From bc7a2d72a3fea324fa432de9b6ce6073302d3d8c Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Huon Wilson Date: Tue, 25 Mar 2014 16:13:11 +1100 Subject: rand: bubble up IO messages futher. The various ...Rng::new() methods can hit IO errors from the OSRng they use, and it seems sensible to expose them at a higher level. Unfortunately, writing e.g. `StdRng::new().unwrap()` gives a much poorer error message than if it failed internally, but this is a problem with all `IoResult`s. --- src/libstd/rt/task.rs | 2 +- 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-) (limited to 'src/libstd/rt') diff --git a/src/libstd/rt/task.rs b/src/libstd/rt/task.rs index ededc69c5a1..abaa91b12f8 100644 --- a/src/libstd/rt/task.rs +++ b/src/libstd/rt/task.rs @@ -434,7 +434,7 @@ mod test { #[test] fn rng() { use rand::{StdRng, Rng}; - let mut r = StdRng::new(); + let mut r = StdRng::new().unwrap(); let _ = r.next_u32(); } -- cgit 1.4.1-3-g733a5