From 9f9cd5e2837f57504b92b5acbadb48ff0cb9e29c Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: dianqk <dianqk@dianqk.net>
Date: Sun, 8 Jun 2025 15:30:18 +0800
Subject: mir: Add a `new` method to `statement`

Avoid introducing a large number of changes when adding optional initialization fields.
---
 compiler/rustc_mir_build/src/builder/coverageinfo.rs | 6 +++---
 1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)

(limited to 'compiler/rustc_mir_build/src/builder/coverageinfo.rs')

diff --git a/compiler/rustc_mir_build/src/builder/coverageinfo.rs b/compiler/rustc_mir_build/src/builder/coverageinfo.rs
index a80bd4f3c80..aa43b273cff 100644
--- a/compiler/rustc_mir_build/src/builder/coverageinfo.rs
+++ b/compiler/rustc_mir_build/src/builder/coverageinfo.rs
@@ -61,10 +61,10 @@ impl BlockMarkerGen {
         block: BasicBlock,
     ) -> BlockMarkerId {
         let id = self.next_block_marker_id();
-        let marker_statement = mir::Statement {
+        let marker_statement = mir::Statement::new(
             source_info,
-            kind: mir::StatementKind::Coverage(CoverageKind::BlockMarker { id }),
-        };
+            mir::StatementKind::Coverage(CoverageKind::BlockMarker { id }),
+        );
         cfg.push(block, marker_statement);
 
         id
-- 
cgit 1.4.1-3-g733a5