From 74653b61a67ae7db9f77ea1e09e65e40686c9058 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Caleb Zulawski <caleb.zulawski@gmail.com>
Date: Fri, 26 Jul 2024 00:05:20 -0400
Subject: Add implied target features to target_feature attribute

---
 compiler/rustc_codegen_llvm/src/llvm_util.rs | 16 ----------------
 1 file changed, 16 deletions(-)

(limited to 'compiler/rustc_codegen_llvm/src')

diff --git a/compiler/rustc_codegen_llvm/src/llvm_util.rs b/compiler/rustc_codegen_llvm/src/llvm_util.rs
index af8a9be1ccb..dc21b92a95f 100644
--- a/compiler/rustc_codegen_llvm/src/llvm_util.rs
+++ b/compiler/rustc_codegen_llvm/src/llvm_util.rs
@@ -646,22 +646,6 @@ pub(crate) fn global_llvm_features(sess: &Session, diagnostics: bool) -> Vec<Str
         }
     }
 
-    // This is a workaround for a LLVM bug that doesn't implicitly enable
-    // `simd128` when `relaxed-simd` is.
-    // See <https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/99803>, which didn't make
-    // it into a released version of LLVM yet.
-    //
-    // This doesn't use the "implicit target feature" system because it is only
-    // used for function attributes in other targets, which fixes this bug as
-    // well on the function attribute level.
-    if sess.target.families.contains(&"wasm".into()) {
-        if features.iter().any(|f| f == "+relaxed-simd")
-            && !features.iter().any(|f| f == "+simd128")
-        {
-            features.push("+simd128".into());
-        }
-    }
-
     if diagnostics && let Some(f) = check_tied_features(sess, &featsmap) {
         sess.dcx().emit_err(TargetFeatureDisableOrEnable {
             features: f,
-- 
cgit 1.4.1-3-g733a5