From 7de48419ee8f9ae0a41503e5e104709ea39bfe85 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Alex Crichton Date: Tue, 25 Mar 2014 16:53:52 -0700 Subject: syntax: Permit visibility on tuple fields This change is in preparation for #8122. Nothing is currently done with these visibility qualifiers, they are just parsed and accepted by the compiler. RFC: 0004-private-fields --- src/libsyntax/print/pprust.rs | 5 +++-- 1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-) (limited to 'src/libsyntax/print/pprust.rs') diff --git a/src/libsyntax/print/pprust.rs b/src/libsyntax/print/pprust.rs index a9ab596b300..e1d6f821ba9 100644 --- a/src/libsyntax/print/pprust.rs +++ b/src/libsyntax/print/pprust.rs @@ -743,7 +743,8 @@ impl<'a> State<'a> { |s, field| { match field.node.kind { ast::NamedField(..) => fail!("unexpected named field"), - ast::UnnamedField => { + ast::UnnamedField(vis) => { + try!(s.print_visibility(vis)); try!(s.maybe_print_comment(field.span.lo)); s.print_type(field.node.ty) } @@ -762,7 +763,7 @@ impl<'a> State<'a> { for field in struct_def.fields.iter() { match field.node.kind { - ast::UnnamedField => fail!("unexpected unnamed field"), + ast::UnnamedField(..) => fail!("unexpected unnamed field"), ast::NamedField(ident, visibility) => { try!(self.hardbreak_if_not_bol()); try!(self.maybe_print_comment(field.span.lo)); -- cgit 1.4.1-3-g733a5