From cf2dff2b1e3fa55fa5415d524200070d0d7aacfe Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Albert Larsan <74931857+albertlarsan68@users.noreply.github.com> Date: Thu, 5 Jan 2023 09:13:28 +0100 Subject: Move /src/test to /tests --- tests/codegen/drop.rs | 36 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++ 1 file changed, 36 insertions(+) create mode 100644 tests/codegen/drop.rs (limited to 'tests/codegen/drop.rs') diff --git a/tests/codegen/drop.rs b/tests/codegen/drop.rs new file mode 100644 index 00000000000..99402827158 --- /dev/null +++ b/tests/codegen/drop.rs @@ -0,0 +1,36 @@ +// ignore-wasm32-bare compiled with panic=abort by default +// compile-flags: -C no-prepopulate-passes + +#![crate_type = "lib"] + +struct SomeUniqueName; + +impl Drop for SomeUniqueName { + fn drop(&mut self) { + } +} + +pub fn possibly_unwinding() { +} + +// CHECK-LABEL: @droppy +#[no_mangle] +pub fn droppy() { +// Check that there are exactly 6 drop calls. The cleanups for the unwinding should be reused, so +// that's one new drop call per call to possibly_unwinding(), and finally 3 drop calls for the +// regular function exit. We used to have problems with quadratic growths of drop calls in such +// functions. +// FIXME(eddyb) the `void @` forces a match on the instruction, instead of the +// comment, that's `; call core::ptr::drop_in_place::` +// for the `v0` mangling, should switch to matching on that once `legacy` is gone. +// CHECK-COUNT-6: {{(call|invoke) void @.*}}drop_in_place{{.*}}SomeUniqueName +// CHECK-NOT: {{(call|invoke) void @.*}}drop_in_place{{.*}}SomeUniqueName +// The next line checks for the } that ends the function definition +// CHECK-LABEL: {{^[}]}} + let _s = SomeUniqueName; + possibly_unwinding(); + let _s = SomeUniqueName; + possibly_unwinding(); + let _s = SomeUniqueName; + possibly_unwinding(); +} -- cgit 1.4.1-3-g733a5