From cc62018e61edfa9706b8e4e61d1b571bdee7827d Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Joshua Nelson Date: Tue, 29 Dec 2020 23:16:16 -0500 Subject: Rename rustdoc lints to be a tool lint instead of built-in. - Rename `broken_intra_doc_links` to `rustdoc::broken_intra_doc_links` - Ensure that the old lint names still work and give deprecation errors - Register lints even when running doctests Otherwise, all `rustdoc::` lints would be ignored. - Register all existing lints as removed This unfortunately doesn't work with `register_renamed` because tool lints have not yet been registered when rustc is running. For similar reasons, `check_backwards_compat` doesn't work either. Call `register_removed` directly instead. - Fix fallout + Rustdoc lints for compiler/ + Rustdoc lints for library/ Note that this does *not* suggest `rustdoc::broken_intra_doc_links` for `rustdoc::intra_doc_link_resolution_failure`, since there was no time when the latter was valid. --- src/test/rustdoc-ui/lint-missing-doc-code-example.rs | 4 ++-- 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-) (limited to 'src/test/rustdoc-ui/lint-missing-doc-code-example.rs') diff --git a/src/test/rustdoc-ui/lint-missing-doc-code-example.rs b/src/test/rustdoc-ui/lint-missing-doc-code-example.rs index ebe7a242211..8d727b0d0b5 100644 --- a/src/test/rustdoc-ui/lint-missing-doc-code-example.rs +++ b/src/test/rustdoc-ui/lint-missing-doc-code-example.rs @@ -1,5 +1,5 @@ #![deny(missing_docs)] -#![deny(missing_doc_code_examples)] +#![deny(rustdoc::missing_doc_code_examples)] //! crate level doc //! ``` @@ -19,7 +19,7 @@ fn test() { mod module1 { //~ ERROR } -#[allow(missing_doc_code_examples)] +#[allow(rustdoc::missing_doc_code_examples)] /// doc mod module2 { -- cgit 1.4.1-3-g733a5