From 6b96103bf3b0746e443f9bb86b532be2c536113a Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Michael Goulet Date: Fri, 1 Nov 2024 18:49:08 +0000 Subject: Rename the FIXMEs, remove a few that dont matter anymore --- compiler/rustc_const_eval/src/const_eval/machine.rs | 2 +- 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-) (limited to 'compiler/rustc_const_eval/src/const_eval') diff --git a/compiler/rustc_const_eval/src/const_eval/machine.rs b/compiler/rustc_const_eval/src/const_eval/machine.rs index 5f0bc8539ee..977d25f359f 100644 --- a/compiler/rustc_const_eval/src/const_eval/machine.rs +++ b/compiler/rustc_const_eval/src/const_eval/machine.rs @@ -431,7 +431,7 @@ impl<'tcx> interpret::Machine<'tcx> for CompileTimeMachine<'tcx> { // sensitive check here. But we can at least rule out functions that are not const at // all. That said, we have to allow calling functions inside a trait marked with // #[const_trait]. These *are* const-checked! - // FIXME(effects): why does `is_const_fn` not classify them as const? + // FIXME(const_trait_impl): why does `is_const_fn` not classify them as const? if (!ecx.tcx.is_const_fn(def) && !ecx.tcx.is_const_default_method(def)) || ecx.tcx.has_attr(def, sym::rustc_do_not_const_check) { -- cgit 1.4.1-3-g733a5