From 925dc37313853f15dc21e42dc869b024fe488ef3 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Scott McMurray Date: Tue, 17 Jan 2023 23:17:13 -0800 Subject: Stop using `BREAK` & `CONTINUE` in compiler Switching them to `Break(())` and `Continue(())` instead. libs-api would like to remove these constants, so stop using them in compiler to make the removal PR later smaller. --- compiler/rustc_const_eval/src/const_eval/machine.rs | 8 ++++---- 1 file changed, 4 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-) (limited to 'compiler/rustc_const_eval/src/const_eval') diff --git a/compiler/rustc_const_eval/src/const_eval/machine.rs b/compiler/rustc_const_eval/src/const_eval/machine.rs index 4f7c1fc96f1..ca6b01d8a8a 100644 --- a/compiler/rustc_const_eval/src/const_eval/machine.rs +++ b/compiler/rustc_const_eval/src/const_eval/machine.rs @@ -225,7 +225,7 @@ impl<'mir, 'tcx: 'mir> CompileTimeEvalContext<'mir, 'tcx> { /// `align_offset(ptr, target_align)` needs special handling in const eval, because the pointer /// may not have an address. /// - /// If `ptr` does have a known address, then we return `CONTINUE` and the function call should + /// If `ptr` does have a known address, then we return `Continue(())` and the function call should /// proceed as normal. /// /// If `ptr` doesn't have an address, but its underlying allocation's alignment is at most @@ -273,18 +273,18 @@ impl<'mir, 'tcx: 'mir> CompileTimeEvalContext<'mir, 'tcx> { ret, StackPopUnwind::NotAllowed, )?; - Ok(ControlFlow::BREAK) + Ok(ControlFlow::Break(())) } else { // Not alignable in const, return `usize::MAX`. let usize_max = Scalar::from_machine_usize(self.machine_usize_max(), self); self.write_scalar(usize_max, dest)?; self.return_to_block(ret)?; - Ok(ControlFlow::BREAK) + Ok(ControlFlow::Break(())) } } Err(_addr) => { // The pointer has an address, continue with function call. - Ok(ControlFlow::CONTINUE) + Ok(ControlFlow::Continue(())) } } } -- cgit 1.4.1-3-g733a5