by sheer luck some of the CGUs dirtied by the patch in eza incr-unchanged happened to be merged together, and with this PR they are not.
The perf runs on this PR point to a nice runtime performance improvement.
|
|
Reimplement DestinationPropagation according to live ranges.
This PR reimplements DestinationPropagation as a problem of merging live-ranges of locals. We merge locals that have disjoint live-ranges. This allows merging several locals in the same round by updating live range information.
Live ranges are mainly computed using the `MaybeLiveLocals` analysis. The subtlety is that we split each statement and terminator in 2 positions. The first position is the regular statement. The second position is a shadow, which is always more live. It encodes partial writes and dead writes as a local being live for half a statement. This half statement ensures that writes conflict with another local's writes and regular liveness.
r? `@Amanieu`
|
|
|
|
Add amdgpu test for addrspacecasting global vars and the gpu-kernel calling convention
Add two tests that can now be added, as the amdgpu is merged.
- Global variables are casted to the default address space since rust-lang/rust#135026
- gpu-kernel calling convention, translatos to amdgpu_kernel rust-lang/rust#135047
Tracking issue: rust-lang/rust#135024
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
GVN: Allow reusing aggregates if LHS is not a simple local.
This resolves a FIXME in the code. I don't see a reason not to allow this.
|
|
lint ImproperCTypes: refactor linting architecture (part 1)
This is the first PR in an effort to split rust-lang/rust#134697 into individually-mergeable parts.
This one focuses on properly packaging the lint and its tests, as well as properly separate the "linting" and "type-checking" code.
There is exactly one user-visible change: the safety of `Option<Box<FFISafePointee>>` is now the same in `extern` blocks and function definitions: it is safe.
r? `@tgross35` because you are already looking at the original
|
|
|
|
Rollup of 5 pull requests
Successful merges:
- rust-lang/rust#139524 (Add socket extensions for cygwin)
- rust-lang/rust#145940 (single buffer for exponent fmt of integers)
- rust-lang/rust#146206 (identity uses are ok, even if there are no defining uses)
- rust-lang/rust#146272 (Update comment for `-Werror` on LLVM builds)
- rust-lang/rust#146280 (Make `LetChainsPolicy` public for rustfmt usage)
r? `@ghost`
`@rustbot` modify labels: rollup
|
|
Mainly, we realise that the non-null assumption on a Box<_> argument
does not depend on what side of the FFI boundary the function is on.
And anyway, this is not the way to deal with this assumption being maybe violated.
|
|
|
