// Copyright 2015 The Rust Project Developers. See the COPYRIGHT // file at the top-level directory of this distribution and at // http://rust-lang.org/COPYRIGHT. // // Licensed under the Apache License, Version 2.0 or the MIT license // , at your // option. This file may not be copied, modified, or distributed // except according to those terms. // Logic and data structures related to impl specialization, explained in // greater detail below. // // At the moment, this implementation support only the simple "chain" rule: // If any two impls overlap, one must be a strict subset of the other. // // See traits/README.md for a bit more detail on how specialization // fits together with the rest of the trait machinery. use super::{SelectionContext, FulfillmentContext}; use super::util::impl_trait_ref_and_oblig; use rustc_data_structures::fx::FxHashMap; use hir::def_id::DefId; use infer::{InferCtxt, InferOk}; use ty::subst::{Subst, Substs}; use traits::{self, Reveal, ObligationCause}; use traits::select::IntercrateAmbiguityCause; use ty::{self, TyCtxt, TypeFoldable}; use syntax_pos::DUMMY_SP; use std::rc::Rc; pub mod specialization_graph; /// Information pertinent to an overlapping impl error. pub struct OverlapError { pub with_impl: DefId, pub trait_desc: String, pub self_desc: Option, pub intercrate_ambiguity_causes: Vec, } /// Given a subst for the requested impl, translate it to a subst /// appropriate for the actual item definition (whether it be in that impl, /// a parent impl, or the trait). /// /// When we have selected one impl, but are actually using item definitions from /// a parent impl providing a default, we need a way to translate between the /// type parameters of the two impls. Here the `source_impl` is the one we've /// selected, and `source_substs` is a substitution of its generics. /// And `target_node` is the impl/trait we're actually going to get the /// definition from. The resulting substitution will map from `target_node`'s /// generics to `source_impl`'s generics as instantiated by `source_subst`. /// /// For example, consider the following scenario: /// /// ```rust /// trait Foo { ... } /// impl Foo for (T, U) { ... } // target impl /// impl Foo for (V, V) { ... } // source impl /// ``` /// /// Suppose we have selected "source impl" with `V` instantiated with `u32`. /// This function will produce a substitution with `T` and `U` both mapping to `u32`. /// /// Where clauses add some trickiness here, because they can be used to "define" /// an argument indirectly: /// /// ```rust /// impl<'a, I, T: 'a> Iterator for Cloned /// where I: Iterator, T: Clone /// ``` /// /// In a case like this, the substitution for `T` is determined indirectly, /// through associated type projection. We deal with such cases by using /// *fulfillment* to relate the two impls, requiring that all projections are /// resolved. pub fn translate_substs<'a, 'gcx, 'tcx>(infcx: &InferCtxt<'a, 'gcx, 'tcx>, param_env: ty::ParamEnv<'tcx>, source_impl: DefId, source_substs: &'tcx Substs<'tcx>, target_node: specialization_graph::Node) -> &'tcx Substs<'tcx> { let source_trait_ref = infcx.tcx .impl_trait_ref(source_impl) .unwrap() .subst(infcx.tcx, &source_substs); // translate the Self and TyParam parts of the substitution, since those // vary across impls let target_substs = match target_node { specialization_graph::Node::Impl(target_impl) => { // no need to translate if we're targeting the impl we started with if source_impl == target_impl { return source_substs; } fulfill_implication(infcx, param_env, source_trait_ref, target_impl) .unwrap_or_else(|_| { bug!("When translating substitutions for specialization, the expected \ specialization failed to hold") }) } specialization_graph::Node::Trait(..) => source_trait_ref.substs, }; // directly inherent the method generics, since those do not vary across impls source_substs.rebase_onto(infcx.tcx, source_impl, target_substs) } /// Given a selected impl described by `impl_data`, returns the /// definition and substitutions for the method with the name `name` /// the kind `kind`, and trait method substitutions `substs`, in /// that impl, a less specialized impl, or the trait default, /// whichever applies. pub fn find_associated_item<'a, 'tcx>( tcx: TyCtxt<'a, 'tcx, 'tcx>, item: &ty::AssociatedItem, substs: &'tcx Substs<'tcx>, impl_data: &super::VtableImplData<'tcx, ()>, ) -> (DefId, &'tcx Substs<'tcx>) { assert!(!substs.needs_infer()); let trait_def_id = tcx.trait_id_of_impl(impl_data.impl_def_id).unwrap(); let trait_def = tcx.trait_def(trait_def_id); let ancestors = trait_def.ancestors(tcx, impl_data.impl_def_id); match ancestors.defs(tcx, item.name, item.kind, trait_def_id).next() { Some(node_item) => { let substs = tcx.infer_ctxt().enter(|infcx| { let param_env = ty::ParamEnv::empty(Reveal::All); let substs = substs.rebase_onto(tcx, trait_def_id, impl_data.substs); let substs = translate_substs(&infcx, param_env, impl_data.impl_def_id, substs, node_item.node); let substs = infcx.tcx.erase_regions(&substs); tcx.lift(&substs).unwrap_or_else(|| { bug!("find_method: translate_substs \ returned {:?} which contains inference types/regions", substs); }) }); (node_item.item.def_id, substs) } None => { bug!("{:?} not found in {:?}", item, impl_data.impl_def_id) } } } /// Is impl1 a specialization of impl2? /// /// Specialization is determined by the sets of types to which the impls apply; /// impl1 specializes impl2 if it applies to a subset of the types impl2 applies /// to. pub(super) fn specializes<'a, 'tcx>(tcx: TyCtxt<'a, 'tcx, 'tcx>, (impl1_def_id, impl2_def_id): (DefId, DefId)) -> bool { debug!("specializes({:?}, {:?})", impl1_def_id, impl2_def_id); // The feature gate should prevent introducing new specializations, but not // taking advantage of upstream ones. if !tcx.sess.features.borrow().specialization && (impl1_def_id.is_local() || impl2_def_id.is_local()) { return false; } // We determine whether there's a subset relationship by: // // - skolemizing impl1, // - assuming the where clauses for impl1, // - instantiating impl2 with fresh inference variables, // - unifying, // - attempting to prove the where clauses for impl2 // // The last three steps are encapsulated in `fulfill_implication`. // // See RFC 1210 for more details and justification. // Currently we do not allow e.g. a negative impl to specialize a positive one if tcx.impl_polarity(impl1_def_id) != tcx.impl_polarity(impl2_def_id) { return false; } // create a parameter environment corresponding to a (skolemized) instantiation of impl1 let penv = tcx.param_env(impl1_def_id); let impl1_trait_ref = tcx.impl_trait_ref(impl1_def_id).unwrap(); // Create a infcx, taking the predicates of impl1 as assumptions: tcx.infer_ctxt().enter(|infcx| { // Normalize the trait reference. The WF rules ought to ensure // that this always succeeds. let impl1_trait_ref = match traits::fully_normalize(&infcx, ObligationCause::dummy(), penv, &impl1_trait_ref) { Ok(impl1_trait_ref) => impl1_trait_ref, Err(err) => { bug!("failed to fully normalize {:?}: {:?}", impl1_trait_ref, err); } }; // Attempt to prove that impl2 applies, given all of the above. fulfill_implication(&infcx, penv, impl1_trait_ref, impl2_def_id).is_ok() }) } /// Attempt to fulfill all obligations of `target_impl` after unification with /// `source_trait_ref`. If successful, returns a substitution for *all* the /// generics of `target_impl`, including both those needed to unify with /// `source_trait_ref` and those whose identity is determined via a where /// clause in the impl. fn fulfill_implication<'a, 'gcx, 'tcx>(infcx: &InferCtxt<'a, 'gcx, 'tcx>, param_env: ty::ParamEnv<'tcx>, source_trait_ref: ty::TraitRef<'tcx>, target_impl: DefId) -> Result<&'tcx Substs<'tcx>, ()> { let selcx = &mut SelectionContext::new(&infcx); let target_substs = infcx.fresh_substs_for_item(DUMMY_SP, target_impl); let (target_trait_ref, mut obligations) = impl_trait_ref_and_oblig(selcx, param_env, target_impl, target_substs); // do the impls unify? If not, no specialization. match infcx.at(&ObligationCause::dummy(), param_env) .eq(source_trait_ref, target_trait_ref) { Ok(InferOk { obligations: o, .. }) => { obligations.extend(o); } Err(_) => { debug!("fulfill_implication: {:?} does not unify with {:?}", source_trait_ref, target_trait_ref); return Err(()); } } // attempt to prove all of the predicates for impl2 given those for impl1 // (which are packed up in penv) infcx.save_and_restore_in_snapshot_flag(|infcx| { let mut fulfill_cx = FulfillmentContext::new(); for oblig in obligations.into_iter() { fulfill_cx.register_predicate_obligation(&infcx, oblig); } match fulfill_cx.select_all_or_error(infcx) { Err(errors) => { // no dice! debug!("fulfill_implication: for impls on {:?} and {:?}, \ could not fulfill: {:?} given {:?}", source_trait_ref, target_trait_ref, errors, param_env.caller_bounds); Err(()) } Ok(()) => { debug!("fulfill_implication: an impl for {:?} specializes {:?}", source_trait_ref, target_trait_ref); // Now resolve the *substitution* we built for the target earlier, replacing // the inference variables inside with whatever we got from fulfillment. Ok(infcx.resolve_type_vars_if_possible(&target_substs)) } } }) } pub struct SpecializesCache { map: FxHashMap<(DefId, DefId), bool>, } impl SpecializesCache { pub fn new() -> Self { SpecializesCache { map: FxHashMap() } } pub fn check(&self, a: DefId, b: DefId) -> Option { self.map.get(&(a, b)).cloned() } pub fn insert(&mut self, a: DefId, b: DefId, result: bool) { self.map.insert((a, b), result); } } // Query provider for `specialization_graph_of`. pub(super) fn specialization_graph_provider<'a, 'tcx>(tcx: TyCtxt<'a, 'tcx, 'tcx>, trait_id: DefId) -> Rc { let mut sg = specialization_graph::Graph::new(); let mut trait_impls = Vec::new(); tcx.for_each_impl(trait_id, |impl_did| trait_impls.push(impl_did)); // The coherence checking implementation seems to rely on impls being // iterated over (roughly) in definition order, so we are sorting by // negated CrateNum (so remote definitions are visited first) and then // by a flattened version of the DefIndex. trait_impls.sort_unstable_by_key(|def_id| { (-(def_id.krate.as_u32() as i64), def_id.index.address_space().index(), def_id.index.as_array_index()) }); for impl_def_id in trait_impls { if impl_def_id.is_local() { // This is where impl overlap checking happens: let insert_result = sg.insert(tcx, impl_def_id); // Report error if there was one. if let Err(overlap) = insert_result { let mut err = struct_span_err!(tcx.sess, tcx.span_of_impl(impl_def_id).unwrap(), E0119, "conflicting implementations of trait `{}`{}:", overlap.trait_desc, overlap.self_desc.clone().map_or(String::new(), |ty| { format!(" for type `{}`", ty) })); match tcx.span_of_impl(overlap.with_impl) { Ok(span) => { err.span_label(span, format!("first implementation here")); err.span_label(tcx.span_of_impl(impl_def_id).unwrap(), format!("conflicting implementation{}", overlap.self_desc .map_or(String::new(), |ty| format!(" for `{}`", ty)))); } Err(cname) => { err.note(&format!("conflicting implementation in crate `{}`", cname)); } } for cause in &overlap.intercrate_ambiguity_causes { cause.add_intercrate_ambiguity_hint(&mut err); } err.emit(); } } else { let parent = tcx.impl_parent(impl_def_id).unwrap_or(trait_id); sg.record_impl_from_cstore(tcx, parent, impl_def_id) } } Rc::new(sg) }