From 23bbd65d968ef385fa7a7cd90ea8252bd78081b1 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Joshua Nelson Date: Thu, 25 Mar 2021 15:48:21 -0400 Subject: Remove unstable `--pretty` flag It doesn't do anything `--unpretty` doesn't, and due to a bug, also didn't show up in `--help`. I don't think there's any reason to keep it around, I haven't seen anyone using it. --- src/tools/compiletest/src/header.rs | 2 +- src/tools/compiletest/src/runtest.rs | 2 +- 2 files changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-) (limited to 'src/tools/compiletest') diff --git a/src/tools/compiletest/src/header.rs b/src/tools/compiletest/src/header.rs index f31a24738df..505a2d2f79f 100644 --- a/src/tools/compiletest/src/header.rs +++ b/src/tools/compiletest/src/header.rs @@ -306,7 +306,7 @@ pub struct TestProps { // a proc-macro and needs `#![crate_type = "proc-macro"]`. This ensures // that the aux file is compiled as a `proc-macro` and not as a `dylib`. pub no_prefer_dynamic: bool, - // Run --pretty expanded when running pretty printing tests + // Run -Zunpretty expanded when running pretty printing tests pub pretty_expanded: bool, // Which pretty mode are we testing with, default to 'normal' pub pretty_mode: String, diff --git a/src/tools/compiletest/src/runtest.rs b/src/tools/compiletest/src/runtest.rs index ecbaccf744d..41de46a43b0 100644 --- a/src/tools/compiletest/src/runtest.rs +++ b/src/tools/compiletest/src/runtest.rs @@ -599,7 +599,7 @@ impl<'test> TestCx<'test> { return; } - // additionally, run `--pretty expanded` and try to build it. + // additionally, run `-Zunpretty=expanded` and try to build it. let proc_res = self.print_source(ReadFrom::Path, "expanded"); if !proc_res.status.success() { self.fatal_proc_rec("pretty-printing (expanded) failed", &proc_res); -- cgit 1.4.1-3-g733a5