From e71d17b9b42b87a0e6ea754d499a553a4fc8e4b8 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: pierwill Date: Mon, 11 Oct 2021 12:56:55 -0500 Subject: Edit explanation of test for nested type ascriptions Closes #88233 --- .../bindings-after-at/nested-type-ascription-syntactically-invalid.rs | 2 +- 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-) (limited to 'src/test/ui/pattern') diff --git a/src/test/ui/pattern/bindings-after-at/nested-type-ascription-syntactically-invalid.rs b/src/test/ui/pattern/bindings-after-at/nested-type-ascription-syntactically-invalid.rs index 5c7769ce604..a709e34b501 100644 --- a/src/test/ui/pattern/bindings-after-at/nested-type-ascription-syntactically-invalid.rs +++ b/src/test/ui/pattern/bindings-after-at/nested-type-ascription-syntactically-invalid.rs @@ -1,5 +1,5 @@ // Here we check that type ascription is syntactically invalid when -// not in the top position of a ascribing a let binding or function parameter. +// not in the top position of an ascribing `let` binding or function parameter. // This has no effect. -- cgit 1.4.1-3-g733a5