From ee89c088b057affb5bdb96195e107a218b64b1c5 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Alexander Regueiro Date: Tue, 27 Nov 2018 02:59:49 +0000 Subject: Various minor/cosmetic improvements to code --- src/test/run-pass/packed/packed-struct-optimized-enum.rs | 4 ++-- 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-) (limited to 'src/test/run-pass/packed/packed-struct-optimized-enum.rs') diff --git a/src/test/run-pass/packed/packed-struct-optimized-enum.rs b/src/test/run-pass/packed/packed-struct-optimized-enum.rs index e22e8c26fe5..98772778010 100644 --- a/src/test/run-pass/packed/packed-struct-optimized-enum.rs +++ b/src/test/run-pass/packed/packed-struct-optimized-enum.rs @@ -34,12 +34,12 @@ fn main() { // In #46769, `Option<(Packed<&()>, bool)>` was found to have // pointer alignment, without actually being aligned in size. - // E.g. on 64-bit platforms, it had alignment `8` but size `9`. + // e.g., on 64-bit platforms, it had alignment `8` but size `9`. type PackedRefAndBool<'a> = (Packed<&'a ()>, bool); sanity_check_size::>(Some((Packed(&()), true))); // Make sure we don't pay for the enum optimization in size, - // e.g. we shouldn't need extra padding after the packed data. + // e.g., we shouldn't need extra padding after the packed data. assert_eq!(std::mem::align_of::>(), 1); assert_eq!(std::mem::size_of::>(), std::mem::size_of::()); -- cgit 1.4.1-3-g733a5