From 2c75256c151774407e5f4a0e4c655604d34bee17 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Steve Klabnik Date: Tue, 9 Jun 2015 16:49:24 -0400 Subject: Exise 'unsafe pointer' in favor of 'raw pointer' Using two terms for one thing is confusing, these are called 'raw pointers' today. --- src/libstd/sys/common/thread_local.rs | 2 +- 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-) (limited to 'src/libstd') diff --git a/src/libstd/sys/common/thread_local.rs b/src/libstd/sys/common/thread_local.rs index eb4cbfcfbcd..3b2cb00d8c4 100644 --- a/src/libstd/sys/common/thread_local.rs +++ b/src/libstd/sys/common/thread_local.rs @@ -102,7 +102,7 @@ pub struct StaticKey { /// type is entirely safe to use. /// /// Implementations will likely, however, contain unsafe code as this type only -/// operates on `*mut u8`, an unsafe pointer. +/// operates on `*mut u8`, a raw pointer. /// /// # Examples /// -- cgit 1.4.1-3-g733a5